Author Archives: vinaire

I am originally from India. I am settled in United States since 1969. I love mathematics, philosophy and clarity in thinking.

The Axioms 1 – 10

Reference: The Axioms

In the Scientology Axioms, written by L. Ron Hubbard in 1954, we have a condensation and a recapitulation of all the earlier Axioms and Logics, boiled down to a more practical, more fundamental and more forthright list. They compare best, perhaps, to the axioms of geometry; they are certainly as self–evident as that. But the axioms of geometry are really much cruder than the Scientology Axioms, since geometry proves itself by itself and the Axioms of Scientology prove themselves by all of life.

This paper presents Scientology Axioms 1 – 10 and the corresponding KHTK versions.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 1: Life is basically a static.

Definition: a Life Static has no mass, no motion, no wavelength, no location in space or in time. It has the ability to postulate and to perceive.

Static implies that Theta and MEST are substances in two different dimensions. Theta is the potential that becomes actual only when manifested in MEST. This manifestation results in motion which is life. In Hubbard’s Theta-MEST theory, theta may separate from MEST and survive as pure potential.

Hubbard postulated the Theta-MEST theory to explain the phenomena of Death. Most of the conscious life leaves the body at the moment of death. So, Hubbard postulated a unit of theta (thetan) leaving the body at death. But life in the organs of the body takes another 14 days to leave completely. So Hubbard postulated a Genetic Entity to explain that. But even when the body disintegrates completely, some motion still remains at the atomic level. This presents an anomaly because if theta leaves the MEST, then no motion should be left at all in MEST.

We find that motion is inherent to MEST at the atomic level and it can never be separated. Motion becomes more sophisticated as MEST becomes more complex at the molecular level. As molecules increase in complexity they act like computers. A DNA molecule is so complex that it can store the whole blue print of the body within itself. The sophisticated motion at the level of the body expresses itself as thought. Throughout this increasing complexity of MEST, the increasingly sophisticated motion cannot be separated from MEST.

So, at the moment of death, most of the sophisticated motion of life ceases, because the overall system of the body breaks down. The remaining motion of the body ceases over the next 14 days as body’s sub-systems break down one by one. Subsequently, any sophisticated motion goes dormant in the DNA molecules. So, we can explain death in terms of an integrated Theta-MEST system gradually breaking down and becoming dormant, instead of “theta leaving MEST.” This is more consistent.

Lets’ look at the phenomenon of exteriorization where, in Hubbard’s model, the thetan leaves the body, and the genetic entity is left in the body to maintain its functions. We may explain the phenomenon of exteriorization in terms of shift in consideration. When the person is interiorized, his attention is, actually, fixated on the body. When this attention suddenly frees itself up, we have exteriorization. The body, actually, extends as an aura around the solid part. The attention units, when freed up, can be focused in the aura away from the solid part. This makes one feel that one is outside the body, when in fact the Theta-MEST remains integrated. This is more consistent than the hypothesis of “theta leaving MEST.”

KHTK AXIOM 1: Life is the expression of Theta integrated with MEST.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 2: The static is capable of considerations, postulates, and opinions.

The static cannot be measured because it is a total potential. All things manifest when static becomes kinetic. Space comes about as the extents of energy. Thus, energy forms are a phenomenon of space. Furthermore, these energy forms change through innate impulses. This gives us self-animation and the impression of time.

All energy, and its animation, is innate. This animation, when sufficiently complex, appears as life. This is not the production of energy by life as Hubbard assumes. He also assumes these peculiar and individualistic impulses to be thetans. But the impulses are innate to the fabric of the universe, and they express themselves as considerations, postulates and opinions in the process of guiding and governing the animation of energy.

We see consideration as something taken up while making a decision, evaluating facts, etc. We see postulate as something assumed without proof as a basis for reasoning. We see opinion as a judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty. These elements appearing spontaneously to generate animations provide the impression of a living unit, which Hubbard called a thetan.

So, thetan is this innate impulse expressing itself through unique workings of considerations, postulates and opinions. To exteriorize the thetan from an area simply requires removing fixation in that area. This area could be the body, or the mind, or even the self. Ultimately, thetan may be exteriorized even from this universe by removing all fixations. Sometimes a person can exteriorize himself from the body by simply postulating no fixations on the body.

KHTK AXIOM 2: The innate impulse of life evolves into considerations, postulates and opinions.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 3: Space, energy, objects, form and time are the result of considerations made and/or agreed upon or not by the static and are perceived solely because the static considers that it can perceive them.

You simply look at what is there. You don’t have to believe that something is there. Energy reflects from things out there and enters your physical sense channels. Your mental sense then assimilates that energy to make the perception continuous, harmonious and consistent (See the Prelogics and the Logics). Any discontinuity, disharmony or inconsistency is seen as an anomaly to be sorted out. (See The Logic of Perception).

Hubbard believed that you perceive what you put out there in the first place. This is not entirely correct. Your mental sense is assimilating the energy that comes in. Your considerations are simply modifying that energy. They act as filters. The effort in Buddhism is to see things as they are without any filters.

NOTE: A postulate is defined here as something assumed without proof as a basis for reasoning.

KHTK AXIOM 3: Space, energy, objects, form and time are postulates that help us assimilate, understand and explain the reality reaching us through our senses.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 4: Space is a viewpoint of dimension.

At present the definitions of matter, energy, space and time in physics are not really circular. The innate fundamental substance of this universe is energy. Space is defined by the extents of energy. If there is no energy there is no space either. “Empty space” is empty of matter only. It is not empty of low vibrational energy.

When we are looking at space, we are looking at the extents of energy (matter is condensed energy). Therefore, it is more correct to say that space is “a viewpoint of dimensions of energy.” Hubbard’s contribution has been to generalize the concept of energy to include life energy. Thus, the concept of space may be expanded to include the extents of life and thought energy.

KHTK AXIOM 4: Space describes the dimensions of energy.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 5: Energy consists of postulated particles in space.

Energy postulates that the substance of the universe is innate. It is neither created nor destroyed. It simply changes from static to kinetic and then back to static again. It is manifested in myriads of forms. All these forms interchange with each other. Science acknowledges this by the Law of Conservation of Energy.

Energy is the most fundamental postulate because all other postulates derive from it. For example, space describes the dimensions of energy; time describes the duration of energy; and matter describes the condensed state of energy.

The innate impulse of energy is its vibration. Energy propagates itself as a wave of that vibration. As vibration increases the energy condenses and appears increasingly as a particle. The most stable particle is the atom. Energy is the substance of both Theta and MEST. We may say Theta energy particles appear as considerations, postulates and opinions.

Hubbard is looking at energy mathematically in the context of space. That reverses the postulates of energy and space. Hubbard describes neither energy nor space fully in a consistent manner.

KHTK AXIOM 5: Energy describes the innate substance of the universe.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 6: Objects consist of grouped particles and solids.

The smallest MEST particles are atoms that combine as molecules and group together as objects. We may extend this same logic to Theta. The smallest Theta particles are considerations, postulates and opinions that may group together as theta objects. The most obvious theta object is a thetan.

But these grouped particles maintain continuity among themselves and with the environment. The high gradient of vibrations at the boundary ensures the identity of the particles. The high gradient at the boundary with the environment ensures the identity of the object. The highly condensed particles and objects move within an environment of energy of very low vibrations, while maintaining continuity with it.

KHTK AXIOM 6: Objects consist of grouped particles of condensed energy.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 7: Time is basically a postulate that space and particles will persist.

Time describes the duration of energy. As energy increases in its vibration, it becomes denser and its duration also increases. Less enduring energy appears to move against a background that is more enduring.

The universe has infinite endurance and it makes a perfect background against which relative endurances (or motions) of the whole spectrum of energy may be observed.

KHTK AXIOM 7: Time describes the duration of energy.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 8: The apparency of time is the change of position of particles in space.

Empty space doesn’t itself seem to move because its energy is invisible. It, therefore, represents the infinite duration of the universe. It forms the background for all visible particles and matter. The visible particles of matter seem to move according to their relative durations. Motion appears as relative change of position in space.

If everything is enduring at the same rate, no motion shall be observed, and it will appear as if no time is passing. Therefore, passage of time is sensed through relative motion.

KHTK AXIOM 8: Time is sensed by the motion of particles in space. The faster is the motion, the faster is time passing.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 9: Change is the primary manifestation of time.

Time relates to motion. Motionless particles do not provide the sense of time. Motion is either acceleration of the body or relative to another body. Therefore, the basis of motion is change relative to oneself or to something else.

When change is occurring, we know for sure that time is passing. It doesn’t have to be a change of position in space. It could be change in any characteristic. A person who is in a rush all the time is unable to consider time directly. He is trying to create time frantically by changing things around him.

KHTK AXIOM 9: Change is the primary manifestation of time.

.

SCIENTOLOGY AXIOM 10: The highest purpose in this universe is the creation of an effect.

Creating an effect is to bring about some change according to the impulses of life. If errors are made and the resulting effect is not as was desired, then one must take responsibility to correct the errors and resolve any situation. When one does not take responsibility, no further progress is made. Instead life deteriorates.

KHTK AXIOM 10: The highest purpose in the universe is to evolve by taking full responsibility.

.

SCN 8-8008: Theta-Mest Theory

Reference: The Book of Scientology

Theta-Mest Theory

Please see the original section at the link above.

.

Summary

.

Comments

The above summary shows where Hubbard is going with his Theta-MEST theory. This theory is based on the Creator-creation paradigm. It introduces the idea of there being many creators, who are individuals. These individual creators have their individual universes. The biggest arbitrary in this theory is that it postulates individual creators and does not define the relationships among them.

.

The Prelogics (old)

Please see The Prelogics

L. Ron Hubbard analyzed life in its relationship to matter, energy, space and time and as a result evolved the Pre-logics. These were published in late 1951 as a result of many years of research into the nature of life and the spirituality of man.

Knowledge is a pyramid, and knowledge as a pyramid has a common denominator which evaluates all other data below it. At the top point of this pyramid, we have what could be called a Q, and it could also be called a common denominator. It is in common to every other datum in this pyramid full of data.

The Qs are the highest echelon from which all other things are derived.

Q came from quod in Q.E.D. (quod erat demonstrandum, meaning “which was to be shown or demonstrated,” used especially in mathematical proofs).

Actually, Q can be defined this way: It is the level from which we are now viewing, which is a common denominator to all experience which we can now view. This is the level which acts as a common denominator to all this experience, and is the highest level from which we are operating. This data, then, would stand behind everything else that we do.

Q simply means the most common datum that sums all other data.

.

SCIENTOLOGY Q 1: Self-determinism is the common denominator of all life impulses.

A life impulse by its very nature is something innate or inborn. It has to be there at the beginning of the universe. It has to be woven into the very fabric of the universe. Any motion of the universe must proceed from such an impulse. The evolution of the universe depends on such an impulse. Therefore, the vibrations of energy are innate. The motion of electrons in an atom is innate.

KHTK Q 1: All life impulses are naturally innate.

.

SCIENTOLOGY Q 2: Definition of self-determinism: the ability to locate in space and time, energy and matter, also the ability to create space and time in which to create and locate energy and matter.

Space and time are the characteristics of energy and matter. Without energy and matter there is neither space nor time. Matter comes about because of condensation of energy. Therefore, the innate vibrations appear as energy. As vibrations change, so does energy. As energy condenses, its extents (space) reduce, and its duration (time) increases.

There is no “nothing” in absolute sense because vibration (energy) is always there. Therefore, there is creation only in the sense of change from one state to another. Outwardly, the change is in terms of vibration; but, inwardly, the change occurs in terms of awareness.

A change has a beginning and an end, but the universe has neither beginning nor end. There is nothing “outside” the universe influencing the universe. It is the universe influencing itself. It may appear that one part of the universe is influencing another part; but the universe overall is self-determined.

On a universal scale, the self-determinism is the natural balance. For example, if there is a hill in one place, then there is a valley in another.

KHTK Q 2: Definition of self-determinism: The ability to bring balanced changes within oneself and in the environment.

.

SCIENTOLOGY Q 3: The identification of the source of that which places matter and energy and originates space and time is not necessary to the resolution of this problem at this time.

It may appear that one part of the universe is causing changes in another part of the universe. However, the whole universe is, essentially, making changes within itself because it is one continuous system. Each part of the universe is influenced by the rest of the universe. The nature of changes may be identified at every point within the system.

Therefore, human self is a part of the universe. It has self-determinism built into it, but it is also influenced by the rest of the universe.

KHTK Q 3: The overall source of self-determinism is the universe. The human self has self-determinism built into it, but it is also influenced by the rest of the universe.

.

SCIENTOLOGY Q 4: Theta creates space, energy and objects by postulates.

Theta is the innate nature of the universe. Space-energy-objects (Mest) is the outward form of the universe. Theta and Mest are simply two different aspects of the universe. Neither creates the other.

Similarly, humans have an innate nature (thetan), and an outward form (body). Postulates are made by humans to understand the natural phenomena, which is the universe.

With this understanding the changes can be made to the universe to make it evolve more rapidly.

KHTK Q 4: Theta, space, energy and objects are innate phenomena of the universe. Postulates serve to bring understanding to these phenomena.

.

SCIENTOLOGY Q 5: Universes are created by the application of self-determinism on eight dynamics.

There is one overall universe. Some people happen to refer to parts of universe as “universes” too. This clarification is made because the overall universe is intrinsically continuous, harmonious and consistent.

The eight dynamics refer to aspects of the universe. For example, the overall universe is Eighth Dynamic that has the aspects of Seventh Dynamic (Theta) and Sixth Dynamic (MEST). The seventh and sixth dynamics evolve together to produce Fifth Dynamic (life). The highest point of evolution of the Fifth Dynamic is the Fourth Dynamic (Mankind). The Fourth Dynamic subdivides into Third Dynamic (Groups). The smallest unit of Third Dynamic is the Second Dynamic (Family) that has a special way of forming and propagating through sexual activity. The third and second dynamics are made up of the First Dynamic (individuals).

Self-determinism refers to the innate impulse that exists in the fabric of the universe. That impulse, therefore, exists in each of the dynamics, making it what it is.

KHTK Q 5: Self-determinism is the innate impulse that makes the universe expand and evolve into the eight dynamics.

.

SCIENTOLOGY Q 6: Self-determinism, applied, will create, alter, conserve and possibly destroy universes.

The Universe is everything. Self-determinism is the innate characteristic of this universe. Self-determinism does not exist apart from the universe. It underlies all the power there is in the universe to change and evolve.

It is interesting to note that Scientology takes the viewpoint of the individual (First Dynamic), whereas, KHTK takes the viewpoint of the Universe (Eighth Dynamic). That is the major difference.

KHTK Q 6: Self-determinism underlies all the power there is in the universe to change and evolve.

.

SCIENTOLOGY Q 7: The action cycle is one of the abilities of a thetan. An action cycle goes from 40.0 to 0.0 on the Tone Scale. An action cycle is the creation, growth, conservation, decay and death or destruction of energy and matter in a space. Action cycles produce time.

Thetan may be identified as the viewpoint related to First Dynamic, whereas, Theta is the universal viewpoint related to the Eighth Dynamic. The viewpoint narrows down from Eighth to the First Dynamic. Thetan may be viewed as the individuation from Theta. A person grows as his viewpoint broadens from first to eighth dynamic.

The 40.0 on the Tone Scale represents the broadest viewpoint. It is totally free and objective. Therefore, it is unfixed and detached from everything. The 0.0 on the Tone Scale represents the narrowest viewpoint. It is totally bound and subjective. Therefore, it is completely fixated and attached in one manner or another.

The Action Cycle is basically a cycle of change from total static to total kinetic and then back to total static. A good example of this is the pendulum. The energy of the pendulum starts converting from potential state (static) to kinetic in the first half of its swing, reaching full kinetic state at the midpoint; after which it starts converting back from kinetic to potential reaching full potential state (static) at the end of the swing.

The energy is neither created out of nothing, nor destroyed into nothing. In static state, energy is simply unmanifested. In kinetic state, energy is fully manifested. The static state exists at either end of the Action Cycle where everything stops momentarily before changing direction. In this state all energy exists in potential form. This potential energy is then expressed as kinetic energy during rest of the cycle by different degrees. The time from one static state to the next is called the Period of the Action Cycle.

KHTK Q 7: The action cycle is a cycle of change from a static state to a kinetic state then back to the static state. It may be applied to the Universe. It may also be applied to a viewpoint from 40.0 to 0.0 on the Tone Scale. Change is the characteristic of Time.

.

PHOENIX LECTURES: Chapter 12

Project: Hubbard 1954: The Phoenix Lectures

This paper presents Chapter 12 from the book THE PHOENIX LECTURES by L. RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original publication of this book by The Church of Scientology (1954).

The paragraphs of the original material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the understanding from Buddhism.  Feedback on these comments is always appreciated.

.

TIME

Time is the subject which was introduced very early into this universe, and it has been with it ever since. The very obviousness of time has obfuscated time. Time is something that one can easily not have enough of and at the same time have too much of. And at the same time not be in.

Time is the duration of energy. Energy came about as a Static potential transformed into a Kinetic form similar to a pendulum starting its swing. With energy came time. Time depends on the energy one has and how long it is lasting.

The whole subject of time is a confusing subject because it is a consideration which took place along with — not after or before — because there wasn’t any time at the moment the consideration called time was made. It took place along with space-energy. So, it was space-energy-time or energy-space and time.

Time is part of the definition of energy. Space is the energy of lowest vibrations Mass is the energy of highest vibrations. So, we have space-energy-mass as the spectrum of energy and time. These may be seen as very fundamental postulates and considerations.

Time was created immediately after these basic postulates with the postulate of change, or the introduction of policy, and as soon as policy comes in or new considerations come in then we begin to get consecutive time.

Energy endures while its form changes. Thus, a sequence of changing forms appear. This gives the impression of time passing.

The first few Board Minutes of any corporation are more or less nebulous with regard to time. They might as well have all taken place in zero minutes at the beginning of the world. You see that it doesn’t matter. The people who elect the Board of Directors are the Board of Directors before they elect the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors precipitate from an idea of Board of Directors. It is potential becoming actual. Time comes about as energy transforms from potential to actual.

Now you are the space before you make the space. You are the energy before you make the energy. After you make the energy you are before the energy. The time which is postulated at that point is postulated at a time when there is no time, which is not any time at all, which might as well be now as then. You might as well be postulating time just this very instant which is the time you postulated at the beginning of this universe.

At the beginning there is potential only and nothing exists actually. Even consciousness is potential. One may say potential comes before actual but those are two very different levels. Time applies to actuality only. Time begins for a cycle of action whenever it transitions from potential to actual.

This instant in absence of the consideration called time is the instant of the creation of this universe, is the instant of the end of this universe. If no time has been postulated, then all time would be one time.

A potential is totally static. There is no differentiation of beginning from end. Time exists only as a potential.

A preclear who ceases to postulate time ceases to have time. And that’s the first thing you can learn about time. Unless you’re putting things on the future time track consistently and continually, you will not have any time track, because — was there a Board of Directors or a single Director at the beginning of track of this universe who made all the postulates, then elected you to the Board afterwards? Or were you part of the Board?

To “postulate time” is to make a transition from potential to actual. If a person does not make that transition, he would have neither energy nor time. One must continually postulate future to have it. If there were consciousness at the beginning it was potential too. It also becomes actual with the transition.

Well, you could be running on this very well simply being recruited to this particular organization called Physical Universe. You could be — and have been — recruited to it afterwards, but the moment you were recruited to it you could only have been recruited to it if you had agreed to its time continuum. In other words, if you had agreed to a uniform rate of change, and had you agreed to this uniform rate of change you would then have a uniform rate of change. Otherwise you’d be in 1776, or 2060, while everybody else was in 1954. You see, you’d be somewhere, something, and sometime.

The so-called “physical universe” is simply the physical aspect of the Universe (Eighth Dynamic). You were part of theta aspect of the Universe, and in sync with its time before you separated as a “thetan”. You are simply making your way back to the original state.

You are not being “recruited back by the physical universe”. You are not being made to agree to the uniform rate of change of the physical universe. That is merely the fixation of Hubbard.

Well, in view of the fact that the particles themselves of this universe are a matter of consideration, stem from consideration, are themselves consideration — the space in which those particles exist are themselves considerations — we are not then at any time dealing with anything else but considerations.

Considerations are relatively potential. They become actual in the form of “space-energy-mass” with duration (time). Underlying this spectrum of energy with varying duration are universal principles, which are part of the universal consciousness.

We’re dealing with considerations, and these considerations are only complicated and fixed to the degree that they are agreed upon. If you have agreed solidly with these considerations why then, you have the considerations with which you’ve agreed. It was not necessary for you to be the prime mover to be part of this universe.

These considerations exist midway between the potential and actual. They are constantly changing while maintaining continuity, harmony and consistency among themselves. They fall out from their natural state when they become fixed. Such fixation may arise when a gradient is violated because of a sudden change or shock. The fixation becomes stronger as it is further agreed upon. There is no Prime Mover. Motion is part of the characteristics of this universe.

The moment you have agreed to the considerations which compose this universe, you are at its inception, you are at its end, you are at its present, but you are running under the consideration that time is taking place. And as long as you are running under that consideration you say fine, we’ll go along the time track. Wonderful. Time is progressing. You start looking at clocks. Clocks are keeping time for me, the bus schedule’s keeping time for me, the motion of the earth is keeping time for me, the precession of planets and stars are keeping time for me, everything is keeping time for me, my wife keeps time for me by serving breakfast at a certain time, everybody keeps time for me… time? Time? Time… what… what time? What time is it? Do I have any time?

It appears as considerations when you look back, but it is one phenomenon and you are part of it. It is a matter of being, and not some kind of agreement after separation. Time is part of existence as its duration. The existence is going through its natural evolution. Clocks reflect a constant rate of progression of time and you use it as a reference point to coordinate your activities.

No, you’ve become motionless. You became dependent on everything else to keep time and make the considerations and then you didn’t continue to agree with those considerations that are made. All you’d have to do is just go on agreeing with those considerations — you’d move right on along the time track, just as nice as you please. But if you just drop out of the basis of consideration, drop your own consideration of the fact that time is taking place — at that moment time ceases to take place.

The background duration of the universe, through a constant progression of change, provides a basis for comparison for all activities including the motion of the planets. You may look at all time from a certain viewpoint but that doesn’t mean you have become motionless. You are simply aware of these considerations and not fixated on them. Shutting off that awareness would be Not-is-ness.

Because time is a consideration and these other things are consideration, it doesn’t mean then that after this consideration was made all considerations start moving. Should we make a consideration that there is time, then this doesn’t immediately put all considerations in motion or create anything more than that which is already created with considerations, with the changing factor of time.

The definition of time itself is very important to you. Time is the co-action of particles. You can’t have action of particles at all unless you have space. If you have space, then you can have change in space, and when you have a change in space then you have a different time.

The basic considerations of space-energy-time occur as one. Energy maintains its continuity despite any change. To co-action of particles takes place because there is time (duration).

There’s the time from the moment the particle was at position A — that’s one time, now another time when the particle has been moved to position B. There could have been no motion taking place whatsoever unless you had made a postulate of motion from position A to position B, and if you had made this consideration “from position A to position B”, then you would have motion and you would have time, because you said position B is then a later time than position A.

There has to be endurance of energy for it to be able to shift around. That shifting around must be in continuous infinitesimal steps.

A later time — what is this word time? You might as well have said this: “there’s a consecutive shift of position”. You ask somebody, “What consecutive shift of position is it?” And if he answered you truly, he would say, “It is the 15th degree position past zenith of the sun on its 200th revolution since its Winter Solstice.” Quarter after twelve to you. 200th day of the year. That’s time. If the sun hadn’t shifted 200 times you wouldn’t have had 200 days.

Different times are represented by different configurations of energy. Changes in configurations are measured from some reference point.

But it isn’t that that is making it simply because it marks it. Let’s look at that now. Just because it’s doing it is no reason it is creating it. It is simply a particle which is moving in space. Earth is a particle which is revolving in space. And the sun wouldn’t be there, unless we were running on the basic consideration and agreement that it was there.

We have the basic considerations of the spectrum of energy with its durations and shifts in configurations. This is the Is-ness. No agreement is necessary.

Here is an example of that simple change-of-position idea: I pick up a book, and just consider at this moment everything’s static, no motion at this instant — no time, no motion. A new instant. You see that it does not require articulation or verbalization or anything else. It’s so simple that it is overlooked. In order to conceive that this book can move from a position on the desk over to a second position, one must simple have conceived a new set of considerations which are consecutive in each position of motion over to this new position. And each one of these is after the consideration that the book was here. Now it’s very embarrassing when an auditor is running the process Opening Procedure by Duplication and he tells the preclear, every time he picks up an object, to duplicate it — if the auditor forgets to have him consider that it’s there again, because it’s an invalidation of the preclear — the preclear makes a perfect duplicate of it and the object isn’t there. When going back to that object a new time the auditor, if he’s using “make a perfect duplicate of it” as part of his routine, had better then also say just before he sends him back toward this book: “Consider there’s a book over there”. Because as far as the preclear’s concerned he’s just unmocked it, and if you’re working with a preclear who’s getting into good shape, that book will be invisible. So, he has to consider there’s a book there, then he has to consider that he has moved across to it there, and he has to consider that all these things are taking place, and if he does, he has time. Time is the co-action of particles.

So, there is a particular configuration of energy at the instant of picking up the book. Other configurations follow continuously as the book is shifted. Duplicating the book does not make the book vanish, only the misconceptions. The book is still there the next time, the person is supposed to pick it up. Maybe the person’s attention is no longer on it. You can simply say, “Look at the book over there.” The book is enduring. You just have to manage your misconceptions of it.

Now the time that we’re dealing with is a time with which we can stay in good agreement. It’s a uniform rate of change. In other words, we are considering and considering and considering and considering and considering. We could be doing it very rapidly with regard to a particle for instance in the wall. We consider that it’s there, and let’s say the wall is being pulled this way — we consider it’s there, it’s there, there, there, in other words we keep considering that that particle is coming closer. It takes a brand-new consideration every time to have a particle and to have a space to move it in. Every time you see a particle move, actually somewhere in some automatic fashion and so on, we don’t care about the mechanism, you have to consider space-particle-position, space-particle-position, space-particle-position, space-particle- position. You get motion. You’ll get an airplane going overhead, and for you to see it go overhead you’ll have to be saying space-airplane-position, space-airplane-position, space-airplane-position, space-airplane-position — and you’ll see a jet plane go across the sky. But if you aren’t at least agreed to this, you won’t see any airplane go across the sky, you won’t have any space, and it certainly will have no position.

In dealing with time it is simply a matter of being aware of changes in configurations as they take pace. Of course, you keep the reference of background duration in mind to keep your observation consistent. The closer to infinite is the background duration, the more uniform are your observations. It is not a literal considering again and again and again. It is simply the awareness of change against a uniform background. A “space-particle-position” simply means a “new configuration” of energy to be aware. You lose awareness when you don’t have active attention. Hubbard is using the word “consideration” to mean “attention”.

Now what happens to an individual when his time factor starts to go to pieces? He gets stuck in time. He gets stuck at those moments when he is sufficiently rattled, confused or upset, in other words is given a new consideration that all is confused, and he doesn’t at that moment have time to make new considerations that there is time or agree with the fact there is time. Or he resents the fact that there is time, and so he loses time, so he gets stuck on the time track.

It isn’t energy that sticks anybody on the time track. It’s this fact. Somebody told him to move, and he resented it, so he didn’t move. What’s he done? He has fallen out of agreement about the progress of particles.

Communication itself has been used to shift his consideration about considerations. Somebody demonstrates to him completely that these are time. They tell him to stay in one place. You can demonstrate that to an individual very easily with a bullet. He’s going ahead, beautiful automaticity, just mocking up things flying here and things flying there, regiments of soldiers marching here and marching there, and in one way or another why he’s just as much part of the enemy as he is part of himself, but he’s got a new consideration that he is part of himself, and this bullet comes through space, and if he were able to see it — a Civil War cannonball for instance he could have seen very easily, they only travel about sixty miles an hour — and he would have done this space-particle-position, you know, space-cannonball-position, space-cannonball-position, space-cannonball-position, space… BOOM. He has just considered himself into a complete confusion, hasn’t he? He’s considered himself right on down the line to an impact, so he says, “Now look, the best thing to do — when you see anything that even faintly resembles a cannonball — you don’t say ‘space-particle-position, space-particle-position’. No, you don’t. You say, Nothing.” The fellow’s learned to keep his mouth shut.

 “We don’t see cannonballs.” Nope. But he’s in agreement with the man on the right and he’s in agreement with the man on the left, and they’re in agreement with the man on the right and the left, and he’s standing on the ground and he’s in agreement with the body, and all these things are thoroughly in agreement with the fellow who fired the cannonball, and so the cannonball will come across anyway. And boy, is he invalidated now! On his right and his left and behind him and below him he stayed in agreement with all other things which were in agreement on the subject of rate of change. He stayed in agreement with all these other things which were saying space-particle- position, so he’s saying “space-particle-agreement”, unwillingly unwittingly. And this will leave him really hung. This will leave him with a certain unreality.

Well, he’s postulated no time, and so he can get stuck on the time track. You see that? Only his mockup is kind of thin, because he depended for the solidity of mockups such as the material universe on all these other people mocking ‘em up too. Everybody’s mocking them up. He’s just staying in agreement with everybody, and he doesn’t quite have to mock them up, so what has he got now? He’s got a dependency upon the agreement to keep time for him. So, if he’s done this then he’s lost his power to completely unmock everything, hasn’t he?

A person’s time factor (awareness) starts to go to pieces when his attention gets stuck on a particular configuration of energy. The change was such that he got rattled, confused or upset, for example, when he got shot by a bullet. He couldn’t follow the bullet because it was extremely fast, and he could not get out of the way. He gets stuck at that moment.

Time as you conceive it, the time that is running on your watch, is simply the motion of a bunch of little wheels and a couple of hands and a second hand. And that’s just consecutive motions. Those are changes in space. And everywhere you look, mechanically you will find that time never amounts to anything else than a change of position of a particle in space. You see we have two conditions here. If something is postulating the change of position of a particle in space, and you’re agreeing with that something, then you will get a change of position of particle in space. It’s just a consecutive consideration, but that is all time ever is. The change of position of particle in space. To see anything, you have to have space-particle-position.

Space-particle-position is the change in energy configuration. It is visible because of the endurance of energy. Time is that endurance, which makes the change in form visible.

Now in order to stay in good agreement it would be a very, very good thing to have a uniform rate of change, wouldn’t it? “Let’s all together now chant” — the universe is saying — let’s all together chant space-particle-position, space-particle-position, space-particle-position, and we’ll chant it together so that we are all uniformly saying it and we will then have time because we’re saying it and not for any other reason. We are postulating it. And so, we’ve got space-particle-position, space-particle-position, space-particle-position as the hymn of time itself. And it goes right on running all the way down any years that are because those are the years.

The universe has infinite endurance. Stars and planets have nearly fixed rate of change in form. We use such change that may remain constant for the duration of the universe, as our reference to measure time.

Let’s not get divided up again on the subject of, “Well, now there’s thought”. The old Theta-MEST theory is a terrifically interesting theory simply because it led into this. The idea that there was a universe and that there was thought — theta without wavelength, without mass, without time, without position in space: this was Life. And that was impinged upon something else called the physical universe, which was a mechanical entity which did things in a peculiar way, and these two things together, theta-MEST interacting, gave us life forms. But then we get a further refinement of that.

Theta and Mest are simply the two ends of a continuous scale of the Universe (Eighth Dynamic). Both Theta and MEST are the Kinetic expression of Static potential. Both Theta and MEST are evolving together—MEST forms the things and Theta forms their vibrations, which appear as properties.

We find that the physical universe itself is simply this chanted space-particle-position, so MEST is coming from thought itself, so what do we get? We get the appearance of the physical universe having a seniority in mechanics. It appears to be above consideration, because of the agreements you have made with so many people concerning the continuation of it.

The physical universe is mainly identified with condensed energy, or matter, where vibrations are extremely high, and they fall in a narrow range of the energy spectrum. The bodies operate in this range. Their vibrations form the basis for our sense of time.

Continuation itself is another word which could be supplanted for time and so is survival. Now, what then would we say is the common denominator of time? Consideration.

Below this level, in the field of mechanics, what would we say is the common denominator of time? Change. That is the one thing we could say was the common denominator of all kinds of time anywhere, anyhow, in any universe.

Time is duration that appears as continuation of energy. While continuing, energy changes in form. This provides the sense of time passing. Considerations of space-energy-mass and time were set right in the beginning when Static transitioned into Kinetic. The varying considerations of form then bring changes. Both ‘duration of energy’ and ‘changes in its forms’ contribute to the sense of time.

Now let’s not lose that one. A certain set of particles or a certain body of individualized life forms, or an automaticity postulated by such life forms, could go on saying that there are a certain set of particles, they’re moving in a uniform rate of change, and they’re postulating the same space over and over again — and we would get at that moment a uniform time continuum. And that is a condition which has to exist in a universe, and it is that which makes a universe peculiar. It’s the time continuum for that universe. In other words, it’s this agreed upon chant. It’s where we are chanting and with whom we are chanting, that makes the universe.

The universe is made of a spectrum of energy. Each energy on the spectrum has its own duration. But these energies transform into each other. One or another form of energy is always present. Therefore, the duration of the universe is infinite. Matter particles have the highest duration, se we use that as the background duration (basis of our reference), or as the time continuum of the universe.

So, we have the people of earth and this universe chanting or simply agreeing with something that is chanting space-particle-position. And so, we’ve got time, time, time, time, time.

If all of a sudden, the chant stopped, nothing would move. You might still have some space on a hangover of a past consideration or something, but you wouldn’t have any new particles moving anywhere. The walls would simply vanish, the space go, to a very marked degree. Everything would kind of look like a Black V (Black V: a heavily occluded case characterized by mental pictures consisting of masses of blackness. This is a “Step V” in early procedures such as Standard Operating Procedure 8.) caving in on himself. That’s the way things would look if this stopped. It would look just like that because that’s what he’s done.

Then in order for a person to have time, to be in present time, it is necessary to be in contact, at least in contact, with those particles which are being formed by this continuous hymn to time. It’s at least necessary to be in contact with the particles. If we’re not, we’re out of time.

If we’re simply agreeing, then we’re out of time, and we get stuck on the time track, stuck in old facsimiles, all messed up — we’re not postulating any time at all, and we’re not looking at any time particles, not looking at any particles or their change, and as a result — where’s anybody going to get any time?

He has to either himself start chanting space-particle-position, space-particle-position, space-particle-position, until he gets time going again for himself, or you have him feel the walls, and feeling the walls, he’ll say, “Ah, what do you know!” He’s getting into time.

Agreement is a very important thing because the thetan begins to depend upon the universe keeping its own chant and stops chanting himself.

A person who is totally interiorized with attention fixated on his facsimiles has no time. To have time he must have some attention exterior to himself on his surroundings. When he goes around and feels the walls, his attention comes out of fixation and back into the time stream. It is simply a matter of freeing up of attention from fixation. Agreement simply fixes the attention.

What happens if he does things? He has to agree with something which is vibrating, doesn’t he? So, he himself becomes mass. And that’s how a thetan becomes mass. He’s not chanting anymore, so he goes one hundred percent into agreement with something that is doing the chanting and then he falls away from agreement with what he was depending on to keep on agreeing with him for.

A thetan is not a thing. It is a piece of theta that has individuated from the universal theta. The universal theta is vibrating with and duplicating everything. By individuating the thetan has ceased to vibrate with things around him. He tries to mimic them to be able to function. He starts to depend on them.

He depends upon that wall, decides that wall is harmful to him, and he’s no longer chanting. He’s no longer now in contact with the wall because it’s dangerous. Where’s he going to get any time? He isn’t going to get any. He may fish around and contact another time continuum in another universe and be to some vague degree in contact with that time continuum — another entire body of beings and automaticities chanting space-particle-position, space-particle- position, space-particle-position, space-particle-position. Another song going on.

A preclear gets out of time. He himself is sort of mocked up in agreement, therefore he gets to vibrating and he as a thetan vibrates out of phase with. He’s vibrating bobobobobobop, and the walls are vibrating bap bap bap bap bap bap. Oh, he’d say, what time is it?

He’d have to get some kind of a duplication to run this out or straighten it out. Just by having him contact the walls of any universe by the Opening Procedure of S.O.P. 8C you get him straightened out on his vibrations and he stops being so much mass — simply by getting him into good agreement.

The resolution of fixation that made him individuate from universal theta is the key. That is the main reason why he is not in touch with the things around him. That fixation may be made up of many misconceptions and resulting consequences. He may be living in an alternate reality. SOP 8C helps free up the attention of a person from deep fixation.

If the common denominator of time is change, then why do you think a preclear is so anxious to change? What is his anxiety about change? Well, he is doubly inverted — he finally depended on just agreement alone. He wasn’t postulating time anymore and he was just depending on this universe alone to say change change change change change — change of position of particle in space, change of position of particle in space, change, change, change.

He has (1) depended on that, (2) stopped depending on that, (3) fallen away from it, and (4) says:

“Look. Wait a minute. To have any survival or to go on with any of these items or any of these responsibilities or anything, something has got to change around here. So, let’s change, change. Let’s change other things. Oh, I can’t change those. People are easy to change, so let’s try to change those…. Well, I can’t change those. I’ll change myself, change myself, change myself, I’ll change myself, change, change, change, change, change, chan, chan, cha, cha, cha, chachacha …. BOOM.”

Totally-fixed-self-personal-time-track-with-no-agreement-any-place-else which looks like a solid mass, because it’s changing so fast and there’s nobody agreeing with it — and he’s gone out the bottom. And that is why people get into compulsive change.

8-C Opening Procedure will get people out of that. Opening Procedure by Duplication will resolve this because you’re changing at a uniform rate, and you, the auditor, are in agreement with him, and as a result he will be able to come on up out of it until he has re-timed.

The individual has simply fallen away from universal theta. It is no longer vibrating in sync with the rest of the universe. He is trying to get back in sync, and that puts him in the mode of compulsive change. Open Procedure by Duplication will help him get back in sync to some degree.

