Vinaire's Blog

Reference: The Dianetics Axioms

L. Ron Hubbard found that man is obeying very definite laws and rules which could be set forward in axioms. The very first and most fundamental of these is: The dynamic principle of existence is survive. That is the basic axiom of Dianetics.

The original Dianetic axioms are referenced below in black.

In color are corresponding axioms as seen through Postulate Mechanics (PM).

.

Executive Summary 2025

Pain is the randomity produced by sudden or strong counter-efforts, which is stored as that randomity in the mental matrix. When restimulated, it can reinflict itself upon the organism.

Past pain becomes ineffective upon the organism when the randomity of its area is addressed and aligned. Later areas of plus or minus randomity cannot be realigned easily until earlier areas are realigned.

Absolute good and absolute evil do not exist in this universe. That which is good for an organism allows it to evolve, and even assists its evolution. That which is evil inhibits the organism’s ability to assimilate. Happiness consists in assimilating hitherto unassimilated sensations that have been resistive.

Optimum survival behavior consists of effort on the dynamics in accordance with the natural laws. The worth of any organism consists of its value to the evolution along any dynamic.

.

Axioms 181-194

DN AXIOM 181: Pain is stored as plus or minus randomity

PM AXIOM 181: Pain is stored as plus or minus randomity.

.

DN AXIOM 182: Pain, as an area of plus or minus randomity, can reinflict itself upon the organism.

PM AXIOM 182: Pain, as an area of plus or minus randomity, can reinflict itself upon the organism.

.

DN AXIOM 183: Past pain becomes ineffective upon the organism when the randomity of its area is addressed and aligned.

PM AXIOM 183: Past pain becomes ineffective upon the organism when the randomity of its area is addressed and aligned.

.

DN AXIOM 184: The earlier the area of plus or minus randomity, the greater self-produced effort existed to repel it.

When a plus or minus randomity is first introduced, it has to be quite intense to not be assimilated. Later randomity is not assimilated mainly because it has similarity to earlier non-assimilated randomity. Therefore, the earlier is the area of plus or minus randomity, the greater is its resistance to assimilation.

PM AXIOM 184: The earlier the area of unassimilated sensation, the greater resistance it puts against assimilation.

.

DN AXIOM 185: Later areas of plus or minus randomity cannot be realigned easily until earlier areas are realigned.

Earlier areas lies nearer to the core of the randomity; whereas, later areas are toward the periphery.

PM AXIOM 185: Later areas of plus or minus randomity cannot be realigned easily until earlier areas are realigned.

.

DN AXIOM 186: Areas of plus or minus randomity become increased in activity when perceptions of similarity are introduced into them.

PM AXIOM 186: Areas of plus or minus randomity become increased in activity when perceptions of similarity are introduced into them.

.

DN AXIOM 187: Past areas of plus or minus randomity can be reduced and aligned by address to them in present time.

PM AXIOM 187: Past areas of plus or minus randomity can be reduced and aligned by address to them in present time.

.

DN AXIOM 188: Absolute good and absolute evil do not exist in the mest universe.

PM AXIOM 188: Absolute good and absolute evil do not exist in this universe.

.

DN AXIOM 189: That which is good for an organism may be defined as that which promotes the survival of that organism. 

COROLLARY: Evil may be defined as that which inhibits or brings plus or minus randomity into the organism, which is contrary to the survival motives of the organism.

PM AXIOM 189: That which is good for an organism allows it to evolve, and even assists its evolution. That which is evil inhibits the organism’s ability to assimilate.

.

DN AXIOM 190: Happiness consists in the act of bringing alignment into hitherto resisting plus or minus randomity. Neither the act or action of attaining survival, nor the accomplishment of this act itself, brings about happiness.

PM AXIOM 190: Happiness consists in assimilating hitherto unassimilated sensations that have been resistive.

.

DN AXIOM 191: Construction is an alignment of data. 

COROLLARY: Destruction is a plus or minus randomity of data. The effort of constructing is the alignment toward the survival of the aligning organism. Destruction is the effort of bringing randomity into an area.

PM AXIOM 191: Construction is alignment of data with the natural laws. Destruction is the effort of bringing randomity into an area.

.

DN AXIOM 192: Optimum survival behavior consists of effort in the maximum survival interest in everything concerned in the dynamics.

PM AXIOM 192: Optimum survival behavior consists of effort on the dynamics in accordance with the natural laws.

.

DN AXIOM 193: The optimum survival solution of any problem would consist of the highest attainable survival for every dynamic concerned.

PM AXIOM 193: The optimum survival solution of any problem would consist of the highest attainable survival for every dynamic concerned.

.

DN AXIOM 194: The worth of any organism consists of its value to the survival of its own THETA along any dynamic.

PM AXIOM 194: The worth of any organism consists of its value to the evolution along any dynamic.

.

Reference: The Book of Subject Clearing

If you really want to go after the cruelty of the Church of Scientology, and eliminate it once and for all, then you have to generate and promote a grassroots version of Scientology that is free, doable and effective.

The grassroots’ version of Scientology is rooted in Buddhism, as Scientology was originally conceived to be. It is unlike the Scientology promoted by the Church of Scientology that uses the therapist-patient model borrowed from psychotherapy. This grassroots version of Scientology is Self-Help.

.

Grassroots Version and E-meter

The e-meter is not used in the Grassroots version, which uses The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness instead. By drilling on these 12 aspects of Mindfulness, a person develops an internal sensitivity for processing one’s own mind. This internal sensitivity replaces the dependence on the E-meter.

.

Grassroots Version and End Phenomenon (EP)

Scientology uses the technique of “repetitive questioning” to make a person look closely at an auditing question. This makes the person search his mind for answers. A Scientology process is not ended until some realization (called EP) takes place. Very often this ends up in overrunning the process. “Overrun” means continuing a process past the optimum point. The “overrun” then requires repair and wastes valuable auditing time.

In the grassroots version, the person does not search his mind for answers. He simply contemplates on the question by being there and confronting. He has enough sensitivity to know ahead of time if a new answer to the auditing question is accessible or not. If it is, he waits for the answer to appear. When there are no more answers appearing, the person ends the process.

A person can always go back to a process and run it again. As his confront improves, more answers become accessible. So, even when there is no EP in the first attempt, there will certainly be realizations in subsequent attempts in running a process. And there will also come a point, when the person knows that he is done with a process, or a Grade, and he is ready to move on.

.

Grassroots Version and Solo Auditing

The grassroots version does not use the therapist-patient model of psychotherapy, in which a therapist (or auditor) uses some theory to figure out what is wrong with a person in each moment, and tries to handle that wrongness. Such an approach is prone to many errors because the therapist can never be fully in the shoes of the person. Such errors of “external evaluation” are avoided when the person uses mindfulness approach in grassroots Scientology.

Of course, there are going to be a small percentage of people who would not be able to apply the mindfulness approach of grassroots version without some initial help. Such help may be provided by field auditors at a reasonable cost. Otherwise, the grassroots version is free.

.

Prerequisite

One should start with Handling Introversion.

Then do the drills provided in The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness.

Then do TR0 with Mindfulness with a friend or another person.

You can always do these basic actions (prerequisites) whenever you need to free up your attention. Recycling through them now and then is very helpful.

.

Scientology Grades

A person contemplates on the grade processes in the “TR0 mode”, with all the 12 aspects of mindfulness naturally present.

The Scientology Grades focus on the fixations of a person due to his IDENTIFICATIONS with the universe. Each grade is made up of processes that address a different level of fixation. The person may do a grade level several times until he is satisfied with it. He may then move to the next grade level. These grades are done in the following order.

1. ARC Straight wire Processes
2. Grade 0 Processes (Communications Release)
3. Grade 1 Processes (Problems Release)
4. Grade 2 Processes (Relief Release)
5. Grade 3 Processes (Freedom Release)
6. Grade 4 Processes (Ability Release)
7. Grade 5 Exercises (Power Release)
8. Grade 6 Exercises (Whole Track Release)

One may then recycle through all the grade levels as necessary. This goes very fast with mindfulness and without an e-meter.

.

The OT Levels

Then one may move on to the OT Levels.

OT Levels are accompanied by Subject Clearing as the continuing process of OT VIII.

.

Dianetics

The erasure on Dianetics fully occurs at the level of NOTs (New Era Dianetics for OTs). The procedure of NOTs shall be added when it is fully researched for Grassroots Scientology.

.

Notes

1. Scientology focuses on the RIGHT MINDFULNESS section of the Eight-Fold Path of Buddhism. To understand Scientology properly, you may want to study the following “subject-cleared” summary of Buddhism: SC: Buddhism.
2. To understand the philosophy underlying Scientology, you may go to this link: Scientology Research.
3. If you are willing to follow the Grassroots Scientology program as a solo auditor, I shall be happy to work with you as your C/S (Case Supervisor). It is all free, of course, for the sake of humanity that is soon going to be challenged by Artificial Intelligence.

.

Reference: Scientology OT Levels

William Chad Holland is a good friend of mine. He s a retired psychotherapist with Scientology experience. He did OT levels in the seventies and trained up to Class VIII and C/Sed at the San Francisco Org. 

When I asked Chad about his experience on OTII, his response was as follows:

My experience on OT II, as well the Clearing Course and other OT levels, was profound. When I realized that the focus of the Clearing Course and many of the OT levels was working to diffuse polarities, and blow charge on dichotomies, I was intrigued and ready to audit the processes. I thought I knew from exposure to Eastern thought that any work toward wholeness, inclusiveness, and oneness, was a good thing.

My end phenomena from these Scientology processes were a sense of peace, compassion, and expanded consciousness. However, even though i tried to imagine Hubbard’s whole track bank incidents as literal and my personal facsimiles, I couldn’t. But rather, I saw the LRH content as suggestive and archetypical. Still, I was willing to run each and every process and drill on the content that LRH presented. I ran most OT processes several times, and I realized that in many cases I might be “mocking up” incidents or pulling together fragments of memories, thoughts, and assumptions—from who knows where. I remember letting go of judgement, not caring whether I was actually contacting an historical Hubbard track event presented in the data or engaging in the power to create and then explode my own mocked up facsimiles and narratives. My only gauge of success was whether or not a particular OT exercise provided the end point of catharsis, insight, and or expanded consciousness.

Although Scientology processing was a boon for me, maintaining those early gains is most always a work in progress, but it is usually an enjoyable exercise. I thank LRH for triggering in me an incipient realization and joy of connectedness; a new dimension of understanding that I was something beyond the confines of my own skin. Ironically, Hubbard seemingly couldn’t give himself the gift of his own transformative teaching. I remember reading a confidential note on one of the higher OT levels. Paraphrasing Hubbard’s arcane message, it read something like this: The big lie is that We Are All One. This assumption seems contrary to my understanding that the intent of processing at advanced levels is to create a sense of inclusion and oneness with all of existence. So I was left with one more dichotomy. But what do I really know?

Chad

This response resonated with me. It is a beautiful response stated in a very simple and sincere manner. I believe that what one gets out from OT Levels depends on the way one approaches them. Simplicity, sincerity and honesty with oneself are the key factors.

.