We shall Witness

Iqbal Bano, the subcontinent’s beloved ghazal singer, born in India and trained in the Dilli Gharana by the legendary Ustad Chand Khan, . In the hearts of all who knew and loved her music is the memory of that day: when, in protest against the jailing of the subcontinent’s foremost left poet Faiz Ahmad Faiz by Pakistan’s dictator General Zia-ul Haq, she sang Faiz’s immortal song “Hum Dekhenge” (We shall witness) at a Lahore stadium full of 50,000 people, wearing a black sari in defiance of Zia’s ban on the sari. As her liquid voice reached the crescendo — declaring “Certainly we, too, shall witness that day … When these high mountains/Of tyranny and oppression turn to fluff and evaporate/And we oppressed/Beneath our feet will this earth shiver, shake and beat/And heads of rulers will be struck/With crackling lightening and thunder roars/When crowns will be flung in the air — and thrones will be overturned …,” people joined with slogans of “Inquilab Zindabad” (Long live revolution!)

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;LYRICS;;;;;;;;;;;­;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Hum dekhenge
Lazim hai ke hum bhi dekhenge
Woh din ke jis ka waada hai
Jo loh-e-azl pe likha hai
Hum dekhenge

Jab zulm-o-sitam ke koh-e-garaan
Rui ki tarah ud jayenge
Hum mehkumoon ke paun tale
Yeh dharti dhad dhad dhadkagi
Aur ehl-e-hukum ke sar upar
Jab bijli kad kad kadkegi
Hum dekhenge

Jab arz-e-khuda ke Kabe se
Sab but uthwaye jayenge
Hum ahl-e-safa mardood-e-haram
Masnad pe bithaye jayenge
Sab taaj uchale jayenge
Sab takht giraye jayenga
Bas naam rahega Allah ka
Jo ghayab bhi hai hazir bhi
Jo nazir bhi hai manzar bhi
Uthega nalhaq ka naara
Jomain bhi hoon aur tum bhi ho
Aur raaj karegi khalq-e-khuda
Jo main bhi hoon aur tum bhi ho
Hum dekhenge
Lazim hai ke hum bhi dekhenge
Hum dekhenge

Love and Liking

Love

Love and Liking can have many flavors.

But, underlying them all

Is mindfulness.

.

The 12 aspects of mindfulness are:

  1. Observe without expecting anything, or attempting to get an answer.
  2. Observe things as they really are, not as they seem to be.
  3. If something is missing do not imagine something else in its place. 
  4. If something does not make sense then do not explain it away.
  5. Use physical senses as well as mental sense to observe.
  6. Let the mind un-stack itself. 
  7. Experience fully what is there.  
  8. Do not suppress anything.
  9. Associate data freely.
  10. Do not get hung up on name and form.
  11. Contemplate thoughtfully.
  12. Let it all be effortless.

.

Idenics and KHTK

Idenics

John Galusha and L. Ron Hubbard

Idenics has had a wonderful influence in the development of KHTK (Mindfulness), and this should be acknowledged. Idenics helped set up the bridge of understanding between the influences that KHTK had from Buddhism and Scientology.

Like Buddhism, KHTK is a grass-roots movement that employs mindfulness. But it incorporates the modern technology of “directed mindfulness” as introduced in Scientology but finally rounded up in Idenics.

If a person is having difficulty with the self-application of KHTK exercises and processes, I shall certainly recommend that person to go to an Idenics practitioner for assistance.

NOTE (February 22, 2020): KHTK is an acronym formed from Knowing How To Know.

NOTE (February 12, 2021): I now prefer Subject Clearing under the Discipline of Mindfulness over Idenics. You handle such points of equilibrium (or shocks) on a gradient in your contemplations during subject clearing.

.

Failure of Scientology

HolmesCruise
[Reference: Scientology]

The failure of Scientology lies in

(1) Chasing individual power and status
(2) Being afraid of criticism.
(3) Seeking security through money and force.

.

[For further details, please see KHTK Mindfulness]

.

Question for Scientology “Purists”

Tom_Cruise

Here is a question I have for Scientology “purists” that I put on JIM ROSS MESKIMEN’S BLOG

.

I saw this article on Facebook, and that is why I am here. I like Scientology too because I have been helped by it, but there are also aspects of Scientology that I don’t like, and which I try to understand. I hope you wouldn’t mind if I take up one of those aspects for discussion on your blog.

My earlier experiences in Scientology were wonderful; so much so that I documented them in My Introduction to America. Those early experiences gave me hope that I could get a grass-roots movement in education going in my country (India), through which people could improve themselves. The ancient movement of “meditation” had lost its steam long ago. But auditing as “directed meditation” could put life back in it.

But then I saw Scientology moving away from its early promise of creating a grass-roots movement in the field. I saw it becoming very sensitive to criticism even if that criticism were valid. I saw it declaring people as squirrels and suppressive if they thought on their own to make Scientology principles easier to apply at the grass-roots level. I saw an obsessive control to keep the technology out of general reach under the pretext of keeping it “pure.”

As we see in the field of science that the purity of knowledge would always be aspired for and any corruption of knowledge would just wash away over time. All one has to do is to make those basic principles easier to understand and apply. And that is what I have gone back to doing on my blog, which may not be appreciated by the “purists.”

Should or should not the Scientology research be continued by others, after Hubbard’s passing away? Shouldn’t the principles discovered by Hubbard be made easier to be applied at the grass-roots level?

.

PS: It was 1969 when I first came across Dianetics and Scientology, and dreamed of a grass-roots movement going in India. But, today, my country is the United States of America. It is where I live. And now I dream of a grass-roots movement in education started throughout the world.

I hope to accomplish that dream with the help of KHTK (Knowing How To Know), which is inspired in part by Scientology.

.