Author Archives: vinaire

I am originally from India. I am settled in United States since 1969. I love mathematics, philosophy and clarity in thinking.

Thought as Substance

We find thought to be a substance when we look at it according to the following definition:

SUBSTANCE
Substance is that which is substantial enough to be sensed and perceived. We may divide the substance of this universe into three categories: (1) thought, (2) radiation, and (3) matter. Thought is extremely light and has least consistency. Radiation has a little more consistency. Matter has extremely high consistency. Consistency means “a degree of density, firmness, viscosity, etc.” We have increasing consistency from thought to radiation to matter. Matter and radiation are considered to be substances that are physical. Thought is considered to be a substance that is metaphysical, or spiritual.

When we look at thought as substance, we are looking at its significance, or meaning, for what it is. We then look at how this significance is being modulated by the mind, just like one looks at how one’s breath is being modulated by the body. It is like stepping back from being entangled and identified with the significance, and looking at all that significance from a distance. It is like examining the functioning of the mind itself.

Looking at the mind functioning is like looking at thought being processed. There are many dimensions to the mind. Reprocessing the existing data is one thing. Postulating new data is something very different. To do classical Yoga and Tantra we need to develop a sophisticated understanding of the mind. Yoga is what we do internally in the form of meditation. Tantra (technology of thought) is what we apply externally in the form of rituals. The external effort is to collect and arrange the relevant data. The internalization is to assimilate all that data.

Intellect is just one of the tools of the mind. We see it being used when two people are arguing. It is like a knife that helps you dissect things to know more about them. But we cannot know everything by just using the cutting intellect, because we are cutting everything to pieces and making it more and more complex. The other way to know something is to become one with it. Maybe I can know more about you by hugging you. There is no distance then. It seems that we need intellect to know more about the physical form; but it requires becoming one to know the spiritual form.

What is the significance of sound ‘Sh’ that makes the word “Shiva”?  There is a canvas on which existence is painted. Understanding that canvas is understanding ‘shiva.’ SHIVA MEANS THAT WHICH IS NOT. It is the Unknowable. The sound ‘sh’ represents the immensity of the empty canvas. We may assign it any meaning we want. Meaning exists only in the human mind. It has only psychological significance. It has substance. This is thought.

The efficiency of the functioning of a substantial system is just a question of perfection of its geometry, how well aligned all its parts are. Only what is geometrically perfect sustains itself. What is not geometrically perfect will fall apart. In other words, this oneness (continuity, consistency and harmony) of substance, both spiritual (thought), and physical (radiation and matter) is extremely important.

.

Vinaire’s Blog: What is it?

Here is my blog. Recently it was indexed on Google. This blog is about thought and its sensing organ, the mind. It talks about ONENESS of all thought, knowledge, wisdom, etc. It expresses the violation of that oneness as an ANOMALY.

This blog points to anomalies in the existing knowledge and proposes how to resolve them through the use of the mind. But then it finds that there are anomalies in the mind itself that prevent the mind from resolving anomalies. So, it focuses on resolving the anomalies of the mind.

Based on the principles outlined in Buddhism and Scientology, this blog proposes the method of Subject Clearing, which can become a powerful algorithm for AI.

A Short Guide to Subject Clearing

But the human intelligence can also use this simple but powerful method to resolve the anomalies of the human mind.

This blog has gone international because it talks about the principles of Buddhism and the modernization of those principles in the subject of Scientology. Both of the subjects of Buddhism and Scientology are popular internationally.

Here are the number of views on Vinaire’s Blog for the top five countries for the W/E 9/14/25 The total number of views was 1,572. The total number of visitors was 1,049. Views per visitor was 1.50.

You may also check out:

About This Blog
About Vinaire

.

MN 106 Anenjasappaya Sutta

Reference: Exploring the Words of the Buddha

This is a reformatted Sutta with comments (in color). Here is the original translation of this Sutta: The Way to the Imperturbable.

The Blessed One said:

(1) “Sensual pleasures are impermanent, hollow, false, deceptive; they are illusory, the prattle of fools.
(2) “Sensual pleasures here and now and sensual pleasures in lives to come, 
(3) “Sensual perceptions here and now and sensual perceptions in lives to come – 
(4) “Both alike are Mara’s realm, Mara’s domain, Mara’s bait, Mara’s hunting ground.
(5) “On account of them, these evil unwholesome mental states such as covetousness, ill will, and presumption arise, 
(6) “And they constitute an obstruction to a noble disciple in training here.”

