PROCESS: The Intention to Harm

Mental Hindrances

 

August 18, 2014
This issue is now obsolete. For latest references please see: KHTK Mindfulness. The specific reference that updates this issue is The Intention to Harm.

.

[Reference: What is KHTK?]

The intention to harm is morally so unacceptable that when not fully confronted it gets buried deep in the psyche. It then causes anxiety and unhappiness.

Some of the forms of this intention are as follows:

(1)    SELFISHNESS.  One thinks of the satisfaction of one’s own desires without caring of the effects it creates on others in its wake.

(2)    EXPLOITATION. Any action that exploits others for personal gains has the intention to harm underlying it.

(3)    SEXUAL DESIRES. This is a special instance of the above when it leads to actions that cause suffering to the object of one’s affection.

.

Prerequisites

The prerequisites for running this process are:

EXERCISE: Technique of Mindfulness

EXERCISE: Being There

EXERCISE: Contemplation

TRAINING: Word Clearing

TRAINING: Subject Clearing

These exercises and training may be repeated anytime to polish up the ability to spot and resolve inconsistencies.

.

Process

  1. Word Clear INTENTION.

  2. Word clear HARM.

  3. Read the introduction above to this process. Make some examples of INTENTION TO HARM for each category.

  4. Silently contemplate over each instance of “intention to harm” as you may have encountered in real life. Let the mind unstack itself naturally during such contemplation.

  5. Do the above to a point when some persistent thought, emotion or impulse has just left, though this may not always be possible.

  6. Repeat this procedure until you can BE THERE comfortably with a deep understanding of “intention to harm” on a first-hand experiential basis.

NOTE: If other words and concepts come up during this process, continue applying word and subject clearing to them.

.

[For further details, please see: KHTK Index]

.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Comments

  • MarkNR  On November 21, 2013 at 8:31 AM

    Useful thread

    • vinaire  On November 21, 2013 at 4:51 PM

      This thread resulted from a close look at the L-11 Rundown of Scientology on the following thread,

      Questioning Scientology

      There are two more L-Rundown. Mark needs to tell me, which one to take up next.

      .

      • MarkNR  On November 21, 2013 at 11:56 PM

        Vin:
        I have not done any of the L rundowns. I have been spending most of my time on early considerations and stuck opinions. My article ‘The desire and effort to control others’ is PART of the equation underlying harmful intentions. Games which separated one from basic theta underlie that computation. Implants are much later on the track. There had to be basic agreements which aligned with the implants. Want to release the affects of the enforced considerations? Find the subtle ‘opinions’ which align with their instructions or their inventors and the time one got the idea that giving them would be a good idea. (Control, Desire to win, not to lose, whatever it was for one. One may have to pass through later incidents to be ‘reminded’ of earlier considerations. Finding hidden data is one key.
        There are many more approaches to different areas of undesirable and unknown portions of ones beingness. I have explored only a few.
        Part of my journey so far.
        Mark

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 12:11 AM

          Mark, I like your attitude and the way you describe your path. Very best wishes to you as you continue.

        • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 5:49 AM

          Mark, my earliest training in Sea Org (Flag) was that of a word clearer. I used to get wonderful results in word clearing – almost like results from auditing. It seems like I got people to contemnplate over the meaning of words, by asking them to give examples from their own lives. I used to get them really involved in the word clearing. I myself used to get a lot of gain out of word clearing others.

          It was very much like in the process above where one is looking up the definitions of the words HARM, INTENTION, and the phrase INTENTION TO HARM. The same thing I am doing with the long list of words to be “assessed” on L10.

          It is looking at what comes up from one’s case as one reads the definition of a word, and then looking at it more closely until it dissolves into understanding. It is a very subtle but powerful process when mindfulness is used.

          Looking at what you are trying to resolve, I would contemplate on the definitions of the words: CONTROL, DESIRE, EFFORT, GAMES, THETA, CONSIDERATIONS, COMPUTATION, AGREEMENTS, IMPLANTS, TRACK, LOSS, WIN, DATA, etc. I shall follow the procedure as described in

          LOOKING AT KNOWLEDGE

          I would look at both Scientology and regular definitions. I hope that you have a lot of fun out of this process. Make sure that if nothing comes up in the mind, then there is nothing to look closely at. DON’T VIOLATE MINDFULNESS BY UNNECESSARILY DIGGING INTO THE MIND. The fruit is not ripe to be picked yet.

