This paper presents Chapter 2
from the book DIANETICS: THE ORIGINAL THESIS by L.
RON HUBBARD. The contents are from the original
publication of this book by The Hubbard Dianetic Foundation, Inc. (1948).
The paragraphs of the original
material (in black) are accompanied by brief comments (in color) based on the present
understanding. Feedback on these comments is appreciated.
The heading below is linked to
the original materials.
.
Dianetics
is an heuristic science built upon axioms. Workability rather than Idealism has
been consulted. The only claim made for these axioms is that by their use
certain definite and predictable results can be obtained.
The
principal achievement of Dianetics lies in its organization. Almost any of its
parts can be found somewhere in history, even when they were independently
evolved by the writer. There are no principal sources, and where a practice or
a principle is borrowed from some past school the connection is usually
accidental and does not admit any further use or validity of that school.
Dianetics will work, and can only be worked, when regarded and used as a unity.
When diluted by broader applications of older practices, it will no longer
produce results. To avoid confusion and prevent semantic difficulties, new and
simplified terminology has been used and is used only as defined herein.
Dianetics
is actually a family of sciences. It is here addressed in the form of a science
of thought applicable to psychosomatic ills and individual aberrations.
Dianetics is a science of thought designed to resolve psychosomatic ills and individual aberrations. It has been organized from past and current observations made objectively.
The
field of thought may be divided into two areas which have been classified as
the “knowable” and the “unknowable”. We are here concerned only with the
“knowable”. In the “unknowable” we place that data which we do not need to know
in order to solve the problem of improving or resolving aberrations of the
human mind. By thus splitting the broad field of thought, we need not now
concern ourselves with such indefinites as spiritualism, deism, telepathy,
clairvoyance, or, for instance, the human soul.
Conceiving
this split as a line drawn through the area, we can assign a dynamic principle
of existence to all that data remaining in the “knowable” field.
After
exhaustive research one word was selected as embracing the finite universe as a
dynamic principle of existence. This word can be used as a guide or a measuring
stick and by it can be evaluated much information. It is therefore our first
and our controlling axiom.
The
first axiom is.
SURVIVE!
We observe radiation condensing into matter; matter acquiring animation; animation developing into reaction; and reaction developing into rational thought. The dynamic principle of existence on an immediate basis is to SURVIVE, but on a longer basis it is to EVOLVE.
The first axiom is.
EVOLVE! SURVIVE BETTER.
This
can be seen to be the lowest common denominator of the finite universe. It
embraces all forms of energy. It further delineates the purpose of that energy
so far as it is now viewable by us in the “knowable” field. The activity of the
finite universe can easily be seen to obey this axiom as though it were a
command. All works and energies can be considered to be motivated by it. The
various kingdoms have this as their lowest common denominator, for animals,
vegetables and minerals are all striving for survival. We do not know to what
end we are surviving, and in our field of the “knowable” and in our choice of
only the workable axioms, we do not know and have no immediate reason to ask
why.
All
forms of energy are then surviving to some unknown end, for some unknown
purpose. We need only to know that they are surviving and that, as units or
species, they must survive.
The basic substance is energy that gradually develops an organized structure. As this structure evolves we get minerals, vegetables, animals and humans. The organism evolves through trial and error with different activities to survive better.
By
derivation from the first workable axiom, we come into possession of the
second. In obedience to the command “survive”, life took on the form of a cell
which, joining with other cells, formed a colony. The cell, by procreating,
expanded the colony. The colony, by procreation, formed other colonies.
Colonies of different types united and necessity, mutation and natural
selection brought about specializing, which increased the complexity of the
colonies until they became an aggregation. The problems of the colonial
aggregation were those of food, protection and procreation. In various ways a
colonial aggregation of cells became a standardized unity and any advanced
colonial aggregation came into possession by necessity, mutation and natural
selection of a central control system.
The
purpose of the colonial aggregation was to survive. To do this it had to have
food, means of defense, protection and means of procreation. The control
center, which had developed, had as its primary command, Survive! Its prime
purpose was the food, defense, protection and means of procreation.
