Awareness, a New Dimension

Looking at THOUGHT as a substance really opens up the view to a new dimension.

SUBSTANCE
Substance is that which is substantial enough to be sensed and perceived. We may divide the substance of this universe into three categories: (1) matter, (2) radiation, and (3) thought. Matter has extremely high consistency called mass. Radiation has a such small consistency that it is considered to have no mass. Thought has still less consistency that cannot be sensed physically. It can only be sensed mentally. Consistency means “a degree of density, firmness, viscosity, etc.” We have decreasing consistency from matter to radiation to thought. Matter and radiation are considered to be physical substances. Thought is considered to be a metaphysical substance, or even a spiritual substance. 

According to Ouspensky, understanding of a new dimension requires a new vocabulary. Sometimes, the vocabulary is already there; it just requires a bit more clarity.

For example, we have been using the words, AWARENESS and CONSCIOUSNESS interchangeably. But, with thought as a category of substance of the universe, we can differentiate between these two concepts, as follows:

AWARENESS
Awareness senses thought but it is not made up of thought; whereas, consciousness is made up of thought itself. Therefore, awareness is a dimension independent of the universe; whereas, consciousness is a dimension of the universe. In fact, awareness has the ability to postulate thought and sense the outcome. The source of this awareness is unknowable.

Thus, awareness has no attributes. It creates attributes through postulates. This just represents in modern terms the ancient concept of Nirākār Brahman. Nirākār Brahman has no attributes; but it creates attributes, such as, thought and consciousness, through Maya. Thus, we get a better understanding of Nirākār Brahman as awareness, and of Maya as postulates.

These ancient concepts now become real to us, and very useful.

.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • Unknown's avatar Anonymous  On December 10, 2025 at 10:38 AM

    This segment is so discombobulated that anyone who attempts to read it will be scratching their head as they walk away.

    You are not helping anyone with understanding something useful when presenting it as a highfalutin passage of written gibberish.

    Keep it simple and tone it down.

    Guy Vogel

    • vinaire's avatar vinaire  On December 10, 2025 at 12:02 PM

      It does go against centuries of Western thinking. I can see how confusing it can be to a Westerner who is not familiar with the Vedas.

  • vinaire's avatar vinaire  On December 10, 2025 at 11:55 AM

    Maybe, you are missing a study of Ouspensky on dimensions.

    Tertium Organum

Leave a reply to vinaire Cancel reply