L10 Overts by Dynamics Rundown

Reference: The L Processes

The L10 Overts by Dynamics R/D rundown addresses overts on each dynamic. Make sure you have completed the Basic L10 approach before you attempt this rundown.

  1. The prepared lists below outline intentions and behavior by dynamics.
  2. Assess these lists for the dynamics in descending order, starting from Dynamic 8.
    1. Go down the list of items for the dynamic.
    2. Stop at the item that you feel you have some charge on.
    3. Look at that item per The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness. Make sure you understand it.
    4. Get the earliest instance of when that overt was committed. It will produce relief.
    5. Continue going down the list this way till the end.
  3. Finish assessing the lists for each dynamic this way.

Please view these listed overts as opportunity to discover more overts of your own on each dynamic. As you resolve the considerations underlying these overts, it will strengthen and broaden your viewpoint.

.

EIGHTH DYNAMIC

  1. Have you ever doubted the truth of your religion?
  2. Have you ever desecrated a holy place? sacred object?
  3. Have you ever disobeyed God’s commandments?
  4. Have you ever failed to perform your religious duties?
  5. Have you ever neglected an opportunity to save a sinner?
  6. Have you ever been disrespectful to a holy person?
  7. Have you ever compromised your religious convictions?
  8. Have you ever attacked a religion?
  9. Have you ever tolerated a bad religion?
  10. Have you ever perverted a religion?
  11. Have you thought evil thoughts?
  12. Have you ever concealed (denied) your religion?
  13. Have you ever changed your religion?
  14. Have you ever committed a sin?
  15. Have you ever convinced others that some things are unknowable?
  16. Have you ever convinced another that there were effects he couldn’t create?
  17. Have you ever convinced another there were places he couldn’t be?
  18. Have you ever convinced another that there were Beings with whom he couldn’t communicate?
  19. Have you ever convinced another that some things cannot be communicated?
  20. Have you ever convinced another there were places he couldn’t leave?
  21. Have you ever persuaded another that he never created anything?

.

SEVENTH DYNAMIC

  1. Have you ever denied the existence of Beings?
  2. Have you ever made people believe they weren’t Beings?
  3. Have you ever persuaded others some thoughts are bad?
  4. Have you ever made a Being believe he was evil?
  5. Have you ever made another forget?
  6. Have you ever forced a beingness on another?
  7. Have you ever made another believe he was somewhere else?
  8. Have you ever made another believe he was in a different time?
  9. Have you ever made another believe he was someone else?
  10. Have you ever confused another’s memory?
  11. Have you ever persuaded another there were things he must resist?
  12. Have you ever prevented another from perceiving?
  13. Have you ever prevented another from being something?
  14. Have you ever convinced another his postulates didn’t work?
  15. Have you ever made another experience something he didn’t wish to?
  16. Have you ever convinced another that he was weak?
  17. Have you ever convinced another that he was incompetent?
  18. Have you ever convinced another that he was insane?
  19. Have you ever convinced another that he was stupid?
  20. Have you ever convinced another that he was dishonorable?
  21. Have you ever driven another insane?
  22. Have you ever enslaved another?

.

SIXTH DYNAMIC

  1. Have you ever failed to maintain a machine properly?
  2. Have you ever destroyed a useful object? beautiful object?
  3. Have you ever hid an object?
  4. Have you ever made harmful combinations of matter?
  5. Have you ever wasted metals? chemicals? inorganic materials?
  6. Have you ever misused a tool? machine?
  7. Have you ever forgotten how to build something?
  8. Have you ever perverted the use of a scientific discovery?
  9. Have you ever built something destructive?
  10. Have you ever built something that didn’t work?
  11. Have you ever made an ugly “work of art”?
  12. Have you ever put things too far apart?
  13. Have you ever put things too close together?
  14. Have you ever made a location a mystery?
  15. Have you ever misplaced something in time?
  16. Have you ever forgotten a place?
  17. Have you ever made an object mysterious?
  18. Have you ever made something vanish?
  19. Have you ever made something imperceptible?
  20. Have you ever misapplied energy?

.

FIFTH DYNAMIC

  1. Have you ever treated living creatures like objects? machines?
  2. Have you ever damaged crops?
  3. Have you ever used bad breeding stock?
  4. Have you ever eliminated good breeding stock?
  5. Have you ever crippled or killed living creatures for fun?
  6. Have you ever cut down trees without replanting?
  7. Have you ever let weeds take over cultivated areas?
  8. Have you ever failed to fertilize crops?
  9. Have you failed to provide water for livestock? crops?
  10. Have you ever put life forms to strange uses?
  11. Have you ever polluted water sources?
  12. Have you ever killed off a useful species faster than it could breed?
  13. Have you ever abused a living creature?
  14. Have you ever castrated or spayed domestic animals?
  15. Have you ever bred warped life forms?
  16. What life forms have you eaten?
  17. What life forms have you fed to other life forms?
  18. Have you ever kept a life form in an unsuitable environment?
  19. Have you ever destroyed other life forms?

