Category Archives: Physics

The Field

Frequency

Reference: Disturbance Theory

.

The concept of field started out as a mathematical abstraction in fluid dynamics, but it acquired the reality of a substance in electrodynamics of Faraday. Maxwell showed light to be made up of this substance. Einstein then showed this substance to be more basic than matter.

The fundamental substance that fills emptiness is the FIELD.

It is the field that condenses as matter. The atom is mostly made up of field.  The field of the atom condenses in the direction of the center.  As it condenses the electrons are formed. The most condensed part is the nucleus at the center of the atom. Matter is made up of atoms.

MATTER results from the condensation of field.

The background of the sun, moon and stars that we see should more properly be called the field. The sun, moon, and stars are simply the more enduring aspects of the field. So the ‘space” among them is actually field that can transmit force. This explains the supposed “action at a distance”.

This universe is a FIELD with the background of EMPTINESS.

The field is a continuation of emptiness. Not only must it change from emptiness to become a field, but it must continue to change to maintain itself as a field. As observed, the basic field oscillates continually between electric and magnetic states to maintain itself. The fundamental property of the field is CHANGE that distinguishes it from background emptiness.

We live in a universe of CHANGE.

.

Maxwell’s Preface to his Book

Maxwell Cover
Reference: Disturbance Theory

.

This is the preface from Maxwell’s book A Treatise on Electricity & Magnetism – Volume 1.  It highlights Maxwell’s view of Faraday’s work.

Here is my summary of these views:

It is true that any mathematical work must have its basis in actual experimental data. I am glad that Maxwell decided to consult Faraday’s work first. Faraday’s way of conceiving phenomena was very different from other mathematicians. The main difference was in their basic postulates.  

Maxwell observes that Faraday considered space to be a dimension of force, whereas the mathematicians took space for granted as something standalone. Thus, Faraday saw force as the medium, which the mathematicians didn’t. Faraday sought the seat of the phenomena in real actions going on in the medium; whereas, the mathematicians were satisfied with the idea of action at a distance.

Faraday’s approach was analytical as it was based on experiments; whereas, the approach of mathematicians was a synthesis that started out with certain assumptions. Faraday’s ideas clarified observed phenomena much better than “most fertile methods of research discovered by the mathematicians.”

According to Maxwell, the whole theory of potential as a quantity was more compatible with the ideas of Faraday and with the mathematical discoveries of Laplace, Poisson, Green and Gauss, than with the various speculations of “mathematicians”.

Maxwell decided to take the Faraday’s approach to develop a theory of electromagnetism, hoping that someone else might take up the “action at a distance” approach. 

.

The contents of this preface follow. My comments follow the quoted paragraphs in bold italics.

PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION

The fact that certain bodies, after being rubbed, appear to attract other bodies, was known to the ancients. In modern times, a great variety of other phenomena have been observed, and have been found to be related to these phenomena of attraction. They have been classed under the name of Electric phenomena, amber, having been the substance in which they were first described.

Other bodies, particularly the loadstone, and pieces of iron and steel which have been subjected to certain processes, have also been long known to exhibit phenomena of action at a distance. These phenomena, with others related to them, were found to differ from the electric phenomena, and have been classed under the name of Magnetic phenomena, the loadstone, being found in the Thessalian Magnesia.

The electromagnetic attraction seems to come about because of the separation of the two sides of the particle-void interface. There is more nuclei and less motion on one side and more void and motion on the other. Void does contain substance but it is not concentrated like mass in the nucleus. Thus, there is contact with continuity of substance that passes action across a distance.

These two classes of phenomena have since been found to be related to each other, and the relations between the various phenomena of both classes, so far as they are known, constitute the science of Electromagnetism.

Electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same phenomenon to be studied here.

In the following Treatise I propose to describe the most important of these phenomena, to shew how they may be subjected to measurement, and to trace the mathematical connexions of the quantities measured. Having thus obtained  the data for a mathematical theory of electromagnetism, and  having shewn how this theory may be applied to the calculation of phenomena, I shall endeavour to place in as clear a  light as I can the relations between the mathematical form of  this theory and that of the fundamental science of Dynamics,  in order that we may be in some degree prepared to determine  the kind of dynamical phenomena among which we are to  look for illustrations or explanations of the electromagnetic  phenomena.

Maxwell intends to keep his mathematical analysis of the electromagnetic phenomenon consistent with Newtonian mechanics, such that all effects are measurable in a consistent fashion.

In describing the phenomena, I shall select those which most clearly illustrate the fundamental ideas of the theory, omitting others, or reserving them till the reader is more advanced.

The most important aspect of any phenomenon from a mathematical point of view is that of a measurable quantity.  I shall therefore consider electrical phenomena chiefly with a view to their measurement, describing the methods of measurement, and defining the standards on which they depend.

In the application of mathematics to the calculation of electrical quantities, I shall endeavour in the first place to deduce the most general conclusions from the data at our disposal, and in the next place to apply the results to the simplest cases that can be chosen. I shall avoid, as much as I can, those questions which, though they have elicited the skill of mathematicians, have not enlarged our knowledge of science.

In working out his theory, Maxwell decides to focus on electrical phenomena chiefly with a view to their measurement, describing the methods of measurement, and defining the standards on which they depend.

The internal relations of the different branches of the science which we have to study are more numerous and complex than those of any other science hitherto developed. Its external relations, on the one hand to dynamics, and on the other to heat, light, chemical action, and the constitution of bodies, seem to indicate the special importance of electrical science as an aid to the interpretation of nature.

It appears to me, therefore, that the study of electromagnetism in all its extent has now become of the first importance as a means of promoting the progress of science.

The mathematical laws of the different classes of phenomena have been to a great extent satisfactorily made out.

The connexions between the different classes of phenomena have also been investigated, and the probability of the rigorous exactness of the experimental laws have been greatly strengthened by a more extended knowledge of their relations to each other.

Finally, some progress has been made in the reduction of electromagnetism to a dynamical science, by shewing that no electromagnetic phenomenon is contradictory to the supposition that it depends on purely dynamical action.

Maxwell is looking at the resolution of electromagnetic phenomena according to Newtonian dynamics to be central to the progress of science.

What has been hitherto done, however, has by no means exhausted the field of electrical research. It has rather opened up that field, by pointing out subjects of enquiry, and furnishing us with means of investigation.

It is hardly necessary to enlarge upon the beneficial results of magnetic research on navigation, and the importance of a knowledge of the true direction of the compass, and of the effect of the iron in a ship. But the labours of those who have endeavoured to render navigation more secure by means of magnetic observations have at the same time greatly advanced the progress of pure science.

Gauss, as a member of the German Magnetic Union, brought  his powerful intellect to bear on the theory of magnetism, and  on the methods of observing it, and he not only added greatly  to our knowledge of the theory of attractions, but reconstructed  the whole of magnetic science as regards the instruments used,  the methods of observation, and the calculation of the results,  so that his memoirs on Terrestrial Magnetism may be taken as  models of physical research by all those who are engaged in  the measurement of any of the forces in nature.

The important applications of electromagnetism to telegraphy have also reacted on pure science by giving a commercial value to accurate electrical measurements, and by affording to electricians the use of apparatus on a scale which greatly transcends that of any ordinary laboratory. The consequences of this demand for electrical knowledge, and of  these experimental opportunities for acquiring it, have been  already very great, both in stimulating the energies of advanced electricians, and in diffusing among practical men  a degree of accurate knowledge which is likely to conduce  to the general scientific progress of the whole engineering  profession.

Maxwell is acknowledging the work done in the field of electromagnetism so far.

There are several treatises in which electrical and magnetic phenomena are described in a popular way. These, however, are not what is wanted by those who have been brought face to face with quantities to be measured, and whose minds do not rest satisfied with lecture-room experiments.

There is also a considerable mass of mathematical memoirs which are of great importance in electrical science, but they lie concealed in the bulky Transactions of learned societies; they do not form a connected system; they are of very unequal merit, and they are for the most part beyond the comprehension of any but professed mathematicians.

