The Split Second when the Lightning Meets the Land:
Daredevil Photographer Risks his Life
Does lightning start from the land, or from the cloud?
.
Vinaire's Blog
Daredevil Photographer Risks his Life
Does lightning start from the land, or from the cloud?
.
.
PURPOSE: To distinctly recognize physical and mental objects, and any association that may have been taken for granted.
Here is an example:
Suppose you are looking at the profile of a person. When the question arises, “How many ears does this person have?” Your mind may say, “Two.” But as you look, you see only one ear. Underlying this inconsistency there is some association that you are not fully aware of.
Continuing with the previous example, you may find that there is the thought, “All persons have two ears” associated with the person’s profile you are looking at. You may then be able to look at the person’s profile separately from the thought, and realize that this person may, or may not, have a second ear. This will be a more accurate view.
.
PURPOSE: To distinctly recognize the mental objects and the activity taking place among them, without participating, or interfering, in any way.
Here is an example:
A memory may come up when you were in school, and you used to be terrified at the sight of a bully. You may get a series of pictures of the school and the person, who bullied you. You may become aware of several incidents of being bullied, the time of the year when those incidents occurred, and a feeling of dread.
Continuing with the previous example, thoughts may arise, such as, how the fear of the bully affected your school grades. This thought may remind you of people in the present time who act like that bully. You may also be reminded of fears that worry you in the present. The mind may then start computing how to avoid those people, and how to go about handling those fears. Computations like this may go on and on.
.
PURPOSE: To experience a feeling, emotion, or sensation thoroughly without avoiding, resisting, or suppressing it back.
Physical Objects
The physical objects result from the assimilation of coming perceptual elements from the senses of sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch.
Mental Objects
The mental objects are memories, thoughts, and feelings triggered by incoming perceptual elements.
.
Joint venture builds on MITx and Harvard distance learning; aims to benefit campus-based education and beyond.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. – Harvard University and MIT today announced edX, a transformational new partnership in online education. Through edX, the two institutions will collaborate to enhance campus-based teaching and learning and build a global community of online learners.
EdX will build on both universities’ experience in offering online instructional content. The technological platform recently established by MITx, which will serve as the foundation for the new learning system, was designed to offer online versions of MIT courses featuring video lesson segments, embedded quizzes, immediate feedback, student-ranked questions and answers, online laboratories and student-paced learning. Certificates of mastery will be available for those who are motivated and able to demonstrate their knowledge of the course material.
MIT and Harvard expect that over time other universities will join them in offering courses on the edX platform. The gathering of many universities’ educational content together on one site will enable learners worldwide to access the course content of any participating university from a single website, and to use a set of online educational tools shared by all participating universities.
EdX will release its learning platform as open-source software so it can be used by other universities and organizations that wish to host the platform themselves. Because the learning technology will be available as open-source software, other universities and individuals will be able to help edX improve and add features to the technology.
MIT and Harvard will use the jointly operated edX platform to research how students learn and how technologies can facilitate effective teaching both on campus and online. The edX platform will enable the study of which teaching methods and tools are most successful. The findings of this research will be used to inform how faculty use technology in their teaching, which will enhance the experience for students on campus and for the millions expected to take advantage of these new online offerings.
“EdX represents a unique opportunity to improve education on our own campuses through online learning, while simultaneously creating a bold new educational path for millions of learners worldwide,” MIT President Susan Hockfield said.
Harvard President Drew Faust said, “EdX gives Harvard and MIT an unprecedented opportunity to dramatically extend our collective reach by conducting groundbreaking research into effective education and by extending online access to quality higher education.”
“Harvard and MIT will use these new technologies and the research they will make possible to lead the direction of online learning in a way that benefits our students, our peers, and people across the nation and the globe,” Faust continued.
Jointly owned not-for-profit structure
The initiative will be overseen by a not-for-profit organization based in Cambridge, Mass., to be owned and governed equally by the two universities. MIT and Harvard have committed to a combined $60 million ($30 million each) in institutional support, grants and philanthropy to launch the collaboration.
Anant Agarwal, director of MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, who has led the development of the MITx platform under the leadership of MIT Provost L. Rafael Reif, will serve as the first president of edX.
At Harvard, Provost Alan Garber will direct the Harvardx effort and Faculty of Arts and Sciences Dean Michael D. Smith will play a leading role in working with faculty to develop and deliver courses.
It is anticipated that near-term course offerings from a range of Harvard and MIT schools will be included on the edX platform.
Research to enhance residential model
EdX will enhance the traditional residential model of undergraduate education on both campuses by supporting an unlimited number of experimental online approaches to teaching that can be used by Harvard and MIT faculty to benefit their students. It will also provide global access to some of the world-class instruction that already occurs at both institutions, but which is only one aspect of the full Harvard College and MIT experience.
“The campus environment offers opportunities and experiences that cannot be replicated online,” Hockfield said. “EdX is designed to improve, not replace, the campus experience.”
EdX will be separate from ongoing distance-learning initiatives at both institutions, including MIT OpenCourseWare and courses offered by schools at Harvard such as the Harvard Extension School, Harvard Business School and Harvard Medical School.
First courses by fall 2012
The universities will work to develop further the online learning platform already begun with MITx and to populate the edX website with courses from the MIT and Harvard faculty. During the early stages, the two universities will work cooperatively to offer as broad an initial set of courses as possible. A first set of courses is scheduled to be announced in early summer and to start in fall 2012.
“We are already moving forward quickly,” Agarwal said. “There’s a lot of energy in the air, and the teams at Harvard and MIT can’t wait to collaborate.”
.

.
Reference: Religion
I provided a couple of examples of inconsistencies in General Inconsistencies on the subject of God as follows:
I find that looking at the inconsistencies on the subject of God can be very helpful as it may bring to view The Basic Inconsistency.
Attempt to look at the inconsistencies on the subject of God does not mean that one is denying God. I believe that there is God, but I also believe that as long as inconsistencies exist, a complete understanding of God is not there, and a complete understanding of “self” is also missing.
Saying, “I see no inconsistencies on the subject of God,” may simply point to an outright rejection of other views on God. This may mean that one is resisting looking at the inconsistencies on the subject of God. That would be a weakness.
A person, who can think for oneself, should be willing to look at all different views on God, and discuss them intelligently.
The Comment Section below is reserved for bringing into view all inconsistencies that have existed on God and look at them closely.
I hope this exercise would be worthwhile.
.
It is believed by many that, “God created the universe” and that “God is good.” An inconsistency comes about when one observes that there is evil in this world, and God cannot be the source of evil. One then rationalizes that Satan, who is created by God, is the source of evil. Satan is evil because, having a mind of his own, he disobeys God. One then wonders if it is bad to have a mind of one’s own. The inconsistency then falls apart when one looks more closely without rationalization.
It is believed by many that, “Man is created in the image of god.” Thus, God is believed to have a beingness with a form. Since beingness with form must exist in space, God must exist in space too. We then observe that space is part of this universe, and it must have been created when the universe was created. This means that, God did not have location in space, when he first created this universe. And so, God did not have beingness with form in the beginning. The inconsistency also falls apart when looked at more closely.
These are some obvious examples of inconsistencies that are hidden under rationalized beliefs. The whole concept of LOOKING goes against rationalization. It makes the gaps in knowledge stand out quite clearly. This may be uncomfortable when looking raises questions about one’s cherished beliefs, but this is necessary if any progress is to be made.
.
Most of our knowledge is acquired through spoken or written words when we listen to our parents, go to school, go to church, work on jobs, read books and use Internet. Of course, there is experience but it gets colored by what we have been taught through spoken and written words.
Truth exists only in the exactness of perception. If one is interested in knowing the truth then one should perceive for oneself what is actually there without assuming anything. And, if that brings up inconsistencies then truth is contained in the resolution of those inconsistencies.
When knowledge is being conveyed via the spoken or written word, then the first step is to clearly understand the sense conveyed by the words in the context they are used. The next step is to resolve any inconsistencies that come up when dealing with the meaning of those words.
A good example is the word “God,” which is passed down to us through the Bible. There are inconsistencies connected with the word “God” as pointed out at the beginning of this essay. We are not sure if the language used in the scriptures is poetic and allegorical. So a closer look is needed at the Biblical references. When all inconsistencies are resolved the truth shall reveal itself.
.
We have dictionaries available to help us find the meaning of words. When doing so, keep in mind that words have evolved over time and they have acquired different shades of meanings.
(1) Start with the root meaning of the word.
A good place to start would be to grasp the common denominator of the various meanings attributed to a word. The derivation of a word may help you understand how the various meanings have evolved. Look up the derivation of the word first. Follow the derivation back to its roots to find the “root meaning.” For example, when you follow the derivation of the word study, you may come up with the root meaning “eagerness.” This may be the common denominator of the various meanings of the word study as “eagerness to know.”
Dictionaries usually provide useful derivations of words. You may use dictionaries on Internet, such as, the link http://dictionary.reference.com. To really get the history of a word, you may have to go to a reference, such as, “Dictionary of Word Origins” by John Ayato. Check out the derivation and history of the word arithmetic.
(2) Look up and visualize the various definitions of the word.
Next, look up the definitions provided for that word. As you look at each meaning, relate it to your experience and visualize it in your mind. If the word is exuberant then look at the times when you felt exuberant, or perceived somebody else being exuberant. It is much easier to visualize when the word refers to something concrete. You can find the actual thing to look at, or you may find a model or, at least, a picture of that thing. For example, for the word archipelago, you may easily find models or pictures in an encyclopedia or on the Internet.
If the definition refers to something abstract, then you can still find examples that illustrate that idea or concept. For example, the word ineffable is quite abstract; but you can find enough examples to define it for yourself. Look up as many examples as necessary, and follow it up with your own examples. You may even work out how ineffable is that way, or not that way until it starts to make sense. Use your experience and visualization.
(3) If there are words in definitions that you don’t understand then look them up too.
It is possible to get into long word chains when looking up the words in definitions, but this needs to be done. Keep in mind that words are only approximations. What is important is getting a clear visualization of what is meant. So, get enough understanding of the word to be able to visualize the context. Keep on visualizing that word in different contexts until suddenly the meaning becomes clear. A skillful use of visualization may help you keep the word chains short.
Keep a record of the words as you look them up. Cross out a word as soon as its meaning is understood. Sometimes a word may come up again that you had looked up earlier. But this time it may be used differently. It is okay to look up the same word as many times as necessary. Each time you look up a word you may pick up a new dimension of its meaning.
(4) Select the definition that clarifies the context the most.
A dictionary may provide several definitions for a word. Check out how each definition fits into the context through visualization. Even if the right definition is not there, the visualization will help you work it out. Once you have a clear idea of the meaning that fits in that context, use that word in several sentences. This will make you feel comfortable when using that word in speech or writing.
Sorting out the meaning of words, as above, removes the initial hurdle in understanding a subject. Since the subject has passed through various hands before arriving in its present form, there may still be some inconsistencies to sort out. The following steps may help detect inconsistencies present in the subject.
(1) List the key words of the subject.
Scan through the material to be studied and list all the key words. These are the words that carry the key concepts. For example, in the subject of mathematics, some of the key words are: mathematics, arithmetic, algebra, geometry, number, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, equation, unknown, variable, space, and direction, distance, position, etc. This list may grow as you get deeper into the subject. Words may also be added as the definition of a word may refer to additional words in that subject that may carry key concepts.
(2) Arrange the words in the sequence in which the concepts have evolved.
Start by arranging the words in the sequence that they appear in the material being studied. As you gain familiarity with their meanings, keep rearranging the key words in the sequence they seem to have evolved. Move the words embodying more fundamental concepts toward the top. Move the words embodying derived concepts toward the bottom. You may attach brief clues to the words as to what they mean.
(3) Use the list as the “context” in which to understand the key words.
Go up and down the sequence of the key words. Clarify and align the meanings further as necessary. Notice any gaps or inconsistencies and try to resolve them. Include them in your list if they cannot be resolved.
(4) Study the subject in detail to resolve gaps and inconsistencies.
The purpose of study is not to memorize information, but to resolve gaps and inconsistencies in understanding. What you already understand should be of no further concern. Make sure you understand the materials as you proceed. The moment some material start to become confusing, stop and locate the source of confusion. Clear the confusion; or, at least, note it down in your list, before proceeding further.
Note that there are likely to be many contributors to a subject. For example, you may look at religion as a subject contributed to by many different cultures. You may find different contributors referring to similar concepts by different key words. Add such keywords to your List. If more than one key word seems to embody the same concept, then note down the similarities and differences among the meaning of those key words.
(5) Clarify the fundamentals of the subject as a priority.
Your Key Words List may branch out and grow into an inverted ”Key Words Tree” as you move lower and lower down the list. The gaps and inconsistencies at the lower part of tree may depend on those at the top. It is, therefore, worthwhile to start addressing the gaps and inconsistencies closer to the top as a priority. This is where the fundamentals of a subject would reside.
Study the fundamentals from various sources. You may create a Key Word List or Tree just for these fundamentals. It is the most important part of any subject. You may create experiments where you find obvious gaps in the fundamental knowledge. Fill these gaps with research and make the whole subject as much complete and consistent as possible.
.
When spoken and written words are used to gain knowledge, one must understand the meaning of those words in the correct context. Inconsistencies may arise during this process, and a resolution of them may guide one toward the correct meaning. This may then require a close examination of one’s beliefs and assumptions.
If one rationalizes inconsistencies to preserve one’s beliefs then no new knowledge is gained. It is only through the resolution of inconsistencies that one gains new knowledge and arrives at truth.
To resolve an inconsistency, simply keep looking at it per The Mechanics of Looking, until one spots considerations that one has been taking for granted, all the way to their source.
.