Author Archives: vinaire

I am originally from India. I am settled in United States since 1969. I love mathematics, philosophy and clarity in thinking.

The Philosophy of Cosmology

January 22, 2014 – 10:52 PM
cosmo
Reference: Disturbance Theory

.

Recently I discovered that my thought process, unbeknownst to me, has wandered into the realms of the philosophy of cosmology – a new field that was established within the philosophy of Physics just recently in December 2011.

This article from The Atlantic What Happened Before the Big Bang? The New Philosophy of Cosmology provides a nice introduction to this latest venture in philosophy.

“This is a branch of the philosophy of physics, in which you happen to be treating the entire universe –which is one huge physical object– as a subject of study, rather than say studying just electrons by themselves, or studying only the solar system. There are particular physical problems, problems of explanation, which arise in thinking about the entire universe, which don’t arise when you consider only its smaller systems. I see this as trying to articulate what those particular problems are, and what the avenues are for solving them, rather than trying to translate from physics into some other language. This is all within the purview of a scientific attempt to come to grips with the physical world.”

This philosophy has started with a bang by questioning the Big Bang theory. “The state of Big Bang,” it says, “has to be a highly ordered state of low entropy. How can the universe begin in this highly improbable state?”

Current scientific observations show that the universe is expanding. The idea of “Big Bang” came from extrapolating this expansion of universe backwards in time using general relativity. This yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. However, this poses the inconsistency identified above in the philosophy of cosmology.

There can be many other scenarios that may be postulated to explain the present condition of an expanding universe. One such scenario could be a resonating field that may start out in a very subtle state. But all such scenarios may contradict the postulates underlying general relativity and later developments.

Here is an interesting criticism of Quantum Mechanics forwarded by this new philosophy.

“Physics has definitely avoided what were traditionally considered to be foundational physical questions, but the reason for that goes back to the foundation of quantum mechanics. The problem is that quantum mechanics was developed as a mathematical tool. Physicists understood how to use it as a tool for making predictions, but without an agreement or understanding about what it was telling us about the physical world. And that’s very clear when you look at any of the foundational discussions. This is what Einstein was upset about; this is what Schrodinger was upset about. Quantum mechanics was merely a calculational technique that was not well understood as a physical theory. Bohr and Heisenberg tried to argue that asking for a clear physical theory was something you shouldn’t do anymore. That it was something outmoded. And they were wrong, Bohr and Heisenberg were wrong about that. But the effect of it was to shut down perfectly legitimate physics questions within the physics community for about half a century. And now we’re coming out of that, fortunately.”

The philosophy of cosmology allows us to look at the big picture outside the constraints of general relativity or quantum mechanics. This leads to interesting conjectures such as the following:

  1. Spacetime is generated from the resonance of some primeval field.

  2. The primeval field may be viewed as some theoretical ground state.

    The space and time associated with this primeval field may be postulated to be infinite. At this level there is no disturbance or frequency. This is marked by the parameter of “Disturbance = 0.”

  3. This model visualizes multi-layered spacetime produced from disturbances of the primeval field described above.

    The first level of spacetime may be identified as “Disturbance = 1″. The nth level of spacetime may be identified as “Disturbance = n″. As disturbance increases the spread of spacetime becomes finite and lesser. There are frequencies and physical constant associated with spacetime. The frequency increaseses with disturbance. Physical constants change too in some harmonic relationship.

  4. Increasing disturbance generates increasing inertia (resistance to motion) in spacetime.

    If the electromagnetic radiation is identified with these disturbances than higher than “speed of light” velocities are predicted at the lower frequencies and lower than “speed of light” velocities are predicted at higher frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum.

  5. Inertia generates discreteness such as that of photon. At sufficiently high disturbance levels, inertia generates particles with mass.

  6. At still higher disturbance levels, particles generated are of increased frequency and complexity, and of reduced velocity.

  7. Thus come about atoms, molecules, compounds, materials, and the solidity and location of planets in the universe.

.

Posted in Science | Comments (35)

Physics Subject Clearing

January 11, 2014 – 8:34 AM
main-physics
[Reference: Mindful Subject Clearing (MSC)]

.

From Wikipedia: 

Physics (from Greek φυσική (ἐπιστήμη), i.e. “knowledge of nature”, from φύσις, physis, i.e. “nature”) is the natural science that involves the study of matter and its motion through space and time, along with related concepts such as energy and force. More broadly, it is the general analysis of nature, conducted in order to understand how the universe behaves.

This is an open thread where the fundamentals of physics shall be discussed. This post shall be added to with meaningful ideas as the discussion develops.

The fundamental concepts seems be the following (Note: we shall be using SI units):

Mass – kilogram (M), Length – meter (L), Time – second (T)

From these we derive the following concepts in mechanics:

Velocity – m/s (L/T), Acceleration – m/s2 (L/T2), Force – Newton (ML/T2),

Work, Energy – Joule (ML2/T2), Power – j/s (ML2/T3)

In Mechanics, two fascinating concepts are Motion and Inertia.

.

In Electricity, I am looking at the following concepts:

Charge – Coulomb (C), Current – Ampere (I), Voltage – Volt (V)

The most fascinating concept is that of Charge.

  1. Charge is quantized as a multiple of the electron or proton charge (e). One Coulomb of charge is the charge which would flow through a 120 watt lightbulb (120 volts AC) in one second.

  2. The influence of charges is characterized in terms of the forces between them. Two charges of one Coulomb each separated by a meter would repel each other with a force of about a million tons!

  3. Charge produces electric field and voltage.

.

A more fascinating concept is that of field from Wikipedia:

Maxwell, at first, did not adopt the modern concept of a field as fundamental entity that could independently exist. Instead, he supposed that the electromagnetic field expressed the deformation of some underlying medium—the luminiferous aether—much like the tension in a rubber membrane. If that were the case, the observed velocity of the electromagnetic waves should depend upon the velocity of the observer with respect to the aether. Despite much effort, no experimental evidence of such an effect was ever found; the situation was resolved by the introduction of the theory of special relativity by Albert Einstein in 1905. This theory changed the way the viewpoints of moving observers should be related to each other in such a way that velocity of electromagnetic waves in Maxwell’s theory would be the same for all observers. By doing away with the need for a background medium, this development opened the way for physicists to start thinking about fields as truly independent entities.

A charge produces a field. A brief acceleration of the charge produces a disturbance in the field that propagates at the speed of light. The animation provided at the preceding link is insightful.

When we look at this animation, the viewpoint is covering the whole extent of motion without moving itself. This may be considered the “viewpoint of the universe” with respect to actual propagation of light in cosmic space. The “velocity of the observer” does not enter the picture.

We run into problem when the viewpoint is reduced to that of the “body of the observer” and much smaller than the size of the universe. Now the “velocity of the observer” enters the picture.

Einstein assumes that the viewpoint is limited to the body of the observer and, therefore, the viewpoint has a velocity. But when we expand the viewpoint to the size of the universe then no “velocity of the observer” is necessary.

The special theory of relativity seems to depend on the assumption that viewpoint can have a velocity.

.

In mindfulness, there is no viewpoint separate from what is being observed. So, the “velocity” of the viewpoint is the same as the velocity of what is being observed.

Science is observing the universe. So, the correct viewpoint is that of the universe. A universe is all that exists.

The net velocity of the universe shall be indeterminate because there is nothing else to compare it to. The net velocity of the universe relative to itself shall be zero.

So, the velocity of a scientific viewpoint shall be zero.

In other words, the velocity of the scientific observer shall be zero relative to the resultant velocity of the universe. From the viewpoint of the scientific observer, the maximum velocity of light shall always be c.

.

The velocity of a wave on the surface of the pond depends on the properties of water filling that pond.

The velocity of sound wave depends on the properties of the medium, such as, air, in which it is travelling.

The velocity of the light wave also depends on the properties of the medium, such as, glass, in which it is traveling. The problem has been that light can travel in space where, apparently, there is no medium.

The medium in outer space is not made up of atoms and molecules. It is made up of the “field” that also exists within an atom, but much concentrated.

The vacuum of space seems to be a field similar to the field existing within the atoms of matter.

.

Albert Einstein stated in 1920: ”We may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an Aether. According to the general theory of relativity space without Aether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this Aether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.”

To me, this medium is a universal field. This field has indeterminate motion because there is nothing else to compare its motion to. Its motion is zero relative to the universe as a whole. Therefore, this field also acts as the universal frame of reference for all the velocities within the universe.

It requires some primitive form of energy to disturb this field. A disturbance of this field gives birth to space and time with the manifestations of electromagnetic radiation. This disturbance has a frequency. This frequency increases as more energy is pumped in.

At some point frequency causes discreteness (wave packets, photons) to appear. These photons may not have mass, but they have inertia (resistance to motion). This inertia occurs because the speed of the disturbance cannot be increased beyond that allowed by the physical properties (permittivity and permeability) of the field.

As more energy is pumped in, this inertia acquires the appearance of mass. Thus, the following evolution seems to take place:

Energy + Field = disturbance

>>> wave + frequency

>>> photon + inertia

>>> particles + mass

>>> atoms and molecules

Thus, expansion of this space-time universe occurs as energy of some primitive form gets pumped into this field.

.

Here is how this conjecture is developing:

  1. The universal field of modern aether is pre-spacetime.

  2. Spacetime is generated from the disturbance of this universal field.

  3. The fundamental harmonic of this disturbance manifests as the basic spacetime, where the frequency of the disturbance is close to zero, the wave-length is almost infinite, and the period is infinite too.

  4. Subsequent harmonics have higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths and period. Each harmonic acts as an overlay of spacetime.

  5. Increasing frequency generates increasing inertia.

  6. At sufficient higher frequencies, inertia generates discreteness, such as that of photon.

  7. At still higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths, inertia generates particles with mass.

  8. There are particles of increasing complexity until electrons, protons and neutrons are generated.

  9. Thus come about atoms, elements, the periodic table, the molecules and compounds.

  10. And, so we have a universe of objects with forms.

This model explains why Michelson-Morley’s experiment shall detect no “aether wind.”

.

Conjecture #5 above postulates, “Increasing frequency generates increasing inertia.” Thus the speed of the electromagnetic radiation shall be slower at higher end of the frequency spectrum compared to the lower end. This seems to be confirmed by the following article. 

High Energy Gamma Rays Go Slower Than the Speed of Light?

And also by Wikipedia entry: Markarian 501

.

Conjectures #3 and #4 above may be expressed further as follows:

The universal field may be viewed as “Disturbance = 0″. The frequency is 0. The space (wavelength) and time (period) associated with this field are infinite. This is like a theoretical absolute for space and time.

The next level of disturbance is “Disturbance = 1″. The frequency is 1 (20) Hz. The space (wavelength) and time (period) associated with this disturbance has finite value yet to be determined. These would supply some constant units of space and time.

The next level of disturbance is “Disturbance = 2″. The frequency is 2  (21) Hz. The space (wavelength) and time (period) associated with this disturbance would be half of the constants determined above.

The next level of disturbance is “Disturbance = 3″. The frequency is 4 (22)  Hz. The space (wavelength) and time (period) associated with this disturbance would be quarter of the constants determined above.

…

The nth level of disturbance is “Disturbance = n″. The frequency is 2n-1  Hz. The space (wavelength) and time (period) associated with this disturbance would be 1/2n-1 of the constants determined above.

And so on.

.

The “disturbance” parameter for visible light of frequency 4 x 1014 to 8 x 1014 shall be approximately 49 to 50 compared to the “disturbance” parameter of 1 for a 1 Hz electromagnetic wave. The “disturbance” parameter at the upper end of the electromagnetic spectrum would be about 66-67.

The velocity of light is 3 x 105 km/sec. The velocity of electromagnetic radiation of low level “disturbance” shall be greater than the velocity of light because it has much lower inertia (resistance to motion). The opposite shall be the case for high level “disturbances.”

The “disturbance” levels beyond 70 shall be those of particles with mass variety.

The layer of “Disturbance = 0″ shall have infinite velocity. This would be the layer of fundamental spacetime, which would gradually transition to electromagnetic type disturbance.

Electromagnetism may start from “Disturbance = 1″ but the velocity at this low level shall be much higher than the velocity of light.

Beyond “Disturbance = 67” electromagnetism may gradually transition to disturbances of particles with mass variety such as the electron. Here the velocity shall be much lower than the velocity of light.

Thus the universe seems to be made up of layered “disturbances” that are expanding at different rates. The lower level “disturbances” are expanding at much higher rates than the high level “disturbances.”

.

Posted in Science | Comments (229)

Recognizing Objects

January 10, 2014 – 7:32 AM

object2

Reference: Mindfulness Therapy

It is much easier to recognize physical objects than the subjective thoughts and ideas. So the person should gradually be brought up to a point that he can recognize physical objects in his present environment. The person’s memory is very fragile so no demands should be made to recall things from the past. All conversation must be limited to simple things in the present.

Get the person to recognize large, simple physical objects first by looking, touching and feeling them. Then give him smaller and more complex objects. Do not ask him to recall or recognize things out of his memory.

.

EXERCISE

Purpose: To get the person to recognize physical objects in his present environment.

  1. If it is difficult to get into communication with the person, imitate his actions. This might get you his attention.

  2. Get the person look at various items in his environment with the following command.  

    “Look at that ______.”

    Acknowledge when he looks as directed by saying, “Good, excellent, wonderful, etc.” Do this action gently, calmly and repeatedly for as long as it is comfortable.

  3. If it is difficult to get the person to look at objects in the environment, then bring items to him that he is familiar with. These could be his favorite toys, or possessions. Have him look at them, touch them and feel them until he can recognize them comfortably. 

  4. If it is still difficult to do step 2, take him to locations that he is familiar with, especially those, which were his favorite. Have him look at things there, touch them and feel them until he can recognize them comfortably.

  5. Once you are able to direct his attention go back to step 2. Get the person to look at items in his environment until he can do so comfortably without resistance. He does not have to identify the items to you. Let him also touch and feel them if he wants to.

  6. Next, get the person to identify items by pointing and asking, “What is this?” If he recognizes the item correctly then reinforce it by saying, “Yes. This is _______.” If he is unable to recognize the item then tell him with mindfulness, “This is _______,” and have him examine it by touching and feeling it.

  7. Get him to recognize large and simple objects first, such as, wall, door, chair, table, etc., and then, gradually, smaller and more complex objects.

  8. Encourage him to use all his physical perceptions. Do not ask anything that may require memory and recalling things from the past.

  9. Continue with this exercise until the person can comfortably recognize correctly the various items in his environment. This exercise may take as many sessions as necessary.

  10. After the person can recognize physical objects, ask him to recognize simple characteristics of those things, such as, number, shape and color. Make sure that the characteristics are obvious, that is, numbers are small, shapes are simple, and the colors are bright. 

  11. Next, get the person to visualize and draw simple objects, such as, ball, table, chair, etc. Never exceed his capability to visualize. If ideas get too complex for him to visualize, then make them simpler until he can visualize them comfortably.

  12. Gradually, get him to visualize subjective but simple ideas and describe them, such as, what it is like to get a haircut. Build up his ability to be mindful slowly and carefully. This itself will prove to be a wonderful therapy.

  13. The above exercise may require many sessions. Use your own judgment as to when to start and end a session.

.

Posted in Mindfulness | Comments (4)

Mindfulness N3: Physical Sickness and Basic Care

January 10, 2014 – 6:41 AM
care

Whatever the sickness is, the first step is always to examine the body and treat it with rest, calm environment, and nutritious diet. The chemistry of the body needs to be corrected and restored back to its natural state. Many times we have acute situations due to injuries and illnesses. We have a well-developed medical system that uses proper operations and drugs to address those situations.

Once the acute situation is under control, the body is allowed to heal and strengthen with nutrition and physical exercise. The nutritious diet helps gradually replace the drugs that were used. It is important to exercise the senses of smell and taste with mindfulness, because the body uses them to find out what is good and nutritious.

Exercising the senses of smell and taste with mindfulness helps recover from physical sickness.

There are artificial imitations of smell and taste out there. One must guard against them.

.

MINDFULNESS N3: Physical Sickness and Basic Care

  1. Move the person to an area where he can rest and recuperate.

  2. Get the person medically examined by a doctor.

  3. Get proper diagnosis and treatment.

  4. Administer necessary drugs to help the person recover from acute illness and injury.

  5. Provide nutritious diet and physical therapy to help the person get off drugs.

  6. Exercise the person’s sense of smell and taste to recognize nutritious foods.

  7. Eliminate those things from diet that are not nutritious.

  8. Help build up the person’s immune system with proper foods.

  9. Let the environment of the person be calm, pleasant and secure.

  10. As the person regains health get him to exercise through walking.

  11. The person is fully recovered from physical sickness when his attention is no longer introverted into his body.

.

Posted in Mindfulness | Comments (3)

KHTK Postulates (old)

January 1, 2014 – 7:05 PM

einsteintagore1

When Einstein Met Tagore

Please see Course on Subject Clearing

KHTK Postulate #0: There are no absolute certainties.

DEFINITION: Absolute means, “Viewed independently; not comparative or relative; ultimate; intrinsic.”

All certainties are relative. This statement does not degrade any certainty we have. It simply means that one can always come up with a better certainty. That is how science makes progress.

Einstein declared the speed of light to be a universal constant. This is a certainty for now, but I believe that there is possibly a wider context in which the speed of light may simply be a special case.

There is no progress possible for a person who believes his certainties to be absolute.

.

KHTK Postulate #1: All motion is relative.

With nothing else to compare to one cannot tell if one is at rest or if one is moving at the speed of light. When there are two objects in relative motion there is still no way to tell which object is at rest and which object is moving.

There is no frame of reference that may be considered absolute. Einstein makes “speed of light” as the absolute frame of reference, from which he then derives rest of his theory. I believe that this frame of reference needs to be examined more closely.

.

KHTK Postulate #2: Awareness arises with motion.

All awareness must consist of motion. For example, all objects perceived consist of motion at atomic level. Similarly, there is no inherent awareness, or consciousness, that does not consist of motion within itself.

Awareness is an interesting subject yet to be fully investigated.

.

KHTK Postulate #3: Physical motion is composed of physical space and time.

Motion consists of changing states that must occur relative to each other. This postulates separation, which is the characteristic of space. Space consists of dimensions, such as, length, width and depth. Relative occurrence is the characteristic of time.

The radical idea here is that space and time are components of motion. This is different from the traditional idea that motion takes place in space and time, which is how it appears.

.

KHTK Postulate #4: Awareness is composed of mental space and time.

Awareness consists of relative assessment of perceptions. Mental space provides dimensions, such as, good – evil, survival – non-survival, constructive – destructive, etc., in the form of scales. Mental time provides sequencial associations and consistency.

.

KHTK Postulate #5: Physical Space consists of distances and directions.

A point may be referenced from another point by means of a distance and a direction. In a three-dimensional frame of reference the distance may have component dimensions of length, width and height. Relationship among these dimensions represents the direction.

Distance and direction form the space component of motion.

.

KHTK Postulate #6: Mental Space consists of evaluations and tones.

A datum may be compared to another datum resulting in an evaluation and a tone or feeling. Evaluations are based on gradient scales, such as, good – evil, survival – non-survival, constructive – destructive, etc. Tone is set by the relationship of the positions on these scales.

Evaluation and tone form the mental space component of awareness.

.

KHTK Postulate #7: Physical time consists of repetitive occurrence.

A moving object disappears at one location and appears at another location repetitively. Repetitive appearance and disappearance form the time component of motion.

.

KHTK Postulate #8: Mental time consists of controllable sequences.

Mental time consists of sequences that may be accessed at a slow or faster pace, and which, to some degree, may be controlled. Access to such sequences form the mental time component of awareness.

.

KHTK Postulate #9: Motion may be represented by a wave.

When we use wave to represent motion, the wave-length shall represent the space aspect of motion, and the period shall represent the time aspect of motion.

In addition, the frequency shall represent the inertial aspect of motion. The larger is the frequency, the greater shall be the inertia (resistance to change from the status quo) contained in that motion.

.

KHTK Postulate #10: The frequency of a wave is a measure of its inertia.

Per E = hʋ, the momentum of a photon is proportional to its frequency. Taking it one step further it may be said that the frequency of a wave is a measure of its inertia. As the frequency of wave increases, the inertia of the wave increases. This increased inertia first appears in the discreteness of wave packets or photons.

The higher is the frequency of electromagnetic radiation, the straighter will be its path through a gravity field. A massive celestial body may bend the electromagnetic radiation variously by its frequency components. This may be easy to verify. [Note 1/13/16 – This may just be the opposite. The higher inertia will bend the radiation more.]

.

KHTK Postulate #11: The location of an object in this universe is only as certain as its inertia.

The stars and planets in this universe are massive and can be located with precision. However, the electrons in an atom have very little mass or inertia. They can be located in highly probabilistic terms only. Thus, it appears that the higher is the inertia of an object, the greater is the certainty with which it may be located as a discrete entity.

Inertia is resistance to motion. Increasing inertia may collapse an electromagnetic wave upon itself making it appear like a discrete particle with a form. It may also be looked upon as condensation of motion or space-time.

.

NOTE: This is a developing post. It shall be continually added to.

.

Posted in KHTK | Comments (95)