Category Archives: Psychology

Psychology (1-1000 CE): The Eastern Trajectory

Reference: SC: Psychology

Holistic Systems and Cognitive Therapies

.

Indian Medical Psychology (1st Century Onward):
The Ayurvedic Framework

Ancient Indian medicine developed sophisticated understandings of mental illness centuries before the Common Era, but the classical texts were composed and systematized during the early centuries CE. The Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita (composed in their current forms during the 1st-2nd centuries CE, though based on much earlier oral traditions) contain detailed expositions of mental disorders.

The primary Ayurvedic category for major mental disorders was unmada, literally meaning “frenzy, madness, or mental derangement”. The Charaka Samhita defined unmada as “the excessive wandering of the intellect, mind, and memory,” a condition that encompassed what modern psychiatry would classify across multiple diagnostic categories including various forms of psychosis, severe mood disorders, and organic mental syndromes. The text specified that unmada was “brought on by the consumption of impure food, blasphemy, and mental shock”, reflecting a biopsychosocial understanding that integrated dietary, spiritual, and traumatic etiologies.

Ayurvedic medicine classified unmada into five subtypes based on which of the three fundamental physiological principles (doshas) were vitiated. Vataja unmada resulted from vitiation of the vata humor (associated with movement and the nervous system), pittaja unmada from vitiation of pitta (associated with metabolism and transformation), kaphaja unmada from vitiation of kapha (associated with structure and lubrication), sannipataja unmada from simultaneous vitiation of all three doshas, and agantuja unmada from exogenous causes including possession by supernatural entities. This classification system demonstrated remarkable sophistication, recognizing that similar behavioral presentations could arise from fundamentally different pathophysiological processes.

The Ayurvedic understanding of mental illness was deeply integrated with its model of personality and consciousness. Mental health was understood to depend upon the balance of the trigunas—three fundamental qualities of mind: sattva (harmony, goodness, clarity), rajas (passion, activity, restlessness), and tamas (inertia, darkness, ignorance). “Improving Sattva and achieving a balance between Rajas and Tamas are necessary for mental well-being”. The hrdaya (emotional heart and seat of intellect) was identified as the origin point where aggravated doshas would travel into the mental channels, “subsequently causing an imbalance within the mind”.

Treatment approaches combined pharmacological, psychological, and spiritual interventions. The Charaka Samhita prescribed that “the mind should be treated with knowledge, specific knowledge, restraint, memory, and concentration”. Therapeutic methods included herbal medicines, dietary modifications, massage (abhyanga), fumigation (dhuma), music therapy, and psychotherapeutic interventions. For unmada caused by loss of something the patient loved, “he is made to regain a similar object. Simultaneously, he is consoled with pleasing assurances of friends as a result of which he becomes free from the ailment”. For unmada caused by emotions—“passion, grief, fear, anger, exhilaration, jealousy and greed”—physicians employed “exposure of the patient to mutually contradictory psychic factors” to restore equilibrium.

.

Buddhist Psychology (1st-5th Centuries):
Cognitive Approaches to Mental Suffering

Buddhism developed a comprehensive psychological system that distinguished between general human suffering (dukkha) and specific mental illnesses. The Buddha himself “distinguished between two kinds of illness (rogo): physical illness (kāyiko rogo) and mental illness (cetasiko rogo)”. The Buddha attributed mental illness to “the arising of mental defilements (Kleshas) which are ultimately based on the unwholesome roots (three poisons) of greed, hatred, and confusion”.

From the Buddhist perspective, “everyone who is not an awakened being is in some sense mentally ill”—as the Buddha stated in the Pali canon, “those beings are hard to find in the world who can admit freedom from mental disease even for one moment, save only those in whom the asavas mental fermentations are destroyed”. This radical claim did not pathologize normal human experience but rather established enlightenment as the standard of perfect mental health. The Buddhist approach to mental suffering was fundamentally therapeutic and pragmatic—rather than metaphysical speculation, Buddhism offered “a method of cleansing the stream of consciousness from ‘contaminations’ and ‘defilements’”.

Buddhist texts identified five major hindrances (nivarana) that prevent mental cultivation and contribute to psychological distress: sense desire, hostility, sloth-torpor, restlessness-worry, and doubt. The therapeutic methodology for removing negative or intrusive thoughts, detailed in the Vitakkasanthana Sutta (MN 20, “The Removal of Distracting Thoughts”), prescribed five cognitive techniques that strikingly anticipate modern cognitive-behavioral therapy:

  1. Focus on an opposite or incompatible thought or object
  2. Ponder the perils and disadvantages of the thought and its harmful consequences
  3. Ignore the thought and distract oneself through another activity
  4. Reflect on the removal or stopping of the causes of the target thought
  5. Make a forceful mental effort to suppress the thought

Nagarjuna (c. 150-250 CE), founder of the Madhyamaka school of Mahayana Buddhism, revolutionized Buddhist philosophy and psychology through his concept of sunyata (emptiness). Nagarjuna’s philosophy functioned as “linguistic therapy: it uses language to reveal how language deceives us”. He argued that mental and emotional turmoil arises from clinging to conceptual elaborations (prapancha)—fixed ideas about the nature of reality, self, and phenomena. These conceptualizations “do not accurately reflect how the world actually is” and generate suffering because we mistake linguistic constructs for reality.

Nagarjuna demonstrated through rigorous dialectical analysis that all phenomena, including mental states and the self, lack intrinsic existence (svabhava). This “cognitive default” of projecting substantial existence onto things reflects “our tendency to become attached to things, reflecting a need for solidity and permanence, forever frustrated by the certainty of death”. The therapeutic goal was not to replace deluded thinking with a correct philosophical view but rather to let go of all fixed conceptual positions. “Our emotional and mental turmoil is replaced by a beatitude or serenity (shiva) that cannot be grasped but can be lived”.

Vasubandhu (fl. 4th-5th century CE), philosopher and co-founder of the Yogacara school, developed a sophisticated psychological system centered on consciousness and its transformations. Vasubandhu elaborated the theory of eight types of consciousness: the five sense consciousnesses, empirical consciousness (mano-vijnana), a self-aggrandizing mentality (manas), and the alaya-vijnana (storehouse consciousness). The storehouse consciousness explained psychological continuity and the mechanisms of karmic conditioning—the “seed” (bija) of each experience is “stored subliminally and released into a new experience,” providing “a quasi-causal explanation for the functioning of karmic retribution”.

Vasubandhu’s analysis revealed that what we take to be an external objective world is actually constructed within consciousness itself. “We are fooled by consciousness into believing that those things which we perceive and appropriate within consciousness are actually outside our cognitive sphere”. This insight—that “cognition takes place only in consciousness and nowhere else”—anticipated by over a millennium Western philosophical idealism and phenomenology. The therapeutic implications were profound: suffering could be addressed by transforming the very basis of consciousness. “Buddhism is a method of cleansing the stream of consciousness from ‘contaminations’ and ‘defilements’”, achieved through ashraya-paravritti (overturning the basis) whereby consciousness (vijnana) is gradually transformed into unmediated cognition (jnana).

.

Chinese Medical Psychology (1st-10th Centuries):
The Integration of Emotion and Physiology

Traditional Chinese Medicine developed during the Han Dynasty (206 BCE-220 CE) and flourished through the Tang Dynasty (618-907 CE), creating a comprehensive system for understanding the relationship between emotional states and physiological processes. The foundational text, the Huang Di Nei Jing (Yellow Emperor’s Inner Classic), described the Shen (spirit or consciousness) as residing in the Heart and governing consciousness. The Shen concept evolved from a mystical force into “a clinical entity in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), influencing diagnostics and treatments for emotional and mental imbalances”.

Zhang Zhongjing’s Shang Han Lun (Treatise on Cold Damage, c. 200 CE) built upon this foundation, addressing “how external pathogens can disrupt the Shen, leading to symptoms like delirium or restlessness”. The text emphasized that “the Heart is the sovereign of all organs and represents the consciousness of one’s being. It is responsible for intelligence, wisdom, and spiritual transformation”.

Chinese medicine conceptualized mental disorders as arising from disruptions in the flow of qi (vital energy) and imbalances among the internal organ systems. “According to Chinese medicine theory, MDD major depressive disorder is mostly characterized by emotional disorders and stagnation of qi, which leads to a loss of regulation of the liver, a loss of function of the spleen, and a loss of nourishment of the heart”. The system recognized both external emotional factors (worry, fear, anger) and internal factors (the qi of the organs being easily disturbed) as contributing to mental illness.

Treatment modalities integrated herbal pharmacology with emotional and spiritual interventions. Classical formulas like Xiao Yao San (Free and Easy Wanderer Powder), first recorded during the Song Dynasty (960-1127 CE) but based on earlier traditions, have been “used in the treatment of psychiatric disorders for thousands of years”. The formula’s eight herbs were designed to address liver qi stagnation, a fundamental pattern underlying many emotional disorders. Chinese physicians documented successful treatments of hysteria, insomnia, and depression using these formulas, with detailed case records surviving from the medieval period.

.

Psychology (1-1000 CE): The Western Trajectory

Reference: SC: Psychology

From Greco-Roman Naturalism to Christian Supernaturalism

.

Early Imperial Rome (1st-2nd Centuries):
Medical Systematization

The opening centuries of the Christian Era marked the culmination of Greco-Roman medical thought regarding mental disorders. 

Aulus Cornelius Celsus (c. 25 BCE-50 CE) produced the first systematic taxonomy of mental illnesses in his encyclopedic work De Medicina. His classification system represented a sophisticated attempt to categorize the diverse manifestations of psychological distress into distinct disease entities: phrenitis (delirium accompanied by fever), melancholia (depression), a disorder characterized by false images and disordered judgment (resembling modern schizophrenia), delirium arising from fear, lethargus (coma), and morbus comitialis (epilepsy). Celsus introduced the term insania (insanity) into medical vocabulary and advocated for a range of treatments that combined harsh interventions—bleeding, frightening the patient, emetics, total darkness—with more humane approaches such as music therapy, travel, sport, reading aloud, and massage.

Aretaeus of Cappadocia (active in the second half of the 2nd century CE) advanced clinical psychiatry through meticulous observation and detailed case documentation. His most significant contribution was recognizing the cyclical nature of certain mental conditions, observing that some patients alternated between periods of profound melancholia and states of mania—an early description of what contemporary psychiatry recognizes as bipolar disorder. Aretaeus differentiated nervous diseases from mental disorders and provided classic accounts of various forms of insanity, including hysteria, headaches, mania, and melancholia, describing patients as experiencing “aversion to food, despondency, sleeplessness, irritability, and restlessness”.

Galen of Pergamum (129-216 CE) synthesized and expanded upon Hippocratic humoral theory, asserting that mental disturbances resulted primarily from humoral imbalances in the brain that damaged its functioning. His therapeutic approach aimed at re-establishing the balance of bodily humors through evacuations, drugs, and dietary modifications. Galen’s most innovative contribution was his recognition of psychosomatic relationships—he famously documented a case in which a female patient’s pulse became irregular when the name of a specific male dancer was mentioned, leading him to conclude that the patient was “in love” and demonstrating that “thinking can lead to physiological consequences”. This observation represented “the first clear description of a psychosomatic (mind-body) relationship”. Galen emphasized the importance of counsel and education in treating psychological problems, recommending that therapy involve “a mature, unbiased older person” who would confront patients whose passions—anger, jealousy—were responsible for their psychological difficulties.

.

The Christian Transformation (3rd-5th Centuries):
The Return of Supernatural Explanations

The rise of Christianity as the dominant religious and intellectual force in the Roman Empire precipitated a profound shift in explanations of mental illness. As Christianity spread, “ideas about sin dominated, and the ‘psychotherapists’ of the era were priests rather than physicians”. The Church became “the primary authority on health and illness, and religious interpretations replaced medical ones”. Mental disorders were increasingly viewed through the lens of demonology—the belief that demons or evil spirits could possess humans and cause abnormal behaviors. Church authorities often interpreted unusual behaviors, emotional disturbances, or psychological symptoms as evidence of demonic influence or punishment for sin. This represented a regression from the naturalistic explanations that had characterized Greco-Roman medicine.

Yet the picture was more complex than simple rejection of medical knowledge. 

Tertullian (c. 160-c. 220 CE), despite his theological rigor, “showed greater respect for physicians than many of his pagan contemporaries” and demonstrated extensive knowledge of contemporary medical thought. His anthropology emphasized “the indivisible unity of flesh and soul,” which paradoxically led him to maintain an “elevated view of the body” and appreciation for medical treatment. Early Christians generally “accepted Greco-Roman ideas that disease results from an imbalance of the humors and disconnect between mind and body”, attempting to remove excess humors through purgative medicines, bloodletting, and cauterization. Church fathers like Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, and others “saw medicine as God’s gift”.

Origen (c. 184-c. 253 CE) developed a sophisticated theological psychology grounded in Platonic philosophy. His doctrine of the preexistence of souls posited that God originally created incorporeal “spiritual intelligences” (psychaí) devoted to contemplating their Creator. As the “fervor of the divine fire cooled,” these intelligences grew “bored of contemplating God” and their love “cooled off” (psýchesthai), transforming them into souls (psychē) encased in material bodies. For Origen, mental and spiritual conditions reflected the degree to which a soul had fallen from its original state of contemplation. He theorized that “a single lifetime is not enough for a soul to achieve salvation, for certain souls require more education or ‘healing’ than others”, prefiguring later concepts of spiritual development and therapeutic education. Origen’s framework integrated body and soul: “the purity and subtleness of the body with which a soul is enveloped depends upon the moral development and perfection of the soul to which it is joined”.

.

Monastic Psychology (4th-5th Centuries):
The Desert Fathers and Acedia

The emergence of Christian monasticism in the deserts of Egypt, Syria, Palestine, and Mesopotamia between the 3rd and 7th centuries created a unique laboratory for psychological observation and spiritual therapy. The Desert Fathers, who sought lives of solitude, manual labor, contemplation, and silence, developed sophisticated understandings of mental and spiritual afflictions. These monks, who “we could also say were the first therapists,” created recommendations to heal the “sicknesses of the soul”.

Evagrius of Pontus (346-399 CE) produced Antirrhetikos, “the first and most complete early Christian book on demonology”. He systematized eight “wicked thoughts” (logismoi) that afflict Christians: gluttony (gastrimargia), sexual infidelity (porneia), greed (phylargia), pride (hyperephania), despair (lype), anger (orge), boasting (kenodoxia), and acedia (akedia). Acedia, “the most troublesome of all” the evil thoughts, was characterized by spiritual listlessness, torpor, restlessness, boredom, and indifference to religious practice. Evagrius associated acedia with “the plague that stalks at noonday” (Psalm 91:6), calling it “the noonday demon” that struck when monks were at their weakest—when the midday sun beat down, their energy waned, and their fasting stomachs growled. The afflicted monk experienced “an inert state without pain or care,” becoming “resistant to prayer and devotional reading,” unmoved by “rebuke or exhortation,” “spiritually numb and completely inert”.

John Cassian (360-435 CE), Evagrius’s student, transmitted these insights to Western monasticism through his Institutes and Conferences. Cassian’s vivid description of acedia’s manifestation in a monk’s cell captures its psychological reality: “He fancies that he is making no progress… he complains that he is unfruitful… he looks anxiously this way and that, and sighs that none of the brethren come to see him”. Cassian’s works profoundly influenced Western Christian spirituality—Benedict prescribed reading the Conferences in his monastic rule, and later Western thinkers including Gregory the Great, Alcuin, and Thomas Aquinas drew upon Cassian’s psychological insights. The monastic response to acedia involved “guarding the heart,” sobriety, hospitality, and meditation—practices that anticipated modern mindfulness-based therapies by nearly two millennia.

.

Byzantine Medical Continuity (4th-7th Centuries):
Preserving and Advancing Greco-Roman Knowledge

While Western Europe increasingly interpreted mental illness through supernatural frameworks, the Byzantine Empire maintained and developed the Greco-Roman medical tradition. Byzantine physicians followed Hippocratic theory, diagnosing illnesses through examination of the four humors (blood, phlegm, yellow bile, black bile) connected to particular seasons and qualities (hot, cold, dry, moist). Treatment involved dietary changes, pharmaceuticals, bloodletting, and surgery to expunge problematic humors.

Oribasius (c. 320-400/403 CE), physician to Emperor Julian the Apostate, created Collectiones medicae (Medical Collections), “a kind of encyclopedia comprising all the anatomical and physiological medical knowledge of the time”. Though only about 25 of the original 70+ volumes survive, Oribasius’s work “paved the way for Galenism, as he was the first to consider Galen’s works as fundamental for the progress of medicine”. His systematic compilation preserved extensive material from Galen and earlier physicians that would otherwise have been lost, creating “a precious source on the history of ancient and early Byzantine medicine”.

Aetius of Amida (late 5th/early 6th century CE), physician to Emperor Justinian I, produced the Tetrabiblion (16 books), a comprehensive medical textbook that “gives significant information about surgical approaches” and detailed descriptions of various conditions. Aetius was reportedly “the first Greek physician who embraced Christianity”, representing the gradual integration of Christian identity with medical practice. His work “influenced Islamic and European medicine” and drew upon the knowledge of earlier physicians including Rufus of Ephesus, Leonidas, Soranus, and Philumenos.

Alexander of Tralles (c. 525-c. 605 CE) was “one of the most eminent physicians in the Byzantine Empire” who gained “great reputation, not only at Rome, but wherever he traveled in Spain, Gaul, and Italy”. His Therapeutics, written from extensive practical experience in extreme old age, demonstrated sophisticated understanding of mental disorders. Alexander classified melancholia into subtypes based on humoral imbalances: black bile melancholia characterized by depressed mood, anxiety, and delusions; yellow bile melancholia characterized by anger. He recognized that “anger resulted when one transitioned from melancholia to mania,” anticipating by over a millennium modern psychiatry’s recognition of “switch phenomena” in mood disorders. Alexander’s work described over 600 pharmaceutical preparations, including his Twelve Books which “exemplify the use of medicine to treat all types of diseases, including what he described as ‘melancholy’ which modern doctors would describe as depression”.

Paul of Aegina (c. 625-c. 690 CE), educated at Alexandria’s medical school, was acclaimed as the “Father of Early Medical Writing”. His Medical Compendium in Seven Books represented the culmination of Byzantine medical knowledge—“for many years in the Byzantine Empire, his work contained the sum of all available medical knowledge and was unrivaled in its accuracy and completeness”. Paul distinguished 62 types of pulse associated with various diseases and dealt extensively with apoplexy and epilepsy. His surgical expertise was legendary: he performed tonsillectomy, trephination, paracentesis, lithotomy, and breast amputation. Paul’s work achieved extraordinary influence in the Islamic world—his reputation “seems to have been very great, and it is said that he was especially consulted by midwives, whence he received the name of Al-kawabeli or ‘the Accoucheur’”. The Arabic translation by Hunayn ibn Ishaq in the 9th century transmitted Byzantine medical knowledge to Islamic civilization, where it would be transformed and expanded.

.

Psychology (20th century CE)

Reference: SC: Psychology

.

20th century

1900s

1910s

1920s

1930s

1940s

1950s

1960s

1970s

1980s

1990s

.

Synthesis: Common Patterns and Divergent Paths

Reference: SC: Psychology

.

Universal Recognition

All ancient civilizations recognized mental illness as a distinct phenomenon requiring explanation and treatment. Whether called unmada, kuang, até, or mania, each culture developed:

  • Classification systems distinguishing types of mental disturbance
  • Causal theories explaining origins
  • Treatment protocols addressing symptoms
  • Social frameworks for managing affected individuals

.

Dual Causation Models

Most traditions maintained parallel supernatural and naturalistic explanations without seeing them as contradictory. Vedic medicine could simultaneously attribute unmada to demonic possession and dosha imbalance. Roman physicians could describe brain-based mechanisms while patients sought divine intercession. This pluralism reflected sophisticated understanding that multiple factors might contribute to mental disturbance.

.

The Turn Toward Naturalism

Yet certain pivotal moments accelerated naturalistic thinking:

  • Hippocratic Greece (5th century BCE): Explicit rejection of supernatural causation, brain-centered psychology
  • Buddhist Abhidhamma (3rd century BCE onwards): Phenomenological analysis of mental factors without supernatural agency
  • Asclepiades’ Rome (1st century BCE): Molecular/atomic theory of disease, humane environmental treatment

.

Cultural Emphasis Patterns

Eastern traditions (India, China, Buddhism) emphasized:

  • Mind-body integration rather than separation
  • Balance and harmony as health ideals
  • Emotions as physiological forces, not purely psychological
  • Preventive practices (meditation, seasonal regimens, lifestyle)
  • Spiritual/moral dimensions of mental health

Western traditions (Greece, Rome) emphasized:

  • Brain localization of mental functions
  • Material/humoral explanations for psychological phenomena
  • Classification and taxonomy of discrete conditions
  • Clinical observation and detailed symptom description
  • Progressive separation of natural from supernatural causation

.

Treatment Sophistication

By the 1st-2nd centuries CE, the ancient world had developed remarkably sophisticated treatment approaches:

  • Ayurvedic psychotherapy (Satwavajaya) using cognitive techniques
  • Chinese acupuncture targeting specific mental-emotional states
  • Buddhist meditation for transforming unwholesome mental factors
  • Roman humane care with music, light, exercise, and supportive environments

Many of these approaches presaged modern treatments: cognitive therapy, environmental modifications, the importance of social support, and recognition that mental and physical health form an integrated whole.

.

Limitations and Blind Spots

Ancient understanding also suffered significant limitations:

  • Confusion between neurological conditions (epilepsy, dementia, delirium) and psychiatric conditions (depression, psychosis)
  • Gendered theories often attributing women’s mental illness to “wandering wombs” or hysteria
  • Harmful treatments including bloodletting, violent purges, and occasional use of restraints or isolation
  • Persistent stigma in popular culture despite medical advances
  • Limited understanding of psychotic disorders’ underlying mechanisms

Nevertheless, the intellectual achievements of ancient civilizations in psychology and psychiatry remain profound. They recognized mental illness as a human condition requiring compassionate, systematic response—and in their best moments, developed treatments that honored the dignity and complexity of human consciousness.

.

Ancient Rome: Clinical Psychiatry and Humane Treatment

Reference: SC: Psychology

.

Progressive Physicians

Asclepiades of Bithynia (124-40 BCE) represents one of history’s most progressive psychiatric reformers. Practicing in Rome, he rejected Hippocratic humoral theory, instead proposing that disease resulted from blockages in the movement of önkoi (imperceptible atomic particles) through theoretical pores in the body—including the brain. This proto-molecular medicine led him to fundamentally different therapeutic approaches.

Most revolutionary were Asclepiades’ humane treatment methods:

  • Fresh air and natural light rather than darkness and dungeons
  • Music therapy using soothing sounds to calm agitated patients
  • Hydrotherapy with therapeutic baths
  • Massage and exercise programs
  • Proper diet to support recovery
  • Pleasant environments conducive to healing

His therapeutic motto—“cito, tuto, jucunde” (safely, swiftly, pleasantly)—stood in stark contrast to the chains, whipping, bloodletting, and forced emetics commonly employed. Asclepiades advocated releasing mentally ill persons from confinement and treating them with dignity, recognizing that the mind could be healed through gentle, supportive interventions.

Celsus (1st century CE) provided the first systematic taxonomy of mental illnesses (genera insaniae) in his De Medicina. He distinguished three primary types:

  1. Phrenitis: acute delirium accompanied by fever, fluctuating pulse rates, and spastic movements—likely organic delirium from physical illness
  2. Mania: characterized by chaotic thoughts, frenzy, anger, and delusions occurring without fever—corresponding to what we would call acute psychosis or manic episodes
  3. Melancholy: persistent sadness, fear, despair, and withdrawal from external reality into an “impenetrable inner world”—encompassing both depression and paranoid or catatonic states we might now associate with schizophrenia

Soranus of Ephesus (1st-2nd century CE), whose work was translated by Caelius Aurelianus, provided detailed clinical descriptions and developed sophisticated treatment protocols including restoration therapy after acute phases subsided.

Galen of Pergamon (129-216 CE) synthesized and expanded Greek medical knowledge, creating a comprehensive system that dominated Western medicine for 1,500 years. Galen:

  • Emphasized the brain’s central role in mental functioning, developing a proto-neurological approach
  • Described how imbalanced humors specifically affected brain operations
  • Recognized anxiety disorders, noting patients with symptoms resembling generalized anxiety or major depression—sweating, indigestion, palpitations, dizziness, insomnia, weight loss
  • Observed that anxiety could “develop into melancholia” when black bile accumulated in the brain, causing delirium, aggression, or suicidal behavior
  • Described brain injuries and their cognitive consequences

Aretaeus of Cappadocia (2nd century CE) provided remarkably modern clinical descriptions, noting melancholic patients’ “aversion to food, despondency, sleeplessness, irritability, and restlessness”. His observations of aura, convulsions, and postictal states in epilepsy closely resemble modern clinical understanding.

.

Treatment Modalities

Roman therapeutic approaches combined:

  1. Environmental interventions: well-lit rooms, moderate temperatures, therapeutic gardens
  2. Physical therapies: massage, exercise, hydrotherapy at Roman baths
  3. Dietary regimens: carefully calibrated to restore humoral balance
  4. Pharmacological treatments: various herbs and compounds
  5. Bloodletting, emetics, and purging: to expel excess humors (though now recognized as harmful)
  6. Asclepian temple healing: serene sanctuaries providing relaxation, proper diet, dream interpretation, and social support
  7. Musical therapy: using soothing music therapeutically

Wealthy Roman families sometimes employed personal physicians specializing in mental conditions, providing individualized care in home settings.

.

Persistent Popular Beliefs

Despite medical advances, popular Roman culture maintained traditional supernatural explanations. Cicero (106-43 BCE) distinguished between:

  • Insania: a relatively mild condition caused by moral weakness or failure of will
  • Furens: serious, total loss of mental reasoning making individuals unable to function—inflicted by the Furies (Erinyes), three bloodthirsty goddesses who drove mortals mad as divine punishment

The rise of Christianity saw a resurgence of demonic possession theories, temporarily eclipsing the naturalistic medical tradition.

.