Handling Trauma

Reference: The Book of Subject Clearing
Reference: Running Hubbard’s Processes with Subject Clearing

When clearing the subject of life, the first target is always the traumas in a person’s life. A trauma is an incident that has a beginning and an end. 

People have different conditions in life that they want to handle. The difficulty that the person is trying to resolve could be a body condition, such as, an auto-immune disease, or a continually recurring illness, painful symptoms, etc. Or, it could be a mental condition such as panic attacks, depression, compulsion, obsession, etc. Or, it can be a combination of such conditions.

All such difficulties seem to be connected to certain traumas in a person’s life. So, the main target for addressing a person’s difficulty is the clearing of the traumatic incidents connected to it.

.

The Traumatic Incident

The incident that affects a person the most are traumas. They contain pain and unconsciousness. Most of the details of such an incident are submerged into his subconsciousness. He is resisting to look at those details because they are very painful. At the core of those painful details is a moment of shock. 

Some traumas are so deep that the person is not even aware that they exist. Birth is such a traumatic incident. Most people have no memory of the moment of their birth, because it is a very painful and traumatic event for both mother and child. The child is squeezed through a narrow birth canal, and then suddenly exposed to a harsh environment as compared to the comfort of the womb.

The birth incident is the source of many auto-immune conditions and other difficulties. Once a person is able to re-experience the birth incident with all its pain, sensations, emotions and feelings, a remarkable change comes about. Many of the unwanted conditions disappear.

But the mind offers the birth incident to run only when it is ready. Therefore, we simply clear the incidents that are available. The birth incident may appear sooner or later. It should not be rushed.

.

Clearing an Incident

A person usually knows the difficulty that he would like to handle. It could either be a physical or a mental condition. Or, it could have elements of both, such as, a psychosomatic illness. To address that difficulty he starts with an incident connected to it, which he may spot right away.

To clear that incident, the person lets his mind replay that incident from the beginning to end until he is fully aware of all its content. This may require several replays. He may use commands such as the following.

“What is the date of the incident? What is its duration?”
“Go to the beginning of the incident and perceive what is there.”
“Move through to the end of the incident.”
“Review what happened.”

The person first locates the time and place of the beginning of the incident. Once he is reasonably certain of the beginning he lets the incident replay in his mind. He does not think, but simply watches and re-experiences the sensations, feelings and emotions contained in that incident. He does that until he reaches the end of the incident. He then reviews what he perceived.

During each replay he checks if the incident could have started earlier, and focuses on the new details emerging during the replay. He replays the incident again and again as long as new details are emerging and the incident is becoming clearer. The difficulty may also lighten up as the awareness increases.

If the difficulty still persists, he looks for an earlier incident connected to this difficulty. When such an incident is found then he starts from the beginning of the earlier incident. He proceeds as he did with the first incident, and replays it till there are no more changes. He looks for earlier and earlier incidents connected to the difficulty.

He may end up with a chain of incidents connected to the difficulty. After he has run each incident individually, he may scan through the whole chain of incidents from beginning to end. He may come up with later incidents also as a part of this chain. The idea is to run the whole chain of incidents that are connected with the difficulty from as early as possible to now. This may lighten up the difficulty considerably.

.

Handling the Difficulty

Running the incidents as above may bring the difficulty to remission, and the person may now strengthen his discipline and remain free of that difficulty. But the root cause of the difficulty still exists and the difficulty can flare up under stressful circumstances.

A deeper remedy would require the handling of identifications (attachments) the person is carrying unconsciously with worldly things. It should be emphasized that the person is not aware of these identifications so he cannot control them with self-discipline.

At the root of these identifications are misconceptions. 

Only after all available incidents connected with the difficulty are cleared up, that one targets the identifications, and then the misconceptions, to handle the root cause of the difficulty.

.

L10 8D Rundown

Reference: The L Processes

The L10 8D R/D uses prepared lists of motivators and overts to handle underlying considerations. Make sure you have completed the Basic L10 approach before you attempt this rundown.

  1. Make sure you understand the following words: DYNAMICS, MOTIVATOR, OVERT ACT, OVERT-MOTIVATOR SEQUENCE.
  2. Resolve your motivators and overts, starting from Dynamic 8 in descending order.
    1. Ask your mind: What motivator do you have on (dynamic)?
      • List motivators on a sheet of paper as they come to your mind.
      • As necessary, rearrange the motivators in their order of importance.
      • Starting from the top of the list, look closely at each motivator per The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness. This will produce relief.
    2. Ask your mind: What overts do you have on (the dynamic above)?
      • List overts on a sheet of paper as they come to your mind.
      • As necessary, rearrange the overts in their order of importance.
      • Starting from the top of the list, get the earliest instance of when that overt was committed. It will produce relief.
  3. In case an item does not discharge easily, do the following
    1. L&N: “What would be the intention behind someone who would (item)?
    2. Date/Locate the intention found. This will produce relief.
  4. Do Step 2 (1 – 2) for each dynamic. Apply Step 3 as needed.
  5. Use the prepared lists below to discover and discharge any motivators and overts still remaining.

.

Please view these listed questions as opportunity to discover more questions of your own on each dynamic. As you resolve the considerations underlying these questions, it will strengthen and broaden your viewpoint.

.

The Sixth Dynamic

  1. Are your possessions your own?
  2. Have you been bought off with possessions?
  3. Have you let things decay?
  4. Has MEST been your enemy?
  5. Have you stolen things?
  6. Have you been destructive to another’s belongings?
  7. Have you intentionally hurt an object?
  8. Have you used energy to dictate to others?
  9. Have you used MEST to do something evil?
  10. Is there an impulse to do something to MEST?
  11. Have you grabbed another’s space?
  12. Have you destroyed an aesthetic creation? 
  13. Have you failed to control a harmful intention with energy?
  14. Have you let time dictate to you?
  15. Have you created something that harmed a lot of people?
  16. Has an object of yours been used for destructive purposes? 
  17. Have you created something with an intent to use it for destruction?
  18. Have you had to restrict yourself in your pursuit of possession? 
  19. Has a destructive impulse gotten in the way of your pursuit for material wealth?
  20. Has a destructive impulse towards MEST been missed?

.

The Third Dynamic 

  1. Have you been ousted from a group for no good reason?
  2. Have you had a group make you out to be a failure when you weren’t?
  3. Was a group determined to stop you?
  4. Was a group threatening to you?
  5. Was a group invalidating your initiative?
  6. Has any group failed to better you?
  7. Have you gone along with the wishes of a group when it was wrong?
  8. Have you taken on a group purpose that was destructive?
  9. Have you sided with a traitor of a group?
  10. Have you been an agent against a group that turned out to be worthwhile?
  11. Is there a group that you sided with that did in a lot of people?
  12. Have you been a member of a group whose intent was to harm?
  13. Have you been in a group that chose to hate some part of mankind? 
  14. Is there a group you were in that aided only the rich and influential?
  15. Is there a group that you have actually worked against?
  16. Have you broken up a group through sabotage?
  17. Have you played two groups against each other?
  18. Have you been a destructive source in a group?
  19. Have you had the impulse to do away with any group?
  20. Have you let a group die off?
  21. Have you spied on a group and ruined it?
  22. Is there a hidden distrust of anyone in a group?
  23. Do you hide an evil intention while in a group activity?
  24. Have you ever failed with a purpose to harm any group?
  25. Has a leader been your enemy?

.

The Second Dynamic

  1. Is the 2D something to stay away from?
  2. Have you been made to feel inadequate sexually?
  3. Have you been made wrong for loving someone?
  4. Have you desired someone and not won them over?
  5. Was there someone that insisted you were at fault in the 2D?
  6. Has a 2D partner used anger to get their way?
  7. Have you been stopped on the 2D?
  8. Has a 2D partner forced you into something you don’t want?
  9. Have you gone along with a 2D when you knew it was wrong?
  10. Have you conceded a major point on the 2D when you shouldn’t have?
  11. Have you left a 2D for no good reason?
  12. Have you harmed a 2D?
  13. Have you withheld your true intentions to a 2D?
  14. Does some destructive impulse get in the way of your 2D happiness?
  15. Are you ruled by an evil intention when it comes to the 2D?
  16. Do you have hostility to the opposite sex?
  17. Is there an evil intention that is blunted on the 2D?
  18. Is ther something you want to do and shouldn’t on the 2D?
  19. Has cruelty been a part of your past on the 2D?
  20. Is there a past life 2D partner you have ruined?
  21. Is ther a past life partner that you have suppressed?
  22. Have you stopped another 2D?
  23. Is there some reason for hurting another in the 2D?
  24. Does some consideration make what you do on the 2D right no matter what?
  25. Have you been afraid to reveal something on the 2D?
  26. Do you withhold your real purposes on the 2D?
  27. Has the 2D been a source of revenge for you?
  28. Are you proud of some overt on the 2D?
  29. Is the 2D something to stop?
  30. Is the 2D not worth it?
  31. Are women better left alone?
  32. Has a destructive impulse been missed on the 2D?

.

