Reference: Postulate Mechanics
The increase in consistency from thought to energy to matter, can be seen as condensation of the substance, and a decrease in its fluidity or intrinsic motion. This phenomenon may be represented by a Vortex Model.
.
Definition of VORTEX MODEL
Thought, energy and matter may be visualized as forming the outer, middle and central part, respectively, of a giant rotating vortex. From this Vortex Model we may conclude that matter at the center would have a speed of near zero. The path of electromagnetic energy would have a very large radius, resulting in a linear speed that of light. The path of thought would have a still larger radius and its linear speed shall be still greater in proportion.
As one moves toward the center of this rotating Vortex, one is approaching the concept of a point particle of infinitesimal dimensions and infinite consistency. This particle shall have rotational motion only. This is approximated by a proton in a hydrogen atom.
Only when one moves away from the center of this rotating Vortex, that a location undergoes a displacement and has a linear velocity. The path of such a location has the curvature of a circle. A particle filling this location shall have less than infinite mass. This is approximated by an electron in a hydrogen atom.
When the distance from the center of this rotating Vortex is extremely large, the curvature of the path becomes so small that it appears to be a straight line. The substance filling this location shall have no mass, extremely low consistency, and extremely large linear velocity. This is approximated by light.
A similar extrapolation may be made for thought, which will have still lower consistency and higher liner velocity.
.
Notes
The most striking observation about intrinsic motion is its inverse relationship with the consistency of substance. This relationship is observable only when we look at the spectrum of substance from thought to energy to matter. It is not observable when we simply focus on matter. This is because visible motion of matter corresponds to a negligible change in mass. This change in mass with motion is so small that it is ignored in the Newtonian mechanics. Only when the difference in their masses is not too large that the representation of objects as point particles correctly predicts relative motion in Newtonian mechanics.
For this reason, the representation of both proton and electron as point particles in a Hydrogen atom does become a problem, because the difference between their masses is relatively very large. The Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle was conceived to resolve this problem.
Similarly, the representation of both Mercury and Sun as point particles also became a problem, because the difference between their masses is relatively very large. Thus, Newtonian mechanics produces incorrect results. Einstein’s theory of general relativity was conceived to resolve this problem.
According to this Vortex model, the intrinsic motion of substance increases as its consistency decreases from matter to energy to thought. To get accurate answers for relative motions the inverse relationship between consistency (mass) and motion must be taken into account. A hypothesis may be advanced that the product of the consistency and motion is a universal constant.
.
Key Misconception
A key misconception in Physics is that motion and consistency (mass) of substance are not related to each other, and that there is no absolute scale to measure motion.
.
More Misconceptions
You may discover more misconceptions on your own, if you contemplate on each sentence of the above definition with mindfulness. Please see:
Or, you may end up improving upon this definition.
Good luck!
.
