Home Page

woman_park

Revisions & Highlights

Subject Clearing Universe
Subject Clearing BeingnessThe Attention
Running Scientology Processes with Subject Clearing L10 Prior Assessment
Course on The Bhagavad Gita THE BHAGAVAD GITA: Chapter 2

All Posts

UNIVERSE: The Basic Definitions

Course in Mathematics

Course in Subject Clearing

The Story of Philosophy

The World’s Religions

Scientology Research

Data Series

Books to Read

The Mindfulness Approach

My Facebook Page

.

The God

Reference: UNIVERSE: The Basic Definitions

The Universe consists of everything knowable. The Self is the totality of awareness. We inherently feel the superset of both to be God. Thus, God incorporates everything that we can sense and be aware of.

.

Definition of GOD

God is a projection from all that we can sense and become aware of. Therefore, we cannot determine God as something specific. We may only say that God represents everything.

God may represent the Self, the Universe, and all the laws of nature. It may be all of it and none of it at the same time.

There are unrealities; but when we get rid of them, something remains that seems eternal. Everything appears to be changing. But underlying that change there is an IS-NESS that seems to be eternal.

We feel this element of eternity in our beingness but we cannot define it. We may refer this eternal element as God.

In those moments, when we are able to face the deepest of our fears, or when we resolve the most difficult of our problems, and everything suddenly comes into focus, we find our heart to be filled with gratitude that extends to everything. We may call this feeling the love of God.

God is defined based on the “Creator-created” duality in the West; and on the “Unknowable-knowable” duality in the East. But, it appears, that God will forever remain the subject of deep meditation.

.

Notes & Misconceptions

Nothing can be said about God definitively; so anything said about God with any fixedness of faith, vehemence of feelings, or certainty of intellect, will be a misconception. There are plenty of such misconceptions that are known widely. It is not necessary to list them here.

But important are the misconceptions that are not yet known.

.

More Misconceptions

You may discover more misconceptions on your own, if you contemplate on each sentence of the above definition with mindfulness. Please see:

The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness

Or, you may end up improving upon this definition.

Good luck!

.

PREFACE: Basic Definitions

Reference: UNIVERSE: The Basic Definitions

Preface

One of the paths in Hinduism is Jnana Yoga (the union of knowledge). This book may be looked upon as offering a modern version of it. This book is based on the proposition that consciously resolving anomalies in one’s understanding helps one improve and evolve rapidly.

Anomalies are things like discontinuity (missing data), inconsistency (contradictory data), or disharmony (arbitrary data), which leads to the feeling that something does not make sense. As one handles such anomalies in a systematic manner, not only the mind but the body also starts to heal.

When I retired, the uppermost thing in my mind was wanting to understand all the things that I did not understand during my schooling, first in mathematics and then in physics. I was tutoring mathematics at the time, and I felt interested in finding a way, such that my students could understand the subject rapidly. The trick I found was to first make sure that the basics of the subject were understood, and then building up the understanding on those basics. The formula that I used was:

Start with the broadest concept and make it understood, then the next broadest, and so on.

This book applies that same formula to the understanding of the universe around us and ourselves. Actually, this project started with the desire to understand the interface between physics and metaphysics. That led to interesting insights that are covered in this book.

The general plan followed in this book is to start with the broadest concept possible and define it with scientific precision. This allows us to look at the most widely prevalent misconceptions in the society. Once we have done that, we look at the next broadest concept, and so on.

The broadest concept appears to be the UNIVERSE, which forms the knowable part of the dichotomy “Unknowable-knowable.” This point may be contested, and all questions with respect to it are welcome.

If God is a broader concept than the universe, then one must look at the fact that God is part of the dichotomy “Creator-created.” In this universe both creator and created are generally knowable. If God is knowable, then God is a part of the knowable universe and can be approached scientifically. If God is unknowable, then the dichotomy “Unknowable-knowable” allows much less ambiguity.