Comm Enforcement Questions

These are sec check (security checking) questions that are looking for anomalies in one’s thinking and behavior. When you answer a question, it is likely to be in the context of the present, because any restimulation from the past would exist in the present.

  1. Have you enforced comm on another?
  2. Has comm been enforced on you?
  3. Has your affinity been inhibited?
  4. Have you blunted another’s affinity?
  5. Have you enforced your reality on another?
  6. Has another enforced reality on you?
  7. Have you been indoctrinated into thinking a certain way?
  8. Have you insisted another have your views?
  9. Have you been made to do things you didn’t want?
  10. Have you forced another to do something against his own will?
  11. Have you been made to be something you didn’t want to be?
  12. Have you forced another to act in a certain way?
  13. Have you been forced on an object you didn’t want?
  14. Have you made someone own something they didn’t want?
  15. Have you been made to lie?
  16. Have you made another distort the truth? 
  17. Have you gotten your own way by force?
  18. Have you inhibited another by beingness?
  19. Have you had your identity inhibited by someone?
  20. Has an identity been enforced on you?
  21. Have you made someone be where they didn’t want to be?
  22. Have you been put somewhere you didn’t want to be?
  23. Have you been made to know something?
  24. Have you enforced data on someone else?
  25. Has responsibility been forced on you?
  26. Have you made another be responsible?
  27. Have you had your comm inhibited?
  28. Have you inhibited another’s comm?
  29. Have you had your comm refused?
  30. Have you refused another’s comm?
  31. Have you been party to false affinity?
  32. Has someone been false with their affinity to you?
  33. Have you received false affinity?
  34. Have you had your reality inhibited?
  35. Have you inhibited another’s reality?
  36. Have you refused another’s reality?
  37. Has you reality been refused?
  38. Has someone falsified your reality?
  39. Have you made another’s reality look false?

.

Another Sec Check

  1. Do you lie about yourself?
  2. Do you suppress yourself in some way?
  3. Do you suppress life?
  4. Do you connect yourself with bad influences?
  5. Do you connect up with bad memories?
  6. Is there some connection you wont let go of?
  7. Do you always act in a certain way?
  8. Do you own your loyalty to no one?
  9. Are you doing yourself in?
  10. Do you ant to or intend to do yourself in?
  11. Are you on a succumb?
  12. Do you wish to succumb?
  13. Do you plan to let yourself go unrestrained?
  14. Have you ever sought revenge on your family?
  15. Have you ever done a family member in?
  16. Have you made someone in your family guilty?
  17. Have you ever brutalized another with sex?
  18. Is sex destructive?
  19. Is love harmful?
  20. Are you best left alone?
  21. Is rape justifiable?
  22. Do you hold the opposite sex in contempt?
  23. Are women stupid?
  24. Do you lie about sex?
  25. Do you have a secret desire to annihilate the opposite sex?
  26. Is violence justifiable on a woman?
  27. Are you implanted to feel a certain way about sex?
  28. Do you have a dirty mind?
  29. Are groups worthwhile?
  30. Is there a leader you’ve done in?
  31. Do you have a secret hatred towards groups?
  32. Are you desirous of a group’s support?
  33. Have you let any group die off?
  34. Are groups better left to followers?
  35. Are you spied on?
  36. Is someone after you?
  37. Do you have an evil impulse towards any group?
  38. How long should any group last?
  39. What makes a group fail?
  40. Do you plan to seed the growth of unrest in any group?
  41. Do you judge people by race?
  42. Are certain religions harmful?
  43. Is there any race you have it in for?
  44. Does it pay to be destructive?
  45. How powerful do ;you have to be to be successful?
  46. What connection is sacred?
  47. What part of mankind is harmful?
  48. Have you justified a destruction of a race?
  49. Are other people necessary?
  50. Is there some object you are connected with?
  51. Is there a certain time period you dwell upon?
  52. Is there something your energy is absorbed in?
  53. Is there a space you are forbidden in?
  54. Are spirits evil?
  55. Is your spirituality threatened?
  56. Are spirits overpowering?
  57. Have you squashed a thetan out of existence?
  58. Has your existence been questioned?
  59. Have you lost out to a body?
  60. Do you seek revenge against a spirit or thetan?
  61. Are you a traitor?
  62. Is your cause lost?
  63. Do you intend to create havoc?
  64. Is life worth living?
  65. Are people better off dead?
  66. What makes people insane?
  67. Why are people suspicious?
  68. Is there a past life that was a failure?
  69. Is there a past life that was important?
  70. Is there a past life that you can’t talk about?
  71. Is there a past life that was evil?
  72. What past life was critical?
  73. What past life was suspicious?
  74. Are you facing eternity with lack of hope?
  75. Is eternity a dreaded matter?
  76. What would move you to violence?
  77. What motivates mankind?
  78. Are you motivated by any impulse?
  79. Why do people hate?
  80. Is your survival dependent on an outside source?
  81. Is your destiny decided by someone else?
  82. Should you be punished forever?
  83. Will all be the same?
  84. How can you be stopped?
  85. How can you be made nothing of?
  86. Is there hope for man? 
  87. Has this all been run on someone else?
  88. Are you waiting for something magical to happen?
  89. Have you decided it was a waste?
  90. Do you intend to make trouble after the auditing?

.

Resolving Anomalies

Reference: The Book of Subject Clearing

When you have looked up all the required definitions in clearing up a key word (see Word Meanings), but the confusion still remains, then there is an anomaly present in the definitions being looked up. Such an anomaly may take the form of

  1. Discontinuity (missing data)
  2. Inconsistency (contradictory data)
  3. Disharmony (arbitrary data)

An anomaly is always a departure from the oneness of understanding. Resolution of anomalies restores the sense of wholeness about the subject.

ONENESS
Oneness is understood as CONSISTENCY among parts. This consistency appears as CONTINUITY at very small scales, and as HARMONY at very large scales. Oneness does not imply sameness. Oneness means that all that is known is continuous, consistent and harmonious. Oneness lies in the continuity of dimensions, consistency of realities, and harmony of relations. Oneness underlies the very concept of the Universe, and the Scientific Method. Oneness is not a monotone canvas; but a beautiful painting full of colors and forms that are continuous, consistent and harmonious.

ANOMALY
An ANOMALY is something that doesn’t make sense. Actually, an anomaly is a violation of ONENESS, in the form of discontinuity (missing data), inconsistency (contradictory data), or disharmony (arbitrary data). An anomaly is basically a misalignment among concepts. As you look closely at an anomaly, it resolves into concepts. The concepts arrange themselves into a consistent order. This allows missing, contradictory and arbitrary data to be straightened out. The anomaly then blows.

.

Missing Data

In our childhoods, we could not look into certain areas through lack of opportunity. We then filled those gaps in understanding by assumptions. Later in life, when we do have the opportunity to look, we are held back by our assumptions. The discontinuity is still there but it is hidden underneath the assumption.

It takes the subject clearing approach to discover those assumptions, and be able to examine the actual missing data. Sometime it takes a new invention, such as, a telescope or a microscope. to access the missing data.

.

Contradictory Data

The inconsistencies are sometimes the easiest to spot. For instance, in a history class, your textbook might state in one chapter that a war ended in 1945, but in another chapter, it claims the same war ended in 1946. Both statements cannot be true, so this is an inconsistency within the subject material.

In the workplace, an employee who is punctual and reliable, suddenly starts arriving late or missing work unpredictably, is acting inconsistently.

An inconsistency is something that does not make sense. Underlying an inconsistency, there is missing data.

.

Arbitrary Data

An arbitrary choice is something based on whim or personal preference, without reason or pattern. Assumptions are that way.

For instance, deciding to hold a meeting at 3 PM just because the weather app shows a blue icon, without considering participants’ availability or other relevant factors, is arbitrary. The choice lacks a logical or necessary basis and is made randomly or without meaningful justification.

Many religious beliefs are simply arbitrary.

.

Resolving Anomalies

The anomalies that you come across are either in the materials you study, or in your own thinking. They are present when something does not make sense.

Usually, the definitions provide the missing data, but if definitions are not handling the confusion, then there are anomalies in the definitions you have. There is additional data that is missing. Look for inconsistencies. Look for assumptions that do not follow any logic.

You look more closely at what does not make sense. Examine the definitions available from different sources. Find out what is taken for granted. As you look more closely, more details become available. You separate what make sense from what does not make sense; then follow the trail of what does not make sense, until you find the missing piece.

Always keep the overall context of the key word in mind. You may take a step back to get the context in focus, but you never let go of the trail of what does not make sense. Keep following that trail. Sooner or later the actual anomaly will come into focus, and then it would resolve. You will find out exactly what was missing; or what what was inconsistent; or what was assumed arbitrarily. Suddenly, the key word become clear in its concept.

This procedure becomes faster when you start with key words representing broader concepts first. You not only resolve anomalies in the material, but you also resolve anomalies in your own thinking. This develops a clarity of mind, that allows you to think fast on your feet.

.

Clearing a Subject (old)

Please see Clearing Subjects.

Once the subject titles are cleared, one is in a better position to answer the question:

“Which subject should I clear in full as a priority?”

To answer this question, we make a list newly of all the subjects we would like to clear fully as a priority. We arrange these subjects in the order we would like to clear them. We then focus on the subject at the top of the list.

.

Oneness

The purpose of subject clearing  is to understand the subject as one whole entity. This wholeness or oneness implies that there is continuity, consistency and harmony among all concepts in that subject.

As this oneness is violated we have anomalies, such as, discontinuity (missing data), inconsistency (contradictory data), and disharmony (arbitrary data). Such anomalies are revealed when the key concepts of a subject are arranged on the gradient from broad to narrow starting from the purpose of the subject. This happens especially when we look at the concepts closely and contemplate on how they can be stated precisely and concisely. We see such anomalies in the subject of physics in which the concepts, such as, space, inertia and gravity are not quite clear and the key theories are yet to be unified.

As the definitions of the key words are studied closely and stated concisely with precision in the systematic manner of subject clearing, the anomalies start to resolve and people gradually become free from their doubts, anxieties, and misunderstandings relating to that subject.

.

Exercise 3: Clearing the Subject

Pick up the subject that you would like to clear the most. Make sure that you have already cleared the title of this subject. To clear the subject of misconceptions, we make a list of all the basic concepts special to that subject.

We write down the key words that represent those concepts. We look up these key words to understand their meanings. We arrange the key words on a list, such that the most fundamental, and broadest, concept appears at the top, followed by concepts that are gradually narrowing in their meaning, and becoming more specific.

We don’t have to complete this list right away. We start clearing the key words starting from the top. More concepts and new key words shall start coming into view as we proceed. We add new key words to the list in the appropriate logical sequence.

To clear a key word, we look up its root meaning and definition. We then use the AI to understand the underlying concept better. As we work through the sequence of key words from broad to narrow, we shall notice concepts that are missing, contradictory, overlapping, or arbitrary.

We research into the missing concepts. We may find these concepts not to be fully developed. It may require further research to develop them fully. Sometimes it may lead to a brand new research. We then add these concepts to the sequential list of the key words at the right location. Many realizations may come about during this process.

When we find contradictions between two adjacent concepts on the list, we work to establish a proper gradient between them. This may require looking closely at their definitions, updating and aligning them. Many realizations may come about as a result.

When the adjacent concepts overlap, we may find parts that are redundant. Sometimes, when the gradient between the two concepts appears forced or inappropriate, we examine the definitions for unverified arbitrary ideas. We then we get rid of such ideas. This may simplify the subject considerably and make it more streamlined.

We may, thus, develop comprehensive definitions for the key words. These definitions are then added to the alphabetical subject glossary. This will ultimately give us a comprehensive glossary that contains concise and precise definitions for that subject.

At first, the focus should be on working out the fundamentals of that subject, until you have defined the postulates that established the subject in the first place. Then come forward looking at subsequent concepts making sure that there is continuity, consistency and harmony among them. Do this until your attention is no longer getting stuck on that subject, and is free to consider other subjects.

.

Summary

The approach of Subject Clearing has resulted in this Book of Mathematics, that focuses on the fundamentals of the subject. Once the fundamentals of mathematics are cleared, a person can continue with the learning of higher mathematics very easily on a self-learning basis.

Subject Clearing is also being used to clarify the fundamentals of physics in The Book of Physics. This is a work in progress.

Subject Clearing is also responsible for the development of the new subject of Postulate Mechanics, which primarily deals with the fundamental concepts underlying the universe.

Where subject clearing is concerned, even the sky is not a limit.

.

The L Processes

Reference: Course on Subject Clearing


The Ls are intended to handle out-valence and evil purpose cases. We are handling main areas of resistiveness that are stopping the person from expanding.

On L10 we handle the main valences that make him restrain his havingness. On L11 we handle evil purposes that keep him from acting. On L12 we stabilize his certainty of being himself.

The 3 Ls roughly divide into Have (L10), Do (L11), and Be (L12). The main targets are past identities and evil purposes. It gradually makes the person realize who he really is and thereby free him from past identities. The Ls are tailored to the individual.

L Rundown’s Prerequisites

  1. Drug R/D
  2. Expanded Grades
  3. Case Set Up

L10 Rundowns

  1. The L10 Basic Approach
  2. Prior Assessment
  3. 8D Rundown
  4. Overts by Dynamics R/D
  5. Considerations R/D
  6. Connections R/D
  7. Other L10 R/Ds

L11 Rundowns

  1. Justification R/D
  2. Overrun R/D
  3. Harm Implant R/D
  4. Evil Purpose R/D
  5. Being Effect R/D
  6. Nature of Man R/D

L12 Rundowns

Comments

  1. Comments on the L Rundowns

.