Author Archives: vinaire

I am originally from India. I am settled in United States since 1969. I love mathematics, philosophy and clarity in thinking.

PM Introduction

February 3, 2026 – 11:10 AM

Reference: Postulate Mechanics (PM)

When the subject is the whole universe, what is the starting point from which to begin clearing any misconceptions? There are all kinds of theories available in religion, philosophy and science about the universe. The sciences study matter and try to describe a physical universe. The religions study life and try to describe a spiritual universe. Philosophy speculates on things that are yet to be fully known.

I decided that the first concept to clear would be the meaning of the word UNIVERSE. 

It is always helps if you start with the etymology or origin of a word to get some idea of its derivation and history. For the UNIVERSE, this provided me a sense of “all things combined into one.” 

What combines all things into one? 

The characteristic common to all things in the universe is that they are knowable.” Whether they are physical or spiritual, they are knowable. There cannot be any other characteristic more basic than this. This characteristic definitely combines all things into one.

What is that beyond knowable, which would not be a part of this universe?

This question cannot be answered, because THAT would be unknowable.

.

Unknowable – Knowable

Here the penny dropped. We cannot even consider the unknowable because it is unknowable. The moment we consider “unknowable,” we only know our consideration. The unknowable remains unknowable.

Even God is knowable only as a consideration. We may assign God all those wonderful attributes. But these attributes are our considerations only. The unknowable lies beyond these considerations.

My first realization was that the fundamental dichotomy is UNKNOWABLE-KNOWABLE. Whether something is physical of spiritual it is knowable simply because we have considered it. It is a part of the knowable universe.

.

The Unknowable

The highest echelon concept was UNKNOWABLE. This was supported by The Creation Hymn of Rig Veda.

Whence this creation has arisen
– perhaps it formed itself, or perhaps it did not –
the One who looks down on it,
in the highest heaven, only He knows
or perhaps He does not know.

So, how do we come to know anything?

.

The Knowable

We come to know because we have considered something. That consideration must have started as a postulate. A postulate is something taken for granted. It is a creative thought that is claimed to be true. A postulate then forms the basis of all reasoning that follows. Considerations are formed out of reasoning. They are basically a continuation of the original postulate.

We mostly know our considerations. The underlying postulates likely remain hidden.

The postulates give rise to sensations. The sensation is true to us because we feel it even before it forms into a well-defined thought and acquires a meaning. This clarity of perception comes from the assimilation of this new sensation with other sensations that are already there. The assimilation brings about a continuity, consistency and harmony among all the sensations, such that they start to make more sense. This assimilation leads to increasing clarity of perception of what is there. Thus comes about the conception and consciousness of the knowable universe.

.

Postulate Mechanics

This was excellent sleuthing. These ideas did not appear overnight. A lot of study preceded them. But everything I studied pointed to the above theory. Furthermore, these postulates were not quite visible. But they were there, and they were knowable as sensations, perceptions and conceptions.

But there were also a lot of misconceptions too hiding the actual postulates. And so, a hunt for those hidden postulates began by recognizing and sorting out the misconceptions. 

This endeavor give this book its title: POSTULATE MECHANICS (abbreviated as PM).

For the “matter” we have Classical Mechanics. For the “radiation” we have Quantum Mechanics. For the “postulates” we now propose Postulate Mechanics.

The purpose of Postulate Mechanics is to investigate, in a scientific manner, the postulates underlying this universe by sorting out the misconceptions.

Postulate mechanics uses the technique of Subject Clearing. The concepts, as found during this search, are being compiled at Glossary: Postulate Mechanics.

This is a live search, and the definitions of the various concepts are continually being refined and updated.

This search makes up the rest of this book.

I hope you enjoy this search. 

.

Considerations

The major concepts introduced in this introduction are UNIVERSE, DICHOTOMY, KNOWABLE, UNKNOWABLE, POSTULATE, CONSIDERATION, and POSTULATE MECHANICS. These concepts are defined in Glossary: Postulate Mechanics.

  1. Unknowable is that which can never be fully sensed. 
  2. Knowable is that which can be sensed.
  3. Universe is the totality of what is knowable.
  4. Postulates form the basis of the knowable universe. 
  5. Considerations arise to make the universe known.

.

Posted in Postulate Mechanics | Comments (0)

Remedy of Laughter

January 27, 2026 – 2:49 PM

When a person finds himself in an environment that makes it difficult for him to reject what he doesn’t like, he is likely to feel very uncomfortable. When this continues, he may become serious, and even neurotic. Getting a person to laugh is always a good remedy because, besides surprise, laughter is rejection. Laughter surprises the person into rejecting, and that is very therapeutic.

The Remedy of Laughter could be entered simply by having the individual predict that a wall would be there in ten seconds, count off ten seconds on his watch, and then ascertain with thoroughness that the wall is still there.

A direct mock up process can be applied to the Remedy of Laughter by having the person mock up alternately himself and others laughing.

The person can also be made simply to stand up and start laughing. He at first will demand to have something to laugh at, but at length will be able to laugh without reason. 

The goal of the process is to regain the ability to laugh without reason. One may run this process simply by using the following two commands.

‘Start laughing.’
‘Keep on laughing.’

.

The Excerpt

Here is the full excerpt of this Scientology process from the Book, The Creation of Human Ability by L. Ron Hubbard.

R2-26: REMEDY OF LAUGHTER 

The earliest known psychotherapy consisted of getting a patient to laugh. Laughter is rejection. A preclear being continually inflowed upon by the physical universe at length may find it difficult to reject anything. Getting him to reject something could be made an auditing goal. The best manifestation of this is laughter. Laughter includes both surprise and rejection. The individual is surprised into rejecting. 

In order to laugh, he must have laid aside some of his ability to predict. An individual who is serious has laid aside so much of his ability to predict that he now cannot be surprised into rejection. The anatomy of mystery consists of, in this order, unpredictability, confusion, and chaos covered up because it cannot be tolerated. Therefore, this is also the anatomy of problems. Problems always begin with an unpredictability, deteriorate into a confusion, and then if still unsolved become a mystery which is massed confusion. It will be observed that as a person falls further and further away from the ability to laugh he becomes more and more confused until at last he sees no points in any jokes, he sees only embarrassment when confronted by laughter, and the whole action of laughter itself escapes him. The ability to laugh is rehabilitated in general by Scientology as it advances the ability of the preclear to know – which is to say, predict. 

The Remedy of Laughter could be entered simply by having the individual predict that a wall would be there in ten seconds, count off ten seconds on his watch, and then ascertain with thoroughness that the wall is still there, to establish if the wall is there, then to predict that it will be there in ten seconds, then to count off ten seconds on his watch and ascertain if the wall is still there. By thus bringing solid objects into the realm of prediction, an individual at length comes to a point where he can predict very slowly moving objects. A cheap train and track could be set up for this purpose and the preclear could be led to predict with accuracy the position of engines on the small circular track. However, the preclear can be made to watch automobiles on the street – a process which serves just as well with no such equipment. 

The preclear would then be led to predict the positions of his own body, first by predicting that it was going to be in a certain spot, then moving it there and seeing whether or not it had arrived at that spot. He would then be brought to swing his arm in a circle, predict that it would swing faster, and swing it faster. And thus being led to predict the motion of his body with these simplicities, he could be exercised in making his body go tense and go limp by his command until he was thoroughly certain that he could both predict the tension or relaxation by doing it. Then he could be led to predict the positions of people walking on the street until he felt some security in predicting without exercising physical control. By thus remedying his ability to predict, one brings the preclear up into a tolerance of motion. He is then led to put his attention on one moving object, then on two moving objects at once, and so forth using the processes of spanning attention on moving objects.

A direct mock up process can be applied to the Remedy of Laughter by having the preclear mock up alternately himself and others laughing or by having him mock up an acceptable level of amusement and remedy his havingness with it until he can have people laughing very broadly in his mock-ups. The preclear can also be made simply to stand up and start laughing. He at first will demand to have something to laugh at, but at length will be able to laugh without reason. The goal of the process is contained in the last line – to regain the ability to laugh without reason. 

In this Intensive Procedure only two steps are employed to remedy laughter. The first consists of these commands, ‘Be completely certain that the wall is there’. And when the preclear has become with considerable conversation completely certain that the wall is there, touching it, pushing against it, and so forth, the auditor then says, ‘Sit down, take this (your) watch’, ‘Now predict that the wall will be there ten seconds from now’, ‘Have you done so?’ ‘All right wait ten seconds by your watch’. And when this is done, ‘Is the wall still there?’ And when the preclear has answered, ‘Now make absolutely certain the wall is there’ and the preclear does so by touching it, pushing at it, kicking it. ‘Now make very sure that the wall is there’. And when the preclear very vigorously has done so, ‘Now predict that it will be there in ten seconds’. And when the preclear has done so, the remainder of the commands are given and this is repeated over and over. 

Then the second part of lntensive Procedure’s process of laughter, but only after the preclear has experienced considerable relief and is absolutely sure that he can predict that all parts of the room will be there, not only in ten seconds, but in an hour – although no such timing is used, and only ten seconds of time is employed – ‘Start laughing’. And no matter what the preclear says thereafter, or what arguments he advances, or how many things he asks about, or how many reasons he wants or gives, the auditor merely says (adding words that urge the preclear), ‘Start laughing’. And when the preclear at length does so, no matter how half heartedly, ‘Keep on laughing’. The two commands which are used in addition to words necessary to urge the preclear without giving the preclear any reason whatsoever are, ‘Start laughing’ and ‘Keep on laughing’. 

This process is then done until the preclear can actually enjoy a laugh without any reason whatsoever, without believing that laughing without reason is insane, without feeling self-conscious about laughing, and without needing any boost from the auditor. The auditor in this second part need take no pains to agree with the preclear by laughing. He need not chuckle or smile nor need he even particularly act seriously, his laughter is not needed or used in the process. An auditor can be as serious as he pleases, and indeed, if he wishes to do so, can be even more serious than is usual when running this second step of R2-26. 

In earlier Scientology it was learned that serious preclears would often recover considerable ground simply when they were made to do things without any reason whatsoever. This achievement is much greater when they are made to laugh without any reason.

.

Posted in Scientology | Comments (7)

Comparative Analysis (11-18th century)

January 22, 2026 – 8:25 AM

Reference: SC: Psychology

NOTE: Text in color contains Vinaire’s comments.

.

Ontological Assumptions

Western and Eastern traditions diverged fundamentally in their conceptualization of self and consciousness. Western thought, particularly after Descartes, increasingly adopted substance dualism, treating mind and body as distinct entities requiring connection. Eastern traditions maintained holistic monism, viewing psyche as inherently embodied and integrated with physical and spiritual dimensions.

.

Methodological Approaches

The West progressively prioritized empirical observation and rational analysis, with Vives’s inductive methods and Enlightenment experimentalism establishing psychology’s scientific trajectory. Eastern approaches emphasized introspection, meditative practice, and holistic observation, with Indian yoga and Chinese dialectical analysis providing systematic introspective methodologies.

.

Emotion Theory

Medieval Western thought treated emotions as physiological-psychological responses requiring rational direction. Islamic psychology similarly viewed emotions as natural responses needing cultivation through virtue ethics. Indian psychology identified emotions as expressions of manas and hrdaya, requiring equanimity rather than control. Chinese philosophy developed polarity theories, understanding emotions as manifestations of qing requiring balance between Confucian cultivation and Taoist naturalness.

.

Mental Illness Treatment

Western approaches evolved from supernatural explanations toward medical models, with compassionate care replacing harsh treatment by the 18th century. Islamic psychology maintained holistic treatment combining physical, psychological, and spiritual interventions throughout the period. Indian and Chinese traditions developed sophisticated psychotherapeutic techniques emphasizing meditation, lifestyle modification, and restoration of balance.

.

Consciousness Studies

Western consciousness theory progressed from Ockham’s intuitive cognition to Descartes’s cogito, emphasizing self-awareness as rational certainty. Eastern traditions explored altered states (Indian turiya, Buddhist jhānas) and developed detailed cartographies of consciousness levels, with Islamic mystics (Sufis) mapping spiritual stations (maqāmāt) of self-transformation.

.

