Book: Postulate Mechanics

Cover by Michael Allard

Preface

All my life, I wanted to clear up my confusions. There was so much I did not understand, and that troubled me. I had studied physical sciences, but quantum mechanics was always beyond my grasp. Life felt complex and overwhelming, and I often wondered if I would ever truly make sense of it.

When I retired in 2012, I finally had the time to look for answers. I decided to research the connection between physics and metaphysics — starting with the things that had puzzled me since childhood. I went back to the basics of mathematics, physics, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Scientology.

One practice that proved especially useful was word clearing — the habit of carefully understanding the definitions of words before moving on. I had used this in the Math Club I ran at the Safety Harbor Library from 1995 to 2010, and later through a blog I started in 2010, where I published The Book of Mathematics.

In 2015, I began working with high school dropouts preparing for their GED exams at a facility in New Port Richie, Florida. These young adults had real-life experience that I could only imagine, yet their basic gaps in learning held them back. Word clearing was supposed to help, but they were too overwhelmed to dig back and find where things had gone wrong.

Then something shifted. I organized a set of lectures that started from the very beginning — the most basic ideas in math — and built up step by step. I used an abacus. I showed them that all numbers are written using just ten digits, just as all English words are built from 26 letters. Their faces lit up. Questions started flowing. That is when Subject Clearing was born.

The lesson was clear: every subject has an inner logic. Understanding depends on a smooth, step-by-step path from simple to complex, with no gaps left behind. That is the only reliable way to learn anything.

As that insight sank in, a bold question arose: could the universe itself be treated as a subject? It seemed far-fetched, but no more so than searching for a bridge between physics and metaphysics. And I had the time. So I kept going — until I found the key I had been looking for: the correct definition of the word “substance.” That became the starting point for this book on Postulate Mechanics.

This book may only scratch the surface of what there is to understand. But more than its contents, I hope it points you toward Subject Clearing as a method. It has helped me grasp ideas that once seemed unreachable. I feel fortunate to have lived in an age when the knowledge of great minds is freely available to anyone who looks.

I hope this methodology serves you just as well.

Chapter 1 — Introduction

The Drive to Understand

At the heart of everything is a simple impulse: the desire to know. We always sense, somewhere inside us, the difference between understanding something and not understanding it. When we don’t understand something, we make our best guess and build a theory around it. A good theory has one essential quality — it is consistent all the way through, with no contradictions.

When there is no theory at all, no guesses, no explanations — that is the state described in the ancient Rig Veda creation hymn:

Whence this creation has arisen
— perhaps it formed itself, or perhaps it did not —
the One who looks down on it,
in the highest heaven, only He knows —
or perhaps He does not know.

Starting with a Postulate

Every theory begins with a postulate — a starting assumption accepted as true, from which everything else follows. Einstein, for example, assumed that the speed of light is always the same everywhere. From that single assumption, he built the entire theory of relativity.

The purpose of any theory is to explain what we observe, bring separate facts together into one coherent picture, and help us predict and explore further.

From Sensation to Knowledge

Our knowledge is, at its core, our personal theory of the universe. It begins with sensation — what we feel, hear, see, touch, taste.

From raw sensations, we form perceptions (recognizing patterns). From perceptions, we form concepts (abstract ideas). From concepts, we build knowledge. Each step is a process of assimilation — taking in something new and fitting it into a larger picture.

What Postulate Mechanics Is

Postulate Mechanics is an attempt to bring all of our knowledge into one unified, consistent framework.

Classical Mechanics deals with matter.
Quantum Mechanics deals with energy.
Postulate Mechanics deals with thought.

Just as physics seeks a unified theory of the physical world, Postulate Mechanics seeks a unified theory of how we know — and through that, a unified theory of everything.

Chapter 2 — How We Sense the Universe

Our Senses

We have five physical senses — sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch. Beyond these, there is a sixth sense: thought. The job of thought is to make sense of everything the physical senses bring in.

When something new arrives through the senses and we have no ready explanation for it, the mind proposes a best guess — a postulate. As more sensations keep arriving, the mind slowly builds up a picture of the world. We call this complete picture the “universe” — one unified, harmonious, consistent whole.

