CHRISTIANITY: The Mystical Body of Christ

Reference: Christianity

[NOTE: In color are Vinaire’s comments.]

If Christ was the head of this body and the Holy Spirit its soul, individual Christians were its cells, few at first but increasing as the body came of age. 

The first Christians who spread the Good News throughout the Mediterranean world did not feel themselves to be alone. They were not even alone together, for they believed that Jesus was in their midst as a concrete, energizing power. They remembered that he had said, “Where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them” (Matthew 18:20). So, while their contemporaries were nicknaming them Christians (literally the Messiah-folk, because they believed Jesus to be the Redeemer the prophets foretold), they began to call themselves an ekklesia, a Greek word that means literally “called out,” or “called apart.” The choice of this name points up how unlike a self-help society the early Christian community thought it was. It was no human association in which people of goodwill banded together to encourage one another in good works and lift themselves by their collective bootstraps. Human members constituted it, but it was powered by Christ’s—which is to say God’s—presence within it, though that presence was now spiritual and no longer visible. 

The first Christians, who spread the Good News throughout the Mediterranean world, believed that Jesus was in their midst as a concrete, energizing power. 

Completely convinced of this, the disciples went out to possess a world they believed God had already possessed for them. Images came to mind to characterize the intense corporate identity they felt. One of these came from Christ himself: “I am the vine, you are the branches.” This is obviously a metaphor, but we shall miss its force unless we see the exact sense in which the early Church read it. Just as a physical substance flows through the vine, entering its branches, leaves, and fruit to bring life to them, so a spiritual substance, the Holy Spirit, was flowing from the resurrected Christ into his followers, empowering them with the love that bore good works as its fruit. (The earliest Christians regarded the Holy Spirit as Christ/God’s empowering presence in the world. By the fourth century that presence had assumed a spiritual identity of its own and was identified as the third person of the triune God and was judged to be consubstantial and co-eternal with God the Father and God the Son, Christ.) This was the way Jesus’ followers read his own statement of the matter: “I am the true vine…. Abide in me as I abide in you. Just as the branch cannot bear fruit by itself unless it abides in the vine, neither can you unless you abide in me” (John 15:1, 4). 

It was believed that a spiritual substance, the Holy Spirit, was flowing from the resurrected Christ into his followers, empowering them with the love that bore good works as its fruit. 

Saint Paul adapted Christ’s image by using the human body instead of a vine to symbolize the Church. This preserved the vine’s image of a central life-substance that animated its parts, while allowing for greater diversity than branches and leaves suggest. Though the offices and talents of individual Christians might differ as much as eyes and feet, Paul argued, all are animated by a single source. “For as in one body we have many members, so we who are many, are one body in Christ”–Christ and Church being synonymous here (Romans 12:4–5). 

Christ’s image was adapted to symbolize the whole body of Christian believers, the Church.

This seemed to the early Christians to be the completely apposite image for their corporate life. The Church was the Mystical Body of Christ. Mystical here meant supernatural and mysterious, but not unreal. The human form of Christ had left the earth, but he was continuing his uncompleted mission through a new physical body, his Church, of which he remained the head. This Mystical Body came to life in the “upper room” in Jerusalem at Pentecost through the animating power of the Holy Spirit. For “what the soul is to the body of man,” Saint Augustine was to write, “that the Holy Spirit is to the Body of Christ, which is the Church.” 

For “what the soul is to the body of man,” Saint Augustine was to write, “that the Holy Spirit is to the Body of Christ, which is the Church.” 

If Christ was the head of this body and the Holy Spirit its soul, individual Christians were its cells, few at first but increasing as the body came of age. The cells of an organism are not isolates; they draw their life from the enveloping vitality of their hosts, while at the same time contributing to that vitality. The analogy is exact. The aim of Christian worship was to say those words and do those things that kept the Mystical Body alive, while at the same time opening individual cells, souls, to its inflowing vitality. The transaction literally “incorporated” Christians into Christ’s person, for in an important sense Christ now was the Church. In any given Christian the divine life might be flowing fully, partially, or not at all according to whether his or her faith was vital, perfunctory, or apostate, the latter condition being comparable to paralysis. Some cells might even turn cancerous and turn on their host—these are the Christians Paul speaks of as bringing disrepute upon the Church by falling into scandal. But to the degree that members were in Christian health, the pulse of the Holy Spirit coursed through them. This bound Christians to one another and at the same time placed them in the closest conceivable relation to Christ himself. “Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 6:15). “It is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who lives in me” (Galatians 2:20). 

The aim of Christian worship was to say those words and do those things that kept the Mystical Body alive, while at the same time opening individual cells, souls, to its inflowing vitality. 

Building upon this early conception of the Church, Christians came to think of it as having a double aspect. Insofar as it consists of Christ and the Holy Spirit dwelling in people and suffusing them with grace and love, it is perfect. Insofar as it consists of fallible human members, it always falls short of perfection. The worldly face of the Church is always open to criticism. But its mistakes, Christians hold, have been due to the human material through which it works. 

The worldly face of the Church is always open to criticism. But its mistakes, Christians hold, have been due to the human material through which it works. 

In what sense there is salvation apart from the Body of Christ is a question on which Christians differ. Some Protestant liberals reject completely Christianity’s historic claim that “there is no salvation outside the Church” as indicative of religious imperialism. At the other extreme are fundamentalists who insist that no one but those who are knowingly and formally Christians will be saved. Other Christians, however, answer the question by drawing a distinction between the Church Visible and the Church Invisible. The Church Visible is composed of those who are formally members of the Church as an earthly institution. Pope Pius IX spoke the views of the majority of Christians when he rejected membership in the Church Visible as indispensable to salvation. “Those who are hampered by invincible ignorance about our Holy Religion,” he said,

and, keeping the natural law, with its commands that are written by God in every human heart, and being ready to obey him, live honorably and uprightly, can, with the power of Divine light and grace helping them, attain eternal life. For God, who clearly sees, searches out, and knows the minds, hearts, thoughts, and dispositions of all, in his great goodness and mercy does not by any means suffer a man to be punished with eternal torments, who is not guilty of voluntary faults.

Pope Pius IX spoke the views of the majority of Christians when he rejected membership in the Church Visible as indispensable to salvation.

This statement clearly allows for those who are not members of the Church Visible to be saved. Beyond the Church Visible stands the Church Invisible, composed of all who, whatever their formal persuasion, follow as best they are able the lights they have. Most Christians continue to affirm that in this second meaning of the Church there is no salvation apart from it. Most of them would add to this their belief that the divine life pulses more strongly through the Church Visible than through any alternative institution. For they concur with the thought John Donne put poetically in his sonnet on the Resurrection, where he says of Christ,

He was all gold when He lay down, but rose All tincture….

Beyond the Church Visible stands the Church Invisible, composed of all who, whatever their formal persuasion, follow as best they are able the lights they have.

Donne was referring to the alchemists, whose ultimate hope was to discover not a way of making gold but a tincture that would transmute into gold all the baser metals it touched. A Christian is someone who has found no tincture equal to Christ.

A Christian is someone who has found no tincture equal to Christ.

.

TROM: Understanding Level 5

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing
Reference: TROM: The Full Package

NOTE: This is a Subject Clearing Version of TROM

TROM lays out the goal package for an effect, such as, “love,” as follows:

  1. To Make known [love]
  2. To Make not-known [love]
  3. To Know [love]
  4. To Not-know [love]

The goal package becomes much clearer if we change the wordings as follows:

  1. To manifest [love]
  2. To hide [love]
  3. To know [love]
  4. To forget [love]

(1) – (3) and (2) -(4) are complementary.
(1) – (4) and (2) – (3) are contradictory.

Game starts with the effect brought into play with (1) To manifest [love]. 

.

Postulate Failure

A person may go through progressive postulate failure round the four legs of the basic game as follows:

Leg 1… manifest an effect

  1. Forcing to know. (overt)…… Infliction
  2. Prevented from manifesting (Motivator) …… Rejection

Leg 2… hide that effect

  1. Preventing from knowing. (overt)…… Deprivation
  2. Forced to manifest (motivator)…… Revelation

Leg 3 … know that effect

  1. Forcing to manifest. (overt)……. Revelation
  2. Prevented from knowing. (motivator)…… Deprivation

Leg 4 … forget that effect

  1. Preventing from manifesting. (overt)…… Rejection
  2. Forced to know. (motivator)……. Infliction

Leg 1 commits the overt of Infliction, and suffers the motivator of rejection. Leg 2) commits the overt of Deprivation, and suffers the motivator of Revelation. Leg 3) commits the overt of Revelation, and suffers the motivator of Deprivation. Leg 4) commits the overt of Rejection, and suffers the motivator of Infliction.

According to the graphic on the top:

From (1) to (2) and from (3) to (4) one goes through a reversal of flow.
From (2) to (3) and from (4) to (1) one goes through a shift in valence. 

After these failures no further game with the original effect is any longer playable. He must shift to another effect.

.

Personality

Personality of a person stuck on Leg 1:
Must manifest an effect. Outflowing. Extrovert. Persuasive. Creative. Often prone to jealousy. Overts by infliction, and very upset by rejection. He got into this leg by being overwhelmed by somebody who must manifest an effect, whose valence he now occupies.

Personality of a person stuck on Leg 2:
Must hide that effect. Restrained outflow. Retiring. Devious. Secretive. Obsessed by ‘privacy’. Tends to collect mass and wealth by the simple expedient of not being able to outflow it. Overts by deprivation, and very worried by the thought of their secret wheeler-dealings being revealed. He got into this leg by being overwhelmed by somebody who must hide that effect while being in Leg 1; he now dramatizes the must hide that effect PD postulate of his overwhelmer.

Personality of a person stuck on Leg 3:
Must know that effect. Inflow. Nosey. Curious. Inclined to he highly sensual. Demands open comm lines. Hates secrets, and loves exposing them. Good solver of puzzles. Overts by revelation, and just hates being deprived of things. He got into this leg by being overwhelmed by somebody who must know that effect, whose valence he now occupies.

Personality of a person stuck on Leg 4:
Must forget that effect. Restrained inflow. Rejection. Compulsively makes nothing out of things. Destructive. Overts by rejection, and dreads having anything inflicted upon him. Contrary to popular opinion he did not get this way by having things forced upon him. He got into this leg by being overwhelmed by somebody who must forget that effect while being in Leg3; he now dramatizes the must forget that effect PD postulate of his overwhelmer. He’s been overwhelmed by deprivation.

.

Resolution

Mind is a repository of postulates in conflict. We resolve these conflicts by progressively getting the person:

  1. To create and exercise complementary and conflicting postulates
  2. To create and experience overt and motivator overwhelms
  3. To play games, and generally bring back these four basic postulates under his own determinism both as SD and PD

To remove the command power of any effect from the mind it is only necessary to discharge these various overts and motivators where they appear on the time track.

.

TROM: How to Run

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing
Reference: TROM: The Full Package

NOTE: This is a Subject Clearing Version of TROM

TROM (The Resolution of Mind) is a system derived from Scientology that simplifies the handling of the mind. It was put together by Dennis Stephens in the late seventies. The main feature of this system is that it can be applied to oneself without requiring the assistance of an auditor or E-meter. 

The TROM routine consists of 5 levels. The first one is not always necessary except in a few cases, when a person requires his attention to be stabilized in the present time. Only then, one requires the assistance of an experienced auditor. But the other levels, one can do entirely on one’s own. On these levels, one is basically handling one’s postulates that happen to be in conflict. 

It should understood that a person, basically, is a system of postulates; and, he is handling conflicts within himself.

The key word here is POSTULATE, and it is defined as follows:

A postulate is a self-created truth based on which further reasoning is done. The purpose of postulate is to give form to the unknowable to fill the gaps in the knowable. The postulate may develop into a system of postulates and theories. Everything that we know is based on this system of postulates. To be valid, a postulate must be consistent with all other postulates. 

.

Five Levels of TROM

The five levels of TROM are described below. Before you start running these exercises make sure you have completed the section”The Fundamentals” from the Course on Subject Clearing

.

LEVEL ONE 

TROM Level One is the only level that requires another person to run CCH processes on you. These are exercises devoted to improving the reality of the present time. The CCH processes may be found at Grade 1 Exercises. An average person is in pretty good contact with the reality of present time. He may not need this level. 

.

THE REPAIR OF IMPORTANCES (RI)

This is a simple exercise that one should familiarize oneself. Application of this exercise brings relief whenever the going gets rough in your solo work on the subsequent levels. The purpose of this exercise is to replace the old mass (importance) with mass of your own creation.

Commands: 

a) Bring something into existence. 
b) Have another bring something into existence.

Alternate commands: 

a) Create something. 
b) Have another create something.

The simplest creation is just getting an idea. Next level of creation is the visualization of something. The ultimate level of creation is postulating.

Third alternative: 

a) Create an importance. 
b) Have another create an importance.

A simple version is “RI by perception”:

Grasp a solid object with your hands and feel its solidity, temperature, and texture.

All the above commands are done repetitively, one command at a time. The gain is to see things as they are in present time.

.

LEVEL TWO 

These are exercises devoted to the discovery of the past. One compares a past scene to the present to evaluate it properly. It helps one get rid of past repressions and inhibitions by becoming fully aware of them. Compare the “objects” first and then “persons” and “places.”

Commands:

a) Select a past scene. 
b) Select an object from this scene.
c) Find an object in pt (one you can see with your eyes) that is different from the past object.
d) How is it different?

Repeat c) and d) (Its permissible to use the same pt object over and over again if you wish) until no more change; then:

e) Find an object in pt (one you can see with your eyes) that is similar to the object in the past scene.
f) How is it similar?

Repeat e) and f) until no more change, then repeat c) and d). Continue until both c) and d), and e) and f) produce no more change.

g) Select a new past object, either from the same past scene or a different one.

Repeat c) and d), then e) and f) with this new past object until no more change.

Continue the exercise, using more and more significant past objects, until no more change occurs with any past object you care to select. Now do the exercise with past persons. Select them one at a time, and complete the exercise with each person. Continue until no more change occurs with any past person you care to select. Repeat the exercise with “places.” Whenever you start feeling heavy on this level, use the “RI” exercise.

.

LEVEL THREE 

On this level you learn to “timebreak.” Timebreaking is the simultaneous viewing of ‘then’ and ‘now’. Here you view past and present scene as if they are together in the same moment of time. One can then get a true evaluation of their relative importance.

Every so often you’ll come across a scene that just will not Timebreak. Not to worry. Just roll up your sleeves and drop back to Level Two regarding it and start finding some differences and similarities between the scene and present time. There’s something in that scene more than what meets the casual gaze. Suddenly it will flip out easily. Run a bit of RI at this point. 

Commands:

a) Select a past scene. Become simultaneously aware of the scene and pt around you. 
b) Don’t try and Timebreak all of the scene at once. Take it a bit at a time. 
c) Continue to do this until the past scent ‘fades’ – i.e.. begins to ‘fall away’ in intensity compared to present time.
b) Select a new past scene, and repeat a) b) and c).

The nice thing here is that one is staying in the present time, and not diving into the past as in Dianetics. Thus, there is no liability of getting stuck in the past. Use RI exercise liberally when needed.

.

LEVEL FOUR 

These exercises are devoted to the discovery and timebreaking of overwhelm (upset). Each leg of the goal ‘To Know’ has its own overt and motivator, giving us a total of 8 classes in all.

1) Forced to know.
2) Preventing from being known.
3) Prevented from knowing.
4) Forcing to be known.
5) Forced to be known.
6) Preventing from knowing
7) Prevented from being known.
8) Forcing to know.

