Subject Clearing Beingness (old)

Please refer to Subject Clearing Beingness

Philosophically, the ancient Vedas divide the beingness of a person into Self and Being. This division may be defined in modern terms as follows:

SELF
The SELF is the ability to postulate and to become aware. It pervades everything. It is considered to be infinite. It has no individuality.

BEING
The “being” is a package of postulates energized by Self. It consists of postulated goals and behavior characteristics. It carries the detailed blueprint for the body and the mind. The being, therefore, has an individuality, and it is finite with a beginning and an end.

THE PERSON (BEINGNESS)
The person is the BEING that is grounded in SELF. He is most happy and operates optimally when his postulates are not in violation of the principle of Oneness.

POSTULATE
A POSTULATE is a self-created truth that gives form to the unknowable, and attempts to make it knowable. Based on postulates further reasoning follows. To be valid, postulates and reasoning must adhere to the principle of oneness.

SPIRIT
SPIRIT is a loose concept that includes SELF as defined above and the postulates that form the goals and basic characteristics of a person. Spirituality has to do with becoming aware of the situations in life and having the ability to resolve them.

PRINCIPLE OF ONENESS
Oneness does not imply sameness. Oneness means that all that is known is continuous, consistent and harmonious. This PRINCIPLE OF ONENESS underlies the very concept of the universe. It also underlies the Scientific method. This principle gives us the ideal scene for logic, because its violation gives us anomalies.

ANOMALY
An ANOMALY is any violation of the principle of oneness, such as, discontinuity (missing data), inconsistency (contradictory data), or disharmony (arbitrary data).

.

Anomaly of Beingness

The key anomaly of beingness is its identification with something other than itself. This shows up as “attachment” to that something. This attachment manifests as “fixation of attention” on that something.

The attachment, such as, fixation on the body, or fixation on oneself, muddies up a person’s perception and, therefore, his ability to think.

One solution to this problem is to have a clear idea of one’s goals, and to be devoted to discharging one’s duties according to those goals.

This is the message of The Bhagavad Gita. The goal must not be in violation of the principle of Oneness.

.

Subject Clearing

The target of Subject Clearing is resolving the FIXATION OF ATTENTION. 

If a person’s attention is fixed on his body, then he clears up the subject of the body until his attention is no longer fixed on the body. If his attention is fixed on the mind, then he clears up the subject of the mind until his attention is no longer fixed on the mind. 

If his attention is fixed on a number of different things, then he makes a list of those things and rearranges them in the sequence they are taking up his attention. He then handles them one by one through Subject Clearing.

Ideally, the person’s attention should be free. He should be able to place his attention where he wants, and not have it fixed at a place where he does not want.

.

Subject Clearing Mind (old)

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

The postulates that constitute the being, arrange themselves into a “matrix” type structure. In this “matrix” the postulates are associated with each other such that they are continuous, consistent and harmonious per the principle of Oneness.

This matrix structure makes us aware of the reality that surrounds us. It interprets the incoming sensations and gradually builds up a mental matrix, which contains all the experience of a person. The associations within the mental matrix help us visualize and resolve the situations that we encounter. This is what we call the Mind.

The mind operates as follows.

  1. The external reality enters the mind through the sense organs.
  2. The sense organs convert the external reality into sensations.
  3. The sensations then proceed to the mind’s matrix structure.
  4. The matrix structure assimilates and converts the sensations into perceptions.

The is happening throughout our life at every moment that we are alive.

.

Assimilation

The mind must assimilate the sensations to convert them into perceptions. This process is postulated to occur as follows.

  1. The sensations break down into “perceptual elements” to be assimilated in the mental matrix.
  2. The assimilation sets up associations among the perceptual elements so they are continuous, consistent and harmonious as much as possible.
  3. The assimilation eliminates duplicate perceptual elements for efficient storage. 
  4. These associations then allow the mind to perceive what was received by the sense organs.

Traumatic sensations do not easily break down into perceptual elements. So, they are not assimilated and perceived. They remain as “unassimilated impressions.”

.

Memory, Imagination & Consciousness

The perceptual elements, upon assimilation, are identified by their characteristics and the time when they were received. The whole mental matrix forms the EXPERIENCE of the person.

MEMORIES are reconstructed by associating the perceptual elements in the matrix by their TIME STAMPS as and when needed during mental computations. Memories are not stored as “recordings” because that will result in a lot of duplicate storage.

IMAGINATION is generated from the creative associations among the perceptual elements in the matrix. There may be gaps among the associations, but they are bridged over by rational projections. Over time, these rational projections are replaced by actual experience. 

CONSCIOUSNESS depends on the fineness of the perceptual elements. The finer are the perceptual elements the clearer is the perception and deeper is the understanding. These perceptual elements are much finer in humans compared to the animals.

.

Unassimilated Impressions (Facsimiles)

Traumatic sensations do not break down easily into perceptual elements after entering the mind. They embed themselves into the mental matrix as UNASSIMILATED IMPRESSIONS. These unassimilated impressions act as “recordings” that insert themselves in the thinking circuits when activated. They lead to conclusions, the reasoning of which cannot be traced back because the content of these impressions is not known.

These unassimilated impressions have been called SAMSKARA in Hinduism, and SANKHARA in Buddhism. More recently, these unassimilated impressions have been called FACSIMILES in Scientology by Hubbard, because they appear as recordings. The content of these samskara, sankhara, or facsimiles cannot be properly perceived because they are not assimilated with the rest of mental matrix. 

These facsimiles are felt as raw sensations of PAIN and ANXIETY. Their effect is to distort the mental matrix. Such distortions show up as anomalies in thinking, in the otherwise smooth operation of the mind.

The effect of facsimiles appears in the person in the form of sickness, aberrated behavior and unwanted conditions.

.

Past Life Memories

The facsimiles are carried forward from one generation to the next as part of the DNA programming. It takes them three to four generations to assimilate by themselves.

When they start to assimilate, they appear as “past life memories.”

.

Comparison to Earlier Models

The above may be called THE MATRIX MODEL OF THE MIND.

The assimilated mental matrix, which provides rational thinking, may be compared to the CONSCIOUS mind of Freud, and the ANALYTICAL mind of Hubbard. 

The unassimilated impressions (facsimiles), collectively, which distort the operation of the mind, may be compared to the SUBCONSCIOUS mind of Freud, and the REACTIVE mind of Hubbard. 

Here are some ideas associated with the mind

  1. The idea of self-awareness and self-determinism applies only to the assimilated portion of the mind.
  2. Memories are reconstructed upon demand from perceptual elements in the assimilated mental matrix.
  3. The unassimilated impressions are like recordings, or FACSIMILES.
  4. Memories do not exist as recordings, or facsimiles.
  5. At the core of unassimilated impressions, or facsimiles, are aberrated postulates and misconceptions.
  6. Aberrated thinking and behavior are the outcome of the facsimiles.
  7. The idea of time track applies only to the content of the facsimiles.

.

Summary 

The above describes the MATRIX MODEL OF THE MIND, which was developed through subject clearing. 

The facsimiles generate anomalies in the operation of the mind itself. These are the target of Subject Clearing. The subject clearing is the tool that resolves anomalies.

The assimilation of facsimiles improves a person’s ability to think clearly and perceive things in the environment without distortions. This assimilation of facsimiles also helps repair the body.

With a fully assimilated mind one can then resolve the deeper and larger problems of the universe.

This then helps Man accomplish rapidly the prime purpose of the universe: TO EVOLVE.

.

Subject Clearing Oneself

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

When we look at the the subjects, The categories of “School subjects” and “Professions and Arts” are easy to clear, but when it comes to the category of “The Self and Life,” the subject clearing requires a whole different level of effort because we are resolving anomalies in ourselves. 

This is what religion has been attempting to do since the ancient times. Out of religion have evolved the subjects of philosophy and science. Interestingly enough, an implicit part of mainline religion, philosophy and the scientific method has been the Principle of Oneness.

.

The Principle of Oneness & Truth

The PRINCIPLE OF ONENESS may now be stated explicitly as follows:

Oneness does not imply sameness. Oneness means that all that is known is continuous, consistent and harmonious. This principle of oneness underlies the very concept of the universe. It also underlies the Scientific method. This principle gives us the ideal scene for logic, because its violation gives us anomalies. 

When we look at ourselves, truth no longer appears to be as certain as black and white. Instead, we get a whole spectrum of truth. We find that something is as true as it is continuous, consistent and harmonious within its context. The criterion for truth is, thus, best expressed by the Principle of Oneness.

.

The Subject of “I”

The subject of “I” is generally divided into the categories of Body, Mind and Spirit.

The body can still be seen as a subject that can be examined objectively. When it comes to the mind, it becomes quite subjective. And when we look at the spirit it becomes quite esoteric.

We identify ourselves with the body. The body is studied as an organism in the subject of “Biology.” It is treated through the professional subject of “Medicine.” Structurally, we have a pretty good idea of the body. But when it comes to the subject of genetics to understand the blueprint of the body, we find that there is a lot that we do not know.

We identify ourselves with the mind even more. We apply the mind when we engage in the study of any subject. When we study the subject of mind itself, we get into sort of a loop. We find that we need a model that integrates all the various functions of the mind nicely.

We are identified with the spirit most intimately. In spirit, we start looking at the most fundamental factors that make us what we are. We find a lot of speculations and theories about such factors in various religions.

.

The Beingness as Spirit & Mind

Subject Clearing should start with an understanding of one’s Beingness in terms of Spirit and Mind. Then it should proceed to the understanding of the Body.

The factors underlying the spirit are taken up in The KHTK Factors.

The subject of Beingness is taken up in Subject Clearing Beingness.

The subject of Mind is taken up in Subject Clearing the Mind.

.

History of Subject Clearing

Reference: The Book of Subject Clearing

Subject Clearing is listing the key concepts in a subject and then arranging them in a sequence from broad to narrower. Then you start straightening out that sequence by addressing missing, contradictory or arbitrary concepts. You focus on earlier and earlier parts of that sequence, till you arrive at the original postulates that established the subject.

Clearing a subject can be demonstrated most easily with school subjects. The idea of Subject Clearing started, at first, as a way to handle the weakness in a procedure called Word Clearing.

.

Word Clearing

It is a reasonable idea to not go by words you do not understand the meaning of. You clear up the definitions using a good dictionary. This can prevent confusions on the materials. This idea has long existed in the field of study. Growing up as a bilingual in India, I had used English-to-Hindi dictionaries. 

Around 1970, L. Ron Hubbard formalized this process as Word Clearing and made it a necessary part of his Scientology Study Technology. A student applied word clearing to the learning of Scientology materials, which consisted of Hubbard’s theories. The student was not allowed to question these theories. Instead he was pushed to find his “misunderstood word” until he agreed with Hubbard’s ideas. Many a time the student had to suppress his disagreements with the definitions provided by Hubbard, and accept them on their face value.

This highlighted the weakness of the Word Clearing procedure. It could not detect and correct the flaws in the definitions provided.

The word clearing procedure has no way of evaluating the definitions of words for missing, contradictory, or arbitrary data. But it is very workable with subjects that use standard vocabulary with well-established definitions. 

.

Self-Learning Project

Most of my life I have been tutoring mathematics because I simply love this subject. During the eighties, I started to use word clearing consciously in my tutoring of math. This produced better results faster. I then wanted to see if I could produce similar results on a larger scale. So, in mid-nineties I started a Math Club in the local library. 

The Math Club ran quite successfully for over a decade. I focused on clarifying the math vocabulary. The students had a lot of fun, and I had wonderful experience. I discovered that the many concepts in mathematics were not taught well. For example, most students did not know the difference between a DIGIT and a NUMBER. So, I came up with definitions that immediately communicated the difference to the students.

A DIGIT is like a letter; whereas, a NUMBER is like a word.

There are many more instances like this. For example, most students do not understand the meaning and logic behind “division by zero.” A number divided by zero is not zero but infinity. But why?

I then put together The Book of Mathematics to answer such questions, and bring clarity to the fundamentals of mathematics. Around 2006, Sal Khan launched the Khan Academy. It provided further materials for learning math in a wonderfully simple way. My attention then shifted to self-learning. The goal became teaching the students to become self-learners.

.

High School Dropouts Project

In 2015, I worked with High School dropouts at a facility of the Metropolitan Ministries of Tampa in New Port Richie, Florida. It was an eye-opening experience to get to know the hopes and aspirations of these young students after the disappointments and despair they had gone through. I documented my first encounter with some of them at this link: Troubleshooting Difficulties. My efforts to address their difficulties using word clearing didn’t go too well.

These students were much older than those I had worked with earlier. They had a long trail of misconceptions behind them. They soon became exasperated with any effort to track down their earlier misconceptions. Then I hit upon the idea of doing a series of lectures that introduced the basic math concepts in a logical order. These lectures introduced the basics in the form of well laid out definitions. The first lecture introduced MATHEMATICS with some fun puzzles (see What is Mathematics?). The subsequent lectures cleared up some fundamental vocabulary. 

This lecture series was highly successful. This experience provided me with the following understanding:

  1. Students get fired up when you are clarifying the right concepts that they are missing.
  2. This happens rapidly when students are presented with concepts in a logical order.
  3. This also requires concepts to be explained with great simplicity and total clarity.
  4. This provides the fastest way of learning a subject.

.

Start of Subject Clearing

That later concepts in a subject usually depend on earlier and broader concepts. This led to the discovery that a subject can be learned rapidly if its concepts are presented in the order from broader and more fundamental to narrower and more specific. This was the the start of subject clearing. This approach applied not only to school subjects, but also to the subjects encountered in life, and to the subject of life itself.