          .

        • MarkNR  On November 22, 2013 at 9:18 PM

          The other night I was delving into some very old recollections. One of the very first interactions I had with other individuals was playing a game called catch. No puzzle or word trick. Just throw a ball (object) and catch it. At first, we played as partners, allies, throwing the ball gently in a catch-able manner. Then we threw it in more creative ways to increase our skills at handling objects in space. Over a very long span of time things got faster and more difficult. We were all locked into a common time stream by then. If you didn’t play along in the same time frame, you were sort of left to yourself. Fine when one wanted to do something by oneself, but interacting with others was much more interesting. We were still working together improving skill and cleverness. At first the only aspect of space was distance, separation. Later, spacial orientation was invented so that a new aspect of the game was added. One could then move left, right, up and down. Higher numbers of dimensions were sometimes used, but 3 dimensions was the simplest space that had substance, solidity. Complex methods of throwing and catching were thought up and it was quite fun.
          Then things changed. Someone came up with the idea of being better than his friends. They started sending the object in a manner that was difficult or undesirable to catch. It was thrown with too much energy in an effort to overwhelm. It would be made so bright that the light would fill the entire space and one couldn’t tell where the object was. It would be so fragile that catching it would destroy it. IT WAS DURING THIS ERA THAT THE IDEA OF AN OPPONENT WAS INVENTED. THIS IS IMPORTANT. The intention of making another miss, or fail, was created. To be greater or better than someone else. To make others less. Sometimes additional individuals would watch. Showing that one was better and others were less became a goal.
          A large number of considerations were born in this era. Many complex thoughts and opinions began as this simple game became very complex. This was the beginning of the laying out of the rules of the playing space. It was also the start of the idea of cheating.
          Many of ones ’emotions’ and thoughts about self and others have their origin in this very early game. Early on, there was a togetherness and beauty to the interaction. Later it became individuality and winning and losing. It went from joining with another and doing and sharing experience to more and more individuality and accomplishment for self. As in one of my earlier papers, a lower form of affinity was established. It went from re-joining with another and feeling the bliss of origin, to separating from theta for the pleasure of individuality.
          Many many other areas of case and aberration which are supposed to be handled by understanding later events have as their origin, this game period. But the potential for these undesirable considerations to surface, unseen, are still present until these origins are viewed. “Why did he turn that rock into lightning just as I was catching it, I don’t understand?”
          A tremendous surge of affinity for others and life is returning as I view and begin to understand these incidents. I find myself knowing what others are thinking more and more often. I easily have empathy for those I meet.
          There is much more to see and sort out.
          Just thought I’d let some of you know some things I’ve seen. If any of you have had some glimpses of this time, tell me your thoughts. It is not just seeing, but understanding invented principals. Additional data increases knowingness.
          Thanks, again for your patience.
          Mark.

        • vinaire  On November 23, 2013 at 8:09 AM

          Mark, it may not be a bad idea to list the key concepts in the area you are looking at, and then rearrange those key words per Looking at Knowledge to see what gaps and inconsistencies we can find.

          .

        • MarkNR  On November 22, 2013 at 9:39 PM

          Vin:
          Your article “Looking at Knowledge” is very valuable and should be disseminated broadly. It, alone, could double (arbitrary number) the effectiveness of modern education. Word clearing is one technique that cuts through all case and reaches the heart of ones dilemma. Confusions, inconsistencies go right to the core of one’s being. Very important.
          Cognition: “The resolution of a confusion”
          Mark

        • vinaire  On November 23, 2013 at 8:06 AM

          Thank you. I have now added a SUMMARY section at the end of that essay:

          LOOKING AT KNOWLEDGE

          .

  • vinaire  On November 21, 2013 at 5:29 PM

    Here is from L-10 material:

    L10 is designed to handle the things a thetan uses to restrain himself. The person regains his ability and power to do those things he intends to do and as a result he feels more at cause than ever before. L10 is an action that really releases a person’s power on the third and fourth dynamic. It takes off the stops that hold a person back on these dynamics. L10 will boost the individual’s confront and responsibility level and consequently raise his doingness level.

    .
    The End Phenomenon of L-10 is,

    Freedom from self-restraint. His reach (havingness) is increased.

    .