Thus
can be stated the second workable axiom:
THE PURPOSE OF THE MIND IS TO SOLVE
PROBLEMS RELATING TO SURVIVAL.
The mind perceives the problems in the environment and solves them using trial and error towards the goal of surviving better, or evolving. The mind too evolves along with rest of the organism.
The second axiom is.
THE PURPOSE OF THE MIND IS TO SOLVE PROBLEMS RELATING TO THE ORGANISM’S EVOLUTION.
The
ultimate success of the organism, its species or life would be, at its
unimaginable extreme, immortality. The final failure in obedience to the law survive
would be death. Between eternal survival and death lie innumerable gradations.
In the middle ground of such a scale would be mere existence without hope of
much success and without fear of failure. Below this point would lie, step by
step, innumerable small errors, accidents, losses, each one of which would tend
to abbreviate the chances of reaching the ultimate goal. Above this point would
lie the small successes, appreciations, and triumphs which would tend to secure
the desirable goal.
Immortality as a measure of ultimate success is inconsistent. Life and death occur normally in the course of evolution. A measure of ultimate success shall be successful evolution.
As
an axiom, the mind can then be said to act in obedience to a central basic
command, survive, and to direct or manage the organism in its efforts to
accomplish the ultimate goal for the individual or species or life, and to
avoid for the individual or species or life any part of the final failure,
which leads to the stated axiom:
THE MIND DIRECTS THE ORGANISM, THE
SPECIES, ITS SYMBIOTES OR LIFE IN THE EFFORT OF SURVIVAL.
The mind directs the activity of the organism to implement solutions for better survival. With the evolution of rational thought, these solutions have accelerated.
The next axiom shall be.
THE MIND DIRECTS THE ORGANISM, THE SPECIES, ITS SYMBIOTES OR LIFE TO IMPLEMENT SOLUTIONS FOR BETTER SURVIVAL.
A
study of the field of evolution will indicate that survival has been, will be,
and is the sole test of an organism, whether the organism is treated in the
form of daily activity or the life of the species. No action of the organism
will be found to lie without the field of survival, for the organism is acting
within its environment upon information received or recorded, and error or
failure does not alter the fact that its basic impulse was motivated by
survival.
Another
axiom may then be formulated as follows:
THE MIND AS THE CENTRAL DIRECTION SYSTEM
OF THE BODY, POSES, PERCEIVES AND RESOLVES PROBLEMS OF SURVIVAL AND DIRECTS OR
FAILS TO DIRECT THEIR EXECUTION
The mind is not always successful because it operates on trial and error. It is natural for the physical organism to go through the cycle of life and death for the specie to continue to evolve.
As
there are many organisms in the same species, all attempting to accomplish the
same end, and as there are many species, and as matter itself is attempting in
one unit form or another to survive, there is necessarily conflict and contest
amongst the individuals of the species, species, or units of matter. Species
cannot survive without being interested primarily in the species. Natural
selection and other causes have established this as a primary rule for
survival: That the unit remains alive as
long as possible as a unit and, by association and procreation, that the
species remain alive as a species. Second grade interest is paid by the
unit or the species to its symbiotes Third grade interest is paid to inanimate
matter. As this is apparently the most workable solution, natural selection
best preserves those species which follow this working rule. And the symbiotes
of the successful species therefore have enhanced opportunity for survival.
Conflicts and contests are part of the equation. But an organism evolves better as it cooperates with other members of its species and the environment.
Man
is the most successful organism currently in existence, at least on this
planet. Man is currently winning in the perpetual cosmic election which
possibly may select the thinker of the new THOUGHT.
Man
is heir to the experience and construction of his own ancestors. As cellular
conservatism is one of the factors of survival, his brain is basically the same
brain which directed and resolved the problems of his animal forebears. By
evolution and natural selection, this brain therefore has the primary priority
in emergencies. Superimposed on this animal brain has been developed an
enormously complex analyzer, which probably exists in his frontal lobe.