.

(THE IMPERTURBABLE)

“A noble disciple considers thus:
… [Steps 1 – 6 above]
(7) ‘Suppose I were to abide with a mind abundant and exalted, 
(8) ‘Having transcended the world  and made a firm resolution with the mind.
(9) ‘When I do so, there will be no more evil unwholesome mental states such as covetousness, ill will, and presumption in me, 
(10) ‘And with the abandoning of them my mind will be unlimited, immeasurable, and well developed.
(11) When he practices in this way and frequently abides thus, his mind acquires confidence in this base.
(12) Once there is full confidence, he either attains to the imperturbable now or else he decides upon perfecting wisdom.
(13) On the dissolution of the body, after death, it is possible that his consciousness may pass on to the imperturbable.
(14) This, bhikkhus, is declared to be the first way directed to the imperturbable.”

(Alternate method)

“A noble disciple considers thus:
… [Steps 2 – 3]
(15) Whatever material form [there is], all material form is the four great elements,
(16) ‘And the material form derived from the four great elements.’
… [Steps 11 – 13]
(17) This, bhikkhus, is declared to be the second way directed to the imperturbable.”

(Alternate method)

“A noble disciple considers thus:
… [Steps 2 – 3]
(18) ‘Material forms here and now and material forms in lives to come, 
(19) ‘Perceptions of forms here and now and perceptions of forms in lives to come
(20) ‘Both alike are impermanent.
(21) ‘What is impermanent is not worth delighting in, not worth welcoming, not worth holding to.’
… [Steps 11 – 13]
(22) This, bhikkhus, is declared to be the third way directed to the imperturbable.”

.

(THE BASE OF NOTHINGNESS)

“A noble disciple considers thus:
… [Steps 2, 3, 18 and 19]
(23) ‘And perceptions of the imperturbable – all are perceptions.
(24) ‘Where these perceptions cease without remainder,
(25) ’That is the peaceful, that is the sublime, namely, the base of nothingness.’
(26) When he practices in this way and frequently abides thus, his mind acquires confidence in this base.
(27) Once there is full confidence, he either attains to the base of nothingness now or else he decides upon perfecting wisdom.
(28) On the dissolution of the body, after death, it is possible that his consciousness may pass on to the base of nothingness.
(29) This, bhikkhus, is declared to be the first way directed to the base of nothingness.”

(Alternate method)

“A noble disciple considers  thus: 
(30) ‘This is void of a self or of what belongs to a self.’
… [Steps 26 – 28]
(31) This, bhikkhus, is declared to be the second way directed to the base of nothingness.”

(Alternate method)

“A noble disciple considers  thus: 
(32) ‘I am not anything belonging to anyone anywhere,
(33) ‘Nor is there anything belonging to me in anyone anywhere.’
… [Steps 26 – 28]
(34) This, bhikkhus, is declared to be the third way directed to the base of nothingness.”

.

(THE BASE OF NEITHER-PERCEPTION-NOR-NON-PERCEPTION)

“A noble disciple considers thus:
… [Steps 2, 3, 18 and 19]
(35) ‘Perceptions of the imperturbable, and perceptions of the base of nothingness – all are perceptions. 
(36) ‘Where these perceptions cease without remainder, that is the peaceful, that is the sublime, 
(37) ‘Namely, the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.’ 
(38) When he practices in this way and frequently abides thus, his mind acquires confidence in this base.
(39) Once there is full confidence, he either attains to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception now or else he decides upon perfecting wisdom.
(40) On the dissolution of the body, after death, it is possible that his consciousness may pass on to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.
(41) This, bhikkhus, is declared to be the way directed to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.”

.

(NIBBANA)

The venerable Ananda said to the Blessed One: ”Venerable sir, 
(42) Here a bhikkhu is practicing thus: 
(43) ‘If it were not, it would not be mine; it will not be and it will not be mine. 
(44) ‘What exists, what has come to be, that I am abandoning.’
(45) Thus he obtains equanimity. 
(46) Venerable sir, does such a bhikkhu attain Nibbana?” 

The Blessed One said:
(47) “One bhikkhu here, Ananda, might attain Nibbana, 
(48) Another bhikkhu here might not attain Nibbana.” 

The venerable Ananda:
(49) “What is the cause and reason, venerable sir, 
(50) Why one bhikkhu here might attain Nibbana, 
(51) While another bhikkhu here might not attain Nibbana?” 

