A History of Man: Chapter Two

Reference: A History of Man

This paper presents CHAPTER TWO from the book SCIENTOLOGY: A HISTORY OF MAN by L. RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original publication of this book in 1952.

The paragraphs of the original material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the present understanding.  Feedback on these comments is appreciated.

The heading below is linked to the original materials.

.

CHAPTER TWO

SEVERAL TARGETS PRESENT THEMSELVES IN A CASE and any one of them can be audited with some profit.

The complexity of the problem of human behavior was a complexity of factors, not an unresolvable mass of twine. Once these factors are each one known and identified. very little trouble is experienced.

THOUGHT, EMOTION, EFFORT, COUNTER-THOUGHT, COUNTER-EMOTION, COUNTER-EFFORT, motivator ATTENTION UNITS, overt ATTENTION UNITS, ded ATTENTION UNITS and their manifestation on the various tone scale charts are the sum and total of factors to be audited out of any one target. Each and every auditing target contains these factors, is audited in the same way has the same basic behavior pattern and succumbs to such auditing. It does not matter what target one is addressing in a case he will not discover wild or unexplained manifestations in HOW he audits that target. Each one in short, is made up of the same woof and warp. Each one is basically theta. Theta behaves and manifests in a constant manner, no matter what form it takes. Thus, the auditor should quiet any apprehension he has that something he is auditing is behaving differently than a standard item. Variables, so far as has been discovered do not exist in theta since the discoveries of Dianetics.

The target of auditing is the anomaly. This anomaly comes in many forms. It affects the thought, the emotion, the effort and the attention of the person. One applies theta to it, which is the “ability to postulate and to become aware.” 

There are several targets for the auditor. If he understands thoroughly what they are, his chances of mistaking one kind of incident for another are much reduced. They are in their order of magnitude, not their importance.

CELLULAR INJURIES comprise the first target. A cell is a living animal all by itself. The most necessary auditing on CELLULAR INJURIES is the emergency assist wherein the auditor repairs an accident, a burn, an incident which has just occurred. The auditor will find that, in auditing a cellular injury which has just occurred, the somatics are very sharp and far more painful than when auditing a standard facsimile. CELLULAR INJURIES are audited no differently than any other kind of incident. However, it must be remarked that individual cells have “past lives”, the easiest manifestation of past lives to check. An auditor can follow a particular cell throughout its own generations within the body and, as part of the evolutionary line, discover many injuries to it. Further, in going back on the evolutionary line and auditing an injury to a single cell, the future positions of that cell are easily located in the body from there to the present, for the future injuries blow off like small sparks of pain when the basic injury is released. The migrations of a single cell throughout the body are very easy to track in this fashion and ordinarily check against standard suppositions in the field of physical biology. The pulp of a tooth, for instance, tracks back, cell by cell, to early engrams; when these are relieved a “toothache” in that tooth becomes almost impossible, no matter how many “nerves” are exposed, a matter which brings about quite a revolution in dentistry. CELLULAR INJURIES do not require any special kind of auditing and they comprise no special kind of injury nor are there psycho-somatics which demand that the cells alone be audited.

All anomalies are important. They vary only in their magnitude. CELLULAR INJURY is an anomaly. It comes about when there is an accident, burn, or an incident which has just occurred. The somatics are very sharp. Individual cells have “past lives,” (DNA programming), which may reveal many injuries to it. You audit out the basic injury to the cell.

GENETIC ENTITY, the “GE”, is the second area of address. This is the entity which carries forward from the earliest formation of the MEST body. It is this entity which has the “genetic line” engrams. It is located more or less in the centre of the body the stomach, but it is actually a composite of all the cellular experience on the line. It has the manifestation of a single identity. It was formerly referred to as the SOMATIC MIND (see DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH). Out of all the past experience of the MEST body it makes up a form, a working carbon-oxygen engine. It has no real personality it is not the “I” of the body. It has a record in many cases, of the entire experience forward until the last life. The GE has the record of past deaths. Auditing it alters physical structure, eradicates physical malformations. But these can be otherwise changed by auditing the theta being. The GE facsimiles include a transfer of somatics from past theta beings, for it is not common for a GE to have the same theta being twice. The GE is the constant and continual workhorse of the theta body. It regulates the heartbeat, takes care of all such responses, acts as a stimulus-response mind to avoid pain and discover pleasure and keeps the body running in general. A GE departs from the body much later than the theta beings abandon one, sees it through the death to the end and only then leaves to join the line once more some two or three days before conception. This is the “mind” of an animal, a dog or a cat or a cow.

GENETIC ENTITY is the DNA programming, which represents all the cellular experience on the genetic line. It serves as the blueprint for the body. It has the manifestation of a single identity located at the center of the body in the stomach. Any anomalies in this programming needs to be resolved. Audit them with subject clearing.

INJECTED ENTITIES are the third class of target. These are actually synthetics. They are ridges that “think”. They form a very complex pattern. They have geographical areas in the body. These areas are standard, preclear to preclear. These areas answer up on an E-meter like actual minds rather than compartments of a mind. The areas are the CENTRE (forehead and down), the RIGHT INSIDE (from the edge of the jaw halfway out to the shoulder), the RIGHT OUTSIDE (from halfway to the shoulder to the point of the shoulder), the LEFT INSIDE (opposite from the right inside), the LEFT OUTSIDE (opposite from the right outside), the STOMACH ENTITY (located in the area of the solar plexus), plus various other entities held in by these basic entities. These entities run off their own past deaths, on other tracks, hold sections of the body paralyzed, bar areas from being audited, withhold information from “I” and do other mischief. They are actually the basis of “demon circuits” (as covered in DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH) and they mirror the personality of persons antipathetic to the preclear. They are entirely stimulus-response. Each one has, from preclear to preclear, the same personality in the same body position. The RIGHT INSIDE, for instance, answers up to the name of “crew chief”. They are male and female. Their source is probably a “softened-up” theta being, and they disappear when electronic incidents are audited. Prior to their disappearance, they can exhibit a wonderful and awesome role in confusing the preclear. The auditor can move the attention of the preclear into one of these and audit it through a death or painful experience and so bring it up to present time. In view of the fact that auditing basic electronic incidents eradicates them, little attention need be paid to them by the auditor beyond knowing that they are there, that they are the “mysterious voices” in the heads of some preclears, that they make critical or commanding remarks to him and serve, in general, as a fine source of aberration. Paralysis, anxiety stomachs, arthritis and many ills and aberrations have been relieved by auditing them. An E-meter shows them up and makes them confess their misdeeds. They are probably just compartments of the mind which, cut off, begin to act as though they were persons. Here is an inexhaustible source of study and speculation which I leave to another, having located the method of wiping them out without paying any attention to them.

INJECTED ENTITIES have the characteristics of AI (artificial intelligence). They take on personalities formed out of the person’s thoughts. They are associated with geographical areas in the body. These areas are related to major nerve centers. In auditing out these entities a person must apply the discipline of subject clearing very strictly.

THETA BEINGS are the fourth and only really important target for the auditor. The theta being is the “I”, it is WHO the preclear is. If all the entities and beingnesses of the preclear were hydrogen balloons locked up inside him and each had a name and identity, the auditor might be confused and the preclear IS confused as to who “I” is. But if the preclear were suddenly opened and the balloons let loose, the “I” balloon would float free clear and unmistakable and that “I” balloon would be the theta being, it would be who the preclear always thought he was anyway. All others are simply modifiers. The theta being does not get lost. It does not go away; it cannot be stolen. If it went away, the preclear would be with it and be it. The vagueness of personal identity is caused by the confusion of the theta being, not its “inextricable” entanglement with other identities.

The theta being can be confused in itself, it can be hypnotized, it can go to sleep. It can experience emotions. It can think. It can feel pain. It is immortal in that it cannot die—but it could possibly become so burdened with facsimiles that it could not continue along with bodies. It does not need a body to think, make facsimiles, experience emotions, remember or perceive.

The theta being seems natively capable of producing considerable MEST energy. Facsimiles alone inhibit this ability. Whereas it has come to feel, in association with the bad company of genetic entities and the MEST universe, that it is a stimulus-response thing, it is quite capable of generating thought independently of previous effort, counter effort or experience.

The preclear is not guarding or harboring or hiding his theta being—he IS his theta being. A relaxed understanding of this will prevent a considerable confusion on the part of the auditor and preclear. If the preclear is responding rationally, he is the theta being responding.

The THETA BEING is the “I”, it is WHO the person is. The being is modified by these various entities, but that confusion is cleared up in auditing. It is the being who is auditing his beingness. The anomalies exist mainly as fixed considerations. It is not the body, but a fixation on the body, which is a major anomaly. The body itself is an integral part of the being and must be cared for by handling anomalies in it.