    In my opinion self-restraint is important. It is part of discipline. Letting go of any and all self-restraint can be reckless and dangerous.

    .

    • MarkNR  On November 22, 2013 at 9:53 PM

      Self restraint because of knowledge, in present time, is rational and valuable. Self restraint because of forgotten intentions, done reactively, will always produce wrong solutions and eventual harm. In the truly free and able, self restraint is replaced with wisdom and love.
      The times you reacted due to lack of knowledge and caused harm, must not be allowed to prevent you from acting in present time when action is called for and needed.
      The clearing up of old forgotten stuck identities gives one the ability to assume any identity knowingly and easily as one wishes.
      Mark

  • vinaire  On November 21, 2013 at 7:59 PM

    L10 addresses the situation of a person restraining himself because he is afraid to reach out.

    L10 approach is to help the person shed the fixed identities that he is assuming unwittingly. Many different ways are used to accomplish this.

    One starts out by looking at areas he is having difficulty with. The goal is to to find out the fixed identities being assumed and to audit out those identities. One way to go about it is “to locate the identity, which would have that kind of difficulty.” Or just take an identity associated or connected with that area.

    Once the identity is found one pulls the O/Ws on that identity to unburden it so that its basic purpose could be determined. If this doesn’t handle then one finds the opposing identity and its purpose. If that doesn’t handle then one finds its opposing identity and purpose, and so on.

    It is assumed that ignorance of the basic purpose, or intention, sticks the preclear to an identity. I question this assumption.

    .

    NOTE: If the correct identity is not found then the rest of the process will just muddle along. I find the approach in Idenics to be a lot more precise and faster.

    .

  • vinaire  On November 21, 2013 at 9:11 PM

    L10 PRIOR ASSESSMENT is one of the ways to uncover charge identities and diffuse them. One locates core of justifications and evil purposes associated with an item to diffuse it.

    Here are the items assessed on the first dynamic:

    Thetan, individuality, identity, mental machinery, a mind, a skill, tool, clothing, career, identification human body parts, brain, body, cells, car, house, food, meals, vehicle, decorations, certificates, diplomas, body organs, viewpoints, a habit, appetite, ego, urge to survive as individual, auditing, hobby, medicine, self-improvement, study, book, ornament, grooming, personal hygiene, self-expression, health, product, GE, job, paycheck.

    I shall be using KHTK approach as follows:

    (a) Look up the definitions for each item.
    (b) See what instances for that item come up in the mind from my personal experience. If nothing comes up then that is fine.
    (c) Let the mind unstack itself naturally on each item till I can be with that item comfortably.

    I shall be recording my thoughts.
    .

  • vinaire  On November 21, 2013 at 9:52 PM

    I am looking at the definitions of the word THETAN. I am also looking at what my mind is bringing up in response. I am being mindful about it…

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:00 AM

    I have TECHNICAL DICTIONARY available on my blog here:

    TECHNICAL DICTIONARY

    The regular English dictionary is available in the Internet,

    REGULAR DICTIONARY

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:08 AM

    the·ta
    1. the eighth letter of the greek alphabet (Θ, θ).
    2. the consonant sound represented by this letter.
    Origin: 1595–1605; < Greek thêta < Semitic See teth

    .

    THETA,
    1. theta is thought, life force, elan vital, the spirit, the soul, or any other of the numerous definitions it has had for some thousands of years. (SOS, p. 4)
    2 . the life force, life energy, divine energy, elan vital, or by any other name, the energy peculiar to life which acts upon material in the physical universe and animates it, mobilizes it and changes it. It is susceptible to alteration in character or vibration, at which time it becomes enturbulated theta or entheta. (SOS, Bk. 2, p. 21)
    3. theta is thought; an energy of its own universe analogous to energy in the physical universe but only occasionally paralleling electromagnetic-gravitic laws. The three primary components of theta are affinity, reality, and communication. (SOS, Bk. 2, p. 3)
    4 . reason, serenity, stability, happiness, cheerful emotion, persistence, and the other factors which man ordinarily considers desirable. (SOS, Bk. 2, p. 12)
    5 . an energy existing separate and distinct from the physical universe. (SOS, p. 4)
    6 . Greek for thought or life or the spirit. (Aud 10 UK)
    7 . not a nothingness. It just happens to be an exterior thing to this universe—so you couldn’t talk about it in this universe’s terms. (PDC 6)

    .