It is found that this approach often leads to the discovery of concepts that need to be clarified better, and even to holes in the subject that are camouflaged by assumptions and arbitrary concepts. Many concepts are defined so ambiguously that they lead to contradictions. One can, thus, develop an optimum sequence of key words with precise and concise definitions to learn a subject.

After a student understands this list of key words he can study the subject rapidly on a self-learning basis. An alphabetically arranged glossary may also be put together, so one can find the keywords and definitions conveniently, .

Over time, as the understanding in the subject improves, the definitions evolve to become more precise. As a subject expands, for example, when we study many religions together, the key words for similar concepts may be indexed together.

.

Summary

Subject Clearing is a new method that lends itself to self-learning. It may be used to develop an optimum curriculum for studying a subject. That curriculum may easily by self-studied by students in a large supervised classroom. Students can self-study and learn at their own pace since there are no teachers and lecturers to keep pace with.

.

Comments: The Transfer

Reference: A History of Man
Reference: CHAPTER TEN

Comments on CHAPTER TEN
The Transfer

The Transfer is actually the attention of a person getting fixated on the body. The transfer out is freeing of that attention.

Thetan is not a thing that has physical location. But the person has a viewpoint that can assume different locations to view from. The thetan is the intelligent self-aware programming, which is the upper end of the genetic DNA programming. 

A person can have a fixation on the body, and, at the same time, have a viewpoint that is looking at the body from a distance. A fixation has to do with the state of the mind.

As a person’s attention get increasingly fixated on the body, he thinking becomes increasingly stimulus-response. 

Prior to fixation on the body, there is fixation on oneself.

Even with fixation on the body, a person can still control his environment. But, over time, this control becomes less and less, until he can’t even control the body.

Thetan is “self-awareness programming” that can become aware of the facsimiles as such. But entities being “artificial intelligence programming” may find themselves identified with facsimiles. As a person resolves facsimiles along with entities, he starts to establish his self-identity more clearly.

The problem with the E-meter is that you cannot eliminate all of its reactions in auditing. Therefore, Hubbard is assigning the unsuitable E-meter reactions to the entities. Hubbard’s incredible and elaborate theories exist only to justify the use of E-meter.

Hubbard’s seems to be having a lot of difficulties in auditing, because lot of auditing hours are getting wasted, and the efficiency of auditing is quite low. He is trying to resolve them by coming up with arbitrary theories.

Hubbard is having difficulty differentiating between the thetan and the entities. Better auditing takes place when one directly addresses the fixations using The Discipline of Subject Clearing instead of the E-meter.

The kind of auditing recommended by Hubbard, simply serves to fix the attention on the body and on the thetan. So, the person does not free himself from fixation. This is a self-defeating approach. If you take the subject clearing approach of handling the fixation directly, it keeps your attention free.

Major problem in Scientology is fixation on the thetan and not just on the body. This auditing technique is unworkable. Unfortunately, this auditing approach is still part of the OT levels. More than 70 years have passed since this book was written, and we still do not have clearing occurring on a large scale.

.

Definitions

ENTITY
An entity is programming, which exhibits some artificial intelligence. Therefore, an entity may be referred to as “artificial intelligence programming.”

PROGRAMMING
A program consists of coded instructions. The closer this instructions are to the machine language, the more simply but powerfully the program can be written.

When the instructions are very simple and straightforward, without any feedback, then the program responds in a set way. This is the kind of program that tells you the time in different countries. This compares to very simple stimulus-response type programming.

A sophisticated program may provide you with varied reactions depending of different inputs. This is more like the programming you may find in a cell. You may be surprised at the sophistication of programming in a cell.

Now, when you introduce feedback in the program, it is like introducing some awareness. The more feedback you incorporate at different stages of the program, the more aware you make the software. This too can be taken to a high level of sophistication.

But the self-awareness we see in a software displaying artificial intelligence is due to a very different kind of programming. This kind of programming allows the software to update itself based on the feedback. Thus, the software can grow in complexity as it gets more and more feedback. This is pretty similar to humans learning and becoming more experienced. But AI is nowhere close to the sophistication we find with human learning and intelligence.

Based on this model we can see the Genetic Entity and Thetan having different levels of programming. Genetic entity operates on feedback and it is very sophisticated, but it has limited capacity to update itself. On the other hand, Thetan is programmed for self-awareness. It can easily update itself based on experience. The Genetic Entity + Thetan, actually represent a whole gradient awareness and self-awareness types of programming and not just a two-step programming.

THETAN
The thetan is upper end programming that is intelligent and self-aware. It may be referred to as “self-awareness programming.” It is an extension of the genetic DNA programming. Thetan is not a thing that has physical location. But the thetan aspect of the person has a viewpoint that can assume different locations to view from.

.