Category Archives: Uncategorized

The Secret of Hypnotism

Hyp3
Reference: The Nature of Hypnotism

The secret of hypnotism lies in the compartmentalization of the reality of a person. Broadly, it works as follows:

  1. Break down the reality of a person into compartments.

  2. Fix the attention of the person at the compartment level.

  3. Make irrational items appear rational within the confines of that compartment.

.

An example would be as follows.

  • People generally go clothed in public. That is rational in most societies.
  • People unclothe themselves in the security of their bedroom. That is also rational.
  • “Being in public” or “being in bedroom” are two different compartments of reality.
  • A person’s reality may be compartmentalized and focused on “being in bedroom.”
  • This person, regardless of where he is, feels the security of his bedroom.
  • He could then be made to unclothe himself in public easily.

This is an extreme example, and this particular hypnotism may rarely work, but this illustration makes the following point.

By restricting the context of thinking, a person can be made to believe that he is thinking and behaving in a rational manner, whereas it would be irrational in a broader context.

Thus, certain thinking and behavior that is irrational in society can be made to look rational to the person within the confines of a cult. He would never think that he is acting irrationally.

Of course, there are other aspects to hypnotism. It is not only one’s thinking, but also the autonomic nervous system that can be controlled through hypnotism. Unfortunately, this latter aspect gets noticed mostly because it is dramatic.

.

Yoga: Aligning to the Source

The Guru Complex

guru3
Reference: Inconsistency in KHTK

When a person is moving through his life as if hypnotized, the entrance point to resolving his case is attention. Maybe his attention was free when he was a child, but now he adheres to irrational beliefs and strange rituals to get by in life. This is because he has a lot of unresolved inconsistencies stacked on top of each other.

He does not recognize the inconsistency that is so obvious to you because he has probably explained it to himself as life. Such earlier inconsistencies are somehow taken for granted by him because his attention is now on inconsistencies stacked on top of them.

The inconsistency available to be resolved in any case is the one where the person’s attention now rests.

.

An inconsistency becomes obvious to you only after you have resolved it for yourself. There may be other inconsistencies in you that you are not yet aware of. As you see in others those inconsistencies that you have resolved for yourself, you want others to resolve them too. But you do not know how inconsistencies are stacked up in the other person. He may need to resolve some other inconsistency first.

But if you feel compelled that the other person should be resolving some inconsistency that is so very obvious to you, then there is something wrong with your effort. You are trying to bypass the order in which inconsistencies are stacked up in his case. This compulsion points to some inconsistency in you that you are not aware of.

If a person feels compelled to rid another person of some aberration, with no regard to whether it is accessible, then it is an inconsistency.

.

The Guru complex refers to this compulsion to help a person. One tries to resolve the case of the other person in the same sequence that one resolved it for oneself. It ignores the fact that some other sequence may be more helpful to the other person.

You cannot assume that the other person needs to resolve the inconsistency that is obvious to you. All you can do is carefully observe his attention and assist him in resolving the inconsistency that he is struggling with. This may even help you resolve some inconsistency that you are not aware of. This is how Application of Mindful Discussion works.

This Guru Complex (compulsion to help randomly) may be resolved through Mindful Discussion.

.

The Nature of Awareness (Part 4)

self3
October 1, 2014
This issue is now obsolete. For latest reference please see: The Human-Centric Fixation.

.

Reference: The Nature of Awareness (Part 3)

The idea that an observer must be separate from what is being observed implies that the observer can never observe itself. To observe oneself one would require separation from oneself. This leads to an infinite regression of observers. Whenever we run into infinite regression there is some inconsistency. Such inconsistency comes from holding a human-centric viewpoint.

The idea that an observer must be separate from what is being observed comes from a human-centric viewpoint.

.

It is reality that is being observed from a viewpoint. But a viewpoint is also part of reality. It is reality looking at itself from different angles.  So it becomes possible to observe oneself when one assumes the much broader reality-centric viewpoint. One simply recognizes reality for what it is. From this viewpoint the observer is not separate from what is observed.

In truth there is no such separation because it is reality observing itself from different angles.

.

In human-centric view it is assumed that observer is associated with a beingness that is separate from the reality. This “beingness” is made up of humanlike awareness. In truth, all reality is made up of awareness, and humanlike awareness has simply evolved from it. It is not separate from reality. There is nothing unique or permanent about beingness that separates it from the rest of reality. Beingness is changing all the time like the rest of reality. It is the human-centric viewpoint that considers it to be permanent and separate from reality.

Observer is a viewpoint that is changing all the time being part of reality. 

.

The observer needs not be fixed permanently to a body, or have permanent characteristics of any kind. It is totally transparent in itself. It simply reflects reality for what it is from a particular angle. That angle is changing all the time.

Observer simply reflects reality for what it is from different angles.

.

Observer may try to differentiate itself by acquiring filters and act as relatively permanent. It no longer sees reality as it is. It distorts reality through its make up of filters.  An example of this is the human-centric viewpoint, which assumes certain human characteristics through which it filters reality.

The human-centric viewpoint considers human self to be unique. permanent and separate from reality.

.

It is the human-centric viewpoint that made us believe:

(1) Earth is at the center of the universe.

(2) The Sun revolves around the earth.

(3) The earth is flat.

And now it is making us believe that self not only stands separate from reality, but it also creates this reality.

The reality-centric viewpoint assumed by science is much broader. That viewpoint is also reflected in mindfulness.

.

The Nature of Awareness (Part 3)

Lagoon Nebula
October 1, 2014
This issue is now obsolete. For latest reference please see: The Human-Centric Fixation.

.

Reference: The Nature of Awareness (Part 2)

Let’s look more closely at the “human-centric” view of awareness.  A stone does not respond to its environment with animation, so it is not aware. An animal responds to his environment with animation, but objectively only, so he is partially aware.  But a human being can respond to his environment objectively, as well as subjectively. He is aware of being aware. That is the true measure of awareness.

From human-centric viewpoint, it is the subjectivity of humans that defines awareness.

.

But the universe did not start with humans. In the time frame of this universe, humanity is a very recent development. Humanlike subjective awareness exists only now that there are humans. The “human-centric” viewpoint shall like to think that humanlike awareness has been there since the beginning of time. To make it so, it projects its humanlike awareness into a God, and claims that this God created the universe.

The human-centric viewpoint claims humanlike awareness to exist before the universe started.

.

Awareness cannot exist without something to be aware of. Therefore, God awareness cannot exist prior to the universe. If God awareness was aware of itself then the beginning universe would be that awareness. And this awareness shall arise from non-awareness.

The human-centric viewpoint leads to the concept of a universe at the beginning that had humanlike awareness.

.

Basic awareness corresponds to relative motion. The primitive motion has the form of light. Humanlike attributes consist of very complex motion. Therefore, the beginning universe is more likely to have the form of light than something with humanlike attributes. See The Nature of Awareness (Part 2).

From reality-centric viewpoint the beginning universe is more likely to start as “light” than with human attributes.

.

From reality-centric viewpoint awareness may be defined as the characteristics of existence. Light will have the characteristics of fundamental motion as awareness. Stone will have characteristics of its physical and chemical properties as its awareness. Plants will have their characteristics of germinating and growing as their awareness, and so on. Humans will have the most complex characteristics as their awareness.

Awareness is truly the characteristics of existence. Awareness starts with the simplest form of light and evolves into the most complex form of humans.

.

The universe does not start with a humanlike awareness that is projected as God. That is just a human-centric viewpoint, which may be compared to the viewpoint, such as, “earth is at the center of the universe.” The universe is simply an evolution of awareness as relative motion from simple to complex. Divinity lies in this evolution and not separate from it.

The reality-centric view of God is one that has evolved with the universe. This concept of God is much more abstract than humanlike.

.

Next: The Nature of Awareness (Part 4)

.