Chapter 3A: Resolving Anomalies

Reference: Book III: What is the Mind Really?

Human suffering often appears in many forms: confusion, conflict, fear, guilt, resentment, purposelessness, and the feeling that life does not make sense. Beneath these experiences there is frequently an unresolved anomaly—something arbitrary, inconsistent, absent, misunderstood, or falsely identified. As anomalies are recognized and resolved, suffering diminishes because the mind no longer must defend contradictions, fill gaps with fear, or preserve ideas that do not fit experience.

Resolving anomalies is therefore not merely an intellectual exercise. It is a practical movement toward greater harmony between awareness, experience, understanding, and action.

Anomaly and suffering

An anomaly is anything that does not harmonize with the larger context in which it appears. It may be a fact that does not fit an explanation, a belief that contradicts experience, a missing piece of information, or a division imposed where no real division exists. An anomaly interrupts the natural coherence of understanding.

When anomalies remain unexamined, the mind often responds by avoiding them, rationalizing them, suppressing them, or building increasingly complicated explanations around them. This produces mental strain. A person may feel uneasy without knowing why; an institution may become defensive; a philosophy may become rigid; a culture may become divided. In each case, unresolved anomalies create pressure.

Suffering reduces when this pressure is released. The release does not necessarily come from forcing an answer. It comes from looking closely enough that the anomaly can be understood in its actual context. Sometimes the anomaly dissolves because it was based on a misunderstanding. Sometimes it leads to a correction of an earlier idea. Sometimes it reveals that important information was missing. In all cases, greater clarity restores a measure of harmony.

The principal anomalies

Several kinds of anomaly are especially important because they repeatedly create confusion in individual and collective life.

Type of anomalyDescriptionTypical effect
Arbitrary itemsIdeas, rules, labels, or demands accepted without sufficient reason, observation, or contextBlind obedience, confusion, and dependency
Inconsistent itemsBeliefs or claims that contradict one another, or that conflict with observable factsInner conflict, hypocrisy, and defensive reasoning
Missing itemsInformation, context, evidence, or experience that has been omitted or overlookedUncertainty, distortion, and false conclusions
MisconceptionsIncorrect interpretations mistaken for realityFear, prejudice, and ineffective action
Identification of awareness with substanceTreating awareness as though it were a separate thing, entity, body, soul-object, or possession, thereby producing a fixed “I”Attachment, separation, fear of loss, and egocentric conflict

An arbitrary item has no clearly perceived basis. It may be a command such as “this must be believed,” a social convention whose purpose has been forgotten, or an inherited assumption that nobody has examined. Arbitrary items tend to produce suffering because people are required to conform to something they cannot genuinely understand. What cannot be understood must often be enforced.

An inconsistent item divides the mind against itself. For example, a person may claim to value truth while refusing to inspect evidence that threatens a favored conclusion. A society may proclaim equality while maintaining practices that deny equal dignity. Such contradictions cannot remain peacefully concealed forever. They generate rationalization, moral discomfort, and conflict.

A missing item creates a gap in understanding. The mind often tries to fill that gap quickly, sometimes with speculation, superstition, or accusation. Yet the problem may not be that reality is incomprehensible; it may simply be that a relevant fact, context, distinction, or observation has not yet been found.

Misconceptions are false conclusions that become habitual. They may concern oneself, other people, nature, religion, society, or reality as a whole. A misconception can feel stable because it is familiar, but familiarity is not truth. When closely examined against experience, many misconceptions reveal their limitations.

The deepest anomaly is the identification of awareness with substance. Awareness is the capacity in which experience appears and is known. Substance refers to whatever is treated as a thing: a body, object, thought, role, memory, personality, soul-image, or identity. When awareness is equated with a particular substance, the sense of a separate and fixed “I” arises. This “I” then appears to own experiences, defend itself against the world, and struggle for permanence.

From this identification emerge many forms of suffering: “my” status, “my” beliefs, “my” group, “my” possessions, “my” injury, “my” future, and “my” death. The more rigidly awareness is confined within an imagined separate entity, the more reality is experienced as a field of threats and competing interests.

Begin with the broadest anomaly

In any situation, one should begin with the broadest anomaly. This principle prevents attention from becoming trapped in minor details while the larger source of disorder remains untouched.

For example, if people are arguing over the correct interpretation of a doctrine, the immediate anomaly may seem to be disagreement about a sentence or ritual. But the broader anomaly may be the assumption that spiritual truth must be possessed exclusively by one institution, community, or authority. If that broader assumption remains unquestioned, resolving smaller disputes may only create new forms of conflict.

Similarly, a person may be distressed by a particular failure, criticism, or loss. The narrow anomaly may be the immediate event. But the broader anomaly may be an underlying belief such as, “My worth depends on being approved of,” or “I must be permanently secure in order to be at peace.” Addressing the broader belief can transform the meaning of many smaller events at once.

Starting broadly does not mean ignoring details. It means placing details in their proper setting. The broadest anomaly often organizes many lesser anomalies beneath it. When it is understood, the smaller contradictions may become easier to resolve.

Looking closely

Anomalies resolve when they are looked at more closely. This does not mean staring at a problem with anxiety or forcing an immediate conclusion. Genuine looking is patient, open, and disciplined. It allows the anomaly to reveal its own structure.

To look closely is to ask:

• What exactly is present?
• What assumptions have been added?
• What evidence supports this conclusion?
• What information may be missing?
• Is there a contradiction between this belief and actual experience?
• Is the problem being viewed too narrowly?
• Who is the “I” that feels threatened, certain, guilty, superior, or separate?

The Laws of Looking

The resolution of anomalies is assisted by The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness. These aspects describe a disciplined way of looking that avoids premature conclusions and allows inconsistencies to disclose the missing information or hidden assumptions around them. The central attitude is to observe carefully, add nothing unwarranted, resist nothing, and remain with the anomaly until its relationships become clearer.

These are the laws of looking:

  1. Observe without getting influenced by your expectations and desires.
    Desires make one want certain outcomes. This leads to speculations that have no basis other than one’s expectations. But it is only when you know what is there can you predict future in a reasonable and consistent manner.
  2. Observe things as they are, without assuming anything.
    Familiarity makes one assume certain things to be there. Such assumptions can take the form of beliefs, convictions, biases, fixed ideas, etc. The visualization is already there in the mind, and it gets superimposed over what is actually there. However familiar something may be, it is never permanent, and it may not actually be there.
  3. If something is missing do not imagine something else in its place. 
    If something is missing, then recognize that it is missing. Do not imagine something in its place. If someone asks you a question and no answer come up in your mind, then do not feel obliged to make up an answer. Accept that you do not have an answer.
  4. If something does not make sense, then do not explain it away.
    If something does not make sense, then recognize that it does not make sense. Do not try to justify it. Justification simply puts the blame somewhere without resolving the inconsistency. When you are faced with an inconsistency, and you feel an impulse to explain it away, then be alert to what you might be taking for granted. At times it may take some out-of-the-box thinking to realize what is going on.
  5. Use physical senses as well as the mental sense to observe.
    We associate the idea of sense organs with eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body. We use them to observe physical objects, such as, chair, car, house, etc. However, the mind is also a sense organ, which senses ideas, thoughts, feelings, emotions, etc. These are mental objects. When being mindful, recognize both physical and mental objects for what they are.
  6. Let the mind un-stack itself. 
    Let the mind un-stack itself naturally through patient contemplation on whatever comes up. Observe the issue uppermost in the mind, and then the next, and the next. Let the mind deal with issues in the order it wants to. There should be no effort to recall, to dig for answers, or to interfere with the mind in any way.  Simply look at what is right there in front of the mind’s eye at any moment. The mind will never present anything overwhelming when allowed to un-stack itself.
  7. Experience fully what is there.
    Experiencing is the deepest form of mindfulness. A person is deeply mindful of his feelings, emotions and impulses when he is experiencing them. So, dive into the very heart of whatever arises in the mind without resisting. If the mind is racing, then experience it racing without contributing to it.
  8. Do not suppress anything from yourself.
    Not suppressing anything from yourself is being totally honest with yourself. Follow your attention wherever it goes and do not suppress. Do not avoid something just because it seems shameful or painful. It is the suppression of perceptions, memories, knowledge, visualizations, thinking, etc., that causes all difficulties in life. By not suppressing you establish complete integrity of your perceptions.
  9. Associate data freely.
    In order to practice mindfulness, you will have to let your mind associate data freely. Mindfulness is being comfortable with the very activity of thinking itself. So, let the mind associate data freely on its own.
  10. Do not get hung up on name and form.
    Name acts as a broad reference point to something. Form is one of the many ways that a thing may be represented. The knowing of a thing goes beyond its name and form. Fixation on name and form may act as built-in judgment of what is there. To know something, one must go beyond name and form and look at it more closely including all its associations.
  11. Contemplate thoughtfully.
    When mindfulness is practiced, thinking becomes contemplation. Problems are solved by looking at them non-judgmentally and recognizing the relationships. One looks around to get the missing information instead of trying to “figure it out”.
  12. Let it all be effortless.
    When you let it be, it becomes effortless. Effort comes into play only when there is resistance to letting it be. It is completely safe when you let the body and mind unwind gradually on their own. Trouble occurs only when you become anxious and start to dig for answers.

Harmony and truth

All anomalies are violations of harmony. Harmony does not mean superficial agreement, emotional comfort, or the suppression of differences. It means that elements fit together without arbitrary imposition, unresolved contradiction, or unexplained absence.

A harmonious understanding does not need to deny facts in order to preserve itself. It can incorporate new observations. It does not demand blind allegiance. It does not rely on gaps in knowledge to justify certainty. It does not divide reality into fixed and hostile fragments without examining whether that division is warranted.

This gives a practical criterion of truth: truth is indicated by the absence of anomalies.

This criterion does not mean that one must know every fact before recognizing truth. Rather, it means that a conclusion remains provisional wherever unresolved anomalies exist. A view may be useful, elegant, traditional, or emotionally satisfying, but if it contains arbitrary assumptions, internal inconsistencies, missing explanatory links, or contradictions with observation, it is not yet fully true.

Truth is not established by authority, popularity, repetition, or emotional intensity. It is established through increasing coherence: fewer arbitrary elements, fewer contradictions, fewer missing links, fewer misconceptions, and less need to impose a fixed “I” upon experience.

Monotheism and spiritual hegemony

Monotheism can become anomalous when it aspires to spiritual hegemony—that is, when it claims exclusive authority over the spiritual life of all human beings. The anomaly is not necessarily the affirmation of one ultimate reality or one divine source. The anomaly arises when that affirmation is turned into a demand that all persons, cultures, and spiritual paths must submit to one particular formulation, institution, scripture, or religious authority.

Such a claim is arbitrary if it lacks universally available evidence sufficient to justify universal obedience. It is inconsistent if it teaches compassion while supporting exclusion, humility while asserting unquestionable superiority, or divine unity while dividing humanity into saved and condemned groups. It also contains missing items when it ignores the depth, history, experience, and insight of other traditions. Finally, it may reinforce the illusion of a collective “I”—a religious identity that defines itself against outsiders.

The result is disharmony. Spiritual life, which could deepen reverence, compassion, and understanding, becomes a field of competition and domination. The aspiration to possess truth exclusively can produce intolerance, coercion, and conflict precisely because it treats spiritual reality as an object that can be owned by a group.

Resolving this anomaly does not require rejecting spirituality, devotion, or the search for ultimate truth. It requires distinguishing the direct search for truth from the institutional claim to control it. A mature spiritual orientation can recognize unity without requiring uniformity. It can pursue truth without converting truth into an instrument of domination.

The Main Ideas

  1. Suffering reduces as anomalies are resolved.
  2. Key anomalies are:
    1. Arbitrary items
    2. Inconsistent items
    3. Missing items
    4. Misconceptions
    5. Identification of awareness with substance producing an “I”
  3. One should start with the broadest anomaly in any situation.
  4. Anomalies resolve when looked at more closely.
  5. The laws of looking are the The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness.
  6. All anomalies are violations of harmony.
  7. Criterion of truth is absence of anomalies.
  8. For example, monotheism when it aspires for spiritual hegemony is an anomaly.

.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Unknown's avatar Anonymous  On September 17, 2026 at 6:14 AM

    These so-called “LAWS of Looking” have been never refuted of course, by peer-reviewed studies and multiple experiments? If I’m using senses, and/or associating, or contemplating I’m NOT LOOKING then, am I?

    I’m sure “12” is no accident “The Twelve Steps”, “The Twelve Characteristics….”, but numerology?….or just an arbitrary, which is an “anomaly”?

    Nothing like making a simplicity into a complexity.

    #12: Let it all be “effortless”!

    After 12 steps?
    Hahaha!

    Stupid!

    You don’t get it.
    Not in the least.
    And you never will, no matter how hard you try to “look”!
    Hahaha!

  • Unknown's avatar Anonymous  On September 17, 2026 at 6:17 AM

    Insane, like the author.

  • vinaire's avatar vinaire  On September 17, 2026 at 8:54 AM

    This anonymous person is Patrick Steven Redelfs. I hope he can get better by applying these laws of Looking.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Vinaire's Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading