Category Archives: Subject Clearing

Subject Clearing Oneself

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

When we look at the the subjects, The categories of “School subjects” and “Professions and Arts” are easy to clear, but when it comes to the category of “The Self and Life,” the subject clearing requires a whole different level of effort because we are resolving anomalies in ourselves. 

This is what religion has been attempting to do since the ancient times. Out of religion have evolved the subjects of philosophy and science. Interestingly enough, an implicit part of mainline religion, philosophy and the scientific method has been the Principle of Oneness.

.

The Principle of Oneness & Truth

The PRINCIPLE OF ONENESS may now be stated explicitly as follows:

Oneness does not imply sameness. Oneness means that all that is known is continuous, consistent and harmonious. This principle of oneness underlies the very concept of the universe. It also underlies the Scientific method. This principle gives us the ideal scene for logic, because its violation gives us anomalies. 

When we look at ourselves, truth no longer appears to be as certain as black and white. Instead, we get a whole spectrum of truth. We find that something is as true as it is continuous, consistent and harmonious within its context. The criterion for truth is, thus, best expressed by the Principle of Oneness.

.

The Subject of “I”

The subject of “I” is generally divided into the categories of Body, Mind and Spirit.

The body can still be seen as a subject that can be examined objectively. When it comes to the mind, it becomes quite subjective. And when we look at the spirit it becomes quite esoteric.

We identify ourselves with the body. The body is studied as an organism in the subject of “Biology.” It is treated through the professional subject of “Medicine.” Structurally, we have a pretty good idea of the body. But when it comes to the subject of genetics to understand the blueprint of the body, we find that there is a lot that we do not know.

We identify ourselves with the mind even more. We apply the mind when we engage in the study of any subject. When we study the subject of mind itself, we get into sort of a loop. We find that we need a model that integrates all the various functions of the mind nicely.

We are identified with the spirit most intimately. In spirit, we start looking at the most fundamental factors that make us what we are. We find a lot of speculations and theories about such factors in various religions.

.

The Beingness as Spirit & Mind

Subject Clearing should start with an understanding of one’s Beingness in terms of Spirit and Mind. Then it should proceed to the understanding of the Body.

The factors underlying the spirit are taken up in The KHTK Factors.

The subject of Beingness is taken up in Subject Clearing Beingness.

The subject of Mind is taken up in Subject Clearing the Mind.

.

History of Subject Clearing

Reference: The Book of Subject Clearing

Subject Clearing is listing the key concepts in a subject and then arranging them in a sequence from broad to narrower. Then you start straightening out that sequence by addressing missing, contradictory or arbitrary concepts. You focus on earlier and earlier parts of that sequence, till you arrive at the original postulates that established the subject.

Clearing a subject can be demonstrated most easily with school subjects. The idea of Subject Clearing started, at first, as a way to handle the weakness in a procedure called Word Clearing.

.

Word Clearing

It is a reasonable idea to not go by words you do not understand the meaning of. You clear up the definitions using a good dictionary. This can prevent confusions on the materials. This idea has long existed in the field of study. Growing up as a bilingual in India, I had used English-to-Hindi dictionaries. 

Around 1970, L. Ron Hubbard formalized this process as Word Clearing and made it a necessary part of his Scientology Study Technology. A student applied word clearing to the learning of Scientology materials, which consisted of Hubbard’s theories. The student was not allowed to question these theories. Instead he was pushed to find his “misunderstood word” until he agreed with Hubbard’s ideas. Many a time the student had to suppress his disagreements with the definitions provided by Hubbard, and accept them on their face value.

This highlighted the weakness of the Word Clearing procedure. It could not detect and correct the flaws in the definitions provided.

The word clearing procedure has no way of evaluating the definitions of words for missing, contradictory, or arbitrary data. But it is very workable with subjects that use standard vocabulary with well-established definitions. 

.

Self-Learning Project

Most of my life I have been tutoring mathematics because I simply love this subject. During the eighties, I started to use word clearing consciously in my tutoring of math. This produced better results faster. I then wanted to see if I could produce similar results on a larger scale. So, in mid-nineties I started a Math Club in the local library. 

The Math Club ran quite successfully for over a decade. I focused on clarifying the math vocabulary. The students had a lot of fun, and I had wonderful experience. I discovered that the many concepts in mathematics were not taught well. For example, most students did not know the difference between a DIGIT and a NUMBER. So, I came up with definitions that immediately communicated the difference to the students.

A DIGIT is like a letter; whereas, a NUMBER is like a word.

There are many more instances like this. For example, most students do not understand the meaning and logic behind “division by zero.” A number divided by zero is not zero but infinity. But why?

I then put together The Book of Mathematics to answer such questions, and bring clarity to the fundamentals of mathematics. Around 2006, Sal Khan launched the Khan Academy. It provided further materials for learning math in a wonderfully simple way. My attention then shifted to self-learning. The goal became teaching the students to become self-learners.

.

