Hubbard 1950: Dianetics TMSMH

Dianetics, The Modern Science of Mental Health

BY L. RON HUBBARD
Published in 1950

I hold a Master’s degree in Nuclear Engineering from M.I.T. I am also conversant with Buddhism. I spent 12 years in Sea Org of Scientology from 1971 to 1983. I believe I am qualified to critique DIANETICS.

I am writing my critique one chapter at a time. Please follow the links to see the comments.

.

CONTENTS

SYNOPSIS 

INTRODUCTION

HOW TO READ THIS BOOK

.

Book One: THE GOAL OF MAN

CHAPTER I: The Scope of Dianetics

CHAPTER II: The Clear

CHAPTER III: The Goal of Man

CHAPTER IV: The Four Dynamics

CHAPTER V: Summary

.

Book Two: THE SOURCE OF ALL MENTAL AND PSYCHO-SOMATIC ILLS

CHAPTER I: The Analytical Mind and the Standard Memory Banks

CHAPTER II: The Reactive Mind

CHAPTER III: The Cell and the Organism

CHAPTER IV: The “Demons”

CHAPTER V: Psycho-somatic Illness

CHAPTER VI: Emotion and the Dynamics

CHAPTER VII: Prenatal Experience and Birth

CHAPTER VIII: Contagion of Aberration

CHAPTER IX: Keying-in the Engram

CHAPTER X: Preventive Dianetics

.

Book Three: THERAPY

CHAPTER I: The Mind’s Protection

CHAPTER II: Release or Clear

CHAPTER III: The Auditor’s Role

CHAPTER IV: Diagnosis

CHAPTER V: Returning, the File Clerk, and the Time Track

CHAPTER VI: The Laws of Returning

CHAPTER VII: Emotion and the Life Force

CHAPTER VIII: Some Types of Engrams

CHAPTER IX: PART ONE Mechanisms and Aspects of Therapy

CHAPTER IX: PART TWO Mechanisms and Aspects of Therapy

CHAPTER X: Dianetics — Past and Future

.

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I: The Philosophic Method

APPENDIX II: The Scientific Method

APPENDIX III (A): Mind Schematic

APPENDIX III (B): Analyzer Schematic

APPENDIX IV: Advice to the Pre-clear 

THE DIANETICS AXIOMS

Subject: DIANETICS

.

Tantra: A Technology for Transformation

Reference: Inner Engineering: A Yogi’s Guide to Joy by Sadhguru

The following is an excerpt from the above book by Sadhguru:

.

Tantra: A Technology for Transformation

Today, there are many practices associated with the occult sciences masquerading as spiritual processes.

Let us say I am in India and you are in America. I want to send you a flower, but I am not willing to take the journey that Columbus took. If I make this flower suddenly land in your lap, this is occult. There is nothing spiritual about it; it is just another way of handling the physical dimension of life.

In India, we have many sophisticated occult processes. There are people who can just look at a photograph and make or break a person’s life. They could ensure that the person contracts some ailment that the body could not customarily have acquired in such a short span of time. These occult practitioners can also create health, but unfortunately many of them use their ability in other ways, as there seems to be a better market for these negative talents. In any case, whether it is employed for ill health or good health is beside the point. The use of occult toward any self-oriented goal is inadvisable.

The yogic tradition is filled with stories of the great yogi Gorakhnath. Some say he lived in the eleventh century, but there are many accounts that date him much earlier. He was a disciple of Matsyendranath, an illustrious yogi in his own right. Such was his level of attainment that Matsyendranath was often venerated as a reincarnation of Shiva or Adiyogi. The lore tells us that Matsyendranath lived for about six hundred years. This need not be accepted literally or discarded as hagiography either. It essentially indicates an exceptionally long life span and the tremendous awe with which this iconic figure was regarded.

Gorakhnath became his disciple, and he adored and worshipped his master. Gorakhnath was all fire and intensity. Matsyendranath saw too much fire in him, and not enough restraint. Fire burns through many things, so Gorakhnath started burning through the walls of ignorance, and suddenly he had enormous power. Matsyendranath saw that he was running a little ahead of himself, so he told him, “Go away for fourteen years. Don’t stay near me. You are imbibing too much from me.”

This was the hardest thing for Gorakhnath to do. If Matsyendranath had said, “Give up your life,” he would have done it at once. “Go away” was something he could not bear. But since that was what his beloved master demanded of him, he went away.

