Author Archives: vinaire

I am originally from India. I am settled in United States since 1969. I love mathematics, philosophy and clarity in thinking.

Case Handling

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

Trouble with Scientology was that it was always in a rush to produce an effect. Its premise was that you have to control the mind of the other person before you can create some effect on him. All Scientology processes try to control the person in one way or another.

Subject clearing, on the other hand, is not based on “Cause-Effect”. Instead it is based on “Knowing the Unknowable.” It is easy going and without any stress. You just flow with natural laws.

.

Nuances

I am certainly not thinking in terms of black and white. Of course, there are all different shades in between. I have benefitted from Scientology, and I am spending so much time on it because there is a lot for me to learn from it. But I find the following fundamental difference in the orientation of the two subjects.

Scientology:
Factor # 1. Before the beginning was a Cause and the entire purpose of the Cause was the creation of effect.

Subject Clearing:
KHTK Factor # 1: Before the beginning was the Unknowable and the entire purpose of the Unknowable was to know itself.

This is also the fundamental difference between Western and Eastern philosophy in terms of its orientation. This filters down to the two cultures being different. There is no denying that there is a lot of overlap and diffusion between the two cultures now. But when I look at the orientation at the deepest level, this is what I see. Both orientations have value. Neither is superior to the other. Maybe a complete diffusion between the two orientations will be optimum.

.

Difference in Orientations

The difference in the two orientations shows up in the fact that Scientology is very result oriented. A Scientology auditor is working hard towards producing a certain result. This is not so in Subject Clearing, where the focus is on learning something new by resolving anomalies. It is very organic in terms of moving from one process to another.

Actually, that is the natural instinct of the person to learn something new by resolving anomalies. He just has gotten confused and deviated from that natural path. You have to nudge and encourage the person back on that path, and he would oblige you. This is not the same thing as controlling the person.

If the person is running away with the session in some uncontrolled fashion, then obviously his discipline is out, and he is not spotting anomalies and resolving them. So, you remind him of the discipline and encourage him to practice it, before continuing with the process. Instead of controlling the person, you teach him to control himself.

.

Difference in the Bases

Hubbard’s auditing is based on the same premise as psychoanalysis that a person often resists looking at what he doesn’t know about himself. But it hasn’t thought all the way through why a person resists.

The obvious answer is that a person resists only when the gradient of looking is out. He is resisting because he is not looking at the anomaly he wants to resolve. If you can only help him locate the right confusion and the right anomaly he would cooperate with you. This is what I learned from the following experience, and this is what led to the basis of Subject Clearing. See The Future of Education.

.

The Logic of the Gradient

Whether a person changes or not is not in your hands. The changes are brought about by the person himself or herself. It all comes down to how you look at the case of the person. It is best not to evaluate his case but to arrange the processes in a logical sequence, such that they start by addressing the lowest point of a case, then the next higher point, and so on. You will soon find the right gradient of the process to apply.

The person may tell you the anomaly he is looking at, But a close look at that anomaly should reveal other anomalies that he is struggling with. You note down all those anomalies and list them in a logical sequence and then find the process appropriate for addressing the first anomaly in that sequence. This reduces to an algorithm that you may repeat until you find the right anomaly and the right process.

A Subject Clearing session may appear like a friendly chat, but you very soon become aware if you are in the right area or not, or if you are running the right process or not. There is no use in pushing the incorrect process hoping that it will bite if you push it a bit more. The session will run smoothly if you are on the right gradient of case difficulty with the person.

.

The Job as an Analyst

Of course, as an analyst you may lose patients because of mistakes you make. But be kind to yourself and learn from your mistakes and do better next time. Remember, your job is to assist and not to control, and you learn to assist better as you work with different cases of varying difficulties. The discipline of Subject Clearing applies to you as an analyst as well.

Einstein said, “You can never solve a problem with the same mindset that created it.” That is because that mindset with a problem is assuming something, which is keeping the problem in place. As an analyst you do not want to make the same assumption. In fact, you start out with making no assumptions at all.

So, you do not evaluate the case, but follow the logic of how various cases stack up. If you follow up on the anomalies with the person you are working, he or she will tell you how his or her case is stacked up.

In Subject Clearing you can be your own analyst.

.

Subject Clearing Process 15 (Condition)

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

Processing is the application of a sequence of steps to bring about an improvement in a person’s condition. In Subject Clearing, the processes are obtained from the study of Hinduism, Buddhism and Scientology.

In Subject Clearing, you can always go back to an earlier process and run it again.

.

Process #15

The 15th process in Subject Clearing is to explore the concept of CONDITION. 

“Condition” means an existing state that is right there and visible. The person looks at the condition more closely and also at the attitude he has about it. He looks at all the actions he has taken with respect to it. He experiences non-judgmentally the feelings, emotions and efforts that the mind brings up. 

A person commonly unstacks intense feelings and emotions before finally gaining the complete understanding for his condition. The appearance of intense emotions is a sign that one is approaching the final stages of the process.

In this process a person contemplates on the following.

  1. Tell me an existing condition.
  2. Tell me how you handled it.

This process is discussed more fully here. Make sure you study and understand it: “CONDITIONS” – A Scientology Power Process

Contemplate per the above commands until you are fully satisfied with your understanding of EXISTENCE. If you come across an anomaly handle it with Subject Clearing Process 6 (Viewpoint).

.

Subject Clearing Process 14 (Existence)

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

Processing is the application of a sequence of steps to bring about an improvement in a person’s condition. In Subject Clearing, the processes are obtained from the study of Hinduism, Buddhism and Scientology.

In Subject Clearing, you can always go back to an earlier process and run it again.

.

Process 14

The 14th process in Subject Clearing is to explore the concept of EXISTENCE. 

This process makes a person look at the reality, or the way things are (is-ness). He may or may not like that reality but he must acknowledge that it exists. He may look at the reality, which concerns him in his day-to-day operation; or he may look at the reality of others, society, all life, the whole universe, etc. The process does not limit him to any particular reality. 

His reality may consist of just the physical objects, or it may include mental objets, such as, sensations, perceptions, assumptions, feelings, ideas, expectations, etc. The process tends to make the person aware of his postulates and considerations. He may look at the reality of the past, present or future.

In this process a person contemplates on the following.

  1. What is?
  2. What isn’t?

This process encourages a person to see things as they are. It is discussed more fully here. Make sure you study and understand it: “EXISTENCE” – A Scientology Power Process

Contemplate per the above commands until you are fully satisfied with your understanding of EXISTENCE. If you come across an anomaly handle it with Subject Clearing Process 6 (Viewpoint).

.

Subject Clearing Process 13 (Source)

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

Processing is the application of a sequence of steps to bring about an improvement in a person’s condition. In Subject Clearing, the processes are obtained from the study of Hinduism, Buddhism and Scientology.

In Subject Clearing, you can always go back to an earlier process and run it again.

.

Process #13

The 13th process in Subject Clearing is to explore the concept of SOURCE. 

This process makes one look at logical relationships. It may bring to light a postulate or an arbitrary assumption from which a chain of reasoning started. Or, it may make one aware of instances of circular logic, where the starting point of reasoning circles back to itself as a conclusion of the same chain of reasoning. 

In this process a person contemplates on the following.

  1. Tell me a source.
  2. Tell me about it.
  3. Tell me a no source.
  4. Tell me about it.

This process is discussed more fully here. Make sure you study and understand it: “SOURCE” – A Scientology Power Process.

Contemplate per the above commands until you are fully satisfied with your understanding of SOURCE. If you come across an anomaly handle it with Subject Clearing Process 6 (Viewpoint).

.

Subject Clearing Auditing

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

Processing is the application of a procedure to bring about an improvement in a person’s condition. In Subject Clearing, the processes have been obtained from the study of Vedic Hinduism, Buddhism, Psychoanalysis and Scientology.

In Subject Clearing, you can always go back to a previously applied process and run it again.

.

Process

This Subject Clearing process explores the concept of auditing. 

Look up these words in the sequence given below.
AUDITING, RETURNING, STRAIGHTWIRE, MOCK UP, CONCEPT, LISTING, AUDITING BY RETURNING, AUDITING BY STRAIGHTWIRE, AUDITING BY MOCK UP, AUDITING BY CONCEPT, AUDITING BY LISTING, PRINCIPLE OF ONENESS, ANOMALY, FACSIMILE, SOMATIC, ATTENTION, CONFRONT, CHARGE, ARC, AUDITING QUESTION, END PHENOMENON, REPETITIVE TO EP, FLOWS, ALTERNATIVELY TO EP, BRACKET, COMMUNICATION, SELF-ANALYSIS LISTS.

You may look up their definitions from Regular or Scientology dictionary. The subject cleared definitions for these concepts are provided below.

Contemplate on these concepts until you are fully satisfied with your understanding. If you come across an anomaly handle it with Subject Clearing Process 6 (Viewpoint).

.

AUDITING
Auditing of the mind involves accessing the unassimilated content of the mind and assimilating it in the mental matrix. This action may be compared to handling bugs in a computer program. In Dianetics and Scientology various processes are used to accomplish auditing. In Subject Clearing, the approach is to spot anomalies and resolve them by looking at them more closely.

RETURNING
Returning is the technique in which a person mentally goes back and re-experience an incident. His mental capacity reduces to that in the incident. In other words, in returning, a person’s attention is totally absorbed in the unassimilated impression.

STRAIGHTWIRE
In straightwire, or straight memory, a person is not returning to some past event. Instead he stays in the present time and confronts the sensations that are present. To confront is to face without flinching or withdrawing. As he confronts the sensations they start to assimilate and resolve into perceptions of past events and considerations.

MOCK UP
When a person is mocking up, he is putting together something mentally. He is making a postulate and giving it a form by reorganizing the perceptual elements in the mental matrix. The mock-up then exists in space and time. All scientific theories, such as, the atomic theory, have been mocked up this way.

CONCEPT
A concept is a general notion or idea. It is that which is retained after something has been perceived. Concepts form the basis of mock-ups. For example, one may have the concept of an atom as a very small particle.

LISTING
The person lists a number of items in response to a “Who” or “What” question. He than arranges those items in some logical order that appeals to him. This then helps him select the most appealing item in response to the question. It also provides him with an order in which to deal with those items. See The Listing Process.

AUDITING BY RETURNING
This was the technique used in Dianetics. The auditor commands the attention units of a person to return to an incident that needs to be assimilated. The person searches for the incident in his past. When all his attention units are in the past he becomes part of the incident when found, and he cannot evaluate and assimilate the incident without auditor’s assistance. This required a lot of skill on the part of the auditor.

AUDITING BY STRAIGHTWIRE
This is the technique used in Scientology. The person’s attention remains in present time. The auditor provides the auditing question and keep’s the person focused on it till it is fully answered. The person looks at the answers that come up and gives them to the auditor. The straightwire can be done by the person himself with some discipline without the auditor.

AUDITING BY MOCK UP
This technique is also used in Scientology, especially with children. One cannot perceive the contents of a facsimile because it is not assimilated. But one can mock up something to see if it matches the facsimile in its effects. This may take some trial and error but it helps resolve the facsimile.

AUDITING BY CONCEPT
A person commonly is able to obtain a concept much more easily than he can obtain a specific memory.In this technique, a person holds a concept in his mind, and scans his experience to see what anomalies come up, and then resolves them by looking at them more closely. One may also run an emotional concept this way, such as, not liking dogs. The person may also look at how a concept changes as one moves up some scale, such as, the Know to Mystery scale or the Tone Scale. 

AUDITING BY LISTING
This technique is used on higher grades of Scientology. The person lists a number of items in response to a “Who” or “What” question. He then arranges those items in a logical order that appeals to him. This then helps him select the most appealing item in response to the question. After handling that item, he may rearrange the remaining items in a new list to select and handle the item that is most appealing now. One does this until the original question is fully addressed.

PRINCIPLE OF ONENESS
Oneness does not imply sameness. Oneness means that all that is known is continuous, consistent and harmonious. This Principle of Oneness underlies the very concept of the universe. It also underlies the Scientific method. This principle gives us the ideal scene for logic, because its violation gives us anomalies. 

ANOMALY
An ANOMALY is any violation of the Principle of Oneness, such as, discontinuity (missing data), inconsistency (contradictory data), or disharmony (arbitrary data).

FACSIMILE
When a sensation is difficult to break down, it remains as a copy (facsimile) of what was sensed. It does not get assimilated into the mental matrix; and therefore, its contents are not available to perception. But it gets activated being embedded in the mental matrix, and acts as an unknown influencer of computations. Such computations, and actions based on them, cannot be corrected without discovering and assimilating the facsimile. 

SOMATIC
A somatic is an anomaly that is traced in Dianetics. It is essentially a pleasant or unpleasant awareness of the body. It includes pains, aches, dizziness, physical discomfort, and even unconsciousness.

ATTENTION
Attention is directed awareness. It goes to whatever needs to be resolved. At first, it gets fixated on resolving the situation, but, upon failing, it becomes unfixed and sweeping at random.

CONFRONT
To face without flinching or avoiding.

CHARGE
Charge refers to the degree of confusion, tension, or conflict in a person’s case. It manifests as the lower emotions of anger, fear, grief or apathy on the tone scale. A heavily charged case means a case with a heavy burden of unassimilated losses. 

ARC
ARC stands for affinity, reality and communication. Affinity is the degree of familiarity one feels toward something. Reality is the degree of perception of that thing. Communication is the degree of being in touch with that thing. Together, these three factors represent Understanding.

.