The evolution has successfully produced man, which is a very complex but efficient organism.
The command, survive, is variable in individuals and species to the extent that it may be strong or weak. Superior strength of the command in the individual or species is normally, but variably, a survival factor. The primary facet of personality is the basic strength of the DYNAMIC drive.
The
DYNAMIC is variable from individual to individual and race to race. It is
varied by physiology, environment, and experience. Its manifestation in the
animal brain affects the tenacity of the individual to life or purpose, and it
affects the activity of the analyzer. The first characteristic of the
individual which should be considered is the basic strength of his DYNAMIC. By
this an axiom can be formulated:
THE PERSISTENCY OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN
LIFE IS DIRECTLY GOVERNED BY THE STRENGTH OF HIS BASIC DYNAMIC.
The
analytical, human or, as it has elsewhere been called erroneously, the
conscious mind, is variable from individual to individual and race to race in
its ability to perceive and resolve problems. Another axiom can then be
formulated:
INTELLIGENCE IS THE ABILITY OF AN
INDIVIDUAL, GROUP, OR RACE TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS RELATING TO SURVIVAL.
People differ
from each other in their inherent persistence and the ability to analyze.
It
should be noted that there is a distinct difference between the DYNAMIC and the
intelligence. High intelligence may not denote high DYNAMIC. High DYNAMIC may
not denote high intelligence. Intelligence is mental sensitivity and analytical
ability. DYNAMIC is the persistency of the individual in obedience to the
command, survive!
It
has been noted that there is a gradation in the scale of survival. Gains toward
the ultimate goal are pleasurable. Failures toward the final defeat are
sorrowful or painful. Pleasure is therefore the perception of well-being, or an
advance toward the ultimate goal. Pain, therefore, is the perception of a
reduction toward the final defeat. Both are necessary survival factors.
For
the purpose of Dianetics, good and evil must be defined. Those things which may
be classified as good by an individual are only those things which aid himself,
his family, his group, his race, mankind or life in its dynamic obedience to
the command, modified by the observations of the individual, his family, his
group, his race, or life.
As evil may be classified those things
which tend to limit the dynamic thrust of the individual, his family, his
group, his race, or life in general in the dynamic drive, also limited by the
observation, the observer and his ability to observe.
Good may be defined as
constructive. Evil may be defined as destructive—definitions modified by
viewpoint. The individual man is an organism attempting to survive in affinity
or contest with other men, races, and the three kingdoms. His goal is survival
for himself, his progeny, his group, his race, his symbiotes, life and the
universe in general in contest with any efforts or entities which threaten or
impede his efforts to attain the goal.
His
happiness depends upon making, consolidating, or contemplating gains toward his
goal.
There is pleasure and pain that comes from success or failure respectively. There is good and evil defined by situations that aid or hinder evolution. Happiness comes from evolving toward better states of existence.
It is a purpose of Dianetics to pass man across the abyss of irrational, solely reactive thought and enter him upon a new stage of constructive progression to the ultimate goal.
.
Final Comments
KEY WORDS: Survive (evolve), Mind, Immortality, Dynamic, Intelligence
A living entity is trying to SURVIVE, but the purpose of the universe is to EVOLVE through the living entities to better universal conditions.
We may call the structure of thoughts in a living entity to be its mind. The mind evolves by solving problems relating to survival through trial and error, and directs the organism according to its solutions. The mind is not always successful because it operates on trial and error.
Problems arise as every living entity is trying to survive. In doing so they may step on each other. But the solution lies in ultimate cooperation. This solution has evolved into a complex human body in which all organs function in cooperation with each other. The thought structures of all the organs in the body are also aligned with each other. Thus, an overall complex mind has evolved.
The characteristics of the overall mind may be summed up by its tenacity (DYNAMIC) and its ability to solve problems (INTELLIGENCE). Thoughts, such as, good and evil may be understood in terms of the usefulness of their solution. Happiness comes from evolving toward better states of existence.
.