We divide the universe into physical and spiritual universes. The physical universe is made of energy and matter. It is, obviously, a part of the known universe. The spiritual universe has a component that is unknowable, but the other component is a knowable “thought universe.” So we start with a knowable universe that is made up of thought, energy and matter, with a background that is unknowable.

This book takes a scientific approach to understand both the physical and spiritual aspects of this universe. Science is a rigorous, systematic process of acquiring knowledge about the natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of hypotheses. This book starts with the hypothesis that there is a complete picture into which all the parts of the universe fit together like a puzzle. This hypothesis advances a very practical principle of Oneness. 

This principle of Oneness puts the constraint of continuity, consistency and harmony on all parts of the universe. All dichotomies, such as, hot-cold are the two ends of a continuous scale. Thus, each dichotomy may be seen as a continuous dimension. All dimensions must be consistent with each other in this universe. And, the contents of these dimensions must maintain a harmonious relationship with each other at all times. Therein lie all the laws of conservation advanced in physics.

This scientific approach would not be possible without the earlier extremely broad and speculative approaches of religion and philosophy. We still have those religious and philosophic elements when it comes to addressing the unknowable. Unknowable cannot be known because it is not manifested in the first place. But, the unknowable may be “manifested” through making bold postulates. Such postulates then become part of the knowable universe, and subject to the principle of Oneness.

This book is, thus, based on the dichotomy “Unknowable-knowable,” and it presents a modern version of the ancient Jnana Yoga.

It starts with the broadest concept possible—the UNIVERSE.

.

The Science

Reference: UNIVERSE: The Basic Definitions

The curiosity to know has progressed from speculative thinking of earlier religions and philosophy to modern systematic approach of science. The purpose has always been to explore the natural phenomena. Science organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world.

.

Definition of SCIENCE

Science is a rigorous, systematic process of acquiring knowledge about the natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of hypotheses. 

The scientific process typically involves asking questions, doing background research, forming hypotheses, testing those hypotheses through experiments or observations, analyzing the data, and communicating the findings. This process allows science to continually expand our understanding.

The western science limits itself to looking at physical phenomena only. So, it explores the laws that apply to matter and energy. The eastern science, on the other hand, has focused on the spiritual phenomena beyond the physical. So, it has explored the laws that apply to the thought phenomena.

.

Notes

(1) The thought phenomena underlies the physical phenomena. The awareness of the physical phenomena, in itself, is a thought phenomenon.

(2) The scientific method is an aspect of the thought phenomenon of Oneness.

(3) Science has begun to study the thought phenomena through the information technology, psychology and the social sciences.

.

Misconceptions

(1) It is a misconception that science should be limited to the physical phenomena only. The scientific method can be applied equally to the thought or spiritual phenomena.

(2) There exist many misconceptions about the concept of Oneness. A person should be able to perceive oneness as the basis of a complete picture of this universe.

.

Implants and “Oneness”

Hubbard wrote in SCN 8-8008: Identity versus Individuality:

“One of the control mechanisms which has been used on thetans is that when they rise in potential they are led to believe themselves one with the universe. This is distinctly untrue. Thetans are individuals. They do not as they rise up the scale, merge with other individualities. They have the power of becoming anything they wish while still retaining their own individuality. They are first and foremost themselves. There is evidently no Nirvana. It is the feeling that one will merge and lose his own individuality that restrains the thetan from attempting to remedy his lot. His merging with the rest of the universe would be his becoming matter. This is the ultimate in cohesiveness and the ultimate in affinity, and is at the lowest point of the tone-scale. One declines into a brotherhood with the universe. When he goes up scale, he becomes more and more an individual capable of creating and maintaining his own universe. In this wise (leading people to believe they had no individuality above that of MEST) the MEST universe cut out all competition.”

Thus, Hubbard believed that oneness is an implant. In his mind, oneness conflicted with his idea of individuality. To him, accepting oneness amounted to discrediting individuality.

But oneness does not equate to sameness. A table and a chair are both made of matter, but that does not mean that they are the same thing. Energy consists of a whole spectrum of electromagnetic radiation, but that does not mean that all electromagnetic radiation is the same. An individual is a part of mankind, but that does not mean all individuals are the same.