I have therefore thought that a treatise would be useful  which should have for its principal object to take up the  whole subject in a methodical manner, and which should also  indicate how each part of the subject is brought within the  reach of methods of verification by actual measurement.

Maxwell feels that there is a need for a treatise that examines the subject of electromagnetism quantitatively in a methodical manner.

The general complexion of the treatise differs considerably from that of several excellent electrical works, published, most of them, in Germany, and it may appear that scant justice is done to the speculations of several eminent electricians and mathematicians. One reason of this is that before I began the study of electricity I resolved to read no mathematics on the subject till I had first read through Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. I was aware that there was supposed to be a difference between Faraday’s way of conceiving phenomena and that of the mathematicians, so that neither he nor they were satisfied with each other’s language. I had also the conviction that this discrepancy did not arise from either party being wrong. I was first convinced of this by Sir William Thomson *, to whose advice and assistance, as well as to his published papers, I owe most of what I have learned on the subject.

* I take this opportunity of acknowledging my obligations to Sir W.  Thomson and to Professor Tait for many valuable suggestions made during the printing of this work.

Maxwell decides to base his mathematical research on Faraday’s experimental work, because it is quite different from the theoretical approach of other mathematicians as regards their basic postulates.

As I proceeded with the study of Faraday, I perceived that his method of conceiving the phenomena was also a mathematical one, though not exhibited in the conventional form of mathematical symbols. I also found that these methods were capable of being expressed in the ordinary mathematical forms, and thus compared with those of the professed mathematicians.

For instance, Faraday, in his mind’s eye, saw lines of force traversing all space where the mathematicians saw centres of force attracting at a distance: Faraday saw a medium where they saw nothing but distance: Faraday sought the seat of the phenomena in real actions going on in the medium, they were satisfied that they had found it in a power of action at a distance impressed on the electric fluids.

Maxwell found that Faraday’s work could easily be treated mathematically. It was more practical and corresponded to reality closely.

When I had translated what I considered to be Faraday’s  ideas into a mathematical form, I found that in general the  results of the two methods coincided, so that the same phenomena were accounted for, and the same laws of action deduced by both methods, but that Faraday’s methods resembled  those in which we begin with the whole and arrive at the  parts by analysis, while the ordinary mathematical methods  were founded on the principle of beginning with the parts  and building up the whole by synthesis.

Faraday’s approach was analytical as it was based on experiments; whereas, the approach of mathematicians was a synthesis that started out with certain assumptions.

I also found that several of the most fertile methods of research discovered by the mathematicians could be expressed much better in terms of ideas derived from Faraday than in their original form.

Faraday’s ideas clarified observed phenomena much better.

The whole theory, for instance, of the potential, considered as a quantity which satisfies a certain partial differential equation, belongs essentially to the method which I have called that of Faraday. According to the other method, the potential, if it is to be considered at all, must be regarded as the result of a summation of the electrified particles divided each by its distance from a given point. Hence many of the mathematical discoveries of Laplace, Poisson, Green and Gauss find their proper place in this treatise, and their appropriate expressions in terms of conceptions mainly derived from Faraday.

Faraday’s ideas are very compatible with the mathematical discoveries of Laplace, Poisson, Green and Gauss, and with the theory of potential that satisfies a certain partial differential equation.

Great progress has been made in electrical science, chiefly in Germany, by cultivators of the theory of action at a distance. The valuable electrical measurements of W. Weber are interpreted by him according to this theory, and the electromagnetic speculation which was originated by Gauss, and carried on by Weber, Eiemann, J. and C. Neumann, Lorenz, &c., is founded on the theory of action at a distance, but depending either directly on the relative velocity of the particles, or on the gradual propagation of something, whether potential or force, from the one particle to the other. The great success which these eminent men have attained in the application of mathematics to electrical phenomena, gives, as is natural, additional weight to their theoretical speculations, so that those who, as students of electricity, turn to them as the greatest authorities in mathematical electricity, would probably imbibe, along with their mathematical methods, their physical hypotheses.

Maxwell acknowledges that mathematics based on the action at a distance approach has been quite successful, but it doesn’t resolve the question of how force propagates through the void.

These physical hypotheses, however, are entirely alien from  the way of looking at things which I adopt, and one object  which I have in view is that some of those who wish to study  electricity may, by reading this treatise, come to see that  there is another way of treating the subject, which is no less  fitted to explain the phenomena, and which, though in some  parts it may appear less definite, corresponds, as I think, more  faithfully with our actual knowledge, both in what it affirms  and in what it leaves undecided.

Maxwell, however, believes that there is another way of looking at the phenomena that corresponds more faithfully with our actual knowledge.

In a philosophical point of view, moreover, it is exceedingly  important that two methods should be compared, both of  which have succeeded in explaining the principal electromagnetic phenomena, and both of which have attempted to  explain the propagation of light as an electromagnetic phenomenon and have actually calculated its velocity, while at the  same time the fundamental conceptions of what actually takes place, as well as most of the secondary conceptions of the  quantities concerned, are radically different.

Both approaches have succeeded in explaining the principal electromagnetic phenomena but their fundamental conceptions of what actually takes place are radically different.

I have therefore taken the part of an advocate rather than that of a judge, and have rather exemplified one method than attempted to give an impartial description of both. I have no doubt that the method which I have called the German one will also find its supporters, and will be expounded with a skill worthy of its ingenuity.

I have not attempted an exhaustive account of electrical phenomena, experiments, and apparatus. The student who desires to read all that is known on these subjects will find great assistance from the Traite d’ Electricite of Professor A.  de la Rive, and from several German treatises, such as Wiedemann’s Galvanismus, Riess’ Reibungselektricitat, Beer’s Einleitung in die Elektrostatik, &c.

Maxwell decides to take the Faraday’s approach to develop a theory of electromagnetism, and focuses primarily on the theoretical aspects of the phenomena.

I have confined myself almost entirely to the mathematical treatment of the subject, but I would recommend the student, after he has learned, experimentally if possible, what are the phenomena to be observed, to read carefully Faraday’s Experimental Researches in Electricity. He will there find a strictly contemporary historical account of some of the greatest electrical discoveries and investigations, carried on in an order and succession which could hardly have been improved if the results had been known from the first, and expressed in the language of a man who devoted much of his attention to the methods of accurately describing scientific operations and their results*.

* Life and Letters of Faraday, vol. i. p. 395.

Maxwell is very approving of Faraday’s long and arduous experimental research for its accuracy and attention to detail.

It is of great advantage to the student of any subject to read the original memoirs on that subject, for science is always most completely assimilated when it is in the nascent state, and in the case of Faraday’s Researches this is comparatively easy, as they are published in a separate form, and may be read consecutively. If by anything I have here written I  may assist any student in understanding Faraday’s modes of  thought and expression, I shall regard it as the accomplishment of one of my principal aims–to communicate to others  the same delight which I have found myself in reading Faraday’s Researches.

Maxwell heartily recommends the study of Faraday’s research work.

The description of the phenomena, and the elementary parts of the theory of each subject, will be found in the earlier chapters of each of the four Parts into which this treatise is divided. The student will find in these chapters enough to give him an elementary acquaintance with the whole science.

The remaining chapters of each Part are occupied with the higher parts of the theory, the processes of numerical calculation, and the instruments and methods of experimental research.

The relations between electromagnetic phenomena and those of radiation, the theory of molecular electric currents, and the results of speculation on the nature of action at a distance, are treated of in the last four chapters of the second volume.

James Clerk Maxwell

Feb. 1, 1873.

.

Validity of Lorentz Transformation

Lorentz derivation

Reference: Disturbance Theory

.

From Wikipedia,

“Historically, the transformations were the result of attempts by Lorentz and others to explain how the speed of light was observed to be independent of the reference frame.”

The null results from Michelson-Morley’s experiment in 1887 led to the belief that the speed of light is the same in all inertial frames. For example, light is observed to have the same speed, c = 3 x 108, meters/second, relative to the earth and also to the sun, even when earth is moving at a speed 3 x 104 meters/second relative to the sun.

It is possible to show theoretically that the earth has a speed relative to space, which is the reference frame of no inertia. However, this speed is so small that no experiment so far has been able to measure it directly. See Michelson-Morley’s Null Result.

But the actual problem lies in combining the speeds that belong to particles, such as, light particles and the earth, which have a difference in inertia of many orders of magnitude. The vector algebra works only with particles or bodies that have inertia of similar orders of magnitude.

Lorentz transformation was an effort to resolve this anomaly, where velocities could not be simply added or subtracted per vector algebra. The following links provide the derivation of Lorentz transformation.

Reference from Khan Academy

Reference from Yale University

Lorentz Boost

The derivation of Lorentz transformation is based on the following assumptions.

Assumption #1: The speed of light is the same in all inertial systems.

Based on Michelson-Morley’s experiment, the speed of light of 3 x 108 meters/second was not affected by the velocity of the earth, which is 3 x 104 meters/second relative to the sun. This velocity of the earth is 1/10,000 of the speed of light. The “v/c ratios” of most material bodies in the universe are of the same order. Therefore, this assumption is good for a “v/c ratio” of 1/10,000 or less.

Lorentz transformations may not be valid for “v/c ratios” that are much greater than 1/10,000 and close to 1, as found at the sub-atomic level.

Assumption #2: The gamma “fudge” factor is the same for observers in different inertial systems.

In this cosmos, each body is drifting in space under a balance of forces. These forces depend on the inertia of the body. Therefore, the inertial systems are not exactly alike, and we cannot assume the gamma factor to be the same for them.

However, this assumption is good as long as the difference in inertia among these systems is much less compared to their difference in inertia with light.

Lorentz transformations may not be valid for motion of particles with inertia much less than the inertia of earth and closer to the inertia of light, as is the case with sub-atomic particles.

Lorentz transformations are at the heart of special relativity. Therefore, these limitations apply to special relativity as well.

.

Michelson-Morley’s Null Result (old)

maxresdefault
Reference: Disturbance Theory

Please see Michelson-Morley’s Null Result

“The situation grows more and more serious. Two assumptions have been tried. The first, that moving bodies carry ether along. The fact that the velocity of light does not depend on the motion of the source contradicts this assumption. The second, that there exists one distinguished coordinate system and that moving bodies do not carry the ether but travel through an ever calm ether-sea. If this is so, then the Galilean relativity principle is not valid and the speed of light cannot be the same in every coordinate system. Again we are in contradiction with experiment.”

~ Albert Einstein, Evolution of Physics by Einstein

.

The null results from Michelson-Morley’s experiment in 1887 initiated a line of research that eventually led to Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity. The expected difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles, was found not to exist. The special relativity then ruled out a stationary aether.

Light seems to have both wave and particle characteristics. As a wave, light requires a medium; and as particles, light requires some system of coordination among particles. In either case, light requires some relationship within its background, which is space, even when there is no aether.

There seems to be an assumption that moving bodies travel through space without resistance. We do not see space. We can only see a body moving relative to another body. How do we know that a body is moving relative to space?

We all know about inertia. Newton defined it as follows:

“The vis insita, or innate force of matter, is a power of resisting by which every body, as much as in it lies, endeavours to preserve its present state, whether it be of rest or of moving uniformly forward in a straight line.”

If we postulate that inertia is the resistance of space to a moving body then a lot of observations fall into place.

  1. When there is acceleration then we know that a body is definitely moving relative to space.

  2. When there is no acceleration then a body’s acceleration is balanced by inertia.

  3. Light has a finite and constant speed because its acceleration is balanced by inertia.

  4. A body has a constant drift speed in space when its acceleration is balanced by its inertia.

  5. The drift speed of any object shall depend on its inertia.

We may then postulate space to be the background of no inertia in which bodies with inertia are drifting at speeds that depend on their inertia.

The difference between the speeds of light and the earth shall be constant because the difference between their inertia is constant. This explains the null result of Michelson-Morley’s experiment.

One may object to the above by saying, “The earth is orbiting the sun. Therefore, it is constantly accelerating in the radial direction towards the sun, but not in the tangential direction. So, there must be a slight difference in speed relative to light in the two directions.”

We may calculate the order of this difference as follows:

  1. The difference between the disturbance levels of the earth and light is roughly 186 (235 – 49). Therefore, the ratio of their frequencies is 2186.

  2. The ratio of their drift speed shall then be 293 or 1028.

  3. The drift speed of the earth shall then be (3 x 108 meters/sec) (10-28) = 3 x 10-20 m/s.

  4. The Michelson-Morley’s experiment is then required to detect a velocity difference of 6 x 10-20 m/s.

So far there has been no Michelson-Morley or another type of experiment that has the level of accuracy to detect the speed of the earth relative to “aether”, which, in this case, is space.

.

Conclusion

Thus, the null result from Michelson-Morley’s experiment is questionable when we consider space to be that elusive aether.

This then also makes the postulates of special relativity questionable when we consider inertia to be the resistance of space to a moving body.

This then limits the validity of the theory of special relativity to the explanation of phenomena where speeds involved are much smaller compared to the speed of light.

.

Comment (1/5/2019):

Moving bodies do not carry aether along because there is no aether. There cannot be stationary aether because only a system of infinite inertia can be stationary.

There is only a very ephemeral form of substance with inertia less than that of light. Light has its own inertia, which determines its velocity. Similarly, the source of light also has inertia that determines its velocity. Each velocity is constant in the coordinate system based on a scale of inertia.

.

The Faraday Atom

Loop ball

Reference: Disturbance Theory

.

The fundamental principles that Maxwell helped isolate are:

1.    A changing electric field produces a magnetic field of force

2.    A changing magnetic field produces an electric field of force

The next step is to generate a model based on these principles that we may visualize through Faraday’s lines of force.

When a current flows in a wire the magnetic lines of force loop around it. Similarly, when a magnet is moved through a wire loop, a current is generated in that loop. This gives us a basic structure as follows:

The electrical and magnetic lines of force may be visualized as two circular loops at right angles to each other, such that each loop passes through the center of the other loop.

If we model an atom based on Faraday’s lines of force, the entire atom shall consist of electrical and magnetic lines of forces coupled as above. There would be no sub-atomic particles. Such coupling can get quite complex as atoms grows in complexity.

Since the nucleus of an atom is positive, the electric lines of force in the atom would be mostly radial, and the magnetic lines of force would be mostly circumferential.

The atom is overall neutral. A neutral configuration shall consist of coupled electric and magnetic loops that are symmetrical. Symmetrical loops shall be circular. An asymmetric configuration shall consist of elongated loops resulting in charged or magnetized atom.

Under electrical induction, the electrical loop shall elongate producing positive and negative charge displacement. Under magnetic induction, the magnetic loop shall elongate producing North and South polarization.

When atoms are aligned in the plane of elongated electrical loops we shall have storage of electrical energy as in a capacitor. When atoms are aligned in the plane of elongated magnetic loops we shall have storage of magnetic energy as in a magnet.

It would be easy to distinguish between electric and magnetic lines of force.

When the opposite charges or poles exist in two separate objects situated close to each other, the elongated loop must pass through space from one to the other object. Here we have lines of forces that venture out in space but they always originate from and end in material atoms.  The displacement or polarization occurs in the atoms and not out in the space.

The “space medium” does not act like a dielectric as Maxwell assumed.

.

The electromagnetic phenomenon, such as light, may exist in space by itself as follows.

  1. The lines of forces are traveling through space as pulses.
  2. They exist as simple loops without atomic configuration.
  3. The electric and magnetic loops are symmetrical.

A free charged particle, such as a free electron shall be one end of the stretched loop of electric line of force. The other end of this loop may be attached to an atom (a positive ion) or simply extended into infinity.

The atom as a neutral particle is not really isolated. The lines of force extend from the atom into surrounding space to other atoms.

The atoms may appear discrete but they are never isolated unto themselves. They all connected as a continuum of lines of force.

Please note that this is only a working model of “Faraday atom”. The electrical and magnetic lines are always transforming into each other at a certain frequency.

All lines of forces are dynamic.

The nucleus of the atom is also made up of lines of force. These are extensions of the electromagnetic lines of force, but they have much higher frequency.

The nuclear lines of force have characteristics different from electromagnetic lines of force.

.