Reference: The Book of Scientology
Beingness, Doingness & Havingness
Please see the original section at the link above.
.
Summary
The tone scale deals with beingness as thetan. Beyond the tone scale there is simply theta as the ability to postulate and become aware. The individuality (as thetan) comes about when there is identification of theta (awareness) with postulates (thought). Now there is a tone scale.
At the top of the tone scale, the identification occurs in passing and it is never permanent. As fixation enters the picture, the beingness starts to acquire a permanence and descends down the tone scale. Thus we get the tone-scale of affinity.
The ideal state of beingness occurs at the top of tone scale that contains no fixation. But Hubbard postulates a fixation when he considers the thetan to be eternal. When a person believes that he is, or has, a soul that lives forever, he is fixated on self in some manner. This fixation makes him subject to the laws of MEST.
Hubbard’s Scientology addresses the fixation of the body; but it disregards the fixation on self. In fact, Scientology ends up reinforcing the fixation on self. Hubbard ends up railing against the MEST universe, without ever resolving it because of his own fixation on self.
Viewpoint comes about with the postulation of dimension points. In other words, all knowingness comes about through postulation only. How the postulation occurs in the first place is unknowable. When a beingness is postulated and made the source of postulates, we have an identification of the viewpoint with the dimension point. This is the beginning of self. Fixation comes about as the self starts to think itself to be permanent.
This fixation starts to resolve as one starts to see that the postulates have a oneness of continuity, consistency and harmony. Any violation of oneness cuts across the sense of ultimate freedom. A postulate cannot stand alone arbitrarily, such as, the idea of an eternal thetan. The ultimate freedom shall consist of the freedom to have or not have a beingness.
Doingness naturally accompanies beinginess. Doingness is the changing of dimension points. At the level of thought, doingness means reasoning. At the level of energy, doingness means communicating. And, at the level of matter, doingness means working and moving physical objects around.
Havingness naturally accompanies doingness. Havingness is the resulting arrangement of dimension points. At the level of thought, havingness means arriving at a conclusion. At the level of energy, havingness means arriving at an understanding. And, at the level of matter, havingness means having the fruits of one’s labor.
Havingness is the goal that is aimed at. At the accomplishment of the goal the doingness ceases. Therefore, some stability and duration is associated with havingness. Here the concept of time becomes very obvious. Hubbard considers time to be an arbitrary, but, like everything else, time derives its value from the equation of oneness.
Where the doingness towards a certain havingness is forcefully interrupted, we have a ridge that lasts until it is resolved. This is a fixation of attention, which is different from a satisfied sense of havingness. All human aberrations result from the fixation of attention and not from havingness.
.
Comments
To postulate is to generate thought that has substance, extents and duration. The extents are seen as space and the duration is seen as time. Hubbard erroneously believes that space exists by itself without substance.
Furthermore, to have beingness is to identify with postulates. Hubbard erroneously believes that the beingness exists by itself without postulates or thought.
Such anomalous beliefs come about when a person thinks he knows when he doesn’t. This is the case with Scientology, It pretends to know when it doesn’t. This is because Scientology lacks the concept of the Unknowable.
How the postulates come about, we don’t know. Because all that we know is through postulates only.
.

Comments
Hello and thank you for posting this, as today I was pondering this epitome recollected from the late 1960s, when I left home to seek my fortune and got hooked in NYC by the orgs ;-). Nevertheless, life kept me free, in this case for lack of cash, which was all well and good…
Actually I was pondering this “be-do-have business” in a new light of my current study of Pythagorean Hylozoics, (a relatively recently appearing presentation which is completely free of materialistic orgs at this point and is instead giving latent adherents a head up in their incarnations). This particular source hylozoics, (see laurency dot com), presents a simpler, more refined origination as follows.
Pythagoras originally taught that the three aspects of existence are consciousness, motion and matter which might provide a clearer basis for being, doing and having.
Hello Bo, you have interesting blogs. Thank you for writing.
You write, “Pythagoras originally taught that the three aspects of existence are consciousness, motion and matter which might provide a clearer basis for being, doing and having.” I can see that.
I have recently been compiling a list of postulates to provide me with a framework, using which I can align the knowledge that I come across. What you have fits with the following postulate:
POSTULATE # 3: Energy condenses from thought to electromagnetic radiation to material objects.
COROLLARY: The innate impulse of energy condenses from considerations to flow to structure.
I am sure these postulates will have higher harmonics where they will have a more specific form. But this is something I have started to compile very recently to assimilate the tremendous amount of data that exists out there. Actually, I recently studied a bit of Pythagoras from Wikipedia.
These postulates are a work in progress. See below.
At the moment I am stuck and not sure where to go after Postulate # 15. So, I decided to go through basic Buddhist texts. Maybe you can help with a discussion.
.