.
.
-
Pages
-
Categories
-
Posts by Month
-
Recent Comments
- vinaire on Einstein 1938: The Wave Theory of Light
- vinaire on Einstein 1938: Is Heat a Substance?
- vinaire on Einstein 1938: Is Heat a Substance?
- vinaire on KHTK AXIOM ONE
- Diane Clukey-Chenard on My Brother & I
- vinaire on Quantum & Quantization
- vinaire on The “Particles in Void” Framework
- vinaire on The “Particles in Void” Framework
- vinaire on The “Particles in Void” Framework
- vinaire on The “Particles in Void” Framework
- Follow Vinaire's Blog on WordPress.com
-
Top Posts & Pages
- Einstein 1938: The Reality of the Field
- What the Buddha Taught
- A Scientific Approach to Meditation
- The Creation Hymn of Rig Veda
- My Introduction to America
- Remedial Physics
- MILESTONE 8: Factors & Primes
- Validity of Lorentz Transformation
- A Logical Approach to Theoretical Physics
- Discerning the Environment
-
Links
-
Administration
Comments
Korzybskis model is profound and is an example of how mankind has continued to work out the meaning of life and existence over the millennia. I have begun to realize that this game of wringing meaning out of our perceptions and consequently our experience seems basic to humankind.
The “Manifestation-Filter-Perception” model seems to be consistent with what Korzybski is saying. See Chapter 5 in
Reality & Mindfulness
.
Agreed and is consistent with what many great thinkers worked out. In fact, you seem to be there as well. There is a mathematical point of view which states that .999. . . = 1. You showed me how to prove this. If and when you’ve reached .999…, it seems we can call it done. Or?
Absolutes are not there in reality, but we can approach them as closely as we want.
.
Jeff Dunham is funny and profound!
He is. 🙂