KHTK Axiom #5: Existence (old)

[Reference: KHTK AXIOM #4: Objects]

KHTK Axiom #5: The existence of objects is characterized by time.

  1. Each dimension characterizing an object has its own duration.

  2.  These durations are made up of cycles of start-change-stop.

  3. The existence of the object is characterized by the interactions among these durations.

  4. The time of an object can be quite complex, and so does its existence.


[For further details, please see: KHTK Research]


Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  • vinaire  On October 16, 2013 at 4:32 AM

    An object is a fixed set of values.

    An object persists to the degree it is fixed in awareness.

    When that object persists against the background of motion we have another degree of time as a property of that object.


  • vinaire  On October 16, 2013 at 7:04 AM

    According to Lorentz and Fitzgerald moving matter suffers a physical contraction in the direction of its motion. According to Einstein this contraction is observational as a result of relative motion. This is so even when observed by use of instruments.

    Hence, awareness is a property of objects that is tied to their relative motion.

    It is possible that when a value, which was established by freezing a motion, is set into motion again, then it might simply blur and vanish as its movement approaches the original motion that was frozen.

    The value merges back into the background of uniform motion and no longer stands out as before. Thus, any value is a variation from the background of uniform motion. A value is sort of an inconsistency.


    • Chris Thompson  On October 20, 2013 at 10:53 AM

      It might also be possible that the oscillation that Einstein mentions might be a basic quantum jump between energy states, or possibly more basic than that. At its basic, the appearance and then disappearance of quanta creating the illusion of motion.

      I mean for this concept to align with Heisenberg’s uncertainty and to take it one more step toward resolution.

  • vinaire  On October 16, 2013 at 7:18 AM

    That makes an object to be an inconsistency wrought out from the backround unifom motion.


    • Chris Thompson  On October 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM

      This is a good direction.

      • vinaire  On October 20, 2013 at 6:08 PM

        Well, it supports the idea of the background of consistency being unknowable. 😮


  • vinaire  On October 16, 2013 at 7:29 AM

    Observation depends on light. Therefore, motion as a ratio of the velocity of light does become a factor in observation even by physical instruments.

    Awareness, then, is not something subjective. It is very much objective and can be treated with the laws of physics.


    • Chris Thompson  On October 20, 2013 at 1:50 PM

      Awareness then is physical all the way. Again, on close inspection, we find it productive to ignore assumptions and dismantle reality on our own.

      • vinaire  On October 20, 2013 at 6:13 PM

        It seems that at the basic level awareness and relative motion are the same thing. But it all become very complex, very fast. We have to penetrate that complexity.


  • vinaire  On October 16, 2013 at 7:34 AM

    There is no reason why relative motion greater than speed of light may not be possible. It is just that awareness under those conditions has not been determined.


  • vinaire  On October 16, 2013 at 7:36 AM

    The physical awareness is a function of the ratio of motion of objects to the speed of light.


  • vinaire  On October 18, 2013 at 6:23 PM

    I have revised this KHTK Axiom #5.


%d bloggers like this: