Vinaire's Blog

Project: Hubbard 1954: The Phoenix Lectures

This paper presents Chapter 3 from the book THE PHOENIX LECTURES by L. RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original publication of this book by The Church of Scientology (1954).

The paragraphs of the original material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the understanding from Buddhism.  Feedback on these comments is always appreciated.

.

SCIENTOLOGY, ITS GENERAL BACKGROUND (Part 3)

When we look at Buddhism, we don’t wonder that a great change took place in the operating climate of Man, which it certainly did. Rome went under just 800 years later. Now that’s fast, because their whole philosophy shattered. The philosophy of every state operating on force alone and every barbaric society that Buddhism touched — shattered. The first one to go by the boards was, however, India itself. India at that time was a savage and barbaric area, as was China. Japan is still characterized very impolitely by the Chinese, and the civilization of Japan by Buddhism took place almost in modern times. It was completed by America. So there they meet very closely. 

Buddhism shattered the philosophy of every barbaric society and every state that it touched–the philosophy of operating on force alone.

But now, moving forward on the time track over all of these ages, we discover that it took an awfully long time for the Veda to walk forward and emerge as a new knowledge called the Dhyana. And it took quite a little while for the work of Buddha to move out of Asia. But we see the work of Asia itself — not the work of Buddha necessarily — moving out into the Near East. 

Though it took an awfully long time but we see the work of Asia itself — not the work of Buddha necessarily — moving out into the Near East. 

Now there were trade routes that had existed since time immemorial. Man has no real trace of his own roadways, but the trade routes were quite wide open from very, very early times. We find the Phoenician, for instance, trading very neatly and very nicely up around Great Britain and sailing out through the Pillars of Hercules. And I was just last year standing on the edge of a Phoenician ruin which was advertised as a Roman ruin but wasn’t a Roman ruin. It had its inscription in cuneiform, which was a Phoenician script. And this was 1,000 BC. A Phoenician ship then demonstrated at least ten thousand years of sea-faring technology. It was a very complex ship. And Phoenicia spread its empire out through Europe and just from where and what and why, we have no real trace, but Phoenicia is very well within our own teachings, our own history. Well, it was a thousand years after the Phoenicians that we first began, in the western world, to actually aver to a higher level of civilization. For some time, the Hebrew in the Middle East had been worshipping in a certain direction, along certain lines, and they had as one of their sacred books, the Book of Job, and many other of their sacred works were immediately derivable from similar sources. And into this society, apparently, other teachings suddenly entered. Their holy work, known to us as the Old Testament, leans very heavily on the background of philosophy we have been looking at, but it has a rather barbaric flavor, with all due respect to the holy book. It was a long way from home. 

There were trade routes that had existed from East to the West since time immemorial, on which knowledge traveled. The holy work of Hebrews, known as the Old Testament, leans very heavily on the background of the eastern philosophy, but it has a rather barbaric flavor.

And we discover the civilized aspect of that religion which we know of in the western world as Christianity, taking place of course at the year 1. Now we find that that’s of no importance to us except that everybody who writes a date out is talking about the man we’re talking about, when he puts down A.D. Now when he puts down B.C. we are dating our very calendar from this incident I am discussing here. 

The principles known as Buddhism included those of course of love thy neighbor, abstain from the use of force. These principles appeared in Asia Minor at the beginning of our own date, and I am not, by the way, discounting even vaguely the work of Christ, or Christ himself. 

The principles of love thy neighbor, and abstain from the use of force, that were known as Buddhism, appeared in Asia Minor at the beginning of our own date as the teachings of Christ.

Traditionally Christ is supposed to have studied in India. One doesn’t hear of him until he is thirty years of age, and he was a carpenter and so on — one hears of a lot of things, but we also hear this persistent legend that he had studied in India. Well, this would, of course, be a very acceptable datum, in view of the fact that the basic philosophy about which he was talking was a philosophy which had been extant in India, at this time, for about 500 years. Little less than 500 years. It was about that time that it moved out of that area, having taken over, by that time, two thirds of the earth’s populace, but we don’t quite recognize our Europe, if we think of it as a thriving culture. It was not a culture even twelve or thirteen hundred years after Christ. 

A mighty conqueror stopped abruptly at the borders of Europe because he was leaving all areas of civilization and he saw no slightest gain in attacking an area where everyone was cloaked in fur loin-cloths. That was Tamerlane — Timuri Lang. 

Traditionally Christ is supposed to have studied in India. The basic philosophy he was talking about had been extant in India, at this time, for about 500 years. Europe was not civilized then.

Now when we look at the Middle Eastern picture we find ourselves looking at the rise of a philosophy which, however interpreted, however since utilized, is nevertheless a thoroughly interesting philosophy. You have told a preclear, I’m sure, to get his attention off those energy flows and to get some space. And when he could tolerate that, he then could change his considerations. 

Do you suppose for a moment that a preclear can actually get anywhere if he continues to use force? Well whether we try to put this in to a public practice, such as turn the other cheek, or use it for Theta Clearing — the emancipation of exteriorization of a soul — we are certainly looking at the same fact. And we are looking at the words of Gautama Buddha, however we wish to interpret this. 

At this time we see a rise of a philosophy in Middle East of abstaining force. Use of force fixates attention. One cannot change considerations while attention is so fixed. Therefore, one cannot improve spiritually.

Now the parables which are discovered today in the New Testament are earlier discovered, the same parables, elsewhere in many places. One of them was the Egyptian Book of the Dead, which predates the New Testament considerably. This is love thy neighbor. This is in effect be civilized. And it is abandon the use of force. 

But at the same time, we are talking straight out of the mouth of Moses, so we evidently are at a crossroads of two philosophies, but these two philosophies are both the philosophies of wisdom. 

The parable of love thy neighbor teaches one to abandon the use of force. Moses, however, preached a different philosophy that came from Egypt, but it was wisdom too.

Now the Hebrew definition of Messiah is One Who Brings Wisdom — a teacher. Messiah is from “messenger”, but he is somebody with information and Moses was such a one. And then Christ became such a one. He was a bringer of information. He never announced his sources. He spoke of them as coming from God. But they might just as well have come from the god talked about in the Hymn of the Dawn Child, who, by the way, is rather hard to distinguish from gods talked about later on. The god the Christians worshipped is certainly not the Hebrew god. He looks much more like that one talked about in the Veda. 

Messiah (messenger, teacher) is One Who Brings Wisdom. Moses and Christ spoke of this wisdom as coming from God. The God of the Christians is different from the Hebrew god and more like the god one talked about in the Veda. 

And we come on down from there and we find that we are talking about a meeting place, a sort of melting pot of religious practices stemming from various wisdoms, but the highest amongst those wisdoms is apparently the Veda and the teachings of Gautama Buddha. The parables coming from the Egyptian Book of the Dead and from various other places, were probably not original with the Book of the Dead, so it would not be true that the parables of Christ necessarily came from Egypt, while we know full well that Moses escaped from Egypt, and that the Jewish peoples stem their history from their freedom from bondage in Egypt — not all of their history, but the history which they speak of most in the New Testament. 

Now here we have a great teacher in Moses. We have other Messiahs, and we then arrive with Christ, and the words of Christ were a lesson in compassion and they set a very fine example to the western world, compared to what the western world was doing at that moment. 

Middle East became a melting pot of different philosophies. The wisdom of Christ seem to have come from the Vedas and the Buddha, while the wisdom of Moses came through Egypt.

What were they doing at that time? They were killing men for amusement. They were feeding men to wild beasts for amusement. In the middle reign of Claudius, we find 3,500 men being turned loose, four abreast, divided half and half across a bridge of boats, slaughtering each other for the amusement of the patricians. How long can a society stand up when it is worshipping force to this degree? However these teachings were interpreted, the vein of truth was still here: that an exclusive reliance upon force will bring about a decay and a decadence which is unimaginably terrible. And that was the truth which came through. And so we find the Buddhist principles of brotherly love and compassion, then, appearing in the west 2,000 years ago. 

At that time Europe was worshipping force. The truth that came through from these philosophies, however, was that an exclusive reliance upon force will bring about a decay and a decadence which is unimaginably terrible. 

Now Christianity spread like wildfire throughout Europe. But it was necessary to achieve a certain agreement, and in order to achieve that agreement, many of the practices which you know of today were incorporated into this worship. Basic and early Christianity is not recognizable today in many church practices. It’s just not recognizable. It is very clouded. But these churches themselves recognize as their original source the New Testament, which contains, aside from a few court records and a few legends, all that we know of this particular transition. 

This transition in Europe from the use of force to the abandoning of force is recorded in the New Testament.

But here we have this information poorly interpreted, badly carried, through areas which did not know how to read and write, which is quite different from Asia. And we find this church and that church having to pick into and adopt customs in order to gain any entrance into these new areas. We discover today the worship of the Winter Solstice, in our Christmas. That is German and that is also other barbaric societies. Almost every barbarism that ever existed has worshipped the departure and return of the sun in the northern hemisphere and we find this incorporated into Christianity, and over there we find something else incorporated into Christianity and each time a certain amount of superstition coming into the information line — until we don’t know what was on the information line unless we go back to sources and trace it through clearly and purely. 

But here we have this information poorly interpreted, badly carried, through areas which did not know how to read and write, which was a situation quite different from Asia. 

Then we are again, however, working with wisdom. What wisdom? The wisdom of knowing how to know one’s self to resolve the mystery of life. 

And when this Christianity was interpreted and imported into Europe, there was considerable speculation and resurgence and an enormous amount of hope. The very same thing that the Buddhists hoped for (and this is what is very interesting) became the hope of the Christian world. Emancipation — from the body. The survival and immortality of the human soul. 

And although there was a cult in Rome which had this idea, it itself had no great antiquity, and it had evidently stemmed over from Persia, which was closer yet. The Christian impact wiped out this other cult but that’s because actually they were just alike and one couldn’t distinguish one from the other and the Christians won. 

But in spite of this poor interpretation Christianity brought the very same thing that Buddhism hoped for—emancipation from the body and immortality of the human soul.

Now we have this immortality, this hope of salvation, being expressed throughout Europe and they expound it and they find it expedient to keep extending it, because they keep promising people that it was just about to occurr, the day of judgment was just about to occurr. Now we can get this as a sort of barbaric interpretation of what Gautama Buddha was talking about, the emancipation of the soul from the cycle of births and deaths. And then we get the fact that there is going to be a day when somebody blows a horn and it’s all going to occurr. We don’t know what barbarism that superstition came from, but we have that superstition today in our society. The Day of judgment. 

The Day of Judgment is a barbaric interpretation of what Gautama Buddha was talking about, the emancipation of the soul from the cycle of births and deaths.

At first, Hell was only the fact that Rome was going to disappear in a sea of lava — and everyone wanted to see Rome die. And that recruited people left and right. They promised them that Rome was going to disappear in a sea of molten lava. And they tried to prove it in Nero’s reign, by burning the place down. Well, they didn’t have a great deal of success doing it. Rome went on surviving and was finally taken over entirely and has since been the orientation point of Christianity. 

At first, Hell was only the fact that Rome was going to disappear in a sea of lava, then it was taken over and became the orientation point of Christianity.

A thousand years or so after Christ they started to try to take back the actual birth place of Christ in Jerusalem, and there’s been a considerable argument going on about it, back and forth, ever since. 

But the orientation point was placed at the only stable point, because that was the part of the world to which all roads led, and that became the dissemination point of all this information. But Rome split off and went back to Constantinople and we had then the Constantinople branch of this church and it, however, received its biggest blow when Russia suddenly turned completely atheist. We don’t hear too much of that church any more. 

But we still hear a great deal in the western world of this church at Rome. It is still there. 

The church at Rome is the main dissemination point of all this information in the western world today.

The use of Christianity was to produce a certain civilized state and many people would blacken Christianity by saying it reduced people down to a very low level indeed. This is not true. It took an entire world of slaves and it made free men out of them. This in itself was quite a gain. It took a world which worshipped exclusively force and matter and made it recognize that sooner or later one would have to turn to the fact that he had a soul. 

Christianity took an entire world of slaves and it made free men out of them. This is quite a gain.

Now, remember that Christianity in its basic wisdoms is still available to us in the New Testament, and that this, no matter how it has come through the line, is quickly and swiftly traceable back to the Veda. We have a consistent track here. The same message is coming through. The Christian god is actually much better characterized in the Vedic Hymns than in any subsequent publication, including the Old Testament. The Old Testament doesn’t make nearly as good a statement of what the Christians think of as God as does the Veda. 

Christianity in its basic wisdoms is still available to us in the New Testament, and this, is quickly traceable back to the Veda. The Old Testament doesn’t make nearly as good a statement of what the Christians think of as God as does the Veda. 

We have the loss of the trade routes somewhere in the vicinity of 1,000 A.D. Now, there was an enormous period of non-communication there. What had happened was Ghengis Khan, the various hordes which had been trying to pour out of Russia had cut the trade routes time and time again, and the amount of unrest in the area, and the taking of Baghdad and Jerusalem by such people. Of course, it kept these routes cut. You couldn’t travel safely between these two worlds. And we find that communication doesn’t open up again, not really, until some time in the 17th century.

In the middle of the 17th century, we find certain eastern practices beginning to show up in France, and there are many books being published saying you could do this and you could do that and you’d achieve something more closely related to religious philosophy than Europe was accustomed to. 

We have the loss of the trade routes somewhere in the vicinity of 1,000 A.D.; and we find that communication doesn’t open up again until some time in the 17th century. We then find certain eastern philosophy and practices beginning to show up in France.

Now, quite incidentally, during this period, a navigator who should have taken more lessons but fortunately didn’t, by the name of Christopher Columbus, discovered America. He was simply trying to get to Asia, because everybody knew everybody in Asia knew everything and had everything and so you had to get to Asia. And he ran into America, fortunately, because he miscomputed the size of the earth so grossly that he would have perished out in the endless oceans if there hadn’t been a continent there to receive him. 

Christopher Columbus was simply trying to get to Asia when he discovered America.

He was a very wise man — he discovered among other things a variation of the compass — but he failed. It was up to the Portuguese to continue around the bottom of the Cape of Good Hope and open the lanes to Europe and as soon as we get them open, we first find all of this information flooding in, information suddenly starting to appear, parts of the Veda starting to appear, various practices of Buddhism, Zen-Buddhism, other things start to crop up in Europe and right along with this, we begin to get such things as The Arabian Nights and in the middle of the 18th century, we get what you might call a renaissance of literature, the birth of the novel and so forth, coincident with the introduction of The Arabian Nights into France. A fascinating flood of information came in at about that time and the culture had already, during the Renaissance, picked up considerably, but the Renaissance was right in there with Marco Polo and we find some other interesting routes were open during that time. People had managed to get through. This is no attempt to tell you that everything was invented by Asia, but Asia had a tradition of information. They had kept their records, which was not true of the western world, and so the information was there and you might say it was a depository of knowledge which might just as well have originated in the western world, gone to Asia, been put on file and come back again. I don’t care how you would trace this one way or the other, but we still find that it was the repository of all the wisdom there was in the world at that time. And it has more or less continued so. 

When the Portuguese did open the lanes to Europe, we find all of this information from the East flooding in, and a renaissance of arts and literature taking place. Asia, basically, served as a repository of wisdom.

Philosophers, from the early Greeks on forward, made the first division in wisdom: they said there is wisdom about the soul, and there is wisdom about the physical universe, and there is some speculation about life. And this is the tradition of the Greek philosopher and it has come forward to us as represented in people like Kant, Schopenhauer or Nietzsche — interesting material, and oddly enough those writings are coincident with new releases of Asian information in Europe. If you had ever convinced Schopenhauer he was writing nothing but sacred lore he probably would have committed suicide, but he never wrote anything else. 

Now where did we get this artificial breakdown? We got it right there in the Middle East. The Greek came forward, went through Rome, and the philosophic scholarly consecutive line has come to us through barbarisms. What we call science today came to us from a barbarism, Greece, which civilized itself. It’s largely an independent shoot of information. 

Philosophers, from the early Greeks on forward, made the first division in wisdom about the soul and the physical universe. Science has come to us from the development that followed this artificial division of knowledge.

Now the western world specialized in this, and never made enough advance in the humanities with it to bother about. So that today it would gladly — just to fill another test tube full of guck — it would very, very happily blow all of Man off the face of the earth. It is completely divorced from the humanities. 

Where we come to the humanities and where we have to do anything for the humanities or with the humanities, we go straight back, all the way back, as far as we can go, to the Veda, and then come on forward and as long as we’re on that track, we’re on a track which means better men. 

The western world specialized in physical sciences and  never made enough advance in the humanities to bother about. Where we come to the humanities, we go straight back to the Veda.

And when we go on the other track, we’re talking about dead men. We’re talking about dead men in an arena. We’re talking about dead men on battlefields. We’re talking about dead men in cities under atomic bombs. That is the tradition of barbarism. The only thing that has let the western world survive at all was an entirely different track which went back to the sacred lore of 10,000 years ago. 

When we go on the other track of knowledge about the physical universe, we’re talking about dead men, which has been the tradition of barbarism.

Scientology, then, today, could not possibly be characterized as a science the way the western world understands science. Scientology carries forward a tradition of wisdom which concerns itself about the soul and the solution of mysteries of life. It has not deviated. 

Scientology cannot be characterized as a science the way the western world understands science. Scientology carries forward a tradition of wisdom.

The only reason why I would suddenly come up and do something like this in a western culture is a very simple one. I studied in my earliest years, and the first thing I was exposed to in this life, was a rough tough frontier society. Montana. There was nothing tougher than Montana, either in terms of weather or in terms of people. And from there I went over to the completely soft Far East and heaved a long sigh of relief and found out what it meant to be in part of a civilization and the shock was so great to me that I was very deeply impressed. 

Hubbard was greatly impressed when he went from a rough tough frontier society of Montana over to the completely soft and civilized environment of Far East.

And so, although I was a young American, I did pay attention. I had many, many friends in the western hills of China, friends elsewhere, friends in India, and I was willing to listen. I was also willing to be very suspicious and I was willing to be very distrustful but I was never willing to completely turn aside from the fact that there was some possible solution to the riddle of where man came from. 

Any work that I am doing or have done, and that any Scientologist is doing, has a tremendously long and interesting background. We are delving with and working with the oldest civilized factors known to Man. Anything else is Johnny-come-lately. Scientology is a religion in the very oldest and fullest sense. Anybody who would dare try to make religion in to solely a religious practice and not a religious wisdom would be neglecting the very background of Christianity. Wisdom has no great tradition in the western world. 

Hubbard was very suspicious but willing to listen to possible solution to the riddle of man. So he came up in Scientology with a summarization of the oldest civilized factors known to Man. 

But if we are very industrious, it will be up to us to make one. 

.

FINAL COMMENTS

Hubbard is now describing the track of wisdom as it moved westward from Asia. There were trade routes that had existed from East to the West since time immemorial, on which knowledge traveled. The holy work of Hebrews, known as the Old Testament, leans very heavily on the background of the eastern philosophy, but it has a rather barbaric flavor.

The principles of love thy neighbor, and abstain from the use of force, that were known as Buddhism, appeared in Asia Minor at the beginning of our own date as the teachings of Christ. Buddhism shattered the philosophy of every barbaric society and every state that it touched–the philosophy of operating on force alone. It did so with respect to the Roman Empire through the teachings of Christ.

But here we have this information poorly interpreted; but in spite of this poor interpretation Christianity brought the very same thing that Buddhism hoped for. The Day of Judgment is a barbaric interpretation of what Gautama Buddha was talking about, the emancipation of the soul from the cycle of births and deaths. Even then Christianity took an entire world of slaves and it made free men out of them. This is quite a gain.

Philosophers, from the early Greeks on forward, made the first division in wisdom about the soul and the physical universe. Science has come to us from the development that followed this artificial division of knowledge. The western world specialized in physical sciences and never made enough advance in the humanities to bother about. When we go on the other track of knowledge about the physical universe, we’re talking about dead men, which has been the tradition of barbarism.

Scientology cannot be characterized as a science the way the western world understands science. Scientology carries forward a tradition of wisdom.

.

Project: Hubbard 1954: The Phoenix Lectures

This paper presents Chapter 1 from the book THE PHOENIX LECTURES by L. RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original publication of this book by The Church of Scientology (1954).

The paragraphs of the original material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the understanding from Buddhism.  Feedback on these comments is always appreciated.

.

SCIENTOLOGY, ITS GENERAL BACKGROUND (Part 1)

The word SCIENTOLOGY is one which you might say is anglicized. It comes from the Latin SCIO and the Greek LOGOS, with SCIO the most emphatic statement of KNOW we had in the western world. And OLOGY (from LOGOS) of course means “study of”.

SCIO is “knowing in the fullest sense of the word” and the western world recognizes in it and in the word science something close to a truth.

This is not “science-tology” — and it is not “scio-tology”, simply because that is not close enough to English. So we use a word which is fairly easy to say, which is simply Scientology.

For quite some time we have not used the word Dianetics, but certainly not because Dianetics does not belong to Scientology. It does, one hundred per cent. It is the subject of the mind and says so. It says DIA-NETICS from DIA NOUS (with an engineering twist on it — “ETICS”) and DIA NOUS means no more and no less than “through mind.”

Here Hubbard is explaining the root meanings of SCIENTOLOGY and DIANETICS.

Of course, the western world thinks of mind as something that mental cases have, something of that kind, and we weren’t particularly interested in continuing to concentrate upon this thing called mind, although mind is a perfectly useful word.

In Scientology we are not going “through mind”, we are talking about knowledge. Dianetics was a study of the mind, there’s no doubt about that, and there is no doubt about it that it is a very legitimate ancestor of Scientology, but Scientology is a thing of considerable amplitude, where Dianetics in comparison was a very narrow thing indeed. And Dianetics belongs, in a sense, in the world of psychology, and Scientology does not belong in the world of psychology and is not “an advanced psychology” and cannot be defined in the framework of psychology. Psychology is an anglicized word, not today true to its original meaning.

DIANETICS is limited to resolving unassimilated sensations in the mind. SCIENTOLOGY is broadly engaged in assimilating all knowledge that one has.

Psychology is composited from psyche and ology, and psyche is mind or soul, but leading psychological texts begin very, very carefully by saying that today the word does not refer to the mind or to the soul. To quote one, it “has to be studied by its own history”, since it no longer refers to the soul, or even to the mind. So we don’t know what psychology refers to today. It simply got lost. And so we have to step out and take a word which actually means what we mean, which is a study of knowingness, a study of wisdom. We have to take the word Scientology because that is what we are doing.

SCIENTOLOGY is all about the subject of knowingness. Psychology has little to do with this subject.

Now philosophically, there is a word called epistemology, and epistemology is quite separate from ontology, another word in the same category. In philosophy matter is considered to be separate. The physical universe is considered one direction thought another direction and so it goes. The available words do not encompass enough.

Thus we are already looking at a cloudy vocabulary when we look at the field of western philosophy. In fact, nowhere in the west can we find any qualification for a study which assumes to reach the highest possible level of knowledge which can be attained by Man or Life. We find nowhere in the western world a word or a tradition which will embrace Scientology. This makes some difficulty for an auditor (Auditor: trained Scientologist. Auditor means “one who listens” and is a person who applies Scientology auditing technology to individuals for their betterment) when he is trying to communicate to people in the society around him, since they want to know what Scientology is, and then he speaks to them, in the west, without this tradition.

The Western Philosophy also does not have the tradition that would embrace the subject of knowingness. It arbitrarily divides the universe into a “physical universe” and “thought”. It is mired in a cloudy vocabulary.

They assume that the word psychology embraces all sorts of eccentrics found in mental behavior. They assume this so they could not possibly understand how anything related to thought could be said to exceed or not be the same as psychology, and they are left in the dilemma of non-recognition. You have just not communicated in the west when you have said “we study wisdom”. You see, if you just said that, they would say, Oh yes, that’s all very well, I did that in third grade.

People in western society assume that psychology defines the behavior of thought. So, they assume that all the wisdom that there is, is contained in psychology.

Now, in view of the fact that you go out of communication, in a society which has no standard of communication on the subject about which you are talking, it is necessary to resort to various shifts in trying to describe what you are doing. You have to find the background which actually leads to an understanding of your subject.

To communicate what Scientology is all about, you have to find the background which actually leads to an understanding of Scientology.

There would be many ways in which this could be accomplished, but let’s take up something that is quite important to us and is not limited to any ignorance that we discover in western civilization. Let us take up what amounts to probably ten thousand years of study on the part of Man of the identity of God or gods, the possibility of truth, the inner track mystery of all mysteries. In other words, the mystery of life itself. We find that for ten thousand years, which figure, by the way does not agree today with certain historians (but then they don’t know much of the data I am referring to) man has been on this track. We find that the material which is extant even in western civilization and in Asia, has gathered to itself an enormous verbiage, you might say. There are somewhere between — and I think it would be adventurous to state an exact number — 125,000 and 150,000 books which comprise the Vedic and Buddhist libraries. Now that’s a lot of books. Here is a tremendous amount of data.

We find that for ten thousand years Man has been on this track of studying the mystery of life; and he has accumulated a tremendous amount of data on this subject.

One could say, if all this data is in existence, then why doesn’t the western world know more about it? And we have to go back and take a brief look at what happened about ten thousand years ago, and of course, that’s rather cloudy too, but let’s put it into the field of anthropology rather than into the field of history. And we discover that perhaps much earlier than ten thousand years ago, there was a division of peoples here on earth, and the division point was evidently the Ural Mountains. This is material that was given to me by a Professor of Ethnology at Princeton University.

There was evidently a split of races somewhere in the vicinity of the Ural Mountains. Part of the population which is now in the northern hemisphere went east, and part of it went west. The borning spot of the human race has been variously disputed but if we don’t worry about the borning spot and just say — that is more or less what occurred at that time, that there was a sharp division, and that part of the northern hemisphere’s people went east and part of them went west — we discover that a singular difference of personality occurred which is in the northern hemisphere the most observable difference.

Looking into the reason why the western world doesn’t know more about this track of knowledge, we find that perhaps much earlier than ten thousand years ago, there was a division of peoples here on earth near Ural Mountains. Part of people went east and part of them went west.

The people who went into the steppes, into the Gobi, into China, India, and into the various islands, were faced by an enormous chain of deserts. They were faced by privations of great magnitude, and they developed a philosophy of enduring. That was the keynote because that was what their environment demanded of them. They had to endure and so we find these races colored in a certain way so as to thwart the onslaught of sun and snow. We find them without natural protection in their environment and therefore we find them able to survive long after those who went in the opposite direction.

And so it is, their colorations, their customs, and so on, are different from ours just to the degree that they can survive in tremendously arduous surroundings, and the surroundings of those lands is arduous. They are, those races that are there, able to endure. And if you said anything about them, this is certainly a clear statement of fact.

They also are tremendously practical. Their practicality is such as to stagger a westerner. The explanations that they will suddenly and innocently voice to a query are always of such sweeping simplicity that they leave a westerner standing there staring with a slack jaw.

Now the races which went in the opposite direction from the Urals, evidently went into a country which had a heavy forestation. It had a great deal of game, and the philosophy of the western world became that of striking a hard blow. If you could strike a blow of great magnitude hard enough and fast enough, you could kill game and so you could live. Because of the vegetation and because of many other factors, they did not particularly need coloration. Their own customs did not need to be as thoroughly practical and they were able to dispose of their lives much more easily, you might say, since food was plentiful, as it was not in Asia. And we discover western philosophy building up on the behavior pattern of striking a hard blow. Get in quick, hit hard, your game drops and you eat. And beyond that, not very much thought or practicality.

People who went east had to endure a very harsh environment. So, they developed a philosophy of enduring that is simple and practical. But those who went west were surrounded by heavy forestation with plenty of game. So, their philosophy became one of striking a hard blow and not much thought or practicality beyond that.

However, the truth of this may be, here certainly is something which is said to have preceded a period of 10,000 years ago. It might or might not have truth. But it is a very fast explanation of this — and we discover immediately, as we look at these two worlds, that one of these worlds, having to endure, being faced with enormous privation, would of course develop a certain patience and an ability to philosophize. An ability to think. It would take a long time for anyone to think all the way through something. And a man who is merely accustomed to striking a hard blow is not likely to think all the way through something. When we are up against philosophy, we are fortunately or unfortunately up against an Asian tradition.

So, we have two worlds. In one world there is a certain patience and ability to philosophize. In the other there is energetic activity but not the ability to think all the way through something. When it comes to philosophy, we are up against an Asian tradition.

This is a tradition which is not necessarily that of colored peoples or strangers. This by the way, would come as a great shock to some people in the western world, to discover that in India the ruling caste is quite as white as any Norseman.

Well, they have, because they have a tradition of enduring, preserved records. We do not know what went on in North America. We can only guess. We do not know what went on in South America. There are a few ruins kicking around but beyond, this we don’t know very much. We get down into the Mediterranean basin and we discover that there was a certain traffic with Asia and therefore there is quite a bit known about the Mediterranean basin. This philosophy of endurance came forward into the Middle East — very poorly, but it was to be found there. The records of Europe we can hold in tremendous question. They do not, for instance, know where or when they had ice ages. They actually cannot trace from one millennium to the next, who was where and owned what. Every now and then they have to write a history, so everybody gets in a good state of agreement, and somebody writes a history — but so unreliable that Voltaire dubbed history A Mississippi of Lies. Now where the western world is concerned, we have records which go back — written records — supposedly 3,500 years. This may or may not be true but certainly the schools in the western world teach us that we can go back that far with written records. And in Egypt they go back to Isis, I think, which for the west is quite early. And they have found records in that particular area, and they hold these up as being very old. But be very careful, be very, very careful that you do not leave the western world, if you are looking for early records. In order to have a blackout of history and a blackout of knowledge, you have to stay west of the Ural Mountains.

In the Mediterranean basin there was a certain traffic with Asia, and, therefore, there is quite a bit known about the Mediterranean basin. But the written records in the Western world go back not more than 3,500 years. Beyond that there is a blackout of history.

East of the Urals you discover no such blackout. You discover a recorded tradition of wisdom which reaches back about 10,000 years. And that is the oldest trace that we have.

Now true enough we don’t necessarily have to recognize that there are written works any older than any anthropologist in the western world knows about. It does happen, however, that there is a set of hymns which as I recall were introduced into the societies of earth in about 8212 BC (The favorite western figure puts it after Egyptian!) These are hymns, and it would seem that if we spoke of hymns then they would contain largely modes or rites of worship, since they are religious, but that would only be our western interpretation of what is religious. These were religious hymns and they are our earliest debt in Scientology. Our earliest debt, because the very early hymns contain much that we know today and which checks against what we have rediscovered, or what we have followed back to, and this material included such a common thing as the cycle of the physical universe, known to you in Scientology as the Cycle of Action (Cycle of Action: the creation, growth, conversation, decay and death or destruction of energy and matter in a space. Cycles of Action produce time.) And this is contained in “The Hymn to the Dawn Child”, variously captioned and translated by western translators, but all this information is there.

East of the Urals you discover a recorded tradition of wisdom which reaches back about 10,000 years. It contains religious philosophy that goes way beyond any religious practice.

Furthermore, we find in that same set of hymns, the theory of evolution which was brought forward in the west only a hundred years ago, or slightly less, by Charles Darwin. In fact, as we look at these hymns, we discover almost any information you want to discover later. Whether you call it science or what you wish, here is a tremendous body of knowledge. They are supposed to have come forward in spoken tradition, memorized, from generation to generation, and finally to have been set down. Now this is a western interpretation of what happened to them. I would not care to say how exactly correct this is, but I can tell you that today these hymns are still in existence. They are very hard to acquire in the western world. You have to find the specialized translations of them, and they are studied as curiosa more than anything else, but we do not know what sciences would suddenly open their doors should someone sit down and begin to study the Veda. We don’t know what would happen. But information seems to have leaked from that direction into the Middle East and into Europe rather constantly over the thousands of years.

Here is a tremendous body of knowledge which seems to have leaked from that direction into the Middle East and into Europe rather constantly over the thousands of years.  We are still rediscovering it today in science and humanities.

Man is fond of believing that yesterday’s man was unable to walk, to travel, to move. We find, however, that as late as 1200 BC certainly, he had horses, and horses can go almost anywhere. He was able to make his way here and there across the surface of Earth and naturally when you get this, you get a transplantation of information. For instance, today anyone who knows China discovers nothing very strange in Italian cookery. And he would not discover it very strange that Italian cookery suddenly came into being shortly after the return of Marco Polo and many other travelers who had been in the same area. Just because one person wrote about it, is no reason a lot of people weren’t there. It is always a matter of astonishment to some member of the Explorer’s Club to go in and pick up all the information he needs about an area which is now wild and “completely unexplored”, from a white man or a Chinese — particularly the Chinese — who has been living there for the last forty years. And the explorer brings back the information and publishes it in journals and makes it available to people. The information collected by that white man or Chinese on the ground, would probably only be told to his family when he got home and not particularly broadcast at all. So, we have to recognize that certain information is broadcast broadly, and some is merely carried around. Marco Polo and even Battuta happened to be writers, and like writers, they wrote, but that is no reason to assume they were the only people in motion during the last 3,500 years.

There was considerable mobility among people of yesterday, which resulted in transplantation of information.

Thus, it is no wonder that we discovered the various wisdoms of Egypt appearing as the earliest wisdoms of Greece. It is no wonder why we look into the Christian bibles and find ourselves reading the Egyptian Book of the Dead. It is no wonder that we look into the middle of the Romantic period of Europe and find that the Arabian Nights had just been translated and discover that European literature did a complete revolution at that point. We’re not stressing that nothing has ever been thought up in Europe — but Europe has made tremendous strides forward, immediately that its doors were opened to Eastern information.

We discover various wisdoms of Egypt appearing as the earliest wisdoms of Greece; and Europe making tremendous strides forward, immediately that its doors were opened to Eastern information.

Because the Eastern tradition says that you can sit and think, and sometimes somebody in the western world is reminded of this, and when he is reminded of it, he is struck by the fact that he can sit down and think too. And if we have been taught anything, it is the patience of the East which permitted itself to stop acting long enough to find out how and why. And it’s that tradition alone for which we are most indebted to Asia.

It is the tradition to sit and think patiently for which we are indebted to Asia.

But are we indebted to Asia? Is it to Asia at all, or is it merely to man on this planet, who, breaking into two halves, you might say, went east and went west — the common ancestors of Man. All of us have the same potentials, but it happens that the information which has been collected over the years is available in Asia. It has not been preserved in the Western world. Therefore, we look to such things as the Veda. We look to such things as the Buddhist text, to the Tao-Teh-King and other materials of this character from Asia, to carry forward to us information of the past. Who knows but what these materials did not come out of Europe in the first place and go over to Asia. We could follow very dubious tracks in all directions, but we do know as we sit here in the western world, that man has a tradition of wisdom which goes back about 10,000 years, which is very positively traceable. And we find Scientology’s earliest certainly known ancestor in the Veda. The Veda is a very interesting work. It is a study of the whereins and whereases and who made it and why.

In reality, we are simply indebted to common ancestors of man on this planet. It just happens that the information which has been collected over the years is available in Asia, but not preserved in the western world.

It is a religion. It should not be confused as anything else but a religion. And the very word Veda simply means: Lookingness or Knowingness. That is all it means. That is all it has ever meant. And so, we can look back across a certain span of time, across a great many minds and into a great many places where man has been able to sit still long enough to think, through this oldest record, and find where it joins up with the present and to what we, in Scientology, are rightly indebted. For to say that out of whole cloth and with no background, a Westerner such as myself should suddenly develop all you need to know to do the things they were trying to do, is an incredible and an unbelievable and an untrue statement. Had the information of the Veda not been available to me, if I had not had a very sharp cognizance of earlier information on this whole track, and if at the same time, I had never been trained in an American university, which gave me a background of science, there could not have been enough understanding of the western world to apply anything Eastern to and we would have simply had the Eastern world again. But the western world has to hit with a punch. It has to produce an effect. It has to get there. Nobody urged Asia to get there. You could sit on a mountain top for a thousand years and it was perfectly all right with everybody in the whole neighborhood. In the west, they pick you up for vagrancy. So, we combine the collective wisdom of all those ages with a sufficient impatience and urgency, a sufficiency of scientific methodology. I think, by the way, that Gautama Sakyamuni probably had a better command of scientific methodology than any of your Chairs of Science in western universities. We had to depend, though, upon scientific methodology and mathematics to catalyze and bring to a head the ambition of 10,000 years of thinking men.

In Scientology, we combine the collective wisdom of all those ages available in the East with a sufficient impatience and urgency, a sufficiency of scientific methodology of the West, to catalyze and bring to a head the ambition of 10,000 years of thinking men.

And if I have added anything to this at all, it has simply been the urgency necessary to arrive, which was fairly well lacking in the Eastern world.

Hubbard has done a wonderful job of clarifying and organizing the eastern wisdom so that it can be applied with the urgency it requires.

.

FINAL COMMENTS

When we are up against philosophy, we are fortunately or unfortunately up against an Asian tradition.

Here is a tremendous body of knowledge which seems to have leaked from that direction into the Middle East and into Europe rather constantly over the thousands of years.  We are still rediscovering it today in science and humanities.

In reality, we are simply indebted to common ancestors of man on this planet. It just happens that the information which has been collected over the years is available in Asia, but not preserved in the western world.

In Scientology, we combine the collective wisdom of all those ages available in East with a sufficient impatience and urgency, a sufficiency of scientific methodology of West, to catalyze and bring to a head the ambition of 10,000 years of thinking men.

.

Please see: Grass Roots Scientology

PROJECT: Research into Scientology Processes

Reference:
(1) Book: The Phoenix Lectures by L. RON HUBBARD.
(2) HCO BULLETIN OF 20 OCTOBER AD9, An Experimental Process

When following the discipline of mindfulness, you do not interfere with the mind. You simply observe mind’s reaction to the command given. Therefore, there is no effort when you are running a recall process. You simply observe if a recall comes up in reaction to a command.

When there is no reaction, there would be no recall. To make sure that the recall is not suppressed by the noise in the mind, simply meditate on the command for a reasonable length of time. If there is still no recall then simply move to the next command, or to the next step. Do not assume that there must be a recall.  The recall will appear in the mind all by itself without much effort if it is there.

.

COMM RECALL PROCESS

“Comm” stands for communication. Communication is the process of exchanging ideas, considerations, information and data. Communication requires that there must be some ability to freely make considerations. For real communication to occur, there must be an honest intention to communicate, duplicate and understand. It is through communication only that emotions are experienced, and reality is perceived.

This comm recall process resolves any fixed attention on past or future communications. There is only one command:

“Recall a Communication”

Before you run this command, briefly meditate on what communication really is. Then meditate over this command over and over again, until it is flat. At this point any fixed attention on communication should have disappeared.

.

EXHAUSTION

According to Hubbard, this is a simple, very effective version of a work process. In this process you meditate on exhaustion.

NOTE: Generally, you run a process to handle some fixed attention. By meditating for a few minutes on a process, you’ll quickly know if the process is the right one for you to run.

You run this particular process when you have experienced work-related exhaustion and have attention fixed on it. Repeating the command in meditation may bring up new details. You run the process till it is flat, meaning no more new details are coming up in meditation.

“Recall exhaustion.”

NOTE: Hubbard used the “floating needle” phenomenon on the E-meter to determine the end of a process. However, the “floating needle” is often hard to spot when there are other concerns crowding the mind. It is much easier to notice if the state of fixed attention for a particular item has disappeared or not. When using the mindfulness approach, you use the disappearance of fixed attention to determine the end of a process. Keep in mind that you can always run a process again as needed.

.

KNOW TO MYSTERY RECALL PROCESSES

“Know to Mystery” is a scale that parallels the viewpoint scale of “Objectivity to Subjectivity”. One is objective when one knows. One is subjective when one succumbs to speculation upon being confronted with a mystery.

When running this process, you start from the lowest level of “unconsciousness” and work your way up through the levels of waiting, mystery, sex, etc., until you reach the highest level of “knowing”.

At each level you are resolving some sort of fixation. If you meditate at a level for few minutes and find no fixations, simply move to the next level. You go through this whole sequence of processes several times, until all of them are flat.

The first process is,

“Think of some unconsciousness you wouldn’t mind experiencing.”

Unconsciousness is a condition wherein the organism is uncoordinated to greater or lesser degree in its analytical process and motor controls. You meditate on unconsciousness to see if any instances of such condition come up. If so then re-experience those moments, or periods in time. Run the process until it is flat.

The next process is,

“Think of some waiting you wouldn’t mind experiencing.”

Waiting is inactivity or being in a state of repose, until something expected happens. You meditate on waiting to see if any instances of such condition come up. If so then re-experience those moments, or periods in time. Run the process until it is flat.

The next process is,

“Think of some mystery you wouldn’t mind inspecting.”

A mystery is anything that remains unexplained or unknown. The anatomy of Mystery is an inability to predict, followed by terrific confusion and then total blackout. The person just shut it all off and said, “I won’t look at it anymore”. Mystery is the level of always pretending there’s something to know earlier than the Mystery. There really is nothing to know back of a Mystery, except the Mystery itself. In this process you meditate on mystery and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of some sex you wouldn’t mind looking at.”

When a person thinks he is not going to survive, he will go into the “sexing-ness band”. If you starve cattle for a while they’ll start to breed, and if you feed them too well, they’ll stop breeding. This shows that the fixation on sex is closely associated with the sense of survival. In this process you meditate on any fixation related to sex for survival and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of some eating you wouldn’t mind inspecting.”

Animals eat animals to stay alive. This is their level of knowledge. Here we have fixation on eating and the knowledge associated with it is very condensed. This is what we understand as the dog eat dog world. One has no appreciation of other people and things other than as means for their own survival. In this process you meditate on any fixation related to eating to survive and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of some symbols you wouldn’t mind seeing.”

A symbol contains mass, meaning and mobility and it is in motion relative to some orientation point. At this level a person figures with symbols. His sense of knowledge is very literal, and it doesn’t go any deeper than the surface. In this process you meditate on any fixation on symbols and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of some thinking you wouldn’t mind observing.”

At this level a person is fixated on thinking.  He is, forever, trying to figure things out. There is no progress because he cannot work or act. This is the “figure-figure” case. In this process you meditate on any fixation on thinking and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of some effort you wouldn’t mind observing.”

At this level a person got to touch everything and feel everything before he can know anything. He’ll get a mental image picture of a past incident in order to get an idea of what is happening to him in the present. He cannot observe for himself. In this process you meditate on any fixation on effort and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of an emotion you wouldn’t mind observing.”

At this level we have to have knowledge by emotion. A person has all kinds of emotions about things. He knows things by his emotional reaction to them. In this process you meditate on any fixation on emotion and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of something you wouldn’t mind looking at.”

At this level we have to look to find out as opposed to simply knowing. In this process you meditate on any fixation on looking and not simply knowing and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of something you wouldn’t mind knowing about.”

At this level a person has indirect knowledge of something as opposed to knowing it intimately. In this process you meditate on any fixation on things you only know about indirectly and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of something you wouldn’t mind not-knowing.”

There are things that we don’t know anything about and use speculation in their place. Then we start to believe that speculation to be the reality. In this process you meditate on any fixation on knowledge that is speculation only and flatten the process.

The next process is,

“Think of something you wouldn’t mind knowing.”

There are things that you are so intimately familiar with that they have become part of your nature. You don’t even notice them. In this process you meditate on things that have become second nature to you and flatten the process.

.