The Blessed One:
“Here, Ananda, 
… [Steps 42 – 45]
(52) He delights in that equanimity, welcomes it, and remains holding to it. 
(53) As he does so, his consciousness becomes dependent on it and clings to it. 
(54) A bhikkhu, Ananda, who is affected by clinging does not attain Nibbana.” 

The venerable Ananda:
(55) “But, venerable sir, when that bhikkhu clings, what does he cling to?” 

The Blessed One:
(56) “To the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, Ananda.” 

The venerable Ananda:
(57) “When that bhikkhu clings, venerable sir, it seems he clings to the best [object of] clinging.”

The Blessed One:
(58) When that bhikkhu clings, Ananda, he clings to the best [object of] clinging; 
(59) For this is the best [object of] clinging, namely, the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.
(60) Here, Ananda, a bhikkhu is practising thus:
… [Steps 42 – 45] 
(61) “He does not delight in that equanimity, welcome it, or remain holding to it. 
(62) Since he does not do so, his consciousness does not become dependent on it and does not cling to it. 
(63) A bhikkhu, Ananda, who is without clinging attains Nibbana.” 

The venerable Ananda:
(64) “It is wonderful, venerable sir, it is marvellous! 
(65) The Blessed One, indeed, has explained to us the crossing of the flood in dependence upon one support or another.
(66) But, venerable sir, what is noble liberation?”

The Blessed One:
(67) “Here, Ananda, a noble disciple considers thus: 
… [Steps 2, 3, 18, 19 and 35]
(68) And perceptions of the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception – 
(69) This is personality as far as personality extends.
(70) This is the Deathless, namely, the liberation of the mind through not clinging.
(71) Thus, Ananda, I have taught the way directed to the imperturbable, 
(72) I have taught the way directed to the base of nothingness, 
(73) I have taught the way directed to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, 
(74) I have taught the crossing of the flood in dependence upon one support or another, 
(75) I have taught noble liberation what should be done for his disciples out of compassion by a teacher
(76) Who seeks their welfare and has compassion for them, that I have done for you, Ananda. 
(77) There are these roots of trees, these empty huts. Meditate, Ananda, 
(78) Do not delay, or else you will regret it later. 
(79) This is our instruction to you.”

That is what the Blessed One said. The venerable Ananda was satisfied and delighted in the Blessed One’s words.

.

The Ideal Education

Reference: Education: TED Talks

The is a wonderful video in which two of my favorite gurus are talking about education. Their talk makes a clear distinction between intellect and intelligence. Intellect depends on information and accumulated memory; whereas, intelligence is inherent to the person as the ability to look and comprehend what is there.

.

The Ultimate Reality (old-2)

Reference: Postulate Mechanics

The Vedic formula to understand the ultimate reality is ‘neti, neti’ (not this, not that).  Once one has the correct understanding of the ultimate reality one can make an effort to reach it.

In 5th century BCE, Buddha applied this formula and realized that ’neti,neti’ negates anything knowable, or anything that one can be aware of. This makes the ultimate reality ‘unknowable.’ You cannot talk about it because you don’t know what it is. 

Buddha referred to this understanding of ultimate reality as śūnyatā (“emptiness”). Thus, in Buddhism, liberation (nirvana) is the realization of emptiness—not clinging to any essence, eternal self, or absolute ground.

Buddha’s doctrine spread all over the world, but, within India itself, it got absorbed in Hinduism. 

In 8th venture CE, Adi Shankara used ‘neti, neti’ to popularize ultimate reality as BRAHMAN, the single, eternal, unchanging, non-dual consciousness—described as pure existence, consciousness, and bliss (“sat-cit-ananda”). It was different from the concept of śūnyatā (“emptiness”) of Buddha because Brahman was an identity. Thus, in Hinduism, liberation (moksha)  became realizing one’s identity as Brahman, dispelling the illusion of separation and duality. 

So, in Hinduism, a sense of identity was retained upon moksha. But, in Buddhism, no sense of identity was retained upon nirvana, Even the very self was extinguished.

When we compare the notion of ultimate reality of Buddha to that of Adi Shankara, we find that Buddha’s processing of ‘neti, neti’ goes farther and deeper than that of Adi Shankara.

Adi Shankara’s concept of ultimate reality is knowable as an eternal, unchanging identity; whereas, Buddha’s concept of the ultimate reality is Unknowable as per ‘neti, neti’ (not this, not that). 

.