A preclear who is having any difficulty at all, the first thing that would be wrong with him is that he’d be out of time as a car gets out of time and its motor doesn’t run well. He’s going off on his own time factor which to he aberrative to him would have to be totally automatic. He’d have to have set it up and now be unconscious of it. And he’s out of time, and that’s why he’s obsessively changing, and why the individual who is worst off will want to change the fastest and the hardest and has the most compulsion and obsession about it.

The individual who is worst off will want to change the fastest and the hardest and has the most compulsion and obsession about it.

So, we see what this subject of time is all about, how it is possible to process it, and we see that we have been processing it all along.

.

Theta and MEST are simply the two ends of a continuous scale of the Universe (Eighth Dynamic). Both theta and MEST come about when the Static potential transforms into Kinetic form. We see this occurring when a pendulum starts its swing after stopping.

MEST stands for matter, energy, space and time. Matter is condensation of energy; hence, it is made up of energy of highest vibrations. Space defines the extents of matter; therefore, “empty” space is made up of energy of lowest vibrations. Space-energy-matter essentially provide a spectrum of energy. Energy endures while its form changes. The duration of energy is seen as time, while changes in energy forms give the impression of time passing.

Theta animates energy, and this natural animation is viewed as life. Basically, theta is the vibration of energy which manifests as various properties; but, the key manifestation of theta is thought.

The so-called “physical universe” is simply the physical aspect of the Universe. The spiritual aspect of the universe is thought or theta. These aspects are integrated together and form a continually evolving system. You were part of this theta, and in sync with the time of the universe before you individuated as a “thetan”. Now you are out of phase with the Universe’s time to some degree.

.

PHOENIX LECTURES: Chapter 11

Project: Hubbard 1954: The Phoenix Lectures

This paper presents Chapter 11 from the book THE PHOENIX LECTURES by L. RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original publication of this book by The Church of Scientology (1954).

The paragraphs of the original material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the understanding from Buddhism.  Feedback on these comments is always appreciated.

.

THE FOUR CONDITIONS OF EXISTENCE (Part 5)

With the data we have on these conditions we can talk a little bit here about how your preclear might possibly recover from the state which he conceives himself to be in.

We consider now that the pattern of existence through which he has been is a very definite track. It is a track which starts with As-is-ness, and this of course includes space. You might possibly completely miss in auditing a preclear if you didn’t realize that As-is-ness has to start with space. One could get so concentrated on and frantic about objects and energy, this factor of space might be completely missed. A thetan can communicate with space with great ease. The body has gone too far on this track to do this easily. The body finds it quite sickening to communicate with space, but a thetan can communicate with space rather easily, and the As-is-ness begins with space, and then it gets into, of course simultaneously, energy, and mass.

The track starts with static transforming into kinetic. The potential of Static appears as the energy of Kinetic. The energy of lowest vibration appears as “space”. Energy of very high vibrations appears as mass. Therefore, space-energy-mass describes the spectrum of energy of increasing vibrations. According to Hubbard, thetan finds it easier to communicate with space (low vibrations) than with body (high vibrations).

NOTE: Space defines the extents of energy. The energy of lowest vibration appears as “empty space”.

Now space, energy, mass, consideration of, are all simultaneous. There is no consideration here related to time.

We have to move the anchor points of the space, in order to get a continuance of the space, and move the energy itself in the space, and change them in one fashion or another in order to get a continuance of that energy, and when this has not been introduced we have not postulated time. A thetan doing this would theoretically pass from As-is-ness into Alter-is-ness just immediately. He’d have to, or he would have no continuation of any kind.

In other words, it wouldn’t exist unless he intended to change it. He would have to make the intention of change simultaneous with the action of creation. And if he did not, he would get a disappearance immediately of that mass.

He passes then into Alter-is-ness, which is a simultaneous action with As-is-ness at first, and then of course immediately becomes an action of continuation, and we get Is-ness, which is this reality that we talk about — space, energy, objects.

After the transformation of static to kinetic, space-energy-mass not only appear but they continue to exist. This means they have duration or Time. This is simply the potential manifesting itself, but Hubbard sees this as “As-is-ness followed immediately by Alter-is-ness.”

Just exactly why we consider this combination to be a reality, that reality is Is-ness, is a little bit dull, because the fact of the matter is that reality itself to continue as a reality would not be an Is-ness at all but a continuous Alter-is-ness.

So, we get Is-ness actually as a hypothetical state.

Space-energy-mass are vibrating. This may be called “continuous Alter-is-ness”.  But, conventionally, this forms our reality or Is-ness. Thetan may actually represent the vibrational aspect of energy.

Now the fact that the thetan is a Static — that’s not hypothetical or theoretical. The fact that he is a Static that can consider, and can produce space and energy and objects, is not hypothetical. That’s true.

Hubbard says. “The fact that he [thetan] is a Static that can consider, and can produce space and energy and objects, is not hypothetical.” That means when the static potential of thetan is expressed, we have enduring space-energy-mass. In other words, thetan transforms into enduring space-energy-mass. This may be viewed as space-energy-mass having consciousness.

We have facts, facts, all the way along here, until we get to this thing called reality and we suddenly discover that Is-ness is hypothetical.

In the whole field of As-is-ness, the creation of space, energy, objects, of Alter-is- ness, Is-ness, Not-is-ness and more Alter-is-ness, there is only one hypothetical state. And that’s Is-ness. It never exists. It can’t ever exist. It has to be Alter-is-ness or As-is-ness, and of course As-is-ness can exist. As-is-ness can exist. It really would have to be able to exist, if you can repeat it. It must be in existence if you can repeat it and cause a vanishment of mockups or objects or spaces, so it obviously exists.

But this is not true of Is-ness.

Is-ness is the outcome of As-is-ness and Alter-is-ness. As-is-ness moves Is-ness upwards on the Know-to Mystery scale; whereas, Alter-is-ness moves it downwards.

Reality does not exist. Because it says there is a stop. And there just isn’t any stop. It is continuous Alter-is-ness and when people stop altering the positions of things and stop altering anchor points, and stop pushing things around one way or the other whether they say they’re doing it or they say it’s being done on another determinism, or however, the moment they just relax on this whole thing, they get the condition which your preclear quite commonly is found in, of no longer postulating time. You see, the mechanism of saying “It will continue because I’m saying someone else is responsible” is of limited use. It’s of very limited use.

One may say that Is-ness is always changing on a continuous, harmonious and consistent basis as you scan it in space and time. Any fixation on other determinism is aberration because the person simply gets out of sync.

Let’s go into that a little more clearly — you set up this machine — or something to go on and shift and change the anchor points of the space, manufacture the energy involved and take care of the objects. You set up this machine and you say: I’m no longer responsible for this. I have no further responsibility for this now, and therefore it’s other space and it will go on happening, and therefore I can continue to have this space because somebody else is making it. You see we could get into that rather shifty by-pass, and so we could then have — not over too long a time — but we could have a consistent Alter-is-ness, and this alteration would continue to take place as long as he at least kept one tiny little fingernail on the machine over here. We weren’t looking to see that we had, but as long as we had that fingernail just touching that machine, we were all right. We said just that much of it is ours.

The moment that an individual entirely relaxes and he says I have everything all set up, it’s beautifully set up, and it will all run automatically, and I don’t have to worry about it anymore, after all a fellow created this universe, other people are the ones who caused time to take place, they tell me when to get up, when to go to bed and I’ve just got everything all set and it’s totally other-determined now — it becomes just that totally other-determined, but it also, for the individual, passes by the board.

A person generally has filters set up to look through. The filter takes care of the perception. The person does not have to compute from fresh input. The moment a person puts everything on other determinism, he is finished.

He’s no longer postulating a persistence, he’s no longer changing any objects in space, and so he will simply sit still. Everything gets very dim; everything gets very thin. Well, the funny part of it is that in that state he couldn’t even keep an aberration going. But his Alter-is-ness has been practiced so long after the fact of Not-is-ness that even though he sits still he’ll keep on changing something, and that condition is known as figuring, thinking, thinking. He tries to change something, and he feels, Well, I will just sit here and think, and that will keep the universe moving, it will keep time going. The only one trouble with this is, he is dealing basically with the root stuff of what makes universes but now that he is sunk into that category where he is doing nothing but consider again, not creating or moving anything, he is going to have a very difficult time of it. In fact, everything is going to get dimmer and dimmer and less real and less real. What will persist there is that which he is still changing, which is his worry about aberrations.

It is true that the mechanical aspects of this universe are nicely set up by physical principles, and we don’t bother with them, but then we don’t sit still. We use those principles to create all kind of things. We may even look at those principles more closely to discover finer principles and create more sophisticated things. There is no other determinism postulated as long as there are no fixations.

But when a person just sits still, thinking others will keep everything going, he is no longer part of the reality. He cannot go back to being Static without taking responsibility for reality. He simply gets lost in unreality.

This is not esoteric or difficult. The only thing which goes on persisting is that which a person is actively working to change. You can only have those things which you handle. You can only have those things which you move around.

What are most relevant are the cycles of action that one is engaged in.

But an individual gets into a tremendous protest against mass. He has decided that the continuous survival of things is very bad. In other words, he starts to fight survival itself with Not-is-ness. Now, as you know, Not-is-ness is a highly specialized activity. It is the activity actually of causing something to vanish or dull down or become less, simply because It IS too much. There’s too much Is-ness, the fellow considers. He’s got too much persistency, too much survival — Joe Jinks that got him across the barrel in a bank and took all his money away from him, and, well, there was just too much Is-ness, and the best thing to do about that is to cause a Not-is-ness, and let’s just fight everything.

 When a person is unable to face the Is-ness he uses Not-is-ness.

For an example, let’s take a war. A war is just simply each side saying the other side must cease to exist, and they are doing it with shot, shell, lead, dynamite, spears, arrows, deadfalls, and they’re using energy to make other things cease to exist. Well, it was perfectly all right as long as you were building your camp, you see, but if you suddenly started to fight a war with somebody on the other side of the mountain, whereby you were saying he must cease to exist, you were fighting persistence by causing persistence. If you want to know why a war which shouldn’t take more than a couple of days, goes on and on, and on, and on, and on — they got so bad a few centuries ago that they had a hundred years of nothing but war — everybody was saying everybody else mustn’t exist, and they kept moving objects around to cause existence to cease. Now you see how these postulates could become completely tangled.

Wars are Not-is-ness. They arise from an inability to As-is the situation. Thus, they always end in destruction.

And the thetan does this because he so loves the problem, and that is the most problem there is. The thetan loves a problem, and that is the basic of problems. You move masses around, which basically causes persistence, in order to cause persistence to cease. One hundred per cent paradox. Cannot exist, can’t ever happen, never has happened, and yet he will do this. But he is never happy doing it. There is no serenity involved in this. It becomes nothing but a complete chaos. Probably the only joy any soldier ever gets out of a war (and don’t spread this around, because the society doesn’t believe you should tell this) the only joy anybody ever gets out of a war is by kidding himself that he has made absolutely nothing out of something. Whether it’s enemy troops or tanks, or ships, or anything, there’s a big WHEE in there some place, a big thrill. Combat troops know about this. It’s only when they cease to make nothing at will, apparently, that they become very downhearted.

Hubbard says, “You move masses around, which basically causes persistence, in order to cause persistence to cease.” Masses can be moved around with intelligence to solve the problem. They don’t just have to be moved around with force to destroy a seeming opponent. It is simply As-is-ness versus Not-is-ness.

Hardly anybody would be able to comprehend what is known as a military rout, whereby a body of troops, suddenly, and instantly and immediately disheartened, just completely, completely quits. It’s a strange phenomenon. It has been rather incomprehensible how fast they keep shooting at a castle on a hill. And they just keep shooting at this castle, and shooting at this castle, the castle keeps shooting back, and they keep firing at the castle, and the castle keeps shooting back. Well, they start to go to pieces in morale. They can’t make nothing out of something. Observably — the castle continues to live. They bog down on that rather badly, they get to be rather 1.5, and actually that is the manifestation of 1.5 on the Tone Scale. People using force to make nothing of something which continues to exist in spite of it. And they’ll suddenly drop. It isn’t a slow curve. They enter it rather slowly, and then they will just suddenly go to pieces, because the only compensation they have for war is the fact that as thetans, you see, they can observe that they are at least going through the motions of and have the manifestation of making nothing of form. And the sadness underlying it to them is the fact that they don’t make nothing of it really.

A person goes to pieces when he is overwhelmed by the feeling of failure. This may happen to an army too.

Beyond this point still, all kinds of suffering take place, and sadness, and it goes on and on, but you start moving that many particles with that much velocity, such as a German 88, and you’ll get persistence. That shell bursts, and we don’t find that the fellow in whose vicinity it hit is still there, but there’s persistence. Somebody’s got to go through his effects, and then somebody’s got to write a letter home and say he died a hero, and somebody else has got to carry the news through, and then there are people at home, and he’s left a hole in the society one way or the other, and this goes on and on and on, and then years later they dig up what’s left of him and ship him back over and put him into a cemetery. There’s persistence occasioning here. And what’s persisting? Well, there was that particle — it certainly was moving fast, and when we get a particle moving with this much velocity, we get some persistence, and in a war all they can think of is terms of more and more and more particles, moving with more and more velocity to cause less and less persistence on the part of the enemy.

Random Force leads to Alter-is-ness and not to As-is-ness. What persists is the result of Alter-is-ness. It will keep on persisting and will result ultimately in Not-is-ness.

If you wanted to know why the German nation keeps fighting and keeps overrunning its borders, well it can’t do anything else by this time. From Legion times forward people have been going in there saying, “You mustn’t persist, and these fast-moving particles which we’re making you handle will make it so.” Oh really? This can’t be, you see.

When we find anything about which Man is extremely puzzled, we lead directly into the one little formula which is the mechanism of making things persist: we’re going to use particles to make things not persist.

Alter-is-ness is unnecessary random force that makes things persist.

And any time you find anybody in difficulty or in the middle of a problem, just look at the basic anatomy of a problem which is that anatomy. It’s, “We’re going to cause a non- persistence by the use of the mechanisms which cause persistence.”

And you’re going to get a game — there’s undoubtedly going to be a game occur here. There are going to be lots of problems.

Hubbard describes the basic anatomy of a problem as, “We’re going to cause a non- persistence by the use of the mechanisms which cause persistence.” The mechanism of persistence is Alter-is-ness and not As-is-ness.

If you want to know how to take apart a problem, just look where the person is using particles which you know by changing them will cause persistence, in order to make a non-persistence.

To help a person, just look where he is using random force, which is making his problem persist.

He’ll be using Alter-is-ness to create a Not-is-ness, and of course will be getting consistently and continually an Is-ness. Which is a continuous state. It’s a hypothetical state, because you can never stop it, you can never arrest it, you can never take a look at it. You know that any time you really recognize an Is-ness — not in a state of change — why, it will disappear, it will vanish or it will dim down, something will happen with relationship to it, so you always have to look at the change.

Change can lead to As-is-ness as well as to Alter-is-ness.

This is the fellow living up the time track, this is the fellow living in the past. He’s looking at the changes and he isn’t looking at the reality. Actually, that’s a very healthy state of mind.

The fellow’s looking at the changes, he’s looking at what will be, he’s very cheerful about how many particles he can move around and cause to come into existence or persist. Or he knows the proper modus operandi for mocking things up that he wants to destroy, just As-is-ness. And that would destroy it perfectly adequately, and he could start in again.

The whole effort is to resolve a problem.

To look at the basic mechanics of any problem which is causing any trouble, just find the matter of the particles, the particle motion, the Alter-is-ness in other words, which is aimed with the goal of Not-is-ness and is an impossibility. You’ll find that’s your preclear who’s hanging fire in processing. He’s doing this. He’s using particles to knock down ridges (Ridges: Solid accumulation of old, inactive mental energy suspended in space and time), something on this order.

The person who is not improving is simply using unnecessary force to resolve problems without understanding.

Actually, he’d feel a lot better if he’d simply go out and trim the hedge. Let him move something around not quite as damaging but with the same goal, because if he’s all messed up with his engram bank, and he’s all messed up with tremendous ridges and black ridges and that sort of thing, and he sits there as a thetan creating particles and bombarding these ridges, what is he going to get? He’s going to get a persistence of ridges. That’s why we never use flows in processing. You can process objects you want to, you can process space if you want to, but we’ll just stay away as a general principle from flows.

A person cannot resolve his case (engrams) by being fixated on it and using force. Going out and doing simple manual work will do a lot of good, because it extroverts his attention.

Now your thetan has a great objection, because of the communication formula as used in this universe, a great objection to somethingnesses. He looks across a distance and he sees a somethingness and this begins to tell him after a while that he has to be a something too, and he doesn’t like this. He doesn’t enjoy this really, because it’s an other-determined something that he has to be. It’s looking at a wall, he has to be a wall, you see. And that’s what this universe is dictating to him. Well, actually, because it’s all a consideration in the first place, he doesn’t have to fall into that little grave. He doesn’t have to do that kind of a shift, at all. He could simply say I’m looking at the wall, you see. But after a while he gets into the mechanics of perception, the mechanics of communication. He’s using energy in order to communicate with energy. There’s nothing wrong with that, except to the degree that he loses his fluidity on it. As long as he could maintain the idea that he was simply communicating by postulate, that he was communicating, he’s doing all right, but when he drops below that level — and you get him forced to communication, when he’s made to stand still and be talked to, when he’s made to stand to and hold that ridge, when he’s made to sit there and absorb that textbook, any of these things, he gets under this bombardment, and he starts fighting the communication formula. Of course, we get a persistence then of this universe’s communication formula.

A thetan is part of the Static potential that transformed into this universe. The manifested universe is the eighth dynamic that has theta as its spiritual aspect and MEST as its physical aspect. The thetan individuates from it because of its misconceptions, confusions and fixations. It acquires a certain vibration.

When a thetan is communicating, it is not looking across some distance. It is simply looking at a difference in vibrations. As it duplicates the vibration of the thing it is communicating with, the misconceptions vanish, and it becomes that much part of the theta of the universe. When the thetan starts to look at the universe as other determinism it starts to go downhill. That is what happened to Hubbard.

Remember that this universe has a communication formula, and that that formula is based on the fact that two things can’t occupy the same space, so immediately we fall away from cause, effect and no distance. Cause-and-effect with no distance is not the same thing as the bottom-scale manifestation, where complete identification never actually occurs. There’s still a slight distance no matter how downscale you go; it’s only way upscale that you can get a perfect identification between cause point and effect point. These two points can be coincident way upscale. Well, if they can be coincident way upscale, the individual could put a distance on them or whatever he liked, but to the degree that he began to agree with this universe, we would get the manifestation of “have to have a distance across which to look” because he can’t occupy the same space as the object at which he’s looking.

Each object has its own vibration. Their extents form their space. They are separate because of different vibrations. They must adjust to the same vibration to merge into each other. Thus, the difference between cause and effect is only in terms of vibrations and not some “distance”. Up the scale the vibrations of cause and effect become the same and they become coincident. Down the scale there is no perfect matching of vibrations because of misconceptions and fixations; and mimicry is employed.

That is this universe’s formula, and that by the way is native to a lot of universes — it’s how you keep everything stretched apart. You say two things can’t occupy the same space; therefore, we’ve got to have a lot of spaces and things more or less fixed in these spaces, and we’ve got to keep them all apart and therefore they are separate objects and we go into the communication formula. Cause, Distance, Effect.

Space is the extent of energy. “Empty space” is not really empty but contains energy of lowest vibration. Therefore, there is no empty distance between cause and effect, only a difference in their characteristics. The communication formula should be “cause – difference in vibrations – effect”. Here “distance” is replaced by the difference in vibrations at cause and effect.

As the individual agrees that two things can’t occupy the same space, and as he agrees with this communication formula, he then gets into a situation where he says, “Now look at all these somethings around here. And I am actually basically a nothing, and therefore if I have to duplicate these by becoming a something, I don’t like that. I can’t retain my own native form. I’m in a bad shape here. I can’t fly around and be a spirit. I’ve got to be pinned down here. I’ve got to be an energy mass in order to look at those energy masses,” and he doesn’t like it. He objects to it. And so, we get to the other manifestation on the track.

The viewpoint of the individual has the ability to assume any vibration, and there is no problem in duplicating the things around him. Only misconceptions and fixations prevent him from duplicating.

The only objection a thetan has to anything, if he’s having a big objection, is to something. Just any something. Then this of course will invert and having objected to a something hard enough, you see, he’ll turn around after a while and start objecting to a nothing.

The thetan has objections only because of his misconceptions and fixations, which are handled when he is able to duplicate.

Now how is it then that we get any change at all if Not-is-ness doesn’t work? Well, there is the system known as valences: one ceases to be himself and becomes something else as his sole method of change. You see that? He is causing a persistence by saying things mustn’t persist, and he keeps saying, mustn’t persist, mustn’t persist, and it goes on persisting, and he uses more particles and more particles and more particles — and pretty soon the United States Army is wearing coal-scuttle helmets. Just like that. And the Government says, “Down with Karl Marx, down with Karl Marx, down with Karl Marx — and everybody is now going to be taxed according to his ability to pay.”

When the viewpoint cannot duplicate something by becoming, then the next best thing is to mimic it. This mimicry generates the phenomenon of valences.

So, we get another type of change. Two things can’t occupy the same space; therefore, we are an identity persisting, therefore the best way to get it changed and get an utter change is simply to be somebody else. In other words, completely shift the valence, and because we want to win all the time, why naturally, shift to winning valences compared to oneself. If one thinks one is losing, then anything can start looking like a winning valence. A beggar utterly penniless about to die would look like a winning valence to some people. And we get valence-shifting going right along with “two things can’t occupy the same space”. So, an individual goes out of one spot and over onto another spot and when he is running a lot of Not-is-ness you can expect him to do a lot of valence shifting. He can’t continue to be himself, because he’s in communication with nothing.

“Two things can’t occupy the same space” is false when applied to a thetan, for a thetan can assume any vibration when not prevented by misconceptions and fixations. So, a thetan can duplicate anything easily. When prevented from duplicating one ends up using mimicry instead and the valence phenomenon comes in. The thetan gets stuck in a valence because he cannot duplicate it.

At that time, he will start to believe that he must have nothingness. And he goes from there into having to have somethingnesses and he goes from there into having to have nothingnesses by change of valence, and actually there is no other deep significance to it.

A thetan without misconceptions and fixations has no difficulty duplicating anything.

.

FINAL COMMENTS

A thetan is part of the Static potential that transformed into this universe. The manifested universe is the eighth dynamic that has theta as its spiritual aspect, and MEST as its physical aspect. The thetan individuates from Theta because of its misconceptions, confusions and fixations.

The viewpoint of the individual has the ability to assume any vibration, and there is no problem in duplicating the things around him. Only misconceptions and fixations prevent him from duplicating. When the viewpoint cannot duplicate something by becoming, then the next best thing is to mimic it. This mimicry generates the phenomenon of valences.

When a thetan is communicating, it is not looking across some distance. It is simply looking at a difference in vibrations. As it duplicates the vibration of the thing it is communicating with, the misconceptions vanish, and it becomes that much part of the theta of the universe. When the thetan starts to look at the universe as other determinism it starts to go downhill.

.