Conclusion

The 11th–18th centuries established foundational frameworks that continue shaping contemporary psychology. Western development demonstrated increasing methodological rigor and scientific orientation, moving from theological to naturalistic explanations. Eastern traditions maintained holistic integration, developing sophisticated wellness models that modern psychology has only recently begun to appreciate. The period’s most enduring contribution may be the diversity of psychological paradigms it produced—demonstrating that human consciousness can be understood through multiple valid frameworks, each offering distinctive insights into the complex relationship between mind, body, and society.

This comparative history reveals that psychology’s “progress” is not linear but multidimensional, with different civilizations developing complementary approaches to understanding human nature. The 18th century’s synthesis of empirical method and holistic concern prefigured psychology’s ongoing integration of biological, psychological, and social dimensions—a reconciliation of insights that Eastern traditions never divided.

The Western psychology focuses on individuality; whereas the Eastern psychology focuses on attaining universal consciousness. The contradiction between these two goals is seen in Scientology. This contradiction, however, is handled in Postulate Mechanics.

.

Posted in Psychology | Comments (0)

Eastern Psychological Development (11-18th century)

January 22, 2026 – 7:40 AM

Reference: SC: Psychology

NOTE: Text in color contains Vinaire’s comments.

.

Islamic Psychology (11th–18th Centuries)

Islamic psychology (ʿilm al-nafs—science of the self/psyche) developed a sophisticated holistic model integrating Greek philosophy, Qur’anic principles, and clinical observation. This tradition emphasized the inseparability of mental health, physical wellbeing, and spiritual practice.

Conceptual Framework: Muslim scholars used nafs (self/personality) and fitrah (human nature) to denote psychological constructs, encompassing qalb (heart), ruh (soul), aql (intellect), and irada (will). Mental illness was designated A‘ilaj al-nafs (treatment of the soul), al-tibb al-ruhani (spiritual health), or tibb al-qalb (mental medicine).

Key Contributors:

Al-Ghazali (c. 1058–1111): The 11th-century mujaddid (renewer of faith) systematized Islamic psychology in his Iḥyā’ ‘ulūm ad-dīn (Revival of Religious Sciences). He developed a structural theory of the psyche based on Qur’anic exegesis, analyzing the soul’s faculties and their role in moral development. His tripartite division of the soul—rational, concupiscent (desire), and irascible (anger)—employed the rider-horse-dog metaphor from Greek philosophy, with the rational faculty controlling lower faculties to achieve cardinal virtues. Al-Ghazali’s psychological crisis and recovery, documented in his autobiographical writings, provided profound insights into consciousness, anxiety, and spiritual transformation.

Ibn Miskawayh (c. 940–1030): This 10th-century philosopher pioneered therapeutic techniques including “self-reinforcement” and response-cost mechanisms. His Tahdhib al-Aklaq (Refinement of Character) outlined rules for moral health analogous to medical regimens for physical health, harmonizing Platonic, Aristotelian, Stoic, and Neoplatonic virtues within Islamic culture. Miskawayh emphasized bodily practices, habituation of appetites, and social dimensions of virtue cultivation.

Clinical Innovations: Islamic psychologists implemented expressive therapies using music and olfactory stimulation to engage sensory functions in healing. They recognized curative potential in therapeutic relationships and emphasized positive reinforcement. Al-Razi (864–932) advocated relational skills to ease healing, while physicians like Constantinus Africanus (11th century) translated Arabic texts emphasizing physical cures for melancholia.

Islamic psychologists implemented expressive therapies using music and olfactory stimulation to engage sensory functions in healing. They believed in the inseparability of mental health, physical wellbeing, and spiritual practice; and rational faculty controlling lower faculties to achieve cardinal virtues. Rules were outlined for moral health analogous to medical regimens for physical health. 

.

Indian Psychology (11th–18th Centuries)

Indian psychological thought during this period refined ancient Vedic and Buddhist insights into consciousness, developing sophisticated mental health practices that recognized subconscious influences and therapeutic concentration.

Core Concepts: Indian psychology identified manas (mind/heart) as the center for emotions like fear, with the heart (hrdaya) representing the source of involuntary, irrational psychological processes. The manas operated in multiple states: waking, dreaming, deep sleep (sushupti), and transcendent consciousness (turiya), the latter achieved through meditation rather than ordinary transition.

Mental Health Theory: Ancient texts described unmad (psychosis) with etiologies suggesting both organic (worms, fever) and functional origins, demonstrating nuanced diagnostic understanding. Mental suffering was analyzed through concepts like tapas of manas—maintaining the mind as happy, kind, silent, self-controlled, and pure. The Bhagavad Gita emphasized equanimity (samatva) as essential for mental health, establishing that balanced mind establishes connection with ultimate reality (brahman).

Therapeutic Methods: Yoga systems provided comprehensive frameworks for mental health, recognizing concentration as the means to perceive truth and understanding the mind-body connection. Psychotherapeutic techniques appeared throughout ancient literature, emphasizing meditation, emotional regulation, and cultivation of virtues. Indian psychologists identified subconscious forces as potent determinants of conscious tendencies, anticipating Freudian insights by centuries.

Philosophical Developments: Thinkers systematically analyzed mental tendencies, rejecting theories of innate destructiveness. They concluded that human nature fundamentally seeks eternal happiness and existence, contrasting with Western psychoanalytic emphasis on death drives.

According to Indian psychological thought, human nature fundamentally seeks eternal happiness and existence. But subconscious forces are potent determinants of conscious tendencies. Psychotherapeutic techniques emphasized meditation, emotional regulation, cultivation of virtues, and equanimity.

.

Chinese Psychology (11th–18th Centuries)

Chinese psychological thought integrated Confucian social ethics, Taoist naturalism, and Buddhist introspection, creating distinctive frameworks for understanding human development and mental life.

Theoretical Integration: From the 11th–13th centuries, Chinese philosophy synthesized key concepts—qi (vital energy), yin-yang polarity, wuxing (five phases), and li (principle)—into comprehensive psychological models. This integration created dialectical explanations of behavior emphasizing balance and harmony.

Core Frameworks:

Confucian Psychology: Confucianism centered psychological development on moral cultivation within social relationships. The concept of qing (情) evolved from denoting objective reality to encompass subjective feelings and emotions, particularly during the Warring States period. Mencius’s theory of innate goodness provided foundation for understanding moral emotions, while Xunzi’s counter-argument emphasized cultivation over nature.

Taoist Naturalism: Taoist thinkers viewed human nature as simple and good, arguing that acquired ideas and moralities damage innate purity. Psychological health required purging desires and returning to natural spontaneity, contrasting with Confucian emphasis on cultivated virtue.

Buddhist Influence: Buddhism introduced Indo-European psychological theory, facilitating understanding of mind from representational states perspective. This imported framework enabled new conceptualizations of qing as subjective feelings, revolutionizing Chinese emotion theory.

Brain-Central Theory: Chinese medicine developed sophisticated brain-centered theories of mental function, articulated through the yīn yáng wu˘ xíng framework and heart-central theory. These models emphasized physiological-psychological integration centuries before Western equivalences.

Chinese psychological thought integrated moral cultivation within social relationships with innate purity and mental representations. It synthesized key concepts—qi (vital energy), yin-yang polarity, wuxing (five phases), and li (principle)—into comprehensive psychological models. Chinese medicine developed sophisticated brain-centered theories of mental function.

.

Posted in Psychology | Comments (0)

Western Psychological Development (11-18th century)

January 20, 2026 – 8:38 PM

Reference: SC: Psychology

NOTE: Text in color contains Vinaire’s comments.

.

Medieval Foundations (11th–14th Centuries)

Medieval Western psychology operated within a Christian-Aristotelian synthesis that viewed the psyche as fundamentally embodied. The rational soul served as the “form” of the body, with mental processes understood as integrated physiological-psychological phenomena rather than purely mental events. This period established crucial conceptual foundations:

Mind-Body Integration: Unlike later Cartesian dualism, medieval thinkers understood cognition as a two-part process where physiological brain mechanisms mirrored rational soul processes, with neither reducible to the other. Observations of head injuries confirmed Galen’s localization of rational aspects in the brain, though popular notions of the heart as the seat of understanding persisted.

