Reference: The Book of Scientology
The Importance of Havingness
Please see the original section at the link above.
.
Summary
Hubbard says, “A preclear will not progress when his havingness is impaired… A technique which as-ises energy, if used without a repair or remedy of havingness, will bring about a worsening of the case of a preclear.” When a person starts to become dopey, slightly nervous, agitated, etc., there is a loss of havingness. He has burned up mental energy without replacing it. He is no longer feeling oneness with his body and the environment, and is out of sorts. Whenever one notices a loss of havingness during a process, the process should be interrupted, and havingness should be repaired or remedied. With havingness in, any process runs more effectively.
There is a difference between a repair of havingness and a remedy of havingness. Repair of Havingness means mocking up anything one can mock up, and shoving that mock up into the body in any way it can be done. it is an inflow. It is a stop-gap measure. Remedy of Havingness is mocking up and shoving into the body enough masses to a point where the person can eventually throw one away. It should be done in considerable quantity until one is quite relaxed about that particular type of mock up. It is more thorough.
Sometimes, while remedying havingness a person may find that his body has disappeared as his attention is no longer fixated on it. He doesn’t quite know where to put the mass he has mocked up. In this case, one may ask, “What is there around this room (area) which the body could have,” and then pick out specific objects in the environment, which he feels that the body could have. This question may also be asked when the person cannot get mock ups. There are other tips in this section’s text that may be helpful.
.
Comments
The running of earlier processes had the liability that they were forced on a preclear by an auditor quite mechanically for hours, which threw him out of equilibrium. Free association allowed by Havingness process repaired such auditing and it even lead to realizations. This situation does not arise in Subject Clearing where a person is running the process on himself under a discipline that allows free association at all times.
Hubbard worried about getting the command for a process just right; and tried different commands for the same process. In Subject Clearing, as a person understands the process better as he applies it, he can customize the command to some degree. The data of Unknowable, the fact that he postulates to know, and the principle of oneness provide a stable direction in processing.
.
