I can think of a couple of consistent considerations about this. The first is as you state, that truth can never be declared. And so just like unknowable, truth is, well, er, uh, unknowable!
One more example would be the calculus of speed vs location. It is said that we cannot accuratelly discern both the velocity and location at any moment. However, if we nail a precise enough location, give enough information, then the speed can be established, which would be zero. On the one hand, if we look at an abstraction from some small distance, we see the theater. If we look closely, we begin to abstract the processes themselves. BUT if we look very very closely, we can get an answer for the original question about the original abstraction, which in this case the rate of speed is zero or unchanged.
Another consistent view of this is mathematically. Life and existence is irrational. But that irrationality may be stopped at any point and the relative truth CAN be known. Such as the 15th place of Pi. It can be known. We just have to condition our questions and not make them into paradoxes, riddles, and generally disingenuous. If we ask a closed ended question, then we can get an absolute answer. But if we ask what I call a disingenuous question such as what is the sum total of the ever changing everything, then we have simply been disingenuous.
dis·in·gen·u·ous [dis-in-jen-yoo-uhs]
adjective
lacking in frankness, candor, or sincerity; falsely or hypocritically ingenuous; insincere: Her excuse was rather disingenuous.
.
in·gen·u·ous [in-jen-yoo-uhs]
adjective
1. free from reserve, restraint, or dissimulation; candid; sincere.
2. artless; innocent; naive.
3. Obsolete . honorable or noble.
Origin:
1590–1600; < Latin ingenuus native, free-born, honorable, frank, equivalent to in- in-2 + gen- (base of gignere; see ingenious) + -uus deverbal adj. suffix; see -ous
Comments
I can think of a couple of consistent considerations about this. The first is as you state, that truth can never be declared. And so just like unknowable, truth is, well, er, uh, unknowable!
LikeLike
#1 – Lie is a cooperative act… Power of the lie emerges when someone else agrees to believe the lie.
#2 – We are against lying… but we are covertly for it.
.
LikeLike
One more example would be the calculus of speed vs location. It is said that we cannot accuratelly discern both the velocity and location at any moment. However, if we nail a precise enough location, give enough information, then the speed can be established, which would be zero. On the one hand, if we look at an abstraction from some small distance, we see the theater. If we look closely, we begin to abstract the processes themselves. BUT if we look very very closely, we can get an answer for the original question about the original abstraction, which in this case the rate of speed is zero or unchanged.
LikeLike
Another consistent view of this is mathematically. Life and existence is irrational. But that irrationality may be stopped at any point and the relative truth CAN be known. Such as the 15th place of Pi. It can be known. We just have to condition our questions and not make them into paradoxes, riddles, and generally disingenuous. If we ask a closed ended question, then we can get an absolute answer. But if we ask what I call a disingenuous question such as what is the sum total of the ever changing everything, then we have simply been disingenuous.
LikeLike
dis·in·gen·u·ous [dis-in-jen-yoo-uhs]
adjective
lacking in frankness, candor, or sincerity; falsely or hypocritically ingenuous; insincere: Her excuse was rather disingenuous.
.
in·gen·u·ous [in-jen-yoo-uhs]
adjective
1. free from reserve, restraint, or dissimulation; candid; sincere.
2. artless; innocent; naive.
3. Obsolete . honorable or noble.
Origin:
1590–1600; < Latin ingenuus native, free-born, honorable, frank, equivalent to in- in-2 + gen- (base of gignere; see ingenious) + -uus deverbal adj. suffix; see -ous
.
LikeLike
For me, there is no absolute truth. All truth is relative. I call it consistency. So, consistency means relative truth.
For me, there is no absolute falsehood. All falsehood is relative. I call it inconsistency. So, inconsistency means relative falsehood.
LikeLike
Nice.
LikeLike