Three Basic Postulates

The universe can be sensed and known. From this simple observation, three fundamental postulates follow:

1. Substantiality — “It’s real!”
The universe can be seen, heard, touched, and felt. That means it has substance — it is actually there. In ancient Sanskrit, this is called Sat (meaning “being” or “existence”).

2. Awareness — “It knows itself!”
The universe doesn’t just exist — it is aware. Think about it: you are part of the universe, and you are aware of yourself! In Sanskrit, this is called Chit (meaning “consciousness”).

3. Oneness — “It all fits together!”
Everything in the universe fits together like a giant puzzle. There are no loose pieces. In Sanskrit, this is called Ananda (often translated as “bliss” — the joy of everything being in harmony).

Together, these three are known as Sat-Chit-Ananda (Substantiality-Awareness-Oneness).

Three Grades of Substance

Substance comes in three forms, each with a different degree of “thickness” (density, firmness, viscosity or depth):

Type	How thick/solid?	How we sense it
Matter	Most solid — has mass	You can see and touch it
Energy	Less solid — no mass	You feel it as movement or waves (like light or sound)
Thought	Least solid	You feel it mentally — as fixed ideas or open, free ones

A cool example for thought: hate and bigotry feel very heavy and stuck, while love and tolerance feel light and free. Thoughts have a kind of “thickness” too!

How Awareness Grows

Awareness begins with raw sensation. It deepens in stages:

Sensation → Perception → Conception → Knowledge

Each step takes what came before and blends it into something bigger and clearer.

How Oneness Arises

Oneness is what happens when sensations, perceptions, ideas, and knowledge all fit together seamlessly. It shows up as harmony, consistency, and continuity. When the observer and the observed are in complete accord, bliss, beauty, rationality, and health naturally arise. Oneness is the universe’s ultimate aim.

The Core Idea

Postulate Mechanics rests on the foundational postulate: Substantiality-Awareness-Oneness. Everything we observe about the universe flows from this single starting point.

Chapter 3 — Substance of the Universe

Have you ever wondered what everything around you is made of? Not just rocks and water, but also sunlight, and even your own thoughts? It turns out the universe is made of three big things:

Matter
Energy
Thought

Matter

Matter is all the stuff you can touch and hold — like a rock, a chair, or a glass of water. It has a set shape and it stays put unless something moves it. That’s called inertia — it’s like how a heavy backpack doesn’t just fly off your desk on its own.

If you break matter into smaller and smaller pieces, you eventually get to something called an atom. Atoms are so tiny you can’t see them, but everything solid around you is made of them. If you break an atom apart even further, it stops acting like regular matter.

Matter can be solid (like ice), liquid (like water), or gas (like steam), depending on how hot or cold it is.

Energy

Energy is the opposite of matter. Where matter stays still, energy is always moving. It spreads out as waves and has very little resistance to movement.

Energy exists in both the physical world (like light and heat) and the mental world. Different types of energy with different frequencies stay separate from each other, but energies of the same frequency blend together easily.

The smallest unit of energy is called a quantum — the tiniest possible “packet” of energy involved in any interaction.

Thought

This one might surprise you — thoughts are a kind of substance too! You can’t touch a thought, but you can sense it in your mind. It begins as a basic postulate (a foundational assumption or decision) and develops into bigger ideas, theories, and conclusions as you think things through.

Thoughts have their own kind of “space” and “time” — like how a really big idea can feel like it fills up your whole mind, or how you can get stuck on a thought and just can’t let it go. More complex mental phenomena like emotion and effort grow from thought as well.

Why This Matters

Conventional science recognizes matter as substance and grudgingly acknowledges energy. It ignores thought entirely. Postulate Mechanics takes a broader view: matter, energy, and thought are all equally real forms of substance, and a complete understanding of the universe — including the human being — requires all three.

Chapter 4 — Properties of Substance

All substance — whether matter, energy, or thought — shares five basic properties. These properties only exist where substance exists. They cannot exist without substance.

1. Space

Space is how much room things takes up.

Matter is very compact — it occupies a small, dense space.
Energy (like light or radio waves) spreads out over a huge space.
Thought occupies a mental space, which is different from physical space altogether.

The key point: space is never truly “empty.” What we call empty space just means no matter is there. Energy or thought can still fill it. True nothingness — with no substance at all — does not exist.

2. Time

Time is how long things last.

Matter: a mountain lasts millions of years — it has a lot of time.
Energy: a flash of light zips by super fast — it has much less time.
Thought: sometimes a minute feels like forever (like waiting for summer vacation), and sometimes an hour feels like five minutes (like playing video games). That’s mental time!

The key point: time only makes sense when something is there to have a duration. Without substance, time has no meaning.

3. Inertia

Inertia means things don’t like to change when they are settled in a routine. It maintains that natural routine.

Matter has the highest inertia — it is hard to move and hard to stop.
Energy (like light) has very little inertia — it travels freely.
Thought can be either fixed (like a stubborn belief) or free-flowing.

Think of a spinning top: it stays in a position because it is “centered.” Inertia only shows up as a force when you try to disturb a settled position. A billiard ball sitting still shows no inertial force — push it, and the resistance you feel is inertia.

4. Motion

Motion is how freely a substance moves on its own.

Matter moves slowly and within a limited range.
Energy moves extremely fast — light travels at 300,000 km/s.
Thought can move instantaneously across mental space.

Inertia and motion are connected: inertia is what keeps something moving at its natural speed. The constant speed of light, for example, is maintained by its (very small but real) inertia.

5. Gravity

Gravity does for a system of bodies what inertia does for a single body — it maintains the natural, balanced motion of the whole group.

The planets, moons, and the sun form one system. Gravity keeps them all moving in their natural orbits.
Gravity only produces a noticeable force when that balance is disturbed. Once disturbed, gravity acts to restore the balance.

Think of it as inertia operating at the scale of an entire solar system.

How This Differs from Standard Science

Topic	Standard Science	Postulate Mechanics
Space & Time	Independent backdrop for events	Properties of substance itself
Inertia	Resistance to changes in motion	Centeredness that also sets intrinsic motion
Inertia & Motion	No direct relationship	Inertia maintains natural motion
Gravity	A force between masses (still mysterious)	The inertia of a whole system of bodies

The core difference: science treats space and time as the stage on which things happen. Postulate Mechanics treats them as qualities of the things themselves — just like color or temperature. Remove the substance, and space, time, inertia, motion, and gravity all vanish with it.

Chapter 5 — Where Science Falls Short

What Science Currently Assumes

Modern science is built on a few core assumptions:

The universe looks roughly the same no matter where you are or which direction you look.
The laws of physics work the same for anyone moving at a constant speed — there is no special “motionless” point in the universe.
Light always travels at the same speed, no matter how fast the observer or the source is moving.
Mass (matter) causes space and time to bend around it.
That bending of space and time is what we experience as gravity — it guides how matter moves.

What Postulate Mechanics Assumes Instead

Postulate Mechanics starts from a different set of ideas:

The universe can be sensed, so it must be made of substance — and substance comes in three forms: matter, energy, and thought.
Every substance has five basic properties: space, time, inertia, motion, and gravity.
Space and time give substance its shape and persistence — where it is and how long it lasts.
Inertia and motion govern how substance moves — inertia is the tendency to hold a center, and motion is how fast it moves.
Gravity is essentially inertia acting across a group of bodies, keeping the whole system balanced and stable.

Where Science Falls Short

From the Postulate Mechanics point of view, science has several blind spots:

Science does not recognize energy and thought as forms of substance, because it never ties substance to sensation in its definitions.
Science treats space and time as a backdrop or container, rather than as properties that belong to substance itself.
Science misunderstands inertia — it is not just resistance to change, but an inner “centeredness” that arises from spin within a configuration.
The massive black holes at the centers of galaxies have such enormous inertia that they effectively serve as the absolute reference points for all motion — but science does not see this.
Because the speed of light is determined by its inertia, it is constant — not mysteriously so, but for a clear physical reason science overlooks.
Inertia keeps a single body moving in equilibrium, and restores that equilibrium after any disturbance — science does not frame it this way.
Gravity does the same thing, but for whole systems of bodies — it is the equilibrium-keeper at the larger scale, parallel to what inertia does for a single body.

The core disagreement between science and Postulate Mechanics comes down to this: science treats space, time, and motion as the stage on which matter acts, while Postulate Mechanics sees them as properties that belong to substance itself — inseparable from it.

Chapter 6 — From Simple Motion to Life

The Big Idea

Life is not a mystery added on top of matter. It grows naturally out of motion — motion that becomes more and more organized and controlled.

A Ladder of Increasing Complexity

Think of nature as a ladder, where each rung has more organization than the one below it:

Light — Light moves at a constant speed. It has no variation, no flexibility. It is as simple as motion gets.

Atoms — Electrons orbit a nucleus. The motion is more varied than light. Things can change and respond. There is a tiny hint of something “lively.”

Molecules — In an organic molecule (made of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen), electrons are shared across many atoms. The motion is even richer — more ways to move, more ways to interact.

Viruses — A virus is a highly organized arrangement of molecules. It has so many interlocking moving parts that it behaves almost like a tiny robot running its own program.

Living cells — One step beyond the virus, and you have a true living organism.

What Makes Something “Alive”?

A living organism is matter that has become extraordinarily well-organized. It:

Moves and regulates its own motion from within
Takes in material and energy from its environment
Expresses or reflects the nature of the universe through itself

Life is not some external force plugged into matter. Motion and inertia are already built into substance. Life is simply what emerges when that built-in motion reaches a high enough level of organization and control.

There is no separate “spirit” needed to explain it.

The Core Principle

So here’s the journey from simple to alive:

Step	Example	What’s special about its motion
1	Light	Constant, never changes
2	Atom	Electrons move and can vary
3	Molecule	Many atoms dancing together
4	Virus	Incredibly complex, almost robotic
5	Living Cell	Fully self-controlling — it’s alive!

Life is organized motion, nothing more and nothing less. But “nothing more” is still breathtaking in its complexity.

Chapter 7 — The Science of Life

Life Starts with Chemistry

Before we can understand life, we need to understand chemistry. Life is built on chemical reactions.

The simplest living things are viruses and cells. They follow instructions written in their genetic material — the biological “code” that tells them what to do.

That code is stored in molecules called DNA and RNA. Scientists can now build these molecules in a lab — but lab-made versions tend to have more errors. This is likely because the lab environment is different from the natural environment where these molecules originally formed.

What Happens in Chemical Reactions

When atoms bond together, they form molecules. Each new molecule can have properties that its individual atoms did not have on their own — but the atoms themselves do not disappear or change; their cores stay intact. Only the outer electron regions merge and interact.

One key point: the environment matters. Even if two reactions produce chemically identical results, there are subtle differences depending on where and how the reaction took place. A lab is not the same as nature, and those differences show up.

How Life’s Molecules First Appeared

Early Earth had no life, but it had energy — ultraviolet light, lightning, volcanic heat. These drove reactions between simple inorganic compounds, producing the first organic (carbon-based) molecules. Some of these molecules also arrived from space on meteorites and comets.

Over time, small molecules joined together into larger ones. A major turning point was the appearance of RNA — a molecule that could both store information and help drive chemical reactions on its own.

Eventually, some of these self-copying molecules became enclosed inside a membrane, forming a contained system. That was the beginning of the cell — with its own energy supply, protein-building machinery, and chemical regulation.

What Genetic Material Does

DNA (and RNA in some viruses) is the molecule that carries all the hereditary information of a living thing. It controls how an organism grows, develops, and functions. DNA is shaped like a twisted ladder (a double helix) and is made of repeating units called nucleotides.

“Hereditary” simply means what is passed from parents to offspring — traits like eye color, but also, importantly, the impressions left by trauma or unprocessed experiences. These can be impressed upon genes and carried forward through generations until they are resolved.

Scientists can now synthesize DNA in a lab from scratch. But as with other synthetic genetic material, error rates increase as the molecule gets longer and more complex.

What All Living Things Have in Common

Every living organism, no matter how simple or complex, shares these basic features:

Made of cells — the basic unit of life
Uses energy — through chemical reactions, organisms break down food to power movement, growth, and other processes
Maintains balance — living things regulate their internal temperature, acidity, and water levels despite changes in the outside world
Grows — organisms increase in size and complexity according to their genetic instructions
Reproduces — all living things can produce offspring, passing life on to the next generation
Responds — organisms detect and react to changes in their environment, such as light, heat, or chemicals
Evolves — over many generations, populations change in response to their environment

The Bigger Picture: Environment Is Everything

The core insight of Postulate Mechanics is that the environment is never separate from the organism. This is true at every level — from a simple chemical reaction to the most complex living being.

The environment is not just physical matter and energy. It also includes thought. Interactions happen at all three levels — matter, energy, and thought — and none of these can be ignored or treated as isolated from the others.

The main idea is that life didn’t appear by magic — it grew step by step from simple chemistry, shaped by the environment at every stage.

Chapter 8 — The Origin of Thought

The Core Idea

The mind exists to guide and regulate thought. Just as nature keeps physical things in balance through inertia, the mind keeps mental activity in balance. This balancing act is the very origin of thought itself.

It Starts in the DNA

Every living organism carries a genetic blueprint in its DNA. This blueprint doesn’t just build the body — it also lays the foundation for the mind. Think of it as the “factory settings” of mental life, installed before you were born. You don’t choose it; it comes pre-programmed.

On top of this base layer, higher mental functions develop — like sensing, perceiving, forming ideas, and building knowledge.

The Mind and Its Environment

An organism lives inside an environment that is messy and unpredictable. The organism itself, by contrast, is well-organized. Everything that comes in from the outside — sensations, experiences, shocks — needs to be processed and absorbed.

When experiences are easy and calm, the mind absorbs them smoothly. When they are violent or traumatic, they are harder to absorb. Those unresolved impressions get carried forward in time. Some are so deep they may even pass to the next generation through DNA. When they finally get resolved, they can feel like memories from a past life.

What “Assimilation” Means

Assimilation simply means making something fit in. A good analogy: pour hot water and cold water into the same container. They gradually mix until both reach the same temperature. Balance is restored.

The mind does the same thing with experience. When you pay close attention to something confusing or troubling, all the conflicting thoughts and feelings around it gradually settle into clarity and consistency.

Raw sensations, when assimilated, provide clearer perceptions.
Perceptions, when assimilated, provide clearer concepts.
Concepts, when assimilated, provide clearer knowledge.
Knowledge, fully assimilated, becomes wisdom.

The Physics Behind It

At the deepest level, thought arises from the interplay between inertia (resistance to change) and motion. This same tension shows up in physics — it’s why the speed of light is constant, and why atoms have fixed energy levels.

As atoms combine into complex molecules like DNA, the number of possible energy states becomes enormous — almost like the keys of a vast piano. The mind “plays” these states to generate signals and impulses, which is how it runs the organism.

The Takeaway

Thought, energy, and matter are always moving toward balance. The universe — and life within it — is a continuous process of seeking harmony, consistency, and wholeness. The mind is nature’s instrument for that process.

Chapter 9 — The Anatomy of Reason

The Big Idea

The universe is constantly moving toward greater unity and harmony. Life — especially human life — is the highest expression of that harmony. But we suffer. And suffering means something is wrong. The tool for fixing what’s wrong is reason.

Harmony

Harmony is the natural state of things when everything is working as it should. Motion is smooth, clarity is present, and there are no contradictions. When life feels right — no confusion, no emotional turmoil — that’s harmony.

Any departure from that state is an anomaly.

Anomaly

An anomaly is anything that disrupts clarity or causes wrong emotions (anger, fear, anxiety, etc.). Anomalies come in three forms:

Arbitrary data — assumptions that are disconnected from reality. Example: “My religion is the only true one” — a claim not grounded in careful examination.
Contradictory data — inconsistencies that don’t add up. Example: a leader says the economy is great, but people’s lives are getting worse.
Missing data — gaps in understanding. Example: a case is “closed” but key questions are never answered.

Reason

Reason is the process of tracking down and resolving anomalies. You do it by:

Spotting where the arbitrary, contradictory, or missing data is
Following the trail back to the root cause
Continuing until total clarity is reached — when all doubt disappears

The prerequisite for reason is seeing things as they are — without filtering reality through assumptions or emotional reactions. This is where mindfulness practice comes in. Please see The 12 Aspects of Mindfulness.

Postulate Mechanics

The broader project (Postulate Mechanics) is an effort to clear up the most fundamental misconceptions about the universe and life. By resolving confusion at the deepest level, it sharpens the ability to reason and restore harmony.

In one sentence: Reason is the practice of finding and fixing the root cause of confusion — and when done fully, harmony returns.

Chapter 10 — The Anatomy of Suffering

The Four Noble Truths

Buddha taught four core truths about suffering:

Suffering exists
Suffering has a cause
Suffering can end
There is a path to end it

What Is Suffering?

Suffering — called Dukkha in Buddhism — means that life is often unsatisfying, painful, and unstable. Getting old, getting sick, dying, and not getting what you want are all forms of it. This is not pessimism; it is just an honest look at life.

Postulate Mechanics reframes suffering as a loss of harmony. Think of life as naturally flowing smoothly. Suffering happens when that flow is disrupted — by specific problems, distortions, or imbalances. This framing is useful because you can then tackle one disruption at a time, rather than feeling overwhelmed by “suffering” as a vague whole.

Why Does Suffering Arise?

Buddhism says suffering comes from craving — wanting pleasurable experiences, wanting to keep existing, or wanting experiences to stop. The problem is inside the mind, not outside in the world.

Postulate Mechanics agrees that the cause is internal, but asks: what exactly triggers these cravings? In the modern world, “stop wanting things” is too general to be helpful. The desire to learn and grow is natural and healthy. Suffering arises only when that desire gets twisted, misdirected, or distorted in some way.

Can Suffering End?

Buddhism says yes — by letting go of attachments, greed, and delusion, you can reach a state of peace and freedom called Nirvana.

Postulate Mechanics says this goal is right but hard to reach, because there are so many triggers — countless attachments, countless moments of greed or confusion. However, there is likely one root factor that, once addressed, makes all the others much easier to handle. Finding and resolving that single root factor requires focused, sustained effort — and most people find that difficult.

The Path

Buddhism prescribes the “Middle Way” — a balanced life combining ethical behavior, mindfulness, and wisdom. Neither extreme indulgence nor extreme deprivation.

Postulate Mechanics says this path is hard to follow mainly because of deep misconceptions — about the nature of the universe, about matter and motion, and about how thought and life evolved. Earlier chapters in this book work through many of those misconceptions.

The Big Question

The universe has evolved to a level of complexity where it produced self-awareness and reasoning. With that came the ideas of “I” and suffering — ideas that did not exist before humans.

Postulate Mechanics defines suffering as a lack of harmony. But this raises a deeper question:

Who or what exactly is the “I” that is suffering?

Do we really understand what the self is — or is that itself a misconception we have not yet examined?

Chapter 11 — The Notion of “I”

The Big Picture

Buddhism says life is inherently full of suffering and instability. But that is only true from a narrow human perspective. At the scale of the universe, suffering and instability are simply things that have gone out of balance — problems waiting to be solved.

Life itself is the universe’s way of solving problems. Life is not the problem.

Throughout most of life’s history, organisms existed without any sense of self-awareness. The word “I” only appeared with humans, and even then, it is mostly just a useful label. The trouble starts when religions treat this “I” as something permanent and real.

Three Ideas of a Permanent Self

Soul (Abrahamic religions)
Most people in the West are raised to believe they have a soul — a non-physical entity that survives death and faces judgment in heaven or hell. The soul is thought to be separate from the body and to last forever.

Thetan (Scientology)
Scientology teaches something similar: you are an eternal spiritual being called a thetan. The slight difference is that you don’t have a thetan — you are one. You are the being who lives inside and operates the body.

Atman (Eastern religions)
In Hindu thought, Atman is pure consciousness that takes on individuality by getting caught up in the physical world. It moves from body to body across lifetimes. Eventually, through awareness, it recognizes the entanglement and becomes free, returning to pure consciousness.

A common mistake here: people assume that because consciousness exists, it must be permanent. But consciousness is always changing. Permanence is an illusion projected onto it.

The Core Mistake

All three concepts above share a common assumption: that somewhere at the center of your experience, there is a fixed, permanent “I.”

That assumption is the mistake.

How to Undo It

Eastern traditions offer a direct method called Neti, neti — Sanskrit for “not this, not that.” You systematically ask of everything you identify with: Is this really me?

The process goes like this: pick anything — a physical object, a thought, an emotion, a belief — and ask yourself:

“Am I this _____?”
“What even is this _____?”
“Do I truly understand what this _____ is?”

You can only honestly say “I am not this” after you genuinely understand what it is. You peel away layer by layer — body, energy, thoughts, assumptions — until you reach the bare underlying assumption (the postulate) at the root of it, and ask again: Is this me?

What Postulate Mechanics Says

The observer and the observed are neither completely separate nor the same. There is a living relationship — a harmony — between them.

Recognizing that harmony is the realization.

Chapter 12 — The Truth about “I”

The Problem with a Permanent “I”

Many spiritual traditions — such as those using words like soul, thetan, or atman — assume there is a part of you that never changes and lives forever. They suggest that the “I” from a past life is the same “I” as you are now.

But this may not be true. A more likely explanation is that memories or emotional impressions from our ancestors get passed down through our DNA. When those old impressions surface in us, we mistakenly feel they belong to our own “I.”

Buddha’s teaching of Anatta (No-Soul) directly challenges the idea that any part of “I” is permanent.

What Is the Sense of “I”?

The sense of “I” is the feeling that you are the one thinking your thoughts, feeling your feelings, and being responsible for what happens to you. It seems to arise with the body and gives you a sense of being a separate individual.

This sense of “I” is real — it clearly exists. But it also causes a lot of harm: selfishness, craving, hatred, pride, conflict. All the troubles of the world — from personal arguments to wars — trace back to it. Yet there is no solid evidence that this sense of individuality survives after the body dies.

A newborn baby already has its own “I.” Some of this comes from inherited DNA, some from upbringing and culture. Patterns of dysfunction can pass from one generation to the next — but that does not prove a single, permanent “I” is being carried forward.

DNA and Inherited Patterns

A parent’s experiences can actually change how genes are expressed in their children, without changing the DNA itself. This affects things like stress responses, fear, anxiety, and emotional patterns — and can carry across several generations. Much of what we call “inherited trauma” comes through this biological pathway, as well as through culture and behavior.

Dianetics explores this territory, suggesting that traumatic impressions can even be formed in the womb. These impressions shape the sense of “I” — but they do not prove that the “I” is eternal. They are more like echoes that fade over generations.

Is a Permanent “I” Just a Postulate?

According to Buddha, the belief in an immortal soul is deeply rooted in psychology. When people feel fear, weakness, or uncertainty about death, the idea of a soul that lives forever is deeply comforting.

But when you rigorously examine your experience — asking “Is this really me? Is this really mine?” (the neti, neti process) — it becomes clear that the notion of an eternal soul, thetan, or Atman is simply a belief we hold. It is a postulate, not a discovered fact.

The Nirvana

Buddha taught that a person is made up of five components: the physical body, sensations, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness. There is nothing behind or beneath these five that you can point to and call “I” or “Self” — no permanent, unchanging substance.

Everything is conditioned, interconnected, and relative. The idea of a separate self is useful as a practical convention, but it has no ultimate reality.

Here is a helpful way to see it: when you are aware of something, there is a subject (awareness) and an object (what is being observed). The object exists in the dimension of substance — matter, energy, thought. But awareness itself is a different dimension entirely. Awareness is not a thing being observed; it is the looking itself.

The sense of “I” arises only when awareness identifies with something in the material dimension — when the looker thinks it is the thing being looked at.

Enlightenment is the moment you clearly see that identification happening. You realize you have been constructing or “postulating” the “I” all along — it was never a fixed, inherent reality.

This is the beginning of Nirvana.

As you continue to see through more and more of these false identifications — clearing up misconceptions about yourself and the universe — Nirvana deepens and expands.

The core insight: the “I” is not a permanent entity but a habit of awareness identifying with passing phenomena. When that habit is seen clearly, it loosens — and that loosening is liberation.

Chapter 13 — Infinity and Divinity

What This Chapter Is About

Divinity — whether we call it God, the universe, or ultimate reality — has always been described as infinite. This chapter explores what “infinity” really means when applied to substance, space, and existence itself.

Infinite Substance

Philosophers have long wrestled with what the universe is fundamentally made of.

Anaximander (600s BCE) said everything comes from a single, boundless primal substance and eventually returns to it.
Descartes said only God is truly self-sufficient — everything else depends on something else to exist.
Spinoza simply equated God, the universe, and the one infinite substance — God is Nature.
Leibniz said created things depend on God the way light depends on the sun — continuously produced by a kind of emanation.