    THETAN,
    1. the living unit we call, in Scn, a thetan, that being taken from the Greek letter theta, the mathematic symbol used in Scn to indicate the source of life and life itself. (Abil Ma 1)
    2 . the awareness of awareness unit which has all potentialities but no mass, no wave-length and no location. (HCOB 3 Jul 59)
    3 . the being who is the individual and who handles and lives in the body. (HCOB 23 Apr 69)
    4 . (spirit) is described in Scn as having no mass, no wave-length, no energy and no time or location in space except by consideration or postulate. The spirit is not a thing. It is the creator of things. (FOT, p. 55)
    5 . the personality and beingness which actually is the individual and is aware of being aware and is ordinarily and normally the “person” and who the individual thinks he is. The thetan is immortal and is possessed of capabilities well in excess of those hitherto predicted for man. (Scn 8-8008, p. 9)
    6 . the name given to the life source. It is the individual, the being, the personality, the knowingness of the human being. (Scn 8-80, p. 46)
    7 . energyspace production unit. (COHA, p. 247)
    8 . in the final analysis what is this thing called thetan? It is simply you before you mocked yourself up and that is the handiest definition I know of. (5608C——)
    9 . the person himself—not his body or his name, the physical universe, his mind, or anything else; that which is aware of being aware; the identity which is the individual. The thetan is most familiar to one and all as you. (Aud 25 UK)
    10 . a static that can consider, and can produce space and energy and objects . (PXL, p . 121 )

    .

    I shall look up any word in the definition that I am uncertain about, such as, STATIC. I shall contemplate on that definition as it relates to my personal experience. The first thing to notice is if something comes up in my mind. If nothing comes up then I move on to the next definition. It is picking the fruits that are ripe and ready.

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:21 AM

    What is meant by THETA is nothing new. The consideration has been there for thousands of years. In the past I have looked up words like “elan vital” from Wikipedia to get the history. I have contemplated on words like “thought”, “life force”, “spirit”, “soul” etc. I have familiarized myself with the history of these words. I do it until I can be there totally comfortably with that one defintion. If any question arise I go to the proper reference.

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:30 AM

    To me THETA seems to be like that which manifests as “wave motion” in Physics or Quantum Mechanics. It acquires particle properties as it acquires inertia (resistance).

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:37 AM

    An animated manifestation has two aspects: (1) animation (2) that which is animated. These two aspects cannot be separated from each other.

    Here I see the first inconsistency in Scientology where Hubbard tries to separate the two aspects from each other. He says that what is being animated (MEST) comes from animation (THETA). I find the THETA-MEST theory to be flawed as I have outlined here

    An Analysis of Scientology Axiom # 1

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM

    Enturbulated Theta is the INCONSITENCY, such as that, which exists in THETA-MEST theory.

    THETA and MEST are two aspects of the same existence. They cannot be separated from each other.

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:49 AM

    THETA is thought energy, a harmonic of which is the physical enegy of wave motion. These harmonics exist in the dimension of abstraction as described in

    The Fundamental Dimension

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:53 AM

    The more consistent an understanding is, and the action originating from that understanding is, the more theta there is.

    .

    • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 8:11 AM

      Vin: The more consistent an understanding is, and the action originating form that understanding is, the more theta there is.

      Chris: This is a second use of the word theta. In this definition, you’re using it to describe a state of harmony. And your earlier disagreement with the word enturbulated-theta as it is used to mean disharmonic state of theta. In this definition you are presenting a second definition for theta, do you mean to do that?

      • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 8:38 AM

        This is a redefinition of THETA, when one takes false data out of it.

        Compare theta to pure wave motion. When resistance (inertia) enters the wave motion it makes it appear more discrete and particle like. Similarly, when inconsistency entering theta, it makes it appear more discrete and individualistic.

        THETA = WAVE
        INDIVIDUAL = PARTICLE
        INCONSISTENCY = INERTIA (RESISTANCE)

        Thetan (individuality) appears as inconsistency enters Theta. That is an interesting look.

        .

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM

          Yes, that’s consistent. Thought and language is like that as is our conversation here.

        • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 12:57 PM

          Thetan is the wave-collapse of Theta!

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 4:35 PM

          In this model, YES.