We work through this list using command such as,

  1. Get the idea of being forced to know.
  2. Get the idea of preventing (something or somebody) from being known.
  3. Get the idea of being prevented from knowing.
  4. Get the idea of forcing (something or somebody) to be known.
  5. Get the idea of being forced to be known.
  6. Get the idea of preventing (something or somebody) from knowing.
  7. Get the idea of being prevented from being known.
  8. Get the idea of forcing (something or somebody) to know.

To remove the command power of any effect from the mind it is only necessary to discharge these various overts and motivators. We work through this list, from 1) to 8), round and round, timebreaking everything that shows up as we go, such as, guilt feelings, blame, shame, and regret. When nothing more is showing up then run RI after completing a command. This level helps one get into a state of total peace and relaxation even while engaged in the activities of life.

The completion of Level Four signals that the student is ready to work with pure postulates. 

.

LEVEL FIVE 

The difference between Level 4 and Level 5 is that Level 4 is more mass oriented which the postulates wrap themselves up in; whereas, Level 5 is pure postulate oriented.

At Level 5, each row of the The Postulate Failure Cycle Chart (see above) forms an exercise. As you do more of Level 4, you start to appreciate the organization provided by this chart to go into the mind more deeply at the pure postulate level.

A pure postulate is like a mathematical relationship. When these relationships are applied to a subject like Physics, they acquire mass. Similarly, pure postulates acquire mass when they are applied to life situations. So, at Level 5, one is dealing with very basic postulates of this universe.

The most basic goal in this universe is “To know.” It is found at the core of all dynamics. One knows by postulating.

Postulating is bringing something into existence. Thus, something is manifested. Once manifested it is known. You can not-know something by altering it. When you alter, you manifest something different on top of what you had manifested earlier. So, the earlier manifestation is hidden under the new manifestation. So, we not-know the earlier manifestation. We only know the new manifestation. This is very solidly the case when there is a shift in valence.

So, there are many, many layers of this alter-is, much like the layers of an onion. This is what life does: “alter-is upon alter-is upon alter-is.”

Auditing (or sorting out of the postulates) is reversing this alter-is. It is like peeling back the layers of the onion one by one. It is discovering the previous layers one at a time. Here we have: “as-is upon as-is upon as-is.”

So, “as-is” is the reverse of “alter-is.” You as-is one layer at a time. In TROM, the layers of alter-is are the 16 rows of the chart above. Row 1A is the top layer of the onion. As you peel it off, you get Row 1B as the next layer. By peeling these layers you get to layer 8B. Below 8B you have another harmonic of layer 1A and so it continues.

.

Running Level 5

How do you “as-is” a layer of this onion? Remember that these layers are made up of an “alter-is” of your postulate. Here we shall look at what happens when we “as-is” a layer.

On the above chart, “Self” and “Other” are just two different viewpoints. Furthermore, the direction of flow is prescribed from “Origin” to “Receipt.”

A layer contains these viewpoints and the flows between them. A viewpoint is like a magnet with two poles called SD and PD. SD is a self-determined postulate. PD is a pan-determined postulate. SD and PD are complementary postulates.

We consider the four most basic postulates (and their complementary postulates) as follows:

Postulate …………………………………… Complementary
Must be known …………………………… (Must know)
Mustn’t be known ……………………….. (Mustn’t know)
Must know ………………………………… (Must be known)
Mustn’t know …………………………….. (Mustn’t be known)

You may identify with the viewpoint called “Self” and mock up another viewpoint called “Other”. You may also mock up two flows as follows:
(1) “Self” as origin and “Other” as receipt.
(2) “Self” as receipt and “Other” as origin.

The PD of the “Origin” is up against the SD of the “Receipt”. The chart only shows the SDs. It doesn’t list the PDs but you can figure them out as the complementary postulates of SDs.

The game is between the PD of the “Origin” and SD of the “Receipt”. An overwhelm (alter-is) occurs when one of these postulates takes over the other postulate completely. The following are the possible overwhelm (alter-is) situations:

(1) You (self) are at origin and your PD takes over the other’s SD. You have committed an overt.
(2) You (self) are at origin and your PD is taken over by the other’s SD. You now have a motivator.
(3) You (self) are at receipt and other’s PD takes over your SD. You now have a motivator.
(4) You (self) are at receipt and your SD takes over the other’s PD. You have committed an overt.

These four situations are mirrored when the postulate and its complementary postulate change places.

When neither takes over then we have an ongoing game, and there are 8 possible games. So, at Level 5 we look at these ongoing games as well.

Thus, the 16 possible compulsive game situations consist of 4 overt overwhelms, 4 motivator overwhelms, 4 origin of games, and 4 receipt of games. Life goes from 8B to 1A, where all four basic postulates regarding an effect may enter into failure both as SD and PD. After these failures, the person must move back to 8B with a different effect to have a game.

We reverse the above cycle of life by processing from 1A towards 8B round and round.

Layer 1A is about “forced to know” same as on Level 4. But here we understand how it came about from layer 1B. From 1B to 1A your SD was taken over by other’s PD. As you become aware of this overwhelm, you revert back to the status of 1B.

At 1B, you are at receipt while playing this game. Then you realize that you have played the same game from origin as in 2A. Your PD was then successful in overcoming other’s SD as in 2B. As you become aware of this overt you realize that you were not in your own valence. So, you flip back into an earlier valence as in 3A, where your SD was overwhelmed in the same way. So, you go on peeling the layers of the onion quite rapidly.

The moment you understand the failures of goal package “to know” as a whole, and how those failures got locked into each other, all the stuck points blow, and you feel complete freedom on the goal “to know.”

In Running Level 5, use RI generously. The key to the resolution of the mind lies in the discovery and creation of complementary postulates. Study “The Tape by Dennis” (the next Section).

.

The Tape by Dennis

“[The best way to follow this is when you have the postulate failure cycle chart in front of you]

“I will go through the chart as if I’m the subject and I’m running Level 5. I’m starting at Level 1A and the goal-package I’m using is the basic To Know goal package. Before I start as given in the manual I’d timebreak all the day’s activities and also I would make sure the Levels 1,2,3, and 4 have been run to no more change. I wouldn’t, of course, attempt Level 5 until those first 4 levels have been run to no more change and also I’ve timebroken the day’s activities.

“Ok, here goes. Level lA. The first thing we need is a little bit of space around us. Now, it doesn’t matter which space you use, you can use the space of the present time universe around you or you can use the space of any past moment in time. It doesn’t matter. You are not limited in any form whatsoever. You just need some space in which to work. It doesn’t have to be present time physical universe space, it can be past physical universe time space. You just need some space there to work.

“So, we are at Level lA and the first thing you would do is put up the postulate, the Other’s postulate “Must be Known”. The postulate is “Must be Known” and that is in the class of not- self. Now, it doesn’t matter where you put the postulate. Most people find it easier to put the postulate into a mass. Even a created mass of your own choice or into a wall, a part of the physical universe, a fence, a passing car. It doesn’t matter where you put it.

“The important thing is that it is a “Must be Known” postulate and it’s in the class of not-self. That is important. You must be certain that it’s in the other’s, the class of other’s to which I will refer for more precision as the class of not-self. So you put up that postulate “Must be Known” in the class of not-self. You yourself then create the postulate “Must Know”. If you go over the column 1 on the chart you see that the level here is “Forced to Know. It’s you being forced to know. Get that? Doesn’t matter what it is, you don’t have to specify as we are just working with the postulates. So you would put up “Must be Known” over tht way in the class of not-self and then get yourself there.

“Don’t see yourself over that way doing this. You get yourself right where you are, right where you are with the “Must Know” postulate. There’s a little danger there that you could say, Oh well, get me over that way. Oh no, that’s wrong. You get right where you are – with the “Must know” postulate. Then you simply timebreak out anything that shows up, any sensations that show up. Your whole situation is of cameo, as a scenario, as a scene, and you timebreak out anything that happens. Anything that shows up, you time break it. Time break it out until it’s gone away and then you put the postulates back up again.

“You put the postulates back up and more scenes show up from the past, you timebreak those back out, have a good look at them, timebreak them out of existence and put the postulates back up again. And you keep on doing this until you can put the postulates up at level 1A with no more change occuring and you can quite happily put up the postulate “Must be Known” in the class of not-self over that way while you’re sitting there with “Must Know”. And you got the idea that you’re being Forced to Know. That’s quite OK. Nothing is happening and it’s all quietened down. Right, now you’re ready to move on. You started to get bored with that level. You’ve done all you can with that level, it’s now time to move on. So we now more from 1A to level 1B.

“Now that is signified by you changing your postulate from “Must Know” to “Mustn’t know”. You’re still at receipt point, but you’re changing your postulate from “Must Know” to “Mustn’t know”. The postulate “Must be known” is still out there in the class of not-self. But now it’s a game. We now have a games condition. We now have the opposition. We now have an opposition situation. We have “Must be Known” in the class of not-self and “Mustn’t Know” in the class of self and they are opposing postulates and that is a games situation. So, you just now hold that. Just hold that situation and timebreak out everything that shows up. Everything that shows up there.

“And you continue with it until there’s no more change. You’ve timebroken out everything you quite happily have that situation there where you have “Must be known” over there in the class of not-self and “Mustn’t know” in the class of self and you can hold that situation. And there’s nothing else, it’s all quietened down. There’s nothing else happening. And you’re getting bored with it, so it’s time to move on. So you now move on from 1B to 2A.

“Now this involves a definite change, you’re going from origin now to receipt. That is a bigger change that happens there between 1B and 2A. When we go from 1B to 2A you start off by still feeling yourself at receipt point. You start off by saying, well, I’m in “Mustn’t know” across to the other person, to the “Must be Known” there. In other words, instead of him being the originator and you being at the receipt at level 2A you’re the originator “Mustn’t know” and you drive him into the receipt of “Must be Known”. In other words, you’re beginning to get at him. So you’re beginning to get at the opponent. So it’s you with “Mustn’t know” and him still holding his postulate of “Must be known”, but instead of him being at the origin point he’s now at the receipt point.

“But it’s still a game. Then again you would do all the necessary timebreaking, the handling of all that shows up, clean everything up until you’re quite bored with that Level, the whole Level 2A. Then you would go to Level 2B where now you are going to actually overwhelm the opponent. You still stay in your “Mustn’t know” postulate, you’re originating your “Mustn’t know” postulate at level 2B and now you drive him, you actually force him, you drive him by the sheer power of the postulate, you drive him from “Must be Known” into “Mustn’t be known”. In other words, you make him comply with your postulate. So he’s driven from “Must be known” he held at level 2A he now goes to “Mustn’t know” at the origin and the opponent with “mustn’t be known” at receipt point there.

“So now we’ve gone through a whole little cycle, haven’t we. We’ve gone through a whole little cycle. We had the complementary postulates at level 1A with “Must be known” and “Must know”. We’ve gone through two game cycles and now we’ve gone back to complementary postulates again. But notice that the postulates have changed. We are now at 2B. At 2B we have “Mustn’t Know” – “Mustn’t be known” and we are back with complementary postulates again. But now you are at the origin point and the “Mustn’t be Known” is at the receipt point.

“Basically the difficulty is a lack of understanding that you’re dealing purely with postulates. You’re not dealing with effects here on the chart, you’re dealing with postulates. That’s all you are putting up, it’s postulates. You’re not putting up effects, you’re not putting up sensations, or you’re not creating people, you’re not mocking up people, you are not mocking up walls, or floors, or situations. You’re simply mocking up postulates. What we’re working with are just postulates. That’s the whole level of level 5, it’s postulates. That is all we are working with at level 5, it’s postulates. We don’t work with anything else, we timebreak out anything else that shows up. We only work with postulates at Level 5.

“It is an incredible thing to work with. At first it seems very strange and so forth, very odd and peculiar to be just working with postulates. But after one gets used to it, when you get into level 5 you get to a point eventually where you wouldn’t dream of working with anything else but postulates because you get the fastest results working with postulates and you always work with just postulates. You simply timebreak out everything else that shows up. Any incidents that show up, or sensations, or emotions or whatever shows up. You simply timebreak them out. So at level 5 you are working purely with postulates. Once you grasp that you have got it. You have got it. You can work then on level 5 and realize what you’re doing.”

.

Summary

A person can end a compulsive game only by adopting a complementary postulate voluntarily. He achieves Nirvana when he can adopt complementary postulates with the whole universe. Therefore, at this level, we only have to return to the person his freedom of choice in the playing of games and the job is done.

A large part of your work will be exercises in developing your PD postulates, and becoming aware of the PD postulates of others.

An easier gradient for Level 5 is SUBJECT CLEARING that helps you first recover those postulates that are underlying the subjects that concerns you the most.

.

“Charge” in Quantum Mechanics

Reference: Fundamentals of Physics

Electric charge is created when amber rod is rubbed with fur. By convention, the charge on amber rod is considered positive and that on the fur is considered negative.Like charges repel each other and unlike charges attract each other. In ordinary matter, negative charge is carried by electrons, and positive charge is carried by the protons in the nuclei of atoms. Atoms are neutral because the number of electrons surrounding the nucleus equals the number of protons in the nucleus.Charge is measured in units of Coulomb (C). The magnitude of the charge of an electron (e) is 1.602 x 10-19 C.

Within the atom, the charge appears to be in equilibrium. This equilibrium occurs at the nucleus-electron interface, where the consistency of substance undergoes a  sudden change between the electron region and the nucleus. For the electron region, it is a sudden increase in frequency. For the nucleus, it is a sudden decrease in frequency. If we look at the electronic region as a vortex of substance, the charge lies at its center. It we look at the nucleus as a small vortex, the charge lies at its periphery. The small vortex of the nucleus attaches itself to the center of the vortex of the electronic region, and the two then form a single vortex. It is incorrect to view the whole electron as negative and the whole nucleus as positive.

The “attractive force” between electrons and the nucleus is better understood in terms of alignment of the frequency gradient.

It is easy to visualize this vortex-hypothesis in the case of a hydrogen atom made up of an electron and a proton. We may visualize more complex atoms as vortices too if we do not conceive of the electrons and protons as discrete particles WITHIN the atom. The number of electrons, protons and neutrons are quantum numbers that are merely a property of the atom concerned. The atom is a single vortex of decreasing radius and increasing frequency and consistency.

Free electrons, protons and neutrons exist as vortices of different types.

The ions are atoms in which the equilibrium of charge at the electron-nucleus interface does not exist. The lack of equilibrium is quantized. These atomic vortices are a bit out of shape due to the lack of balance where the frequency gradient is the sharpest. This unbalanced frequency gradient extends out as a force field.

These ionic vortices combine with other ionic vortices to form molecules. They are linked together by the forces generated by their unbalanced frequency gradients. Thus, they regain equilibrium at the molecular level.

Such molecules are complex configurations made up of vortices. 

Any unbalanced charge seems to travel to the surface in a conductor. In non-conductors, it manifests as a stress inside the substance. This stress contributes to chemical reactions.

In case of an electromagnetic field field, force implies frequency gradient.  When a charged particle is placed within an electromagnetic field, an equilibrium is sought in terms of alignment of frequency gradients.

The shifts in frequency gradient is seen as the movement of the charge. 

Quantization of electrical charge means that only the multiples of a basic frequency gradient are permitted as charge. The charge of an electron represents that basic frequency gradient. 

The total amount of charge remains unchanged. If one starts with uncharged materials the initial charge present is zero. Then the total charge after it has been separated must still add to zero, requiring that there be equal amounts of positive and negative charge present.

The total amount of charge is conserved.

.

Kantian Postulate

Here is morning meditation of March 24, 2017, that led to the realization on the subject of Space.

.