Postulate Mechanics takes a practical view: substance as anything substantial enough to be sensed. We sense the universe as matter, energy, and thought. At the deepest level of thought, we arrive at postulates — foundational assumptions from which all reasoning and experienced reality flows. That level of postulates is what we call the divine.

In other words, when we speak of God or the divine, we are really speaking about the deepest layer of thought — the level of first principles.

Infinite Space

Space is where infinity hits us most directly — it just seems to go on forever with no wall or edge.

Archytas (300s BCE) argued: if the universe had a boundary, you could stick your hand past it — so there can be no boundary.
Aristotle shifted the idea of infinity away from substance and toward measurable things like space, time, and numbers.
Newton pictured space as flat, absolute, and infinite in all directions — the stage on which everything happens.

Postulate Mechanics sees space differently: space is not a separate container. It is simply the extent, or reach, of substance itself. As substance changes — from matter to energy to thought — so does the nature of the space it fills. No substance means no extent, and no space.

What about empty void? Even void, to be thought about, must be “filled” with at least the thought of void. The limits of void are the limits of thought. And at those outermost limits of thought — that is where we find divinity, gods, and the deepest Self.

Infinity Itself

Infinity simply means something without end — boundless, limitless, going on forever. It is represented by the symbol ∞, invented by mathematician John Wallis.

In Postulate Mechanics, infinity is a postulate — a foundational assumption we apply to the universe and its key dimensions:

Substantiality — substance, space, time
Awareness — divinity, God, Self
Oneness — nature, natural law, knowledge, wisdom

Infinity, divinity, and the universe are three ways of pointing at the same thing.

The core insight: what we call God or infinity is not something “out there” beyond the universe. It is the universe itself, understood at its deepest level — the level of foundational postulates from which everything else arises.

Chapter 14 — The Notion of God

Where the Idea Begins

The universe is vast and infinite, and humans have always found this overwhelming. Out of that sense of vastness, people developed the idea of God — something infinite and all-encompassing. Because the universe also seems to work as one interconnected whole, God was seen as having a quality of Oneness. That is the seed of every notion of God.

The Vedic Gods

The oldest Indian tradition did not begin with one God. It began with many gods — called devas— who were seen as different expressions of a single underlying reality. A famous ancient saying captures this: “The Truth is one; the wise call it by many names.”

So the Vedic idea of God is more like a poetic insight — one truth shining through many forms — rather than a fixed religious doctrine.

God in Buddhism

Buddhism inherited the idea of devas from the Vedas, but shifted the focus. The Buddha was more interested in solving human suffering than in debating theology.

His view was blunt: people invented God out of fear and weakness. We want protection, so we imagine a protector. We fear death, so we imagine an immortal soul. Buddhism rejects the idea of an all-powerful creator God because it conflicts with two of its core teachings — that everything arises through causes and conditions, and that there is no permanent self.

The Monotheistic God

The belief in one single God — and only one — did not appear all at once. It developed gradually in the ancient Middle East over roughly a thousand years.

Early on, people in the region worshipped one God as the most important while accepting that other gods existed. Over time, this became stricter: the other gods were denied entirely.

The clearest shift happened after the Babylonian exile, around the 6th–5th centuries BCE. When Jewish elites returned from exile, they shaped a religion centered on one God of the entire universe — not just a tribal deity. This strict monotheism is what Christianity and Islam later inherited.

What Postulate Mechanics Says

Postulate Mechanics is built on the idea of SUBSTANTIALITY-AWARENESS-ONENESS, drawn from the Vedic concept of Sat-chit-ananda. It tries to describe reality in a rigorous way, like a science of existence.

From this perspective, the monotheistic God is an oversimplification. The universe is wonderfully complex, and its apparent unity is a dynamic balance among countless interacting forces. Reducing all of that to a single personal God misses the real picture.

There may also be a social and political dimension to strict monotheism. A single God, tied to a single scripture and law, is a powerful tool for unifying large populations, creating shared identity, and drawing sharp lines between “true” and “false” belief.

Postulate Mechanics sees the “one true God” as an arbitrary concept that actually gets in the way of genuinely understanding the Oneness that runs through all of reality.

Chapter 15 —

[To be added]