Vinaire's Blog

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

When you are studying a subject and listening to others, you are inflowing information from other people’s observations. When you are discussing with other people you are outflowing your independent observations and opinions about that subject. This balances your inflow with your outflow. Such a balance is important.

Discussion may be a good way to resolve the doubts and perplexities you have.

.

Discussion

The purpose of a discussion is to learn by exchanging viewpoints. One uses experience and experimentation to obtain data and then brings it to the table to be discussed.

The participants in a discussion focus on the subject and not on each other. A discussion is not a debate where one is in a contest to win argument against others. There is no need for sophistry. In a discussion there are no opponents. All participants are on the same side. On the other side may just be ignorance. In a discussion each participant’s viewpoint is bound to change and evolve as he/she learns from the data pooled together by all.

Thus, a discussion is a cooperative effort. There is no reason to censor any data in a discussion. The data simply needs to be examined in detail.

.

Rules of Discussion

(1) DO NOT DEFEND A VIEWPOINT, INSTEAD LOOK FOR SOME ANOMALY GENERATED BY IT.

For example, a person may believe that God is a being who has created this world. He may reject those who think differently. This viewpoint generates an inconsistency. A being has a form, but all forms are created only when the world gets created. So either God must have been created along with the world, or God is not a being. The person may not be aware of this inconsistency caused by his belief, and he may be willing to engage in a mindful discussion.

But when a person refuses to engage in a discussion despite inconsistency, and continues to defend his belief, then he may be using that belief to hide some confusion. He may be afraid that if his belief is shaken, some confusion will overwhelm him. But as he gets exposed to mindfulness, he may be willing to examine his confusions. Mindful discussion could then help resolve that confusion. Everybody wins.

.

(2) FOCUS ON THE DATA BEING PRESENTED AND NOT ON THE PERSON PRESENTING IT.

Many people feel so invested in their beliefs that they feel attacked when they are unable to uphold their viewpoint in a discussion. They start commenting on the perceived characteristics of another participant holding a different viewpoint. They may even become accusative, emotional and combative.

Any focus on participants rather than on the subject of discussion causes much distraction. It must be avoided.

.

(3) IN A DISAGREEMENT NEVER CALL THE OTHER PERSON WRONG, INSTEAD PROVIDE FURTHER CLARIFICATION REGARDING YOUR VIEWPOINT.

In any disagreement effort should be made to clarify one’s viewpoint as much as possible. Not doing so, and simply saying that the other person is wrong, does not resolve anything. It only produces distraction.

.

(4) FURTHERMORE, IN A DISAGREEMENT, ASK FOR CLARIFICATION AND, WHEN IT IS PROVIDED, CONSIDER IT WITH MINDFULNESS.

A person can be so convinced about being right that he would not even ask the other person for further clarification. He would not even listen if the other person offers any clarification. He simply would not engage in a discussion. This kind of behavior also produces much distraction.

.

(5) DO NOT COMPLAIN THAT THE OTHER PERSON IS NOT ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION, INSTEAD DISCUSS WHAT YOU ARE EXPECTING.

When a person is committed to certain expectations, he may not even see an answer when it is given to him. An indication of that is his continual complaint that he is not getting an answer. The solution is for the person to honestly look at the expectations he has committed himself to and compare it to answers he is getting. If he then finds an anomaly, he should bring it to the table for discussion. But as long as that person is justifying his expectations in his mind, no discussion is possible.

.

(6) ALWAYS FOCUS ON ANOMALIES AND ISOLATE THEM AS BEST AS YOU CAN. NEVER BE DISCOURAGED IF OTHERS ARE TAKING TIME TO RECOGNIZE IT.

An anomaly is a discontinuity (missing information), an inconsistency (contradicting information),  or disharmony (arbitrariness of altered importance). It is something that does not make sense. Mindfulness discussion is very successful because it focuses on anomalies only. When an anomaly is difficult to resolve simply look around for more data on that area of discontinuity, inconsistency, or disharmony, and consider it carefully.

.

Summary

A disagreement doesn’t mean that what is being disagreed with is untrue. To show untruthfulness of something one needs to point out the anomaly. Then that anomaly needs to be resolved to find the actual substance, which makes the observations free of anomalies. That substance shall qualify as the truth.

.