As the theta being can be “put to sleep”, it is possible to bring then to the surface a GE or another entity which using the motor controls of the body, can talk or experience. But the individual himself is not usually aware of what happened then. The various strange multi-personality manifestations of the mind are occasioned by valences and their basics, the entities; ordinarily, unless the preclear is obviously insane, these sub-personalities are not distinctly units in themselves but only colour the activities of the theta being.

Hypnotism is the process of bringing into being the GE or other entity by putting the theta being into unconsciousness. Self-hypnosis is the process of the theta being hypnotizing GE or other entity and setting up a compulsive or inhibitive circuit with it.

All this other phenomenon that appears after the theta being is put to sleep does not contribute to auditing. Auditing is the process that increases the awareness of the theta being.

The auditor must know that the existence of a MEST body within the fields of the theta being is incidental and even unfortunate processing which, in the absence of a body, goes much faster.

The theta being is both outside and inside the MEST body. It is not just inside. The only reason it is inside at all is that any field would penetrate the MEST body. The MEST body should not be thought of as a harbor or vessel for the theta being. A better example would be a sliver inserted unwantedly in the thumb where the thumb would be the Theta being, the MEST body the sliver. MEST bodies are good identification tags, they generate exuding emotions, they are fun to operate at times, but they are no end of existence.

A theta being with its alertness restored is capable of remolding the human body within its field, taking off weight here, restoring it there, changing appearance and even height. The body can also be altered by auditing cells or the GE. All in all, bodies are very easy to handle where their condition is concerned. The question is rather, are they practical? The theta being can evidently manufacture bodies or a reasonable facsimile thereof which, while they do not labor, neither do they have to be fed.

Hubbard thinks erroneously that having a body is an anomaly. That is not true. The actual anomaly is having a fixation on the body.

To a society quite mad on the subject of MEST bodies, very aberrated on “care of the body”, the foregoing may seem a trifle strange, and one might think the writer had, to be short, slipped a cable or two in his wits. Indeed, it is very probable that critics may say so. For their reality is entirely outraged by such sudden statements.

But this matter has been under investigation for a year and a half as witness “THETA CLEAR” on the SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL tone-scale chart which I drew in January 1951. It states that the capabilities of a theta clear were unknown. Now they are not so unknown and while there is much to learn about them still, much can be stated concerning them as clear fact. Back of these statements is a two-year public record of making statements which, under grueling investigation by others, turn out to be exactly what they were said to be.

Before turning away from the above, try SCIENTOLOGY 8-8008 and learn again what it is to be truly FREE. An hour’s auditing will prove it.

In 2023, we are now looking at a seventy-year track of Scientology attainments. What appeared a possibility to Hubbard in 1952 remains a possibility still.

.

Thetan versus The Center of Awareness

Reference: Scientology Fundamentals

Please see The Definition of THETAN

My position is that the center of awareness is the viewpoint associated with the current body-mind system. It is not going from one lifetime to another. Instead unassimilated impressions are forwarded through the mechanism of DNA from one life to the next. Many Scientologists, however, believe that the thetan, which acts as the center of awareness, goes from one life to another because we recognize ourselves in a past life memory. According to them, this is much more than a belief. It is “knowingness.”

The following is from Chapter 24 of “My Introduction to America“:

“Then all of a sudden something happened. My neck went out of my control. My head jerked backwards and seemed to get stuck there for a moment. Then it jerked forward. That took me completely by surprise. There were no pictures of any kind of recall.

“The auditor sent me back through the incident again. By now I had learnt not to force my mind to look or imagine. I waited patiently to see what developed. I felt I was outside my head calmly looking at the developments. The auditor asked me to locate this incident on the time track. I had learned not to second guess whatever the mind gave me even when it seemed outrageous. I patiently related the impressions that came to me.

“The incident appeared to be in some arid region… it was all brown as far as I could see… felt like sand blowing all around me… yes, it was a desert… couldn’t place it on the time track very well yet… I appeared to be chained… there were other people… we all were connected to each other by chain… captives? A chain gang?… we were made to march… I was stumbling forward…this can’t be an incident from this life time… where am I getting these impressions from? They are so real…How far back does it seem? A few centuries ago? A bit more recent…FLASH!!! My whole body jerked… a searing bolt of electricity seemed to pass through my spine… It seemed like an explosion in the center of my body… a heavy, tingling sensation ran outward through my hands and feet… I had a distinct impression that if I touched something metallic there would be sparks coming out of my fingers and toes.

“When it was all over, a sudden calm descended over me. I opened my eyes. I savored the present time. All the sensations were crisp and clear. I had never been so much in the present time before. I just sat there. I was back.”

Now, more than 50 years later I am asking myself, “Did I actually exist centuries ago, or was it an impression from centuries ago that I experienced in my auditing? Who or what am I?”

I certainly am the center of awareness examining an unassmilated impression from centuries ago. But I am not sure if I existed centuries ago when I had that experience the first time?

It is true that there was a body-mind system centuries ago that went through that experience. There was a center of awareness associated with that body-mind system. But the current body-mind system is not the same as the one that existed centuries ago. But is the center of awareness the same?

But any identity or individuality belong to the body-mind system. The center of awareness has neither any identity nor individuality to distinguish it from other centers of awareness. Whether it is Jane’s center of awareness, or John’s, or mine—there is no distinction.

Can you identify a distinct center of awareness apart from the distinctness of the body-mind system? Well, you can try it.

.  

Hubbard 1952: A History of Man

SCIENTOLOGY: A History of Man

BY L. RON HUBBARD
Published in 1952

.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. FOREWORD
    1. Comments: Theory Asserted as Factual
  2. CHAPTER ONE – How and what to Audit
    1. Comments: The Route to Clear
  3. CHAPTER TWO – Cases: Targets of Address
    1. Comments: The Target of Auditing
  4. CHAPTER THREE – The Present Life
    1. Comments: The Route to Rapid Results
  5. CHAPTER FOUR – The Genetic Line
    1. Comments: The Genetic Line
  6. CHAPTER FOUR A – The Theta Being
    1. Comments: The Theta Being
  7. CHAPTER FIVE – Capabilities of a Theta Being
    1. Comments: Capabilities of a Theta Being
  8. CHAPTER SIX – History of the Theta Line
    1. Comments: History of the Theta Line
  9. CHAPTER SEVEN – Type of Incidents on the Theta Line
    1. Comments: Type of Incidents on the Theta Line
  10. CHAPTER EIGHT – Specific Incidents on the Theta Line
    1. Comments: Specific Incidents on the Theta Line
  11. CHAPTER NINE – Generalized Incidents
    1. Comments: Generalized Incidents
  12. CHAPTER TEN – The Transfer
    1. Comments: The Transfer

.

A History of Man: Chapter One

Reference: A History of Man

This paper presents CHAPTER ONE from the book SCIENTOLOGY: A HISTORY OF MAN by L. RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original publication of this book in 1952.

The paragraphs of the original material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the present understanding.  Feedback on these comments is appreciated.

The heading below is linked to the original materials.

.

CHAPTER ONE

There are two general problems in processing preclears. The first is HOW to audit, the second is WHAT to audit. The present volume presupposes that the skill necessary to the First problem has been mastered: and there is good reason why this should be the case. for the present techniques of Dianetics are far from difficult. SCIENTOLOGY 8-8008 to all patents and purposes. putting the finishing touches on the knowledge necessary to handle thought.

A study of HOW to audit embraces thought, emotion and effort. counter-thought, counter-emotion and counter-effort, and three actions of energy, the behaviour of attention units, the anatomy of maybe and a general knowledge of the background of Dianetics. Elementary group courses exist which, coupled with book study and, if possible, study with a college associate, give one all the insight and skill necessary to accomplish results.

WHAT to audit is covered in some degree in other literature such as THE SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL and the first volume of Dianetics: DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH, as well as ADVANCED PROCEDURE AND AXIOMS. The current work is, however, the first coverage of all categories. It is written to be used in connection with ELECTROPSYCHOMETRIC AUDITING and the INDIVIDUAL TRACK MAP, companion pieces of this present volume.

In Subject Clearing, HOW to audit is based on The Discipline of Subject Clearing, and WHAT to audit is based on the anomaly that is bothering you the most.

There are four general fields of incidents. four areas of past. embraced in this work. These are:

  1. Present life, from pre-conception to present time;
  2. The genetic line, being the evolutionary chain on Earth;
  3. Large, specialised segments of the whole track;
  4. The theta body line or “whole track”.

Of the four only the last is actually capable of producing the clear with any rapidity. However, the auditor should be familiar with all these lines. They are taken, one by one in the above order in this volume.

The state of clear comes about when all unassimilated impressions from present and the past are broken down into perceptual elements and assimilated in the mental matrix. One simply starts with an anomaly in the present and traces it back to the impression that is causing it. Many impressions are acquired through DNA from previous generations. Some impressions are so basic that they may go through some mechanism of interpretation to produce recognizable content. The content, such as, the “whole track” is not important. What is important is the assimilation of that content in the mental matrix, which makes the anomaly disappear.

All incidents in this volume should be detected and audited with the assistance of an E-meter. If it were not for the E-meter these incidents would have remained undetected except in the haziest state. Without an E-meter, they cannot be audited with security or even safety for the preclear.

E-meter was the craze in 1952. Over the past 70 years, the limitation of the E-meter has become obvious. It is good for detecting first few incidents on the case; but soon, the gut feeling becomes as good or better than the E-meter. The content of the incidents is not important. What is important is the detection, running and assimilation of the incidents.

How to audit and What to audit together deserve considerable study. Certainly, they deserve more study than one would give American history or English or arithmetic, for they deliver a greater dividend to the individual.

Studying these incidents may be discovered to be restimulative to the student. If so, he would find auditing them as restimulative. However, such restimulation is very easily resolved and, unless he feels close to the end of tolerance, he should not be shy of auditing or studying the track.

Hubbard’s later approach moved away from this stance. It is not true that the same incident shall appear on every person’s track. It is better to start with an anomaly in present time that is real to the person and trace it back to whatever unassimilated impression lies in that person’s mental matrix. The purpose of auditing is assimilation of impressions in the mental matrix and not the “discovery” of any content.

In SCIENTOLOGY 8-8008, we have seen that creative processing is far superior to any other type of processing. Creative processing does not address the facsimiles as such, it breaks agreement on the power of the facsimiles. In order to audit a preclear however, one should have a very good acquaintance with what the facsimiles contain. If he has this information, it is relatively simple for him to give the preclear “mockups” which approximate the material in facsimiles without telling the preclear why such mock-ups are being given to him; the facsimiles yet will themselves desensitize. The mock-ups should be parallel to the incidents which are given here but should not be close enough to bring the preclear into the actual incident. For instance, in the matter of “FAC 1,” the preclear should be made to handle black boxes, cameras, things with handles on them and should handle them in any environment he chooses, but not the environment of FAC 1 itself. All the various conditions of FAC 1 can be approximated, preferably very widely until the preclear is no longer interested. In the matter of “FAC 1,” the auditor will find that, as soon as the preclear is given a black box on a tripod to handle, he may have a tendency to set it on a throne and have large numbers of people bow to it or have the contraption he has mocked up chasing him. Do not in any case let him get an actual FAC 1 “coffee-grinder”. This will become clearer as one audits. If the auditor knows of the existence of these incidents, and if he finds them in the preclear with an E-meter assessment, then he should use some solid geometry parallel of the material in the actual incident, such as a light bulb for a thetan, etc.

Mockups, or visualization, may assist, for example, as in this Visualization Exercise, but assimilation takes place only when the actual impression is detected and duplicated. Hubbard assumes that the actual unassimilated impression in a person’s mind may be detected by visualizing the incidents, such as “FAC 1” listed in this book. This may not occur always but may be tried. This is just a trial-and-error approach. A person can soon determine by visualizing a given incident, if that incident is applicable to him or not. He can determine that easily by gut feeling.

The auditor will soon find that he can tell at a glance in many cases what incidents his preclear is sitting in. This requires experience. For instance, people who wear thick horn-rimmed glasses and are thin are generally in the monitor valence of FAC 1 and will flip into the incident with great suddenness if it is even closely approached; as FAC 1 accounts for Tuberculosis in most cases, it will be seen, then, that this creative processing of whole-track incidents is of considerable value. The auditor should not, however, run the actual incident, but should study SCIENTOLOGY 8-8008 to discover how to approximate the incident with mock-ups.

With Subject Clearing approach no E-meter is required. A person simply uses his or her gut feeling. This approach is safe in the sense that the mind will never bring up an incident that it is not ready to be handled. When an incident is contacted, simply apply The Discipline of Subject Clearing to assimilate it.

.

A History of Man: Foreword

Reference: A History of Man

This paper presents FORWARD from the book SCIENTOLOGY: A HISTORY OF MAN by L. RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original publication of this book in 1952.

The paragraphs of the original material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the present understanding.  Feedback on these comments is appreciated.

The heading below is linked to the original materials.

.

Forward

This is a cold-blooded and factual account of your last sixty trillion years.

The length of time in “trillions,”as determined by E-meter’s needle reaction to thinking, is subjective in nature.

The test of any knowledge is its usefulness. Does it make one happier or more able? By it and with it, can he better achieve his goals?

This is useful knowledge. With it the blind again see, the lame walk, the ill recover, the insane become sane and the sane become saner. By its use the thousand abilities Man has sought to recover become his once more.

The recovery in humans, such as described above, occurs only when traumatic impressions are finally assimilated in the mind.

Like all useful knowledge it was hardly won. I began search into the back track of Mankind some years ago. There was no actual knowledge of it in existence. There were numberless superstitions, countless guesses, as many theories in favour of one thing as in favour of another. People believed, some of them, that Man had lived before. They had no proof. Others believed that Man was born innocent and died and went to a place called Hell. Most believed that when you had lived once, that was all, fellow.

The above knowledge of “unassimilated impressions” has been in existence in India since Buddha’s time. They are called “Samskaras.” Yogis have routinely been assimilating such impressions through yogic meditation.

Such a number of conflicting theories must have truth in them. It became my business to discover, against considerable odds, that truth.

In the first place, there was something wrong with Man. An animal such as a cat, even a reptile, a lizard, had habit patterns which carried him through his early days. Not Man. Why not? As usual, a lot of vagueness answered this. The very schools of ‘thought’ that said Man was just another animal bogged utterly on why it was that babies, the young of this very intelligent animal, are much more stupid than kittens. That was only one thing wrong with Man that wasn’t explained.

The further one investigated, the more one came to understand that here, in this creature Homo Sapiens, were entirely too many unknowns. People who suddenly, out of no observable training, begin to speak foreign tongues, men who ‘seem to remember having been here before,’ strange yearnings in people for various parts of the country or the world or the stars of which they have no actual knowledge, such things are routine puzzles.

The body-mind system in humans is much more sophisticated than in the animals. Such phenomena as described above, is due to the activation of certain programming in the body-mind system. Most of this programming is transmitted from one generation to the next.

And there was a much more important thing at work than mere curiosity. Now and then, in my auditing, I would discover a case which would be extremely reluctant to recover and then would recover only partially so long as I used data from the current lifetime of the preclear; but as soon as I used the whole span of the time track— about sixty trillion years—I could obtain immediate response.

This idea of time track comes from the impressions that have been passed on through DNA molecules over generations.

One must be very impartial, even brutal, in investigation. The last series of cases I audited, twenty in number, chosen at random from various life strata and suffering from mental and physical ills which were extremely varied, were audited to demonstrate finally to myself one thing only—Can an auditor obtain a swift recovery by auditing the current lifetime only? I used the most modern of techniques—1952—and did a standard auditing address to the current lifetime of each one. I obtained mediocre results, partial recoveries, slight betterment in attitude. Then I audited each case addressing only past track, prior to this lifetime: the results were swift and spectacular. Thus, I validated, for myself, the reality that in auditing the whole track, one can obtain excellent results, that in auditing the current lifetime, one can obtain slow and mediocre results. From this series came this conclusion: THE AUDITOR WHO INSISTS ON AUDITING THE CURRENT LIFETIME ONLY WHEN HE HAS THE WHOLE TRACK TECHNIQUE AVAILABLE, IS WASTING TIME AND EFFORT AND IS, IN FACT, SWINDLING HIS PRECLEAR.

The whole track consists of unassimilated impressions that have accumulated over generations. Auditing such whole track impressions certainly provides more complete results.

I announced “whole track” techniques to a large number of auditors. I found the better auditors quite willing to use them, and these immediately began to obtain “miracle level” results. A very few held back, were very cautious, would not employ the whole track, clung to this lifetime, invalidated the E-meter, invalidated what they erroneously called “past lives”, were scathingly critical of my employing such data. So, I investigated the auditors.

The “whole track” is not the same concept as the concept of “past lives.” It was misunderstood by many auditors.

Several of these were given sessions by me. I found several noteworthy similarities about them: they were so low in tone it was almost impossible to get them to register on an old style Mathison, their cases were utterly bogged, they generally made a practice of refusing any auditing, their general record with preclears was very poor, their own lives were running badly, they not only fought “past lives” as they called “whole track,” but they fought any technique evolved since the summer of 1950 or used later techniques poorly, they would not run any overt acts even in this lifetime, they needed, so far as their cases were concerned, the most careful auditing. I found two people not auditors, who objected violently to “past lives” and who were “wide-open” cases. Both were in the inaccessible band, both had unsavoury social records, both protested being audited in any incident of any kind. I concluded, therefore, that the relatively sane are capable of accepting evidence and the insane are not.

The refusal of auditing comes about only when the correct area is not being addressed. Also, people do not want to give out their personal data for the fear of it being misused. Earlier dianetics procedures violated the gradient of auditing and demanded sensitive personal data. Such personal data can be sorted out more easily in meditation.

Occasionally people have told me that I should not release the data contained in this volume because there would be a repercussion throughout the country which would ruin Dianetics forever. Oddly enough, I’ve been unable to discover this repercussion. I have found people alert and friendly toward this data. “Whole track” is evidently much more acceptable than the idea of a prenatal. And witness a recent READER’S DIGEST, even the medical profession is accepting prenatals.

The idea that there are impressions from previous generations, becomes more acceptable when an explanation of a reasonable transmission mechanism, such as DNA, is given. This explanation was not available in early fifties.

Further, it is very hard to argue with a miracle. Today, Eleanor has arthritis. She is audited “whole track” with 1952 techniques. Tonight, she doesn’t have arthritis. Miracles, using “whole track” are plentiful. By using this data an auditor can obtain a MEST clear rather easily.

Just the fact of recovery from illnesses through auditing of unassimilated impressions is miraculous.

But the best argument which can be advanced for “whole track” is that it is factual. By using this knowledge, more is obtained than auditing results. A preclear suddenly recovers the ability carefully learned eighty years ago, to play a piano; an electronics engineer, doing poorly before suddenly wraps up formulae that would puzzle Einstein and which may get man off Earth; and a thousand details in a hundred sciences become clear.

That there are mental impressions passed on from one generation to next is quite factual. The most obvious example is the body’s blueprint that is passed on through genes.

The search of this track began some years ago and was conducted sporadically on many preclears. Various instruments such as the electroencephalograph and the police lie-detector, were used to further this search, but these were inadequate and limited for my purposes. Finally, Volney Mathison applied his electronic genius to the problem and invented the Electropsychometer. This instrument had a range and ability greatly in excess of anything before known; it compares to itself only in the field of physioelectrical mensuration and to existing devices as the electronic microscope compares to looking through a quartz stone. As soon as this instrument was turned loose on the problem, the problem ceased to exist. By adding up and checking probabilities on scores of persons, the character, extent and content of the whole track was mapped.

E-meter is useful only in the early stages of auditing. Soon the mind becomes wise enough to audit itself faster and more accurately than the E-meter.

Once the E-meter gave reliable data, the main problem became the estimation of intentions, of sources, of the reasons behind the reasons. Most of this work has been done.

It comments poorly on Man’s dullness that this project was impeded and slowed greatly by lack of funds and by very active efforts on the part of some to acquire and own the copyrights of Dianetics— may the ill of the world forgive them. Thus, the map is not as complete in this issue as it might be.

Hubbard was on quite a journey of discovery in the field of mind. To his credit he provided processes to more rapidly handle the unassimilated impressions in the mind. These processes can be used in meditation also.

This work is honest research, done with considerable care. And it will bear up under survey by any competent auditor or investigator. The most amusing aspect of the “whole track” is that this work bears up under the onslaught of police lie-detector experts: these, hard-eyed and uncompromising, become startled half out of their wits to discover that some of the crimes they find on their machines were committed two or three “lives” ago by the criminal under test, and that, most alarmingly, the crimes so discovered are discoverable again to the last detail in the police archives. This is very upsetting to these operators, to be informed so bluntly that Man lives many years, not three score and ten, and that today’s lifer may again be on their hands tomorrow as a juvenile delinquent!

Gravestones, ancient vital statistics, old diplomas and medals will verify in every detail the validity of “many lifetimes.” Your E-meter will tell you.

L. RON HUBBARD,
1951