For fourteen years, he counted the days and hours, waiting for the moment when he could return. The moment the period was over, he came rushing back. When he came, he found a disciple guarding the cave where Matsyendranath lived. Gorakhnath said, “I want to see my master!”

The yogi who was guarding the cave said, “I have no such instructions, so you had better wait.”

Gorakhnath flared up. He said, “I’ve waited for fourteen years, you fool! I don’t know when you came here. Maybe you came here the day before yesterday. How dare you stop me!”

He pushed him aside and went into the cave. Matsyendranath was not there. Gorakhnath came back and shook the disciple and said, “Where is he? I want to see my master now!”

The disciple said, “I have no instructions to tell you where he is.”

Gorakhnath could not contain himself. He used his occult powers, looked into the disciple’s mind, and identified where Matsyendranath was. He then started heading in that direction. His guru was waiting for him halfway.

Matsyendranath said, “I sent you away for fourteen years, because you were beginning to become occult-oriented. You were losing sight of the spiritual process and beginning to enjoy the power that it gave you. When you come back, the first thing that you do is use occult to open up your brother disciple’s mind. Another fourteen years for you.”

And so he sent him away again.

There are many stories about Gorakhnath making forays into this forbidden realm, and Matsyendranath punishing him again and again. At the same time, Gorakhnath evolved finally into the greatest disciple that Matsyendranath ever produced.

This is how the practice of occult in has always been treated in the yogic culture. It was never treated with respect. It was seen as a way of misusing life, of encroaching into areas where you should not. It was practiced only by certain types of people obsessed with power or money.

At the same time, occult is not always a negative thing. It has earned this reputation through misuse. Occult is essentially a technology. No science or technology is intrinsically negative. If we start using technology to kill or torture people, then after some time we think, “Enough of this damn technology!” That is what has happened to occult. Too many people misused it for personal benefit. So, generally on the spiritual path, occult is shunned.

What is often referred to as occult is broadly what we know as tantra. In the current understanding in society, tantra is about using very unorthodox or socially unacceptable methods. But in its classical sense, tantra simply means “technology.” It has nothing to do with unbridled sexuality. It is important to make a clear distinction between the occult kind of tantra and spiritual tantra. These two were divided as “left- hand tantra” and “right-hand tantra,” and are completely different in nature.

Left-hand tantra involves various rituals which may seem weirder than weird to many. The left hand is very external; you need materials and elaborate arrangements to make it happen. Occult practices, generally referred to as left-hand tantra, gave people powers to communicate across distances, to appear in two different places at the same time, and use energies to their own benefit and to the detriment of others. Right-hand tantra is more internal; it is about enabling you to use your energies to make things happen. You use all the simple aspects of life as a subjective science to turn inward and do something with yourself. The left-hand tantra is a rudimentary technology and more available to the uninitiated, while the right-hand tantra is highly refined and only available through powerful initiations.

Tantra is a certain capability; without it there is no spiritual process. If you have no tantra in you, you have no technology to transform people; all you have are words. Words can be inspirational and directional, but not transformative. A scholar cannot be labeled a guru. Without a technology for transformation there is no master. So there is no guru without tantra. Today there are too many people claiming to be gurus, but all they are doing is rehashing the scriptures. A true guru’s work is to overhaul the entire human mechanism from acquired cyclical patterns of karma toward its ultimate possibility. It is like a mechanic’s job, removing karmic warts! If there is no tantra or technology in him, you cannot call that person a guru.

.

Serpent Power

Reference: Inner Engineering: A Yogi’s Guide to Joy by Sadhguru

The following is an excerpt from the above book by Sadhguru:

.

Serpent Power

The word kundalini literally means “energy.” It refers to a certain type of energy within every human being which is largely latent and unmanifest. The kundalini has always been symbolized in the yogic tradition as a coiled cobra.

A coiled cobra knows stillness of a very high quality. When the snake is motionless, it is so absolutely still that even if it is lying in your way, you will miss it. Only when it moves do you see it. But these coils hold a hidden volatile dynamism within themselves. So kundalini is referred to as a coiled cobra because this tremendous energy exists within each and every human being, but until it moves, you never realize it is there.

To live a full-fledged physical life, a minuscule amount of this physical energy is adequate. Only when the need to transcend physicality happens do you need a burst of energy which will launch you beyond this reality. It is like the difference in the quantum of energy required in air travel and in a rocket launch. Flying within the atmosphere is one thing and breaking the atmospheric barrier for space travel is quite another. Similarly, transcending physicality requires another dimension of energy altogether.

There is not a single Indian temple where there is no image of a snake. This is not because this is a culture of serpent worshippers. It signifies that a sacred space holds the possibility of arousing the unmanifest energies in you.

Snakes are known to be highly perceptive creatures. (Part of the reason for this of course is that they are stone deaf and perceive only reverberation.) The snake is particularly drawn to a person who is meditative. In the tradition, it is always said that if a yogi is meditating in a place, there will be a snake somewhere nearby. If your energies become still, the snake is naturally drawn to you.

Though physically there is a world of a difference between a snake and a human being, it is very close in terms of its energy system. If you encounter a cobra in the wild, you might find it coming into your hands without any resistance because its energies and yours are so akin to each other. Unless your chemistry shows alarm which it interprets as danger, the snake has no intention of giving up its venom, which is its wealth, the medicinal properties of which are being increasingly acknowledged in the world today.

Historically, of course, the snake has received much bad press because of the biblical story of Adam and Eve. But if you examine the tale closely, you’ll see it is the snake that initiated life on this planet. Otherwise there was just a dumb couple who didn’t know what to do with themselves. You and I wouldn’t have been here without that wonderful serpent!

Ultimately, the rising of the kundalini energy sets the basis for a much larger perception of life. Traditional images of Adiyogi, or Shiva, depict a snake with him to indicate that his perception is at its peak. Only if energy rises to a certain level of intensity and volume can reality be perceived in its utmost purity. Otherwise every other karmic imprint that we have (which goes right back to the single-celled creature that we once were millennia ago) will interfere with the way we perceive reality.

DIANETICS: Introduction

Reference: Hubbard 1950: Dianetics TMSMH

These are some comments based on the Introduction of Dianetics from the book, DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH.

NOTE: Winter wrote the introduction to the first edition of the DIANETICS book. A year later, he critiqued only minor assumptions and outrageous claims of Hubbard in a book whose cover is reproduced above. After about 70 years, we are now in a position to navigate through the hype of Hubbard, and really strengthen the actual discovery of Dianetics—that there are impressions in the mind generated by traumas that underlie consciousness and influence human thinking, health and behavior.

.

Comments on
Introduction

KEY WORDS: Unconsciousness, Engrams

This introduction by physician J. A. Winter states, “In the creation of any New Idea, there is one step which is highly important. It is so obvious as to be frequently overlooked. This step, the sine qua non of any idea, consists in examining the basic assumptions of the subject and determining whether or not they need to be revised. The creator of a New Idea asks, ‘What would happen if I assume that this belief which everyone has had for centuries isn’t necessarily so?’”

The above statement defines Subject Clearing too. What makes Dianetics so revolutionary, and at the same time evolutionary, is that it examines the basic assumptions underlying the subject of life and the functioning of the mind. Dianetics exposes some of these assumptions.

One of the assumptions has been that the mind cannot record what is happening in the environment when the person is unconscious.

In Dianetics therapy, impressions  from the periods of unconsciousness were found to exist in the mind. This led to the speculation of impressions from existence prior to birth, such as, in the womb, or in the DNA. Such past impressions have been known as samskara in the ancient Vedic philosophy. It is interesting to note that, in Buddhism, the mind is considered to be an organ of perception. We, therefore, have six organs of perception—touch, sight, hearing, smell, taste and the mental matrix.

The actual discovery of Dianetics is that the mind is capable of recording events, such as, severe injury, delirium, or surgical anesthesia, while the person appears to be unconscious. Such recordings normally stay below the level of consciousness, but can be retrieved back into consciousness with some effort.

Such recordings, called ENGRAMS, are susceptible to reactivation during future periods of mental anguish. The engram, hidden beneath unexplored layers of “unconsciousness,” possesses a power of command not unlike that of a post-hypnotic suggestion, in a far more insidious and tragic effect. This fact has been found to be a single, direct source of aberrated behavior in Man. 

Winter states, “We should feel free to examine the basic assumptions of any body of knowledge we wish, without fear of committing lese majeste. If any system of thought is going to wither in the light of investigation, it does not deserve the title of Authority.”

Soon after a very successful publication of Dianetics in May 1950, Hubbard, the originator of Dianetics, started to act as an Authority. Dr. Winter, who served as the medical director of the Hubbard’s Dianetics Research Foundation, resigned in October 1950, stating “there was a difference between the ideals inherent within the dianetics hypothesis and the actions of the Foundation.” He published A Doctor’s Report on Dianetics in 1951 (see the image above), that was critical of Hubbard’s Authority. Some detail’s of Winter’s book may be found at Early Scientology / Dianetics – 1950.

It is important to look beyond the Authority of Hubbard at the actual scientific facts that support or deny the claims made by Hubbard with respect to Dianetics.

.

DIANETICS: Synopsis

Reference: Hubbard 1950: Dianetics TMSMH

These are some comments based on the Synopsis of Dianetics from the book, DIANETICS: THE MODERN SCIENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH.

.

Comments on
Synopsis

KEY WORDS: Dianetics, Individuality, Survival

Dianetics was more or less theoretical at the time this book was published, and lots of kinks remained to be smoothed out of its procedure. But it was a great step forward.

Dianetics was designed to handle the psychosomatic causes of illnesses. Shocks and pains were the starting points for looking for the cause that contributed to all illnesses and aberrations. This was identified as engram (cellular impression) because of past trauma. Resolution of illnesses occurred when these engrams were located and desensitized through repeated recounting.

Finding the engram took a lot of clever guessing and questioning on the part of the auditor, since the preclear (the patient) was under reverie and passively obeying auditor’s commands. This yielded at least one engram per case. The running of the engram was usually quite dramatic and affected the case positively.

Locating and resolving the engrams do yield some remarkable results.

However, the rest of the case was not that easy to resolve. Other anomalies that made up the majority of the case were mostly out of reach of Dianetics. Thus, Dianetics results have been quite dramatic but limited in terms of resolving the whole case of a person.

Dianetics’ assertion, “The problems of thought and mental function can be resolved within the bounds of the finite universe,” is quite logical. This approach was taken by Buddha 2600 years ago. It freed Buddhism from mysticism and metaphysics.

Hubbard’s states, “THE DYNAMIC PRINCIPLE OF EXISTENCE IS: SURVIVE!” An individual is surviving along four “dynamics” as follows:

Hubbard’s principle, however, fixes his whole philosophy on survival such that evolution is ignored. The truth is that the individual and the rest of the universe is surviving with the goal to EVOLVE.

The stated goal of Dianetics therapy is to clear the individual of all his mental and physical aberrations. This means freeing the person from all fixations so he can operate freely. But this includes freeing the individual from fixation on his survival. Many individuals have been fixated on personal survival so much that they have been dreaming of immortality in terms of their souls living forever. But, the truth is:

No specific individuality survives permanently. All individualities go through life cycles, so that the consciousness of the universe evolves toward Knowingness.

The current situation in all civilized societies around the world is the focus of individuals on personal survival. Such individuals are unable to evolve beyond living on the first dynamic. Evolution requires willingness to live as well as to die. An individual fixated on living will crave for immortality of his individuality. He will resist death at all costs. He cannot sacrifice himself willingly when circumstances ask for it. 

This is an aspect of the mental impression or engram. When this is shared by all humanity it becomes a “fourth dynamic engram.” This particular fourth dynamic engram is FIXATION ON FIRST DYNAMIC SURVIVAL.

Dianetics, which focuses on the individual, is not capable of handling this fourth dynamic engram of fixation on survival. 

There is no individual decision-making beyond the “body-mind system.” The individual soul is still part of the body-mind system. The “spirit” energizes the body-mind system, just as electricity energizes a machine. There is no individuality in the realm of spirit. Yet, Dianetics seems to postulate “spirit” to have individuality, which is spelled out later in Scientology as “Thetan.” Buddhism has no such concept of a permanent soul, thetan or atman.

But there is consciousness that goes beyond individuality. The true “I” represents a certain level of consciousness.

There are a lot of good ideas in Dianetics, and there is no intention here to minimize the effectiveness of Dianetics in making the sick well. But the handling the whole case of a person requires the handling of the fourth dynamic engram. Dianetics, and its extension, Scientology, is not designed to handle that. Buddhism, on the other hand, is designed to handle the fourth dynamic engram and it can use the technology developed in Dianetics.

Dianetic engrams are just a few low hanging fruits that do bring significant relief on the first dynamic of a person. But the Dianetic therapy does not bring about the evolution of the individual in expanding his viewpoint, or “I,” to other dynamics.

It may be possible to greatly enhance the value of Dianetics by aligning its techniques with the postulates of Buddhism.