Category Archives: Postulates

Philosophy Definitions #1

philosophy

PHILOSOPHY

Wikipedia

“Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on rational argument.”

.

Scientology

“1. the pursuit of knowledge. The knowledge of the causes and laws of all things.  2. a love or pursuit of wisdom or a search for the underlying causes and principles of reality.”

.

KHTK

Philosophy starts broadly with the study of manifestation and perception. It looks at all things and the patterns underlying them. It works to resolve inconsistencies on a broad scale.

.

COMMENTS:

It is interesting to note that the general definition of philosophy does not use the word ’cause’, but the Scientology definition does. Scientology believes that there is a Cause behind all existence. Scientology is close-minded about this belief. However, the general subject of philosophy is open to examining this belief.

KHTK looks at cause to be integral to existence. It is karma. Cause arises from existence and affects the existence. All the intent is within the universe. On the whole this universe is tautological (logically circular). A small segment of a large circle appears to be a straight line and not circular. Similarly, a small segment of this universe appears to be logically linear and not tautological.

.

.

REALITY

Wikipedia

“Reality is the state of things as they actually exist, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. In a wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible. A still more broad definition includes everything that has existed, exists, or will exist.”

.

Scientology

“Reality is, here on earth, agreement as to what is. This does not prevent barriers or time from being formidably real. It does not mean either that space, energy or time are illusions. It is as one knows it is.”

.

KHTK 

Reality is the direct perception of what-is. Any abstraction that remains consistent with direct perception, such as, mathematics, is also part of reality. Inconsistencies with reality, gives rise to unreality and unwanted conditions.

.

COMMENTS:

Scientology believes that reality arises from agreement. A group of people, such as, the Flat Earth Society, can have its own reality of a flat earth regardless of what others say. One may even hold on to the reality of a universe different from the physical universe. Thus, in Scientology, an individual may create his or her own reality and hold on to it.

In KHTK reality is what is perceived through mindfulness. Mindfulness is seeing things as they are without assumptions. Reality becomes clearer as assumptions and inconsistencies are removed. Thus, one’s assumptions are not part of the reality that exists. If a number of people believe in flat earth, then they are simply sharing an assumption, which is not part of reality.

.

.

EXISTENCE

Wikipedia

“In common usage, it is the world one is aware or conscious of through one’s senses, and that persists independently in one’s absence. Other definitions describe it as everything that ‘is’, or more simply, everything. Some define it to be everything that most people believe in.”

.

Scientology

“[Existence is] an existing state or fact of being; life; living; continuance of being; and occurrence; specific manifestation.”

.

KHTK

Existence is made up of the reality out there and thoughts about that reality. Thus, everything that one perceives, and all that one assumes (both reality and unreality), are part of existence.

.

COMMENTS:

In KHTK, nothing is excluded from existence. If God is believed to exist then God is also part of existence.

.

KHTK Research Data

truthavail

 

The Absolute Truth is that there is nothing absolute in the world, that everything is relative, conditioned and impermanent, and that there is no unchanging, everlasting, absolute substance like Self, Soul, or Ātman within or without. ~ Buddha

.

THE FUNDAMENTALS

KHTK 06: KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 1

KHTK 07: KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 2

KHTK 08: KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 3

KHTK 09: KHTK Postulates for Metaphysics – Part 4

.

KHTK AXIOMS

RESEARCH 00: KHTK AXIOM #0: The Absolute

RESEARCH 01: KHTK AXIOM #1: The Relative

RESEARCH 02: KHTK AXIOM #2: Awareness

RESEARCH 03: KHTK AXIOM #3: Space-time

RESEARCH 04: KHTK AXIOM #4: Objects

RESEARCH 05: KHTK AXIOM #5: Existence

RESEARCH 06: KHTK AXIOM #6: The Universe

RESEARCH 07: KHTK AXIOM #7: Location

 

RESEARCH 08: KHTK Postulates

.

CONTEMPLATION

KHTK 31: The Fundamental Dimension

KHTK 32: The Sixth Sense

KHTK 33: KHTK Model of The Universe

KHTK 34: PERCEPTION & KNOWLEDGE

KHTK 35: KNOWLEDGE & INCONSISTENCY

KHTK 36: INCONSISTENCY & LOOKING

. 

KHTK AXIOMS (Earlier)

KHTK 51: KHTK AXIOM ZERO

KHTK 52: KHTK AXIOM ONE

KHTK 53: KHTK AXIOM TWO

KHTK 54: KHTK AXIOM THREE

KHTK 55: KHTK AXIOM FOUR

KHTK 56: KHTK AXIOM FIVE

KHTK 57: KHTK AXIOM SIX

KHTK 58: KHTK AXIOM SEVEN

KHTK 59: KHTK AXIOMS: A Work in Progress

KHTK 60: KHTK AXIOMS: A Work in Progress #2

.

OLD KHTK ESSAYS:

KHTK 14: Mind in Mindfulness

KHTK 300: The Basics of Meditation

KHTK 302: COMMENTS ON LOOKING

KHTK 303: THE BASICS OF LOOKING

KHTK 305: THE MECHANICS OF LOOKING

KHTK 306: THE PRACTICE OF LOOKING

KHTK 307: MEMORY & RECALL

KHTK 308: THE BASIC INCONSISTENCY

KHTK 309: GENERAL INCONSISTENCIES

KHTK 312: EXPERIENCING

KHTK 313: PERCEPTION

KHTK 314: THINKING & THOUGHT

KHTK 315: INCONSISTENCY

KHTK 316: ATTENTION

KHTK 317: UN-STACKING

KHTK 318: SUMMARY

KHTK 319: KHTK LOOKING: AN OVERVIEW

KHTK 324: Observation, Experience and Looking

KHTK 325: From Mystery to Knowing

KHTK 326: Inconsistencies and Knowledge

KHTK 327: FROM UNCONSCIOUSNESS TO KNOWING

KHTK 328: Looking and Illness

KHTK 329: Successes from KHTK

.

 KHTK 90: KHTK EXERCISES BASED ON BUDDHISM

.

OLD KHTK EXERCISES:

KHTK 200: KHTK EXERCISE SET 1 (old)

KHTK 201: KHTK EXERCISE SET 2 (old)

KHTK 204: KHTK EXERCISE SET I

KHTK 205: KHTK EXERCISE SET II

.

FOR REFERENCE ONLY

.

EARLY KHTK SERIES IN ENGLISH:

Early KHTK Exercises

.

KHTK 4A: VIEWPOINT: INTRODUCTION

KHTK 4B: VIEWPOINT: THE FILTER

KHTK 4C: VIEWPOINT: THE GUIDE

KHTK 4D: VIEWPOINT: SUMMARY

.

KHTK 5A: STILL BODY

KHTK 5B: POSTURES OF THE BODY

KHTK 5C: MOVEMENTS OF THE BODY

KHTK 5D: THE BODY: SUMMARY

.

EARLY KHTK SERIES IN SPANISH:

INTRODUCCION A KHTK

KHTK 1A: INTRODUCCION A MIRAR

KHTK 1B: MIRANDO y PENSANDO

KHTK 1C: MIRANDO LA MENTE

KHTK 1D: MIRANDO: PRÁCTICA

KHTK 1E : MIRANDO : RESUMEN

KHTK 1F: MIRANDO: COMENTARIOS

.

KHTK 2A: EXPERIMENTANDO

KHTK 2B: EXPERIMENTANDO (SINTIENDO): LA MENTE

KHTK 2C: EXPERIMENTANDO (SINTIENDO): PRÁCTICA

KHTK 2D: EXPERIMENTANDO (SINTIENDO): EJERCICIOS AVANZADOS

KHTK 2E: EXPERIMENTANDO (SINTIENDO): RESUMEN

.

KHTK 3A: ATENCIÓN: INTRODUCCIÓN

KHTK 3B: ATENCIÓN: EL AMBIENTE FÍSICO

KHTK 3C: ATENCIÓN: EL COMPONENTE FALTANTE

KHTK 3D: ATENCIÓN: LA MENTE

KHTK 3E: ATENCIÓN: RESUMEN

.

KHTK 4A : PUNTO DE VISTA : INTRODUCCIÓN

KHTK 4B: PUNTO DE VISTA: EL FILTRO

KHTK 4C: PUNTO DE VISTA: EL GUÍA

KHTK 4D: PUNTO DE VISTA: RESUMEN

.

KHTK 5A : CUERPO INMÓVIL

KHTK 5B : POSTURAS DEL CUERPO

KHTK 5C : MOVIMIENTOS DEL CUERPO

KHTK 5D : RESUMEN

KHTK 5: ATENCIÓN

.

EARLY KHTK SERIES IN ITALIAN:

KHTK 1A: OSSERVARE: INTRODUZIONE

KHTK 1B: OSSERVARE CONTRO PENSARE

KHTK 1C: OSSERVARE: LA MENTE

KHTK 1D: OSSERVARE: PRATICA/ESERCIZIO

KHTK 1E: OSSERVARE: RIASSUNTO

.

KHTK 2A: SPERIMENTARE: INTRODUZIONE

KHTK 2B: SPERIMENTARE: LA MENTE

.

Looking at the Philosophy Project

Question

This post refers to the Philosophy Project.

The purpose of this post is simply to provide a holding area for ideas.

We shall be looking around at all different kind of stuff to digest it. The ideas shall first be discussed under the COMMENTS section. Anything pertinent will then be added to this post.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

A self (being) seems to be simply a “center of considerations” that it holds and continually outputs.

As the perception point identifies itself with knowledge through considerations, it gets fixed in its place, and loses it fluidity. Thus,  “I,” or the self, is generated.

All knowledge, regardless of its source, should be consistent. When there is inconsistency, there must be something unresolved that is underlying that inconsistency. Spiritual progress occurs when one starts to spot inconsistencies as they come up naturally and applies mindfulness to them until they dissolve.

As one starts to look mindfully at an inconsistency, it may lead to a chain of inconsistencies. Just keep looking more closely at the inconsistency that is on the “top of the stack.” It is very important to follow the 12 points of mindfulness.

“I” generates considerations (assessment, speculations, judgments, justifications, assumptions, etc.). These considerations are capable of filtering whatever “I” looks at. Taking responsibility means not letting one’s considerations color one’s perception and seeing things as they are.

Considerations seem to bring in the factor of “preservation,” whether it is the preservation of self, or the preservation of property. Justice seems to be concerned with such preservation.

Everything about this universe is in flux. Nothing stays the same. Everything is impermanent. Yet this whole system made up of impermanence seems to be permanently there. How can this inconsistency of “impermanence being permanently there” be explained?

Perception is there as long as manifestation is there. When manifestation is not there, there is no perception either. Thus, there can never be a perception of the state of non-manifestation. We would always perceive manifestation to be there. Ha ha… Q.E.D.

.

(1) An “identity” may simply be a tight “knot” of considerations that needs to be loosened up.

(2) The self is the “center of considerations” analogous to the “center of mass.”

(3) An identity may not affect the self if it is somewhere at the periphery of considerations.

(4) If the identity is closer to the center, it may appear as if the self is stuck with it.

(5) But there are simply a bunch of considerations knotted together, which needs to be loosened up.

(6) Being stuck is simply “some considerations locked into each other.”

.

There seems to be two different levels of knowledge:

(1) A level of knowledge before SELF comes into being.

(2) Another level of knowledge, which is generated when SELF starts to react to the previous level of knowledge.

Such a reaction may occur in chain resulting in ballooning of considerations. The only way to stop and reverse such ballooning of considerations would be to look non-judgmentally and see what is actually there.

Then one is no longer reacting to what is there. Instead one is now continually realizing what is there. This starts to deflate the ballooning considerations. In other words, the ego, or self, gradually starts to dissolve.

One can never predict where this process might lead to. :)

.

At death, the body disintegrates into its particles, and the identity that was the body is dissolved. Similarly, the observing and thinking part of the person (the living soul) also disintegrates into its particles (considerations), and the identity that was the person is also dissolved. That is my current understanding.

However, the particles remain and they can recombine into another “body plus living soul” combination. There is infinity of such recombination.

What are the ultimate laws underlying this disintegration and reintegration, I don’t know the details at the moment. But this seems to be going on forever like complex cycles of some eternal wave according to Hinduism.

Nirvana is something different altogether. It happens to a live soul. In my opinion, nirvana is like exteriorization from CONSIDERATIONS. It is the separation of perception-point from all its considerations. This is called giving up of all attachment in Hinduism. One then sees things as they are without any filters as in Buddhism. There is no individuality in terms of considerations. A perception point is the same as any other perception point. It does not add anything to what is observed or experienced.

Nothing arrives at Nirvana. it is what remains after all attachments are dissolved. I call it a perception-point. But even the perception-point dissolves at parinirvana by merging into its own manifestation… something like electron merging into positron.

Parinirvana is probably what occurs at death, where the live soul, that was already reduced to a completely detached perception-point, merges back into its own manifestation, extinguishing both. The laws of disintegration and reintegration are thus bypassed. But this is only my speculation.

The basis of this speculation is removal of all inconsistencies that I am aware of at this level.

.

Philosophy Project

our.philosophy.top_

SCOPE:

To investigate the interface between physics and metaphysics

.

REFERENCES:

  1. The Creation Hymn of Rig Veda
  2. Neti neti

.

OBSERVATIONS:

[OK, I am starting all over again using Buddha’s principle of seeing things as they are. I decided to define the scope of Physics and Metaphysics at the outset. I see Metaphysics much broader in scope and Physics to be part of that scope. Physics deals with manifestations. Metaphysics must deal with perception because there is nothing else there. I have been reading Aristotle. Metaphysics did not start out as the subject of perception, but it should have. That would have greatly simplified the subject of philosophy.]

ONE: There is looking and perceiving.

TWO: There is something to be looked at and perceived.

THREE: Thus there is manifestation and perception.

FOUR: Physics is a study of manifestation.

FIVE: Metaphysics is a study of perception.

.

PERCEPTION:

[It is PERCEPTION that gives rise to the ideas of SELF, SPACE and all the MANIFESTATIONS around us. Our perception is the starting point of it all. Later we would be investigating what perception is. But first I want to establish the starting point of this investigation.]

SIX: MANIFESTATION is thought to be there. It is what is perceived.

SEVEN: Perception is thought to involve a “perception point”. Thus there is the consideration of SELF.

EIGHT: Self is thought to be separate from manifestation. Thus there is the consideration of SPACE.

NINE: Perception, primarily, is thought to involve the considerations of MANIFESTATION, SELF, and SPACE.

TEN: Perception appears to be THOUGHT considering itself. 

.

EXISTENCE:

[Philosophy still hasn’t sorted out fully what EXISTENCE is. There are many different views about it. In other words, different philosophers mentally perceive existence differently. It all boils down to perception. The problem of existence sorts out nicely when we define it in terms of perception.]

ELEVEN: Manifestations, self, and space are thought to be present. Thus, there is the consideration of EXISTENCE.

TWELVE: Manifestation is what is perceived. Self is what perceives. Space makes perception possible.

THIRTEEN: That this is so is a consideration.

FOURTEEN: Existence is the sum total of considerations perceived.

FIFTEEN: Existence is relative and not absolute.

.

CRITERION OF INVESTIGATION:

[It is important to establish the first principle from the outset. It then acts as the criterion for rest of the investigation. Here we are using PERCEPTION as the first principle and the criterion. One may figure-figure whatever one wants, but unless it is there to be perceived, it would not meet the criterion of this investigation.]

SIXTEENAristotle called the subjects of metaphysics “first philosophy”. He called the study of nature, or physics, “second philosophy”. This is consistent with the fact that study of manifestation (second philosophy) is intrinsic to the study of perception (first philosophy).

SEVENTEEN: The implication from Aristotle is that the primary task of philosophy is to search for first principles. Aristotle seems to describe the first principle as “the first basis from which a thing is known.”

EIGHTEEN: By definition, a first principle would be a basic, foundational proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition or assumption.

NINETEEN: In this investigation we start with the first principle of PERCEPTION OF MANIFESTATION. It is something that is universally there. It spurs thinking and further looking.

TWENTY: Hence the criterion used in this investigation would be the determination of those thoughts and observations that are consistent with ‘PERCEPTION OF MANIFESTATION’. These things can be found when actually looked for.

.

FIRST CAUSE:

[“First Cause” is a misnomer. It has nothing to do with the notion of “cause and effect”. “Cause and effect” denote a certain association between two events where the second event is looked upon as the outcome of the first event. “First Cause,” on the other hand, is the property, which makes a manifestation simply appear without association with anything else. It is interesting to observe that the property of “first cause” may be applied to all manifestations before applying the association of “cause and effect.”]

TWENTY-ONE: We cut a tree; it falls. We strike a match; it lights up. Thus, we have a phenomenon that is a direct consequence of another phenomenon. This makes us believe that all phenomena are caused. We, thus, assume that a manifestation must be a consequence of another manifestation. This belief leads to an infinite causal series.

TWENTY-TWO: To resolve this inconsistency, we assume a First Cause that is not itself caused. But this makes the First Cause different from the way all other causes are understood. It allows the possibility that a manifestation may simply appear.

TWENTY-THREE: All manifestations simply appear as we perceive them. They disappear as we stop perceiving them. Thus, we may consider “First Cause” to be the property of all manifestations.

TWENTY-FOUR: The notions of CAUSE and EFFECT seem to indicate an association between two manifestations, which otherwise simply appear and disappear as we perceive or not perceive them.

TWENTY-FIVE: Hence, consistency with perception tells us that “First Cause” is a property that applies to all manifestations. On the other hand, “cause and effect” is a special sequence observed between two manifestations.

.

GOD:

[God cannot be a manifestation itself that can be perceived, and at the same time be the source of all other manifestations. That is highly inconsistent because it makes it possible for any manifestation to be considered God. Thus, if there is a God, then it can’t be manifested. It would be beyond perception. It would be part of speculation only.]

TWENTY-SIX: When God is viewed as a Being with the properties of holiness, justice, sovereignty, omnipotence, omniscience, benevolence, omnipresence, and immortality it qualifies as a manifestation. The property of “First Cause” applies to God just as it applies to any other manifestation.

TWENTY-SEVEN: The implication of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems is that no system can be described completely by using an aspect of that system for reference.

TWENTY-EIGHT: Therefore, God, viewed as a manifestation, cannot completely describe the presence of all other manifestations

TWENTY-NINE: Thus, God must be something that is beyond manifestation. It may be looked upon as the background against which manifestation, and even perception, appears.

THIRTY: Thus, God is THAT, which cannot be conceived or perceived. It is beyond desire, expectation and speculation.

.

CONSIDERATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE:

[The considerations form themselves into space. Disturbances in space travel as radiation. Radiation condenses as matter. The primary knowledge is perception of considerations, from which come memory, experience, knowledge, information, hypotheses, theories, principles, axioms, etc.]

THIRTY-ONE: Space separates manifestation from perception-point. Separation generates desire to know. Desire to know generates expectation. Expectation generates speculation. Speculation generates considerations.

THIRTY-TWO: Considerations (thoughts, ideas, assumptions, expectations, suppositions, conjectures, speculations, etc.) form the fabric of the mental space. Disturbance traveling through this fabric is what forms radiation. This radiation condenses and becomes fixed as matter.

THIRTY-THREE: The perception of these considerations forms the basis of knowledge. Knowledge gradually becomes more structured as it condenses into information, hypotheses, theories, principles and axioms.

THIRTY-FOUR: All considerations are relative and so is knowledge.

THIRTY-FIVE: There is no absolute consideration. There is no absolute knowledge.

.

NAME AND FORM:

[Name and form (nama-rupa in Sanskrit) is the crystallization of thoughts, at which point persistence enters into the picture. Name and form become the points of reference because they are persisting, even if for a fleeting moment. They can now interact and combine into more complex forms with new names.]

THIRTY-SIX: Considerations interact with each other.  For such interaction to take place, there must be persistence.

THIRTY-SEVEN: For considerations to persist they must acquire some form. A unique consideration will have a unique form or ‘name’.

THIRTY- EIGHT: The considerations, thus, interact and combine into more complex forms with new names.

THIRTY-NINE: When there are names and forms there are also considerations.

FORTY: “God,” “Prime Mover Unmoved” “Uncaused Cause,” “Supreme Being,” “Unconditioned Being,” etc. are all considerations.

.

.

[Further development of this project is in progress…]

.

.

SELF:

[As considerations acquire name and form they become fixed. From this come transformations, such as, symbols, pictures, feelings, emotions, impulses, etc. The perception point appears to be the center of these considerations analogous to the “center of mass” in Physics. This is SELF. Considerations give rise to judgments that seem to be coming from self.]

FORTY-ONE: As considerations acquire name and form they develop a structure and become relatively rigid or fixed. 

FORTY-TWOFrom this structure of considerations come transformations, such as, symbols, pictures, feelings, emotions, impulses, etc. Thus come about means for communication, such as, language.

FORTY-THREEAs these considerations become relatively rigid or fixed, the perception point appears to be the center of these considerations analogous to the “center of mass” in Physics. This is SELF.

FORTY-FOUR: The perception gets filtered through the structure of considerations that make up the SELF, before it reaches the perception point.

FORTY-FIVEThe filtered perception gives rise to judgments that seem to be coming from SELF. This determines the view of existence, the Universe and also the view of self.

.

KHTK Axiom Seven

objectivity1

KHTK AXIOM SEVEN: OBJECTIVITY CAN NEVER BE ABSOLUTE. THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A DEGREE OF SUBJECTIVITY.
Corollary: Subjectivity comes from the viewpoint one assumes.
Corollary: A viewpoint acts as a filter.

Perceptibility of a manifestation allows it to be perceived. However, any perception is subject to how that manifestation is being perceived. This aspect of perception may be called a filter. This filter can be so insubstantial that it is almost transparent, or it can be so substantial that the manifestation appears totally different from what it really is.

Manifestation is the same as its perceptibility. It is the filter, which makes a manifestation appear to be separate from its perception. When there is no filter the manifestation may simply appear to be the consideration of itself.

True objectivity would be seeing something for what it is without any filters.That would mean, “Seeing something without any viewpoint.”

.