.

FOURTH DYNAMIC

  1. Have you ever treated a member of your species like an animal? a machine?
  2. Have you ever made territory uninhabitable?
  3. Have you ever resigned from the human race?
  4. Have you ever pretended to be a human being?
  5. Have you ever done anything to keep mankind from uniting?
  6. Have you ever tried to exterminate a species?
  7. Have you ever pretended to be a member of a different species?
  8. Have you ever denied a species a place to live?
  9. Have you ever prevented a species form reproducing?
  10. Have you ever perverted the purpose of a species?
  11. Have you ever kept your own species ignorant?
  12. Have you ever eaten a member of your own species?
  13. Have you tried to start a war among your own species?
  14. Is there anything you’ve done to a species that would be unsafe for you to reveal?

.

THIRD DYNAMIC

  1. Have you ever joined a group without being qualified?
  2. Have you ever given a group less than you received from it?
  3. Have you ever split a group into factions?
  4. Have you ever perverted the purpose of a group?
  5. Have you ever made a group too dependent on you, and then left?
  6. Have you ever belonged to a secret society?
  7. Have you ever gone over to the other side?
  8. Have you ever been an informer?
  9. Have you ever brought your group into disrepute?
  10. Have you ever weakened your group?
  11. Have you ever been a spy?
  12. Have you ever been a double agent?
  13. Have you ever permitted your group to be wiped out?
  14. Have you ever joined a group you considered bad?
  15. Have you ever given a group bad leadership?
  16. Have you ever given a group bad service?
  17. Have you ever provided badly for your group?
  18. Have you ever made your side lose?
  19. Have you ever injured the survival of a fellow group member?
  20. Have you ever enturbulated a group?
  21. Have you ever done anything to a group?
  22. Have you ever destroyed or reduced the survival of your own group?

.

SECOND DYNAMIC

(Family)

  1. Have you ever been a disturbing element in a family?
  2. Have you ever joined a family out of revenge?
  3. Have you ever disowned a member of your family?
  4. Have you ever gotten a relative into trouble?
  5. Have you ever worked against your family?
  6. Have you ever badly raised a child?
  7. Have you failed to provide for a child of yours?
  8. Have you ever split up a family?
  9. Have you ever had a bastard?
  10. Have you ever passed off a bastard as legitimate?
  11. Have you ever claimed a blood-relationship you didn’t have ?
  12. Have you ever forced a child into an unsuitable profession?
  13. Have you ever forced a child into a loveless marriage?
  14. Have you ever interfered with an inheritance?
  15. Have you ever had a member of your family incarcerated?
  16. Have you ever had an abortion?
  17. Have you ever exposed an infant?
  18. Have you ever physically injured a relative?
  19. Have you neglected your child’s education?
  20. Have you caused hostile factions within a family?
  21. Have you ever lived parasitically on your family?

(Sex)

  1. Have you ever sexually aroused someone and then not satisfied him (her)?
  2. Have you ever been sexually aroused by an object?
  3. Have you ever aroused another sexually with an object?
  4. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong age?
  5. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong sex?
  6. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong class?
  7. Have you ever made love to a person of the wrong race?
  8. Have you ever made love to a creature of the wrong species?
  9. Have you ever made love to someone who belonged to another?
  10. Have you ever taught another perverted sexual practices?
  11. Have you ever invented perverted sexual practices?
  12. Have you ever used sex unethically?
  13. Have you ever made love to a person you disliked?
  14. Have you ever used the wrong body part for intercourse?
  15. Have you ever caused someone to be castrated?
  16. Have you ever made someone’s body more exciting by warping or distorting it?
  17. Have you ever raped anyone?
  18. Have you ever failed to have intercourse with someone you should have?
  19. Have you ever had sex with a member of your own family?
  20. Have you ever made love to a person of your own sex?
  21. Is there anything about your sex life that would be unsafe to reveal?
  22. Have you ever misused sex?
  23. Have you ever withheld sex?
  24. Have you ever stood up a date?

.

FIRST DYNAMIC

  1. Have you ever denied yourself an opportunity?
  2. Is there something you haven’t let yourself have?
  3. Have you ever deliberately made someone think badly of you?
  4. Have you ever made someone punish you?
  5. Have you ever distrusted yourself?
  6. Have you ever made yourself sick?
  7. Have you ever deliberately hurt yourself?
  8. What haven’t you let yourself do?
  9. Have you ever considered anything to be “Much too good for you”?
  10. Have you ever hated yourself?
  11. Have you ever decided you were unworthy of your friends? family? job?
  12. Have you ever prevented yourself from accomplishing something?
  13. What haven’t you let yourself feel?
  14. What haven’t you let yourself think?
  15. Have you ever restrained yourself from a desired sexual experience?
  16. Is there anything you won’t let yourself eat? drink?
  17. What won’t you let yourself see? hear? touch?
  18. What won’t you let yourself understand?
  19. Have you ever attempted suicide?
  20. Have you ever misused a body part?
  21. Have you ever punished yourself?
  22. Have you ever lied to yourself?
  23. Have you ever failed to care for a body part?

.

THE CODE OF HONOR

L. Ron Hubbard wrote and issued The Code of Honor in 1954. It is appropriate only when there is no fixation on self, and one is willing to sacrifice oneself to uphold the Principle of Oneness.

.

Introduction

Hubbard introduces the code as follows:

“No one expects the Code of Honor to be closely and tightly followed.

“An ethical code cannot be enforced. Any effort to enforce the Code of Honor would bring it into the level of a moral code. It cannot be enforced simply because it is a way of life which can exist as a way of life only as long as it is not enforced. Any other use but self-determined use of the Code of Honor would, as any Scientologist could quickly see, produce a considerable deterioration in a person. Therefore its use is a luxury use, and which is done solely on self-determined action, providing one sees eye to eye with the Code of Honor.”

.

Code of Honor

1. Never desert a comrade in need, in danger or in trouble.

2. Never withdraw allegiance once granted.

3. Never desert a group to which you owe your support.

4. Never disparage yourself or minimize your strength or power.

5. Never need praise, approval or sympathy.

6. Never compromise with your own reality.

7. Never permit your affinity to be alloyed.

8. Do not give or receive communication unless you yourself desire it.

9. Your self-determinism and your honor are more important than your immediate life.

10. Your integrity to yourself is more important than your body.

11. Never regret yesterday. Life is in you today and you make your tomorrow.

12. Never fear to hurt another in a just cause.

13. Don’t desire to be liked or admired.

14. Be your own adviser, keep your own counsel and select your own decisions.

15. Be true to your own goals.

This is the ethical code of Scientology, the code one uses not because he has to but because he can afford such a luxury.

.

SCN 8-8008: Rising-Scale Processing

Reference: The Book of Scientology

Rising-Scale Processing

Please see the original section at the link above.

.

Summary

.

Comments

.

A Critical look at Beingness (Self)

Reference: The Book of Scientology

In Scientology, the tone scale deals with beingness as thetan. Beyond the tone scale there is simply theta as the ability to postulate and become aware. The individuality (as thetan) comes about when there is identification of theta (awareness) with postulates (thought). Now there is a tone scale. 

At the top of the tone scale, the identification occurs in passing and it is never permanent. As fixation enters the picture, the beingness starts to acquire a permanence and descends down the tone scale. Thus we get the tone-scale of affinity.

The ideal state of beingness occurs at the top of tone scale that contains no fixation. But Hubbard postulates a fixation when he considers the thetan to be eternal. When a person believes that he is, or has, a soul that lives forever, he is fixated on self in some manner. This fixation makes him subject to the laws of MEST. 

Hubbard’s Scientology addresses the fixation of the body; but it disregards the fixation on self. In fact, Scientology ends up reinforcing the fixation on self. Hubbard ends up railing against the MEST universe, without ever resolving it because of his own fixation on self.

Viewpoint comes about with the postulation of dimension points. In other words, all knowingness comes about through postulation only. How the postulation occurs in the first place is unknowable. When a beingness is postulated and made the source of postulates, we have an identification of the viewpoint with the dimension point. This is the beginning of self. Fixation comes about as the self starts to think itself to be permanent.

This fixation starts to resolve as one starts to see that the postulates have a oneness of continuity, consistency and harmony. Any violation of oneness cuts across the sense of ultimate freedom. A postulate cannot stand alone arbitrarily, such as, the idea of an eternal thetan. The ultimate freedom shall consist of the freedom to have or not have a beingness.

Doingness naturally accompanies beinginess. Doingness is the changing of dimension points. At the level of thought, doingness means reasoning. At the level of energy, doingness means communicating. And, at the level of matter, doingness means working and moving physical objects around.  

Havingness naturally accompanies doingness. Havingness is the resulting arrangement of dimension points. At the level of thought, havingness means arriving at a conclusion. At the level of energy, havingness means arriving at an understanding. And, at the level of matter, havingness means having the fruits of one’s labor.  

Havingness is the goal that is aimed at. At the accomplishment of the goal the doingness ceases. Therefore, some stability and duration is associated with havingness. Here the concept of time becomes very obvious. Hubbard considers time to be an arbitrary, but, like everything else, time derives its value from the equation of oneness.

Where the doingness towards a certain havingness is forcefully interrupted, we have a ridge that lasts until it is resolved. This is a fixation of attention, which is different from a satisfied sense of havingness. All human aberrations result from the fixation of attention and not from havingness.

.

Summary

To postulate is to generate thought that has substance, extents and duration. The extents are seen as space and the duration is seen as time. Hubbard erroneously believes that space exists by itself without substance. 

Furthermore, to have beingness is to identify with postulates. Hubbard erroneously believes that the beingness exists by itself without postulates or thought.

Such anomalous beliefs come about when a person thinks he knows when he doesn’t. This is the case with Scientology, It pretends to know when it doesn’t. This is because Scientology lacks the concept of the Unknowable.

How the postulates come about, we don’t know. Because all that we know is through postulates only.

.

Anomalies in Scientology

Reference: The Book of Scientology

Hubbard postulates space as “viewpoint of dimension.” But space is more like “dimension of substance.” In that sense, the void is the dimension of “nothing” which is a thought. Thought is not recognized as a substance, but thought is a substance. 

Viewpoint is the awareness of MEST. Viewpoint is theta, and space is MEST. Therefore, viewpoint cannot be space. The idea of MEST is essentially substance (matter and energy). The dimension of substance is space. The duration of substance is time.

Matter and energy are obviously different categories of substance. But thought is a category of substance too, because substance is anything substantial enough to be sensed. 

So, space is the “dimension of substance.” Space cannot be visualized in the absence of thought, energy and matter. Abstract, or mathematical idea of space is actually thought-space. It is the space occupied by thought. Similarly, we have energy-space, which is space occupied by energy; and matter-space, which is space occupied by matter. Matter is actually floating in the energy-space, and energy is floating in the thought-space. 

When Hubbard says, “Space is creatable by a thetan,” he is assuming a permanent individuality, called thetan. But thetan, or individuality, is a continually changing construct. We do have creation because we postulate; for example, the theory of relativity is based on the postulate that the speed of light is a universal constant. To postulate space one must postulate some thought. Such postulating of thought is the first condition necessary to action. 

Hubbard says, “Space can be considered to be the equivalent in experience of beingness.” But “being” is basically being aware; and when we consider beingness, it is looking at some postulates. Processing is basically straightening out beingness whose dimensions are defined by postulates.

Hubbard is critical of physics not having a good definition of space. This is because physics ignores “thought” as a category of substance. Hubbard does consider “thought,” but he does not clearly differentiate among thought as substance, thought-space and awareness.

Hubbard defines “dimension points” as points in space. Point is essentially a coordinate value of a dimension. The coordinate values are numbers representing length, width and height of substance. The idea of substance adds the coordinate of consistency (a degree of density, firmness, viscosity, etc.). These dimension points can change giving an illusion of motion. Similarly, viewpoint or awareness can change giving an illusion of motion.

Hubbard defines “anchor points” as points at the outermost boundaries of the space. A boundary implies a form carved out of substance. These anchor points refer to the “constraints” that define the boundaries.

Hubbard says, “A material of the universe can not exist in any universe without something in which to exist. The something in which it exists is space.” The container of space has to be made of postulated thought. The space is integral to thought as thought-space.

Substance is not something theoretical. It is defined by it being experienced. Thought, energy and matter are the categories of substance. Space is experienced only as the dimension of substance.

Hubbard says, “Space can be made coincidentally with any other space.” This can only mean that two different dimensions can be made to coincide. He then says, “Space is creatable or uncreatable by a viewpoint.” That means these dimensions are postulated. Hubbard seems to think that a person can postulate anything, regardless of it being inconsistent with other postulates.

And that anomaly is very fundamental to Scientology.

.

Summary

The fact of “Being” is basically being aware. When the “being”  is considering beingness, he is basically looking at his postulates.

The basic criticism of Hubbard is that he does not clearly differentiate among substance, space and viewpoint. Substance is thought, energy and matter. Space is the dimension of substance. And, viewpoint is awareness. Substance and space are part of MEST. But viewpoint is theta.

Hubbard talks about creation and uncreation, but that is just the activity of making postulates. Hubbard thinks that one can postulate anything arbitrarily. But postulates must not violate the principle of Oneness (continuity, consistency, harmony). Two contradictory ideas can not be both true, just like two particles of matter can not occupy the same place.

.