High School Dropouts Project

In 2015, I worked with High School dropouts at a facility of the Metropolitan Ministries of Tampa in New Port Richie, Florida. It was an eye-opening experience to get to know the hopes and aspirations of these young students after the disappointments and despair they had gone through. I documented my first encounter with some of them at this link: Troubleshooting Difficulties. My efforts to address their difficulties using word clearing didn’t go too well.

These students were much older than those I had worked with earlier. They had a long trail of misconceptions behind them. They soon became exasperated with any effort to track down their earlier misconceptions. Then I hit upon the idea of doing a series of lectures that introduced the basic math concepts in a logical order. These lectures introduced the basics in the form of well laid out definitions. The first lecture introduced MATHEMATICS with some fun puzzles (see What is Mathematics?). The subsequent lectures cleared up some fundamental vocabulary. 

This lecture series was highly successful. This experience provided me with the following understanding:

  1. Students get fired up when you are clarifying the right concepts that they are missing.
  2. This happens rapidly when students are presented with concepts in a logical order.
  3. This also requires concepts to be explained with great simplicity and total clarity.
  4. This provides the fastest way of learning a subject.

.

Start of Subject Clearing

That later concepts in a subject usually depend on earlier and broader concepts. This led to the discovery that a subject can be learned rapidly if its concepts are presented in the order from broader and more fundamental to narrower and more specific. This was the the start of subject clearing. This approach applied not only to school subjects, but also to the subjects encountered in life, and to the subject of life itself.

It is found that this approach often leads to the discovery of concepts that need to be clarified better, and even to holes in the subject that are camouflaged by assumptions and arbitrary concepts. Many concepts are defined so ambiguously that they lead to contradictions. One can, thus, develop an optimum sequence of key words with precise and concise definitions to learn a subject.

After a student understands this list of key words he can study the subject rapidly on a self-learning basis. An alphabetically arranged glossary may also be put together, so one can find the keywords and definitions conveniently, .

Over time, as the understanding in the subject improves, the definitions evolve to become more precise. As a subject expands, for example, when we study many religions together, the key words for similar concepts may be indexed together.

.

Summary

Subject Clearing is a new method that lends itself to self-learning. It may be used to develop an optimum curriculum for studying a subject. That curriculum may easily by self-studied by students in a large supervised classroom. Students can self-study and learn at their own pace since there are no teachers and lecturers to keep pace with.

.

The Subjects (old)

Please see The Subject Clearing

Life is a huge subject that needs to be cleared of all it troubles. Of course, that is the ultimate target of Subject Clearing. That target needs to be approached on a gradient.

We may specify that gradient in terms of the following four broad categories.

  1. School subjects
  2. Professions and Arts
  3. The Self and Life
  4. The Universe and the Unknowable

We can break down each category above into many, many subjects. For example, the school subjects may be broken down into language, mathematics, history, etc. Even these subjects may be broken down further into sub-subjects. For example, mathematics may be broken down into Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry, etc.

Under professions and arts, we have medicine, engineering, dramatics, etc.

Under the Self and Life, we have philosophy, religions, psychology, etc.

Under the Universe and the Unknowable, we have matter, energy, space, time, etc.

.

The Subject to Clear

But the subject that a person should clear are the one’s that are taking up his attention. 

It could be health. It could be livelihood. It could be some upset or conflict. Whatever subject a person’s attention is on, it can be identified as being part of one of the four categories above. Some skill would lie in identifying the exact subject.

When there are more than one subject that are taking up your attention then you should identify them all.

But you shall be clearing one subject at a time, and only to a point that it is no longer taking up your attention.

.

The Approach

Make a list of subjects that are taking up your attention. You may start by listing broad categories or sub-categories, and then narrowing it down to the actual subjects. You may feel some relief when you have listed all subject that are taking up your attention.

Now arrange these subjects in the sequence you would like to clear them up. Start with the subject that is on the top of this list.

Note that this sequence might change as you make progress with subject clearing.

.

Summary

Life is very complex, but the above procedure will help you pick up the right subject to start clearing.

Picking the right subject to clear will save you a lot of time.

.

Deep Contemplation

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

A person cannot perceive the facsimiles (unassimilated impressions) because they are not assimilated. It is only upon assimilation can the content of those facsimiles be perceived. 

The facsimiles, when activated, influence the thinking and activities of the person. Thus, the facsimile acts as the MOTIVATOR, and the person is then motivated to commit OVERT ACTS. These overt acts, by their very nature, are dramatized out of context, and are, therefore, anomalous.

Overt Acts are the dramatizations of facsimiles (unassimilated impressions), which act as motivators.

The person assimilates his facsimiles when he traces his OVERT ACTS back to their actual MOTIVATOR, without justifying them.

To assimilate his facsimiles the person contemplates on his overt acts deeply until he recognizes the actual motivator.

.

Resolution of Anomalies

The natural approach is to trace back the anomalies in the sequence that they show up. This makes the running of the more complex anomalies easier. Overt acts are anomalies that trace back to deeper anomaly of motivator.

So, when running a past incident all overts and motivator are brought up to awareness for assimilation to occur. This is how you clean up an incident and get the underlying postulate.  

Current or past life incidents are treated the same way. The incidents from “past lives” might appear as dreamlike visualizations of anomalies. Do not concern yourself with the content of the incident. You just focus on the resolution of the anomaly and the resulting assimilation of the facsimile.

This is how deep contemplation is done in subject clearing.

.

The Discipline

Incidents do not become heavy if anomalies are resolved in the sequence that they come up.

To resolve an anomaly, one must assimilate the underlying facsimile.

To assimilate the facsimile, one must contemplate deeply on the overts and its motivator together.

To accomplish the deep contemplation it takes The Discipline of Subject Clearing.

If you do this then there would not be any adverse consequences.

.

The Level of OT I

Reference: Scientology OT Levels

According to Postulate Mechanics, one handles misjudgments on the Grades. By the time one goes Clear, most of the misjudgments are cleared. The job now remains of handling one’s misconceptions. This is done on OT levels. 

.

OT I

The OT Level I is about the direct understanding of one’s beingness. The OT I drills have to do with

  1. Counting bodies
  2. Noticing the sex (male or female) of those bodies.
  3. Noticing the size (small or large) of those bodies.
  4. Noticing the attribute in terms of there being an individual, or a crowd.
  5. Differentiating oneself from others.
  6. Noticing the degree to which one can have (tolerate) others around oneself.
  7. Noticing the body part in others that one doesn’t like having in one’s body.
  8. Spotting things in others that are not wrong with them.
  9. Noticing people walking toward you or walking away from you.
  10. Noticing how people stick to the ground (get the sense of gravity).
  11. Spotting important things about people (these would be one’s own considerations).
  12. Noticing places where there are no people.
  13. Noticing places where there are people.

OT I focuses on perceiving the attributes of others in different ways  and then looking at oneself with respect to those attributes.

This drill makes a person look at others and oneself more objectively. This may free up the fixed considerations about oneself. Nothing more mysterious need to be read into OT I. Here are OT I instructions in Hubbard’s handwriting that have been in the public domain for some time.

LRH Instructions on OT I

A later version of OT I emphasized looking at upsets, problems etc., from the viewpoint of others. Therefore, on OT I, though not so specified, there is definitely an attempt to broaden the viewpoint of the person, so he is less fixated on himself. Here are the new OT I instructions.

New OT I Instructions

In Subject Clearing approach you do the following,

  1. Put down all the terminals that come to your mind on a list.
  2. Rearrange those terminal on the list in the order they are relevant to you.
    • The most relevant terminal should appear at the top of the list.
  3. Apply subsequent instructions to the most relevant terminal.
  4. Handle the upsets that terminal had with you.
    • You look from the viewpoint of that terminal
    • Recognize the nature of that upset objectively.
    • Was that a break in
      • Affinity
      • Reality
      • Communication, or
      • Understanding
    • Did that break had to do with
      • Curiosity
      • Denial
      • Enforcement
      • Inhibition
      • Absence
      • Refusal
    • The moment you recognize the nature of the upset it should disappear.
    • Handle all possible upsets that terminal had with you.
  5. Next handle the problems that terminal had with you.
    • You look from the viewpoint of that terminal
    • Contemplate on that problem and recognize opposing postulates.
    • Make sure you have no mystery left about any aspects of the problem.
    • Handle all possible problems that terminal had with you.
  6. Next handle things that terminal withheld from you.
    • You look from the viewpoint of that terminal.
    • A withhold is a lack of admission to overt actions committed out of misjudgment.
    • Get details of the withhold in terms of What, When, All, and Who should have known about it.
    • Handle all possible withholds that terminal had regarding you.
  7. Go back to step 3, and handle the next terminal with steps 4 to 6.
  8. You end off when there is a big relief.

.

Misconceptions about Beingness

The most fundamental misconception is expressed through the question, “Who am I?” The beingness as an individual is basically a matrix of matter, radiation and thought elements. In Scientology terminology, we may express it as,

INDIVIDUAL = THETA + GENETIC ENTITY + THETAN

The individual becomes aberrated (flawed) to the degree its matrix acquires identifications or fixations. The idea that the thetan is “immortal” or “eternal” is a misconception that leads to fixation. The thetan is inherently flexible and can change itself completely.

.

Misconceptions about OT I

On OT Levels, one is handling deep misconceptions (blind spots). Hubbard gives the impression that one is walking on egg shells when doing the OT Levels. That may be the case when one is using an E-meter that works well with heavy engrams, but not so well with subtle misconceptions. OT levels are safe to run when you apply the 12 Aspects of Mindfulness as in the subject clearing approach.

Hubbard says on OT I: “It is not the intention of this section to exteriorize anyone but if it happens don’t worry about or fool around with the fact.”

Exteriorization is misconceived in Scientology as the “thetan” becoming detached from the “body.” It gives the impression that the matrix of the individual is coming apart. In reality, all that is happening is that the fixation on the body is becoming undone. This is natural.

.