The Grade Chart of Buddhism

Reference: Exploring the Words of the Buddha

We all go through birth, aging, sickness, death, sorrow, and defilement. That is part of life. But why get fixated on these things. You just want to get on with the purpose of seeing with wisdom and keep evolving. What then is spiritual progress?

.

The Basis

This account is primarily from MN 4 and MN 36:

Prior to Buddha, the general belief in the society was that the path to spiritual enlightenment was only through self-mortification. Buddha’s earlier teachers must have practiced self-mortification to arrive at the “base of nothingness” and the “base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.” Buddha left his earlier teachers because he did not feel enlightened. But he continued on the path of self-mortification because that is what he thought he was supposed to do.

Striving on his own, Buddha took the practice of self-mortification to the utmost limit. Nobody else had gone through self-mortification to the extent Buddha did. Actually, Buddha almost died doing so. It was then that he suddenly realized the futility of this path. It was not self-mortification practiced by his earlier teachers that led them to the “base of nothingness” and the “base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.” It was something else.

This was a huge realization. It went against all beliefs about spiritual practice in those times. There was an immediate blow back to Buddha’s realization. As Buddha gave up the path of self-mortification, other ascetics working with him left him, thinking that he had gone astray.

The next realization of Buddha was, if it was not self-mortification, then what was it, that enabled him to reach the “base of nothingness” and the “base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception” so quickly under his prior teachers! Though Buddha went through self-mortification under his teachers, the reason for his success was something else. It was his complete abandonment of sensual desires and unwholesome states in living that spurred his spiritual success.

With this realization, Buddha went back to the first Jhana and rapidly progressed through to the fourth jhana. He realized the bases of “nothingness” and “neither-perception-nor-non-perception” and much more without the extremes of self-mortification. The abandonment of sensual desires and unwholesome states in living, then became the basis of the “Grade Chart” of Buddhism.

.

The “Grade Chart”

The following Grade Chart of Buddhism is being put together from a study of Majjhima Nikaya. The following has been derived from MN 26, and modified further per MN4 and MN 36: 

  1. First Jhana – seclusion from sensual stimulation
  2. Second Jhana – stilling of applied and sustained thought
  3. Third Jhana – fading away of rapture and pleasure born of seclusion
  4. Fourth Jhana – abandoning of pleasure and pain
  5. Entering upon the base of infinite space
  6. Entering upon the base of infinite consciousness
  7. Entering upon the base of nothingness
  8. Entering upon the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception
  9. Entering upon the cessation of perception and feeling 
  10. Seeing with wisdom.

“1. First Jhana – seclusion from sensual stimulation”
One isolates oneself from the constant sensual stimulation coming from one’s environment. This is spelled out in MN 107.

The first Jhana is accompanied by preparations to become ethical and purified in one’s bodily, verbal and mental conduct and livelihood. The person secludes himself not only from sensual pleasure but also from unwholesome states. He uses mindfulness of breathing as his meditation subject. The applied and sustained thought is present, with rapture and pleasure born of seclusion. 

The way to subdue that fear and dread in haunted spaces is to keep the same posture that one is in (walking, standing, sitting, and lying down) until the fear and dread gradually dissipates.

“2. Second Jhana – stilling of applied and sustained thought”
Through meditation in seclusion one is able to recognize the various factors that are continually stimulating one’s thoughts. Thus, one is able to bring one’s mind to rest an quiet.

With the stilling of applied and sustained thought, one enters upon and abides in the second jhana. There is self-confidence and singleness of mind with rapture and pleasure born of concentration. 

“3. Third Jhana – fading away of rapture and pleasure born of seclusion”
One recognizes that the rest and peace that one has attained from secluding oneself is only the beginning of vast journey.

With the fading away as well of rapture, one enters upon and abides in the third jhana. He is now mindful and fully aware, and has equanimity; though he still feels pleasure with the body. 

“4. Fourth Jhana – abandoning of pleasure and pain”
One comes to recognize the phenomena of pleasure and pain, joy and grief for what it is. He is able to look at these phenomena as if he is separate from them, and looking at them from a distance. 

With no fixation on pleasure and pain, and with the previous disappearance of joy and grief, one enters upon and abides in the fourth jhana. Now there is only the purity of mindfulness due to equanimity. There is neither-pain-nor-pleasure.

Having gone through the four jhanas, Buddha gained the following three true knowledge by directing his attention appropriately.

  1. He recollected many aeons of world-contraction and expansion, and hundred thousand births with their aspects and particulars.
  2. He saw beings inferior and superior, fair and ugly, fortunate and unfortunate passing away and reappearing. He understood how beings pass on according to their actions.
  3. He came to know very directly, the nature of suffering and taints , their origin, their cessation, and the way leading to their cessation. With this direct knowledge, Buddha’s mind was liberated from the taint of sensual desire, from the taint of being, and from the taint of ignorance. He directly knew: ‘Birth is destroyed, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more coming to any state of being.’ 

“5. Entering upon the base of infinite space”
Awareness of infinite space is basically the awareness of the whole substance of this universe. One recognizes what this universe is all about. All illusions disappear.

First one masters the four jhanas or meditative absorptions; then one passes beyond that to a state in which one perceives the infinity of space and masters that.

“6. Entering upon the base of infinite consciousness”
One’s viewpoint has broadened to encompass the consciousness of all other viewpoints. He comes to recognize the boundaries of his own self and is able to shed away its limitation.

One masters infinite space; then shifts the attention to consciousness which is aware of space. He then realizes the base of consciousness and masters that. 

“7. Entering upon the base of nothingness”
One recognizes nothingness as the ultimate reference point from which all phenomena can be understood objectively without any pre-conceived notion.

One masters consciousness; then attends to the insubstantiality or lack of solidity in this infinite consciousness. One gets some sense of absence of anything solid or substantial in it, and that is the base of nothingness. It is not a realization through insight or wisdom; it is purely through deepening of concentration.

“8. Entering upon the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception”
One recognizes that all perception is originating from his own assumptions. He finally recognizes those assumptions and is able to shed away the ALTER-IS arising from them. NOTE: ALTER-IS corruption of one’s awareness. 

“9. Entering upon the cessation of perception and feeling”
One is basically seeing what one has postulated. All his reasoning, perceptions and feelings flow from those postulates. He finally recognizes those postulates and is able to shed away the ALTER-IS arising from them.

“10. Seeing with wisdom”
When one reaches this level, all ALTER-ISNSS (the factors corrupting one’s awareness) is destroyed. The ONENESS OF REALITY is then revealed in full splendor. One had identified with ALTER-ISNESS so strongly that they appeared to be the truth to him. Finally, he is able to shed all alter-ised factors away and see things as they are.

.

Notes

Jhanas (1 – 4) = meditative absorption (attainments with form)

Bases (5 – 8) = deeper concentration (formless attainments)

.

MN: Introduction to Comments

Reference: A Course on Buddhism

L. Ron Hubbard claimed to be the reincarnation of Buddha. He believed that his system of Scientology was a much improved version of Buddhism. However, I found myself rejecting the claim because of the following fundamental difference between Scientology and Buddhism.

Scientology believes that a soul is eternal, and that its individuality is maintained forever. God has an individuality too. Therefore, the souls cannot merge with each other or with God.

Buddhism, on the other hand, does not believe on logical grounds that there can be eternally unchanging substance. Therefore, it does not believe in the eternity of soul. According to Buddhism, souls are part of a changing reality that has the property of “Oneness.” (See Ground State of the Universe). In short,

Scientology is based on the stable data of “Being”; whereas, Buddhism is based on the stable data of “Oneness.” 

In Scientology 8-8008 Hubbard says, “There is evidently no Nirvana. It is the feeling that one will merge and lose his own individuality that restrains the thetan from attempting to remedy his lot.”

Hubbard did not understand that Nirvana is the attainment of oneness that permits the wisdom of seeing things as they are.

With this fundamental difference in Scientology and Buddhism, I must reject Hubbard’s claim that he is the reincarnation of Buddha. Scientology is unable to produce Nirvana that permits a person to, “See with wisdom.”

But Scientology does push the activity of meditation to produce rapid improvement in the beginning. It is more suited to get a person started on the path of improvement, even though it cannot carry that improvement all the way through.

.

My Conclusion

I have decided to be consistent in my thinking with the stable data of ONENESS of Buddhism. At the same time I feel that the insightful innovations of Scientology, when applied to Buddhism, will make Buddhism better appreciated by the modern mind.

Scientology has a modern vocabulary that can be used to better explain the concepts of Buddhism. Scientology vocabulary has to be updated with better definitions from the consideration of ONENESS.

Scientology also has a better organizing system, such as, the “Grade Chart,” to explain spiritual progress. This system can be used quite beneficially to make Buddhism more effective.

By making the approach of Scientology more consistent with Buddhism, it is possible to come up with a powerful system of rapid spiritual progress. This system is currently being attempted through Subject Clearing.

.

Exploring the Words of the Buddha

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing

Abbreviations:
MN = Majjhima_Nikaya (Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha)
SN = Saṃyutta Nikāya (Connected Discourses of the Buddha)
AN = Aṅguttara Nikāya (Numerical Discourses of the Buddha)
DN = Dīgha Nikāya (Long Discourses of the Buddha)

The following course on Buddhism is based on the text The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya. This course was recently suggested to me by my old friend Chuck Beatty. I plan to subject clear this course and record my thoughts.

In doing this course, it is important to have the following references handy.

TEXT: Majjhima_Nikaya

  1. Contents
  2. List of Abbreviations
  3. Summary of Sutta
  4. Notes on Sutta
  5. Glossary

.

The Course

A Systematic Study of the Majjhima Nikaya

MN 26:13 = Majjhima Nikaya Sutta 26 Section 13
MN 26 (1 – 4) = MN 26:1 to MN 26:4

I.  The Buddha’s Enlightenment

II. Approaching the Dhamma

  1. Making wise choices
  2. Test the Buddha himself
    • MN 47 The Inquirer 
  3. Faith, practice, and attainment
    • MN 95 With Cankī

III.  The Ethical Life

  1. Four ways of life
    • MN 46 The Greater Discourse on Ways of Undertaking Things
  2. Karma and its results
    • MN 57 The Dog-Duty Ascetic
    • MN 135 The Shorter Exposition of Action (handout)
  3. The path to a higher rebirth
    • MN 41 The Brahmins of Sālā
    • MN 120 Reappearance by Aspiration
  4. Right speech and patience
    • MN 61 Advice to Rāhula at Ambalaṭṭhikā
    • MN 21 The Simile of the Saw

IV. Deepening One’s Perspective on the World

  1. The faults of the worldly life
    • MN 13 The Greater Discourse on the Mass of Suffering
  2. The shortcomings in sensual pleasures
    • MN 54 To Potaliya
    • MN 75 To Māgandiya
  3. The misery of saṃsāra
    • SN 15 Connected Discourses on Without Discoverable Beginning (handout)
  4. Raṭṭhapāla and the call to renunciation
    • MN 82 On Raṭṭhapāla

V.  The Path to Liberation (General)

  1. The purpose of the spiritual life
    • MN 63 The Shorter Discourse to Mālunkyāputta
    • MN 29 The Greater Discourse on the Simile of the Heartwood
  2. The gradual training
    • MN 27 The Shorter Discourse on the Simile of the Elephant’s Footprint (handout-1,handout-2,handout-3)
    • MN 39 The Greater Discourse at Assapura
  3. What makes one a monk?
    • MN 40 The Shorter Discourse at Assapura
  4. The benefits of virtue
    • MN 6 If a Bhikkhu Should Wish
  5. Purifying the mind
    • MN 19 Two Kinds of Thought
    • MN 20 The Removal of Distracting Thoughts
    • MN 7 The Simile of the Cloth (handout)
    • MN 8 Effacement
  6. Eliminating the taints

VI. The Practice in Detail

  1. The Noble Eightfold Path
    • MN 117 The Greater Forty
  2. The way of mindfulness
  3. Mindfulness of breathing
    • MN 118 Mindfulness of Breathing
  4. The aids to enlightenment, etc.
    • MN 77 The Greater Discourse to Sakuludāyin

VII.  The Cultivation of Wisdom

  1. Right view
    1. MN 9 Right View (handout)
    2. MN 11 The Shorter Discourse on the Lion’s Roar
    3. MN 22 The Simile of the Snake
    4. MN 38 The Greater Discourse on the Destruction of Craving (handout)
  2. Penetrative insight
    1. MN 148 The Six Sets of Six
    2. MN 146 Advice from Nandaka
    3. MN 149 The Great Sixfold Base
    4. MN 28 The Greater Discourse on the Simile of the Elephant’s Footprint
    5. MN 64 The Greater Discourse to Mālunkyāputta
  3. Final realization
    1. MN 52 The Man from Aṭṭhakanāgara (handout-1handout-2)
    2. MN 140 The Exposition of the Elements
  4. A typology of persons
    1. MN 1 The Root of All Things (handout)
  5. A typology of noble disciples
    1. MN 70 At Kīṭāgiri (part) (handout)

VIII.  The Tathāgata

  1. MN 12 The Greater Discourse on the Lion’s Roar

IX. Life in the Sangha

  1. Monks living in harmony
    • MN 31 The Shorter Discourse on Gosinga
  2. The ideal monk
    • MN 32 The Greater Discourse on Gosinga
  3. A recalcitrant monk
    • MN 65 To Bhaddāli
  4. Guidelines for future harmony
    • MN 104 At Sāmagāma
  5. After the Buddha’s parinibbāna
    • MN 108 With Gopaka Moggallāna

.

SUMMATION

  1. Introduction to Comments
  2. Grade Chart of Buddhism

.

KHTK Factor # 16

Reference: A Course on the Factors

KHTK Factor # 16: As forms combine and get more complex, their motion also gets increasingly complex.

With the expansion and consolidation of viewpoints and dimension points, the forms start to get increasingly complex. With the complexity of forms, the motion that is generated, also gets increasingly complex.

We can see this in the motion of a galaxy as compared to the motion of a planet. Or, we may observe it in the motion of the human body, as compared to the motion of an ant.

.

Scientology

Compare the above to the following factor in Scientology.

Scientology Factor # 16. The viewpoint can combine dimension points into forms and the forms can be simple or complex and can be at different distances from the viewpoints and so there can be combinations of form. And the forms are capable of motion and the viewpoints are capable of motion and so there can be motion of forms.

This Scientology Factor simply states how the motion of forms comes about.

.

Logic

Things simply get more complex as they evolve.

.

Ground State of the Universe

Reference: A Course on the Factors

The following is quoted from the book The Tao of Physics.

“The term ‘physics’ is derived from this Greek word [physis] and meant…, originally, the endeavour of seeing the essential nature of all things… The Milesians… saw no distinction between animate and inanimate, spirit and matter. In fact, they did not even have a word for matter, since they saw all forms of existence as manifestations of the ‘physis’, endowed with life and spirituality…

“Heraclitus [c. 535 – c. 475] believed in a world of perpetual change, of eternal ‘Becoming’. For him, all static Being was based on deception and his universal principle was fire, a symbol for the continuous flow and change of all things. Heraclitus taught that all changes in the world arise from the dynamic and cyclic interplay of opposites and he saw any pair of opposites as a unity. This unity, which contains and transcends all opposing forces, he called the Logos.

“The split of this unity began with the Eleatic school, which assumed a Divine Principle standing above all gods and men. This principle was first identified with the unity of the universe, but was later seen as an intelligent and personal God who stands above the world and directs it. Thus began a trend of thought which led, ultimately, to the separation of spirit and matter and to a dualism which became characteristic of Western philosophy.

“A drastic step in this direction was taken by Parmenides of Elea [c. 515/540 -c. 450] who was in strong opposition to Heraclitus. He called his basic principle the Being and held that it was unique and invariable. He considered change to be impossible and regarded the changes we seem to perceive in the world as mere illusions of the senses. The concept of an indestructible substance as the subject of varying properties grew out of this philosophy and became one of the fundamental concepts of Western thought.

“In the fifth century B.C., the Greek philosophers tried to overcome the sharp contrast between the views of Parmenides and Heraclitus. In order to reconcile the idea of unchangeable Being (of Parmenides) with that of eternal Becoming (of Heraclitus), they assumed that the Being is manifest in certain invariable substances, the mixture and separation of which gives rise to the changes in the world.”

.

Parallel to Buddha’s principle of anatta in the East, is Heraclitus’ theory of perpetual change in the West. This happened just about the same time. A departure from this view was championed by Parmenides, who came up with the principle of Being. This principle was first identified with the unity of the universe, but was later seen as an intelligent and personal God who stands above the world and directs it. This departure came about from the logic to have a stable reference point for the perpetual change.

But for Buddha, underlying the principle of anatta was the principle of “oneness of reality” from the Vedas. In other words, there is no permanent substance but all that impermanence  has “oneness,” in the sense that it is continuous, consistent and harmonious. Any random change from this “oneness” is an aberration. That aberration, ultimately, settles itself out.

So we have the stable reference point of “oneness of reality” in the East. But the stable reference point in the West became an “intelligent and personal God.”

.