So, why is Hubbard so ticked about oneness of the universe?

All that Hubbard is ticked about is thought condensing into energy and matter. To him thetan is a form of thought; and, the universe is a form of energy and matter. And the two should not be regarded as the same. Well, that is alright. But does oneness means that everything the same?

No, it doesn’t. Oneness comes from the elimination of discontinuities, inconsistencies and disharmonies. It results in clarity rather than sameness. You see thought as thought, energy as energy, and matter as matter. All three are forms of substance that make up this universe.

And under these major categories, you see a chair as chair, light as light, and a particular idea as that particular idea. You come to see things as they are.

And this is the oneness of the universe because it is all connected by the clarity of knowingness.

The universe is the knowable part of the dichotomy, “Unknowable-knowable.” And that is all it means. All things knowable are part of this universe. If the Cause is knowable, it is a part of the knowable universe.

So, Hubbard had a misunderstanding about oneness of the universe as it is viewed in Buddhism. He invalidated Buddhism because of his own deep misconception. A deep misconception is the result of an implant. So, we are looking here at an implant of Hubbard.

.

More on Oneness

The universe is sensed as a spectrum of substance (thought, energy and matter). By interacting among each other, thought, energy and matter acquire forms and meaning. These forms and meanings appear as patterns within thought, energy and matter.

The basic patterns may be referred to as the laws of nature. These laws must be consistent among themselves to provide a complete picture of the universe. This consistency extends from continuity at one end to harmony at the other. Together, the continuity, consistency and harmony of these patterns represent the principle of oneness. 

In his Theta-MEST theory, Hubbard postulated theta (thought) to be separate from MEST (energy and matter). According to his theory, theta impinged on MEST and then separated gathering the laws of MEST. There existed a tension between theta and MEST, without which the universe could not exist. Therefore, a merger or oneness between theta and MEST was unthinkable to Hubbard. Hubbard’s fear of losing his individuality expressed itself through his own flawed postulate that theta is separate and independent of the physical universe.

In truth, thought is a part of the spectrum of substance, just like energy and matter are. The integration of thought, energy and matter has resulted in this knowable universe. Spiritual and physical elements are not separate, but they form two aspects of this universe. Anomalies arise during the course of interactions among thought, energy and matter. But as these anomalies are resolved, evolution occurs.

.

The Spiritual-Physical

Reference: UNIVERSE: The Basic Definitions

The truly spiritual phenomena is akin to being unknowable. The thought part of the “spiritual” phenomenon may be sensed and can be investigated like any physical phenomena.

.

Definition of SPIRITUAL-PHYSICAL

Physical is the phenomena that impacts our physical senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. We identify such phenomena consisting of matter and energy.

Spiritual is the phenomena that impacts our mental and spiritual senses. We identify the phenomena impacting our mental sense to be made up of thoughts. However, the spiritual sense seems to be deeply embedded within our being. A spiritual phenomenon is almost like the absence of any impact. The realization of this brings an immense sense of freedom.

Therefore, we identify part of spiritual phenomena consisting of thought, but another part of spiritual phenomena cannot be identified at all. It is unknowable.

The spiritual-physical dichotomy roughly parallels the Unknowable-knowable dichotomy in terms of sensations.

.

Notes & Misconceptions

Most people cannot describe the truly spiritual phenomena and express it through allegories. Allegories are mental constructs made up of thought. Then there are “spiritual thoughts” that are sensed mentally. Thought, energy and matter are sensed. Truly spiritual phenomenon is not sensed at all. It simply relates to a highly elevated sense of self.

There are a lot of misconceptions about what is truly spiritual. Out-of-body and near-death experiences are considered to be spiritual; whereas, they are thought phenomena, which are sensed and can be investigated scientifically.

.

More Misconceptions

You may discover more misconceptions on your own, if you contemplate on each sentence of the above definition with mindfulness. Please see:

The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness

Or, you may end up improving upon this definition.

Good luck!

.