Vinaire's Blog

Comments

• Nic  On October 6, 2013 at 7:54 AM

  Permalink

  Hello Vin , this comm, may not be exact .
  Using idenics , I see that you have not determined if
  a Spirit exists or not . This is a limitation I think.
  In the Vedas and Upanishads is clearly and well said
  the ‘ existence of a Spirit . As you well know.
  In making some texts of Buddhism , I see
  and I invite you to look at , Your refusal and denial
  the Spirit . Having also studied Ron – Tech
  Inspect if you want an implant , which under , under the
  level of awareness and persuades suggests
  to reject and deny the Spirit . ” A fool takes
  things worthy , as unworthy , and things unworthy
  as worthy . Buddha ” . This is in my opinion
  Walpola Rahula . See Thy strong training
  in physics ( MEST ) influence you and many more. It ‘ a
  identity – value , I suggest if you let it .
  The values ​​are varied . As I said in
  other comm, the doctrine of the Buddha has been very
  altered, bringing one Spirit to only one result :
  Effect . What do you think of Spirit that can
  out of the body as and when they want ?
  And ‘ one of the aggregates you’ve posted ?
  Taking these aggregates , putting them together
  in a laboratotio … you do not get life .
  So how life began ? From an atom ?
  You posted : It ‘s all a circle ! And ‘ avoid
  direct answer, is not it? One Spirit is not
  can be compared to anything in this universe ,
  as it is not a product or part . It can be
  also be described in negative terms. so he
  the Buddha did , so did Ron . I expected
  the speech of non- self, the Buddha. does not justify
  tions of the text that I mentioned. Well done for the rest.

  LikeLike

  • vinaire  On October 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM

    Permalink

    Hello Nic. I do not deny spirit, just as I do not deny the center of mass. Both are useful concepts and they tie a lot of observations together. But it seems that the idea of spirit being a permanent and unvarying entity is just a hypothesis.

    I have studied Vedas and Upnishads. They talk about spirit, but I do not think that they look at spirit as a permanent entity.

    An implant is essentially something fixed. So, an implant can also be the fixed idea that spirit is a permanent entity. I like to keep my mind open and keep on looking. An implanted mind is a closed mind.

    I don’t believe in Buddha or Buddhism as being the final word. Buddha himself said to question everything. So, I question Buddha just like I question everything else. I observe and make conclusions but those conclusions can always change based on new observations.

    I do not deny the ‘out of body’ experience. Many people have had that experience. I have had that experience too. But that does not prove the existence of a permanent spirit. This is a phenomenon that can have other explanations too. So, I keep my mind open and continue to explore.

    In summary, I do not deny the spirit. I look at it as a useful concept. I do not subscribe to the idea of spirit being a permanent entity. I believe that there is more to be learned about the nature of the spirit.

    .

    LikeLike

• Nic  On October 6, 2013 at 1:06 PM

  Permalink

  Thanks Your reply has common sense and a healthy
  judgment. Very , very well, for your KHKT on
  degrees , objective and so on. If the former cos stop
  Ron ape . Include the material and make them
  rewrite , avoiding problems of copyright , we will
  a new ” bridge ” or” off ” . Shortly after use
  free , something hips . And ‘ the basic material.
  Well your search. From my research , I found
  interesting things , very much. Among other data .
  This data , used in session work , although
  the truth that emerges , is another , compared to that
  the liv ot. You know idenics , you can understand.
  There is of ‘ another , and over the hot potato, that the
  currently not accessible. this figure
  swept in a shot, the religions of the past
  millennia. In Ruds I had a fluctuating and a ta
  fn for almost a week . Search using the data.
  Therefore you are a living example, appreciate that.
  All auditing from one book to liv ot , is incomplete.
  The lev. ‘ ot ‘ , are not’is and alter is , is this : No bt.
  do not suspect and do not know .
  Even the old liv . ot are so .
  This is obvious from my point of view and research.
  I could provide references and would begin to
  understand , and how to apply the data .
  Why liv ot do not work? It ‘s impossible
  they work ! Except in the case of wanting to risk
  a counter flow … and we seriously ot
  sick. Others do not go effect immediately , or not
  nor speak . Even in the blog ‘s, one sees a
  imbalance in these ot ” ” .
  The Way Forward is Your .
  I used a test: If you can not say one thing in two
  three different ways, you’re stuck in it.
  An example of research .
  How to have mock ups ? Do not think about un______
  elephant , house, car , cat, ice cream, etc. etc. .
  What do you think ?
  Good continuation and research.

  LikeLike

  • vinaire  On October 6, 2013 at 4:52 PM

    Permalink

    These exercises may look similar to those in Scientology but they are actually applied very differently. Here one uses the technique of mindfulness. No e-meter is used. There is no idea of achieving EP and FNing on it.

    LikeLike