Monthly Archives: February 2013

KHTK 1B: LOOKING vs. THINKING

August 18, 2014
This issue is now obsolete. For latest references please see: KHTK Mindfulness. The specific reference that updates this issue is The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness.
This was part of a basic series of essays, which started this blog. These essays were later revised and the original versions were deleted. However, these essays were then added back to maintain a complete record.
The basic idea introduced in this essay was that THINKING follows LOOKING and its accuracy depends on the accuracy of looking.

.

LOOKING is to use your physical or inner eyes to observe what is there in the physical environment or in the mind.

THINKING is to associate and align data to arrive at conclusions.

When data obtained from looking is corrupted then conclusions obtained from thinking will be faulty.

Can we improve thinking? Yes, by practicing looking. Can we improve looking? Yes, by not adding thoughts as labels, judgments, justifications and opinions to what is there.

Rational thinking is based on looking. Looking is an activity by itself. Looking should not be corrupted by adding thoughts or interpretations to it.

As we treat looking as an activity by itself, thinking also improves, and one is gradually able to resolve the difficulties in life much faster and more often.

The focus in this issue is to practice looking without thinking. Through this practice one becomes aware of “automatic thinking.”

The basic idea is to observe something as it is, without adding anything to it.

This is the secret underlying the “2500 years old” Vipassana meditation of Buddha and of all other self-development procedures since.

Exercise 1-5

YOU MAY DO THIS EXERCISE AS LONG AS YOU WANT WHILE DOING YOUR DAILY ACTIVITIES. 

1.    Observe the things in your environment. Be alert and aware without thinking or expecting anything.

2.    Look and observe something with full attention. Then look and observe something else with full attention. Continue this way.

3.    If thoughts arise in your mind then simply observe them as “thoughts arising in the mind.” Don’t suppress them. Just continue.

4.    If you notice the mind is adding to what is there, differentiate between what the mind is adding and what you observe to be there. Continue.

5.    Do this until you can comfortably observe what is there, differentiating it from thoughts in the mind, or what the mind may be adding to the observation.

6.    Do not suppress any activity of the mind. You simply observe what your attention is on, without thinking or expecting anything.

Do this exercise as often as you can while following your usual routine. Soon it will become a second nature to do so with no effort

.

KHTK 1A: LOOKING: INTRODUCTION

August 16, 2014
This issue is now obsolete. For latest references please see: KHTK Mindfulness. The specific reference that updates this issue is The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness.
This was the first of a basic series of essays, which started this blog. These essays were later revised and the original versions were deleted. However, these essays were then added back to maintain a complete record.
This first essay introduced the acronym KHTK to identify this set of essays. I couldn’t think of any name. These essays talked about “looking,” which I felt was the actual basis of Scientology and other self-improvement processes. I knew that the word Scientology was used for “Knowing How to Know.” I liked that phrase and derived the acronym KHTK from it. The scope of KHTK is now explained by the essay What is KHTK?
“Looking” was the original concept that I had in mind. But as I came across Vipassana, and got more familiar with the concept of mindfulness, I replaced the term “looking” with “mindfulness” as being more appropriate.

.

There is a set of essays that have come to be known by the acronym KHTK (from the phrase “Knowing How To Know”). This is the first of KHTK essays. It introduces LOOKING as the key to knowing how to know.

Looking means to observe and notice things for what they are. To know something, you do not have to label it, or use words to describe it. You simply look and recognize something for what it is.

This essay further provides exercises to develop the skill of LOOKING, which is

LOOK AND SIMPLY OBSERVE WHAT IS THERE WITHOUT THINKING, OR ATTEMPTING TO GET AN ANSWER.

The mind may introduce thoughts, labels, evaluations, opinions and conclusions as one attempts to look. The wrong approach is to try to get rid of these things as obstructions. The clever thing to do is to turn these annoying intrusions around and make them the objects of looking itself.

 

THOUGHTS

Very often we find thoughts to be racing around in the mind. They  absorb a lot of attention without leading to any solutions. “Look without thinking” means that when you see thoughts appearing in the mind, then you simply observe them without contributing to them.

Exercise 1-1

LOOK AROUND THE ROOM AND OBSERVE DIFFERENT OBJECTS. NOTICE IF THERE ARE THOUGHTS APPEARING IN THE MIND.

If so, then do not stop the thoughts from appearing in the mind. Simply notice these thoughts and then continue to look at the objects. End this exercise when you have done that.

 

LABELS

As you look at objects in your environment, you don’t have to tell yourself what that object is. When you see a lamp, you don’t have to think, “This is a lamp.” You just observe it without labeling it.

Labeling things as you observe them means adding thoughts to what is there.

Exercise 1-2

LOOK AROUND THE ROOM AND OBSERVE DIFFERENT OBJECTS. NOTICE IF THE MIND IS LABELING THESE OBJECTS AS YOU LOOK AT THEM.

If so, then do not stop the mind from labeling. Simply notice that the mind is labeling objects and then continue to look. End the exercise when you have done that.

 

EVALUATIONS

You do not have to evaluate (that is, offer ideas or opinions) as you look at things. When you see a rare lamp of antique design, you do not have to tell yourself, “This is an expensive lamp,” or, “Wow! What a lamp it is!” You just observe what is there.

Evaluating things as you observe them also means adding thoughts to what is there.

Exercise 1-3

LOOK AROUND THE ROOM AND OBSERVE DIFFERENT OBJECTS. NOTICE IF THE MIND IS EVALUATING AS YOU LOOK AT THESE OBJECTS.

If so, then do not stop the mind from evaluating. Simply notice that the mind is evaluating objects and then continue to look. End the exercise when you have done that.

CONCLUSIONS

You do not have to come to certain conclusions about things as you look at them. You simply observe what is there. If it is a mystery then it is a mystery, and that’s that. You then continue looking.

Exercise 1-4

LOOK AROUND THE ROOM AND OBSERVE DIFFERENT OBJECTS. NOTICE IF THE MIND IS OFFERING ANY CONCLUSIONS AS YOU LOOK AT THESE OBJECTS.

If so, then do not stop the mind from offering conclusions. Just notice those conclusions and then continue to look at the objects. End the exercise when you have done that.

.

KHTK Exercises based on Scientology (old)

Please see Grassroots Scientology

These are directed processes, in the sense that one may look as directed by these questions.

Contemplate upon these questions per the The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness.

  • Look attentively at what is right there in front of you.

  • Observe things as they really are, not as they seem to be.

  • If something is missing do not imagine something else in its place. 

  • If something does not make sense then do not explain it away.

  • Use physical senses as well as mental sense to observe.

  • Let the mind un-stack itself. 

  • Experience fully what is there. 

  • Do not suppress anything.

  • Associate data freely.

  • Do not get hung up on name and form.

  • Contemplate thoughtfully.

  • Let it all be effortless.

One may develop the discipline of mindfulness by doing the exercises provided here:

Training in Mindfulness

Please keep in mind that when these questions are approached with mindfulness they may go to conclusion quite fast. These questions may be contemplated upon again as you wish.

Exercise 1

Look at an instance when you lost somebody you loved. As feelings and emotions come up, experience them fully without avoiding, resisting or suppressing them. Take as much time as you need to stay with the feelings and emotions until they start to discharge.

 

.

 

Exercise 2

 

Look at some traumatic experience you went through. The details may come up slowly but stay with it. Look without thinking and experience without resisting. It may take several sittings but continue until all details come to view and the trauma starts to discharge.

 

.

 

Exercise 3

 

Contempate upon the following question mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Look around in your mind and spot something that is trying to grab your attention.”

 

.

 

Exercise 4

 

Contempate upon the following question mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Look around in your mind and spot something there.”

 

.

 

Exercise 5

 

Contempate upon the following question mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Look around in your mind and spot unfinished communication that is hanging around.”

 

.

 

Exercise 6

 

Contempate upon the following questions one by one mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Spot something that another may not want to look at.”

“Spot something that others may not want to look at.”

“Spot something that you may rather not look at.”

.

 

Exercise 7

 

Contempate upon the following question mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Spot something in your mind that is exhausting to look at.”

 

.

 

Exercise 8

 

Contempate upon the following questions one by one mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Spot something in your mind that you are willing to re-experience.”

 

“Spot a postulate you made for future that you would be willing to experience.”

 

.

 

Exercise 9

 

Contempate upon the following question mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Spot something that you or somebody wouldn’t mind forgetting.”

 

.

 

Exercise 10

 

Contempate upon the following question mindfully until no more response appears.

 

“Spot something that you or somebody would permit to have happen again.”

 

.

The Future of Healthcare

This is fascinating…

And General Electric (G.E.) comes through again with breaking technology

Healthcare

>>> story here tonight, we’re about to hear one of the smartphone may change his profession and personal medical his story tonight from dr. nancy snyderman.

>> why do we have people being treated like cattle herds? that’s waste. and the billions of dollars that’s being wasted each year for screening and the wrong drugs and the wrong everything. it’s astounding, and we just can’t go on like this.

>> i’ll take that, thanks.

>> reporter: dr. eric topol has long been one of the world’s foremost cardiologists. he has now become the foremost expert in the exploding field of wireless medicine. and this explosion, he says, is about to make our health care better and cheaper. watch what he does with his cell phone.

>> we’ll just pop this is phone into it like that.

>> reporter: he shows how simply his modified iphone produces a cardiogram for a patient.

>> so you just put your fingers on it. there you go. and in a second — you know, in the first or second it stabilizes.

>> reporter: the device was approved by the fda in december and is now sold to physicians for $199. topol tells his patient he just saved a $100 technician’s fee.

>> so are we close to using this to say i’m going to diagnose you and prescribe four or five apps instead of four or five medications?

>> well, these days i’m actually prescribing a lot more apps than i am medications. you can take the phone and make it a lab on a chip. you can do blood tests, saliva tests, urine tests, all kinds of things. sweat tests through your phone. this is a powerful device.

>> and we’ll just have you hold that on there like that.

>> reporter: topol’s patient, ron thompson, is dealing with several significant heart issues.

>> you saw that on a phone. didn’t you just — weren’t you just amazed the first time you saw that?

>> absolutely. it’s like having an ecg machine hooked up to me and shaving my chest and sticking, you know, stick ’em on there and putting electrodes or whatever, but yeah, no, this is incredible.

>> reporter: topol also uses a portable ultrasound, a v-scan to image ron’s heart.

>> so get a window. there’s the aorta. you see —

>> i sure do.

>> reporter: the v-scan is made by ge, a parent company of nbc.

>> can you see that? see how strong that is coming together?

>> reporter: he does in the office what would normally be a separate test costing $800.

>> there’s 20 million, over 20 million echocardiograms done a year. so 20 million times $800, that’s a lot of money. probably 70, 80% we can get rid of just by having this as part of the physical exam.

>> i was surprised when you saw ron that the technology did not get in the way of the doctor/patient relationship.

>> actually i think it helps make the whole interaction much more intimate, because now i’m sharing the results in realtime. there’s so much technology now that we could — by using digital structure that exists today, that we could make the office visit an enjoyable thing. not only that, nancy, but it doesn’t have to be in person. there’s no reason why a lot of office visits, if not most, could be done remotely.

>> ron could take his ekg at home, send —

>> yes. we’d be looking at it together. or if i got him a wireless ultrasound and he just puts it right there and i say, okay, take a deep breath, i could be watching it in realtime. anything that we can do can be done remotely.

>> reporter: when topol came to scripps in san diego from cleveland, he started a new chapter in his life.

>> when you moved here in 2006, you had just left the cleveland clinic under not very happy circumstances.

>> right.

>> reporter: he had a rep contusion for brashness. he questioned the safety of the hugely profitable pain killer vioxx and eventually forced it off the market.

>> i resigned after having been there 14 years. it was a significant part of my career.

>> do you think, wow, i’ve done a really great job making health care better or do you think, damn, there’s so much yet to do?

>> i feel the damn, there’s so much to do problem. i feel that big-time.

>> do you ever think about how you’re going to die?

>> yeah, i do sometimes. you know, i watched my mother die at a very young age, in her early 50s, with leukemia. my father was an end-stage diabetic. he went blind at age 49.

>> reporter: topol uses dna testing and monitoring to guide his daily life. he refuses to use elevators and his day is spent walking from building to building. he incorporates an hour of exercise into virtually every day, no matter how busy. trying to live the life he thinks we’ll all be living in the near future.

>> how did you find out about that?

>> reporter: at lunch we pulled out what we were told is one of his weaknesses, tortilla chips.

>> will you partake?

>> oh, yeah, it’s hard to resist.

>> okay, come on. handful.

>> reporter: they are loaded with carbohydrates, which trigger glucose.

>> yeah, this is my guilty pleasure here.

>> reporter: so out comes his cell phone.

>> i can look at my glucose every minute. i don’t want to look at it every minute, but i can. so i can just turn it on, my glucose. fortunately i haven’t had enough chips yet. it’s 107.

>> how does it know that?

>> i have a sensor on.

>> where?

>> i have it on my abdomen, but i’ll show you what it looks like. it’s like that. touching the skin.

>> so that sends a wireless signal to this?

>> yes.

>> and if you were a diabetic and you had this, you could then send this message to your physician or to your computer.

>> oh, yeah.

>> and you could start to see triggers and trends and follow this?

>> sure, oh, yeah.

>> and there goes the lifestyle change?

>> you got it.

>> reporter: eric topol is a man who looks way over the horizon, and everywhere he looks, he sees a cell phone.

>> in the future, let’s assume i have heart disease, what could this tell me about impending trouble?

>> well, we’re working on a project that will take a nanosensor in the bloodstream that is smaller than a grain of sand and it will — it will pick up a signal when you have cells that are coming off, shed into the bloodstream, coming off from the artery lining, which is a precursor to a heart attack. and then you will get on your phone a special heart attack ring tone, which will warn you within the week or two weeks that you are very liable to have a heart attack. i know it sounds a little invasive putting this little tiny, smaller than a grain of sand in your blood, but what that will do of having your body under continuous surveillance, talking to your phone, that’s the future of medicine. so this is the heart rate.

>> reporter: this is his newest passion, the busy mobile wrist monitor. topol was involved in its development. everything a hospital intensive care unit now monitors, this does wirelessly.

>> so if my 90-year-old father is discharged from the hospital, it’s conceivable he could go home with something like this and a doctor could monitor him remotely?

>> absolutely.

>> reporter: his book lays out how the digital revolution will create better health care.

>> you write in your book that medicine is currently set up to be maximally imprecise.

>> medicine today is about as much wasteful as one can imagine. so let’s just take drugs in this country, prescription drugs. 350 billion a year, a third of which is total waste. we’re giving a drug that doesn’t work, in fact even worse now, we’re giving drugs that backfire with side effects. so that’s $100 billion plus just from the prescription medications. and what about mass screening? every woman should have a mammogram every year, colonoscopy, psas, it’s really medicine dumbed down. it’s treating everyone the same. that’s crazy. each of us are truly unique in every way.

>> what does the patient of tomorrow look like?

>> the patient of tomorrow is the biggest switch. people need to take ownership. they need to seize the moment and seize the data. the new medicine is plugged into you. it’s understanding you, which we’ve never really done before, and you drive it. you’ve got the data and you’ve got information that you never had before. wouldn’t you like that information? most people would. and wouldn’t you like to be helping to call the shots?

>> fascinating story. our thanks to doctors topol and snyderman for that.

.

The Mystery of OT Levels

mani-occhi1

Reference: Looking at Hallucinations

Here are some of my thoughts on the OT Levels of Scientology. Hubbard says on the original OT I,

“It is not the intention of this section to exteriorize anyone but if it happens don’t worry about or fool around with the fact.”

He is trying to inject some mystery here.

But the OT I drills have to do with

(1) Counting bodies
(2) Noticng the sex (male or female) of those bodies.
(3) Noticing the size (small or large) of those bodies.
(4) Noticing the attribute in terms of there being an individual, or a crowd.
(5) Differentiating oneself from others.
(6) Noticing the degree to which one can have (tolerate) others around oneself.
(7) Noticing the body part in others that one doesn’t like having in one’s body.
(8) Spotting things in others that are not wrong with them.
(9) Noticing people walking toward you or walking away from you.
(10) Noticing how people stick to the ground (get the sense of gravity).
(11) Spotting important things about people (these would be one’s own considerations).
(12) Noticing places where there are no people.
(13) Noticing places where there are people.

Basically, this is LOOKING and recognizing what is there. The principles of mindfulness should apply here.

OT I focuses on perceiving the attributes of bodies in different ways  and then looking at oneself with respect to those attributes.

This drill may make a person look at oneself more objectively. This may free up the fixed considerations that one is a body. And one may get a new perspective on oneself, where one took oneself for granted before.

Nothing more mysterious need to be read into the OT I Level.

.

Mystery

So why would Hubbard say,

“It is not the intention of this section to exteriorize anyone but if it happens don’t worry about or fool around with the fact.”

There is considerable mystery and expectations built around the word “exteriorization” in Scientology. It would have been better not to bring this word up if it was not part of OT I. But, I suppose, it was intended by Hubbard to present these OT Levels as something mysterious.

Are OT Levels really mysterious? Or, do they simply reflect Hubbard’s own uncertainty about the process of exteriorization?

.

Exteriorization

First of all, is there anything mysterious about exteriorization? The Tech Dictionary of Scientology says,

EXTERIOR: the fellow would just move out, away from the body and be aware of himself as independent of a body but still able to control and handle the body. 

Now, what is this thing that would just move out, away from the body? Well, it’s the being. But what is a being? According to the Tech Dictionary,

BEING: a viewpoint; he is as much a being as he is able to assume viewpoints.

But is there somebody assuming this viewpoint? Yes, it is the THETAN. According to the Tech Dictionary,

THETAN: the mathematic symbol used in Scn to indicate the source of life and life itself… the awareness of awareness unit which has all potentialities but no mass, no wave-length and no location… the individual who lives in the body… not a thing, but the creator of things… that which is aware of being aware… energy space production unit… you before you mocked yourself up… a static…

It appears that “being” is a state or a condition. It is not something material. Detachment from body is getting unstuck from the consideration that one is a body. 

.

Uncertainty

But it seems that Hubbard was not sure if exteriorization is material or immaterial.

Any mystery attached to “exteriorization” would come from not understanding this phenomenon. And any misunderstanding of “exteriorization” can inadvertently create complications with a person trying to interpret his experiences on OT I.

Hubbard says on OT I,

“A great many phenomena (strange things) can happen while doing these drills if they are done honestly.”

This definitely injects trepidation and expectation in the OT process. It thus colors and corrupts one’s ability to simply look.

A person’s experience on OT Levels will be messed up to the degree these levels are made mysterious.

.

Mindfulness

The ability to simply look was presented by Hubbard as OBNOSIS. From Tech Dictionary:

OBNOSIS: observing the obvious. 

This is the same concept, which Buddha referred to as Mindfulness.

MINDFULNESS: Observe things as they are, with full awareness of one’s assumptions.

Unfortunately, Hubbard did not explore or emphasize the concept of OBNOSIS much, which, as MINDFULNESS, is central to Buddhism.

Here are the core aspects of mindfulness:

  • Observe without expecting anything, or attempting to get an answer.
  • Observe things as they are, without assuming anything.
  • If something is missing do not imagine something else in its place. 
  • If something does not make sense then do not explain it away.
  • Use physical senses as well as mental sense to observe.
  • Let the mind un-stack itself. 
  • Experience fully what is there.  
  • Do not suppress anything.
  • Associate data freely.
  • Do not get hung up on name and form.
  • Contemplate thoughtfully.
  • Let it all be effortless.

.