Emotion Theory: Emotions (passions) were conceived as natural responses of the sensitive appetite to external events, neither inherently good nor evil until directed by reason and will. This contrasted sharply with the Stoic view that emotions constituted disturbances requiring elimination. Medieval literature, such as Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, depicted love-sickness as both mental and bodily illness, with psychosomatic symptoms reflecting the integrated nature of affective experience.

Faculty Psychology: William of Ockham (1317–1349) revolutionized psychological theory by unifying the rational soul with its faculties. Rejecting previous distinctions between soul and rational powers, Ockham argued for identity between the soul’s essence and its capacities. His principle of ontological parsimony—commonly called Occam’s Razor—eliminated unnecessary multiplication of entities in psychological explanation. Ockham further developed the concept of intuitive cognition, a uniquely human awareness that perceived objects exist and possess particular qualities, bridging sensory data and intellectual understanding.

Brain is the switchboard to the body that is operated upon by the mind. Emotion is a natural response to the external event that initiates the intellectual process of rationality and understanding. The psychosomatic symptoms reflect the integrated nature of affective experience.

.

Renaissance Transformation (15th–16th Centuries)

The Renaissance marked psychology’s emergence from purely metaphysical speculation toward empirical observation, driven by humanist emphasis on individual personality and the printing press’s dissemination of knowledge.

Empirical Methodology: Juan Luis Vives (1493–1540) pioneered observational psychology in his De anima et vita (1538), applying analytical methods that prefigured Bacon and Descartes. Vives advanced several revolutionary concepts:

  • Physiological Psychology: He maintained that mental capacities depended on bodily temperament, arguing maladaptive behavior could be treated as physical illness requiring medical care rather than moral condemnation.
  • Faculty Analysis: Vives systematically examined the soul’s three faculties—mind, will, and memory—while exploring topics from sleep and dreams to longevity.
  • Emotion Theory: Rejecting Stoic suppression of emotions, Vives viewed them as essential constituents of human life, natural responses to how things appear.

Therapeutic Humanism: Vives advocated compassionate treatment of mental disorders, prescribing individualized instruction for mild cases and medical intervention for severe conditions. This humane approach contrasted with medieval harshness and anticipated modern therapeutic ethics.

There is individual personality, and it is best understood by empirical observation. Maladaptive behavior cannot be treated simply by moral condemnation. The mental disorder underlying that behavior requires compassionate treatment.

.

Enlightenment Systematization (17th–18th Centuries)

The Enlightenment crystallized psychology’s shift toward scientific rationalism, establishing foundational concepts for modern experimental psychology.

Philosophical Revolution: Descartes’ Cogito ergo sum (1637) and Newton’s Principia (1687) provided methodological templates for analyzing mental phenomena through reason and empirical evidence. Enlightenment thinkers synthesized 17th-century rationalist metaphysics (Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz) with British empiricism (Locke, Hume), creating hybrid frameworks for understanding human nature.

Emotion Theory Development: Seventeenth and eighteenth-century philosophers developed sophisticated analyses of emotions (passions, affects), often employing hydraulic models where pains and pleasures pushed ideas through associative mechanisms. Key developments included:

  • Spinoza and Descartes: Both sought “remedies” for passions through rational control, viewing emotional regulation as central to virtue and happiness.
  • Associationist Psychology: Hume and others developed “Newtonian” ambitions for a “science of man,” explaining emotions through principles of association.
  • Moral Sentiment Theory: Rousseau traced emotional genesis through social structure changes, while other thinkers emphasized cultivation of moral sentiments.

Medical Model Advancement: By the 18th century, mental illness treatment increasingly paralleled physical medicine. Harsh treatment gave way to compassionate care, with comprehensive approaches incorporating nutrition, exercise, sleep, emotional regulation, and environmental hygiene. The stigma surrounding mental illness diminished as pathological conditions were viewed through medical rather than moral frameworks.

Psychology has gradually shifted toward the use of reason and empirical evidence to understand human nature. Emotions are explained through principles of association. Treatment of mental illness has increasingly paralleled physical medicine. This has helped diminish the stigma surrounding mental illness.

.

Posted in Psychology | Comments (0)