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 6:56 AM

    The following assumption of Hubbard is inconsistent:

    “an energy existing separate and distinct from the physical universe.”

    The fact is that the two energies are harmonics of each other in the dimension of Abstraction.

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 7:00 AM

    The physical universe is simply an aspect of a much larger THETA-MEST universe.

    THETA and MEST are two aspects of this universe. It is incorrect to think that MEST comes from THETA. Hubbard borrowed that assumption from Christianity’s assumption that God created the physical universe.

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 7:04 AM

    Hubbard’s inconsistency shows up again in the following statement from him.

    “[Theta is] not a nothingness. It just happens to be an exterior thing to this universe—so you couldn’t talk about it in this universe’s terms.”

    One can talk about THETA as an earlier harmonic of MEST in the dimension of Abstraction. The complete model of the universe would be as follows.

    KHTK Model of The Universe

    .

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 8:11 AM

    Thus, THETA is more like the concept underlying THETAN (self). Hubbard didn’t like the idea of ONENESS, and so he separated THETA from MEST in his THETA-MEST theory. But that is just Hubbard’s preference. It is not the reality.

    The reality is that THETA and MEST are part of a single spectrum. They are aspects of the same existence. They are relative to each other. They are harmonics of each other. There is no clear boundary separating them. They cannot be separated from each other just like a wave cannot be separated from the medium it travels in.

    The earlier similar to Hubbard’s “preference” is the idea that God created this universe. This separates spirituality from the physical universe. But this is only an idea. It is not that way in reality. In reality, spirtuality and physicality are two aspects of the same existence. These two aspects do not exists separate from each other.

    So, Hubbard has simply carried forward the FALSE DATA that has existed for thousands of years in Christian Theology. What is the earlier similar to that, I shall leave it to contemplation.

    The contemplation should be on the relationship between spirtuality and physicality in the real world. There is no clearcut separation between the two just as there is no clearcut separation between wave and particle properties.

    .

    • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 8:31 AM

      Vin: The reality is that THETA and MEST are part of a single spectrum.

      Chris: This is a good and more consistent model, so now let us locate more assumptions still contained in it. For instance, the word theta was coined in order to create this divisiveness we feel when using it. Yes, we can call theta a band in the spectrum of MEST but is that really correct? It is my opinion that theta comes to us burdened with inconsistent baggage and should simply be dropped as archaic. The English language (the one with which I am familiar) contains enough mental words for now.

      • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 8:52 AM

        I am simply trying to take false data out of Theta-Mest theory.

        From An Analysis of Scientology Axiom # 1
        .

        “… the same fundamental characteristic must apply to all points of a spectrum. THETA (individuality) is as much a consideration as MEST (matter, energy, space and time) is. Both THETA and MEST are manifestations of considerations.

        However, THETA-MEST THEORY also states:

        “It is now considered that the origin of MEST lies with theta itself, and that MEST, as we know the physical universe, is a product of theta.”

        This statement is inconsistent because it assumes that one end of a spectrum produces the other end.

        MEST is not produced by THETA as assumed in Scientology. Both THETA and MEST are aspects of existence.

        .

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 9:02 AM

          Vin: I am simply trying to take false data out of Theta-Mest theory.

          Chris: And when I have a counterpoint, I am trying to do the same. You are outflowing so much material that I can barely keep up with reading the daily notes. I wish I could contribute more but think of me as a filter. That seems to be the most I can contribute and flawed and inconsistent at that.

        • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 1:05 PM

          You are helping me a lot. Here I am simply applying the KHTK Process of contemplation to THETAN. I am simply writing down what comes to me.

          Maybe be I should make a coherent post on THE SCIENTOLOGY THETAN & SOUL.

          .

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 9:05 AM

          Vin: MEST is not produced by THETA as assumed in Scientology. Both THETA and MEST are aspects of existence.”

          Chris: This is quite a breakthrough and changes the Scientology model for the philosophy of universe.

      • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 8:56 AM

        THETA converts into MEST with the introduction of inconsistency.

        Wave + resistance (inertia) = particle
        Theta + inconsistency (disharmony) = individual

        Entheta is simply a gradient in the direction of MEST, and so is individuality.

        .

    • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 8:46 AM

      Vin: The contemplation should be on the relationship between spirituality and physicality in the real world. There is no clearcut separation between the two just as there is no clearcut separation between wave and particle