A postulate is a foundational assumption taken as true, from which everything else is derived.
History of Postulates
- 10/25/2012 | An Analysis of Scientology Axiom #1
- 10/27/2012 | KHTK Axiom Zero
- 11/06/2012 | KHTK Axioms: A Work in Progress
- 11/07/2012 | Comments on Scientology Axioms 1, 2 and 3
- 11/21/2012 | KHTK Axiom One
- 11/21/2012 | KHTK Axiom Two
- 11/21/2012 | KHTK Axiom Three
- 11/21/2012 | KHTK Axiom Four
- 11/30/2012 | KHTK Axiom Five
- 11/26/2012 | KHTK Axiom Six
- 11/30/2012 | KHTK Axiom Seven
- 11/30/2012 | KHTK Axioms: A Work in Progress #2
- 11/08/2013 | KHTK Axiom #0: The Absolute (old)
- 10/04/2013 | KHTK Axiom #1: The Relative (old)
- 10/04/2013 | KHTK Axiom #2: Awareness (old)
- 10/05/2013 | KHTK Axiom #3: Space-time (old)
- 10/14/2013 | KHTK Axiom #4: Objects (old)
- 10/15/2013 | KHTK Axiom #5: Existence (old)
- 10/19/2013 | KHTK Axiom #6: The Universe (old)
- 10/24/2013 | KHTK Axiom #7: Location (old)
- 07/24/2013 | KHTK Research Data
- 11/02/2013 | KHTK Axiom #1 and Scientology
- 11/02/2013 | KHTK Axiom #2 and Scientology
- 11/03/2013 | KHTK Axiom #3 and Scientology
- 01/01/2014 | KHTK Postulates (old)
- 02/16/2014 | KHTK Postulates for Physics – Part 1 (old)
- 04/14/2014 | KHTK Postulates for Physics – Part 2 (old)
- 03/06/2014 | KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 1 (old)
- 04/07/2014 | KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 2 (old)
- 04/08/2014 | KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 3 (old)
- 04/09/2014 | KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 4 (old)
- 12/14/2017 | The Postulates (old-1)
- 05/27/2019 | Einstein 1920 (XX) The General Postulate of Relativity
- 04/04/2020 | The Postulates (old)
- 04/04/2020 | The Postulates 1 – 5 (old)
- 04/12/2020 | The Postulates 6 – 10 (old)
- 04/13/2020 | The Postulates 11 – 15 (old)
- 04/15/2020 | The Postulates 16 – 20 (old)
- 04/14/2020 | Summary of Postulates (old)
- 12/16/2020 | The Postulates 1 – 5 (old)
- 12/18/2020 | The Postulates 6 – 10 (old)
- 12/20/2020 | The Postulates 11 – 15 (old)
- 12/25/2020 | The Postulates 16 – 20 (old)
- 12/30/2020 | The Postulates 21 – 25 (old)
- 02/24/2021 | The Postulates 26 – 30 (old)
- 02/26/2021 | The Postulates 31 … (old)
- 03/08/2022 | The Definition of POSTULATE (old)
- 11/22/2022 | The Postulate of Eternal Being and God
- 11/24/2022 | Unknowable and Postulates
- 11/27/2022 | Starting Postulate
- 03/06/2023 | Kantian Postulate
- 01/31/2024 | The Postulate
- 03/02/2024 | Postulate Mechanics (old)
- 11/09/2024 | PM: Introductory Postulate
- 11/09/2024 | PM: Basic Postulates (old)
- 11/15/2024 | PM: Postulates of Beingness
- 12/11/2024 | Postulates in Hinduism
- 01/06/2025 | First postulate of Relativity
- 01/07/2025 | Second Postulate of Relativity
- 11/26/2025 | The Two Postulates
- 04/19/2026 | Postulate of Sat-Chit-Ananda
Comments
A thought experiment for you:
Suppose that tomorrow people from another planet arrive in their spaceship. And they tell that yes, of course, it’s possible to travel almost instantaneously to very far away worlds. They’ve just done it. What part of your physics theory would you have to reconsider ?
Denis
Instantaneous travel would mean that the spaceship of matter can be converted to thought and then from thought back to matter.
The common physics does not consider thought as a substance, but my physics theory does.
We just have to figure out how to exchange the inertia of substance between matter and thought.
Well, let’s say that they affirm that their spaceship has spécial motors that produce some special energy that makes the ship disappears from where it is and reappear elsewhere. they could add that the reason why it works is unknown but it does work.
OK. Go ahead and finish your thought. What is the thought experiment here? What kind of conclusion are you trying to arrive at?
The only conclusion I can make is that you are postulating infinite speed.
well, the general hypothesis is that the visible universe is not the important or essential one. underlying it is an invisible one, undetectable but with forces and laws that cause the visible one to exist the way we sense it. And that a creation of a certain energy with certain specific characteristics in the visible, enveloping an object, could be ‘rejected’ in the visible (because it contravenes some of it’s basic laws) and once the production of that energy stops the rejection would also stop with the object reappearing.
Just an idea. It also says that the visible universe is conform to all you arrived at (continuous, consistent and harmonious) but it’s not all there is to it. Using your terms we could also say that the visible universe rejects the object because it’s fundamental law is to maintain a continuous, consistent and harmonious structure or form or state…
Well, you have advanced some alternate postulates.
(1) I prefer the postulate of “Unknowable” rather than that of an “Invisible universe.” How would one know that there is an invisible universe, if it is invisible? That sounds like a speculation.
(2) Anyone can forward all kinds of ideas. How does one differentiate viable ideas from arbitrary speculations?
(3) Anything that violates the principle of HCC (harmony, consistency, continuity) can still exist in the universe, but only as an anomaly or aberration.