SC Chapter 8: The Steps of Subject Clearing

Reference: Book II: Subject Clearing

Subject Clearing = Clearing words + Resolving Anomalies

Subject Clearing is a method for taking any topic that confuses you and systematically dissolving the confusion. Think of it like decluttering a messy room — but the room is your mind, and the clutter is half-understood ideas. Here is each step, made plain, with a running example to show how it works.

1. Pick a Subject to Clear

Subjects usually come from four places: childhood, school, your profession, or life itself. Many of them jostle for attention at once. The simplest move is to start where your mind is already pulling you.

When you can’t decide, ask: “What subject, or part of life, is creating the most confusion in my mind?” List every answer that surfaces. Rank them from most to least relevant. Take the top one. That’s your starting subject.

Example. Imagine a man named Raj who feels vaguely uneasy about money but can’t say why. He lists what’s nagging him: “investing,” “inflation,” “taxes,” “budgeting,” “the stock market.” The one that makes his stomach tighten most is “the stock market.” That’s where he begins — not because it’s easiest, but because it’s pulling the loudest.

2. Clear the Subject Title

Before diving in, make sure you actually grasp what the subject is about. Often the title itself tells you. If it doesn’t, look at the postulate — the core assumption the whole subject rests on.

Example. Raj picks “the stock market.” Before reading a single article, he asks: what is this subject really about? He realizes the title alone is vague. The underlying postulate, he finds, is something like: people buy and sell shares of companies, and prices move with perceived value. Now he has a handle. The title is no longer a fog — it’s a starting postulate.

3. List and Arrange the Key Words

Brainstorm the key words the subject brings to mind. Then arrange them from the broadest to the most specific, starting from the subject’s postulate. You’ll likely need to clear each word’s definition as you go.

It helps to build a glossary — all the key terms with their definitions, kept alphabetical for quick lookup. Expect to refine these definitions as you learn. A glossary is a living document, not a finished product.

Example. Raj starts his glossary: company, share, price, value, dividend, bull market, bear market, index. He arranges them broadly-to-specifically: company → share → price → value → dividend → index → bull/bear market. Already, just by ordering them, he sees that “value” sits beneath “price” — price is what you pay, value is what something is worth. That one ordering cleared up a confusion he’d carried for years.

4. Observe the Anomalies

As you line up the key words in logical order, notice the anomalies — the things that don’t fit. Examine definitions for arbitrary data (made-up filler that hides gaps). Strip out the arbitrariness and expose the holes. Then look for contradictions between definitions — those reveal more gaps. Finally, ask what concepts should be there but are missing.

The purpose of this step is simple: become aware of every hole in your understanding. You can’t fix what you can’t see.

Example. Raj notices an anomaly: everyone talks about “market efficiency” (prices reflect all known information), yet also about “bubbles” (prices go irrationally high). Those two ideas contradict each other. He spots the hole — his glossary has no concept for irrational behavior or crowd psychology. Something’s missing. That missing piece is now visible, which is the whole point.

5. Study the Subject

Now read the available material, hunting specifically for data that fills the holes you’ve exposed. Prioritize the subject’s postulates and beginning concepts — the foundation, not the fancy upper floors.

Read one paragraph at a time. Don’t move on until you fully understand the current paragraph. Use Word Clearing (looking up any unclear word) and stay alert for anomalies as you go. New concepts? Add them to your key-word list and glossary. Refine definitions as needed.

Example. Raj reads a beginner’s book on markets, one slow paragraph at a time. He hits the word “leverage,” doesn’t fully grasp it, stops, and looks it up — that’s Word Clearing. He adds “leverage” to his glossary with a plain definition: borrowed money used to amplify a bet. Later he reads about “margin calls” and realizes it connects directly to leverage. His glossary is weaving itself into a web of understanding rather than a pile of terms.

6. Build Up the Foundation

Keep growing the key-word list and refining the glossary until the subject’s foundations feel complete. As you do, you’ll uncover misunderstandings and anomalies in your own thinking — not just in the material. Clearing those up is what actually shrinks your confusion.

Example. Weeks later, Raj’s glossary has grown to forty-odd terms, each with a definition he actually understands. He re-reads his early notes and laughs — he’d once defined “dividend” wrongly. He fixes it. More importantly, he notices he no longer feels that stomach-tightening dread when someone mentions the stock market. The confusion hasn’t been suppressed; it has dissolved, because the holes got filled.

The Payoff

Work through subjects this way and you’ll feel a genuine relief — not the surface comfort of having “studied” something, but the deeper relief of a mind that no longer carries around unanswered questions like loose change in a pocket. Each subject you clear lightens the load, and the method itself becomes second nature: pick, clarify, arrange, find the gaps, study, rebuild.

.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Unknown's avatar Anonymous  On September 17, 2026 at 2:56 AM

    This is as insane as its author.

    Firstly, there are an infinite amount of subjects, external to the person and his available bullpen of data. So where does it end?

    Secondly, no matter how much I “pick, clarify, arrange, find the gaps, study, rebuild”, no matter how many words I clear, or “anomalies” I solve, if I have an infected toothache, no amount of clearing up words, using logic and figure-figure-figure of anomalies, study, “building up a foundation” or any of this utter dross will handle MY PAIN and MY ASSOCIATION with it! Words are based upon AGREEMENT, so if the AUTHORITATIVE VIEWPOINT of a glossary says that a car can’t fly, and I KNOW and AGREE that cars CAN fly, then NOTHING will be resolved. Nothing.

    Period.

    I can study dentistry, the tools used in dental surgery, the nomenclature of the various teeth and maladies, and guess what?

    I STILL HAVE THE INFECTION and MY postulate regarding it!

    This is the cart before the horse. Up the pole from the top to the bottom.

    Take his stock market example:

    “People buy and sell shares of companies, and prices move with perceived value.”

    First off, it’s ANOTHER’S “postulate”, so WHO CARES, because it’s NOT YOURS!

    Secondly, postulates are usually very simple, like: “MAKE MONEY.”

    If I eliminate my PAINS: situational, emotional and physical, I would have the INHERENT ABILITY to clear ANY & ALL subjects, by, ironically: just LOOKING at it!

    If you don’t believe me, just ask a person in excruciating pain to look up “The Stock Market” and “look” that YOU TOO NOW HAS A TOOTHACHE!

    This is utter detritus coming from a psychotic masking as sane; a suppressive person pathetically twisting Hubbard’s writings to narcissistically and egocentrically make his own……

    …..which aren’t, like “The Happiness Rundown”, authored originally by David Mayo, though his is crazy and shows his ineptitude.

    This is coming from “all theory, no practice”, who Vinay has had practically neither given nor received any auditing whatsoever.

    Vinay talks a good game about Looking, but has NO EMPATHY for others, which, of course, and ironically, requires ACTUAL looking.

    What he calls looking, is really figuring, and “The Unknowable” is the utter ANTITHESIS of Scientology, which means “KNOWING how to KNOW.”

    This is ultimately Identification. This is ultimately “Adjust oneself to one’s environment.” Thus:

    It’s nuts.
    It’s stupid.

    ……and it’s slavery and a trap.

  • vinaire's avatar vinaire  On September 17, 2026 at 5:22 AM

    Is this Patrick Steven Redelfs?

    If you have an infected toothache just go to a dentist. Subject Clearing does not replace a dentist.

  • Unknown's avatar Anonymous  On September 17, 2026 at 5:45 AM

    Nor the pain (force) connected to it.

  • vinaire's avatar vinaire  On September 17, 2026 at 8:42 AM

    Patrick Steven Redelfs is a person who needs help.

    Ultimately, it is the person who can help himself. He just needs to become aware of who or what he is identifying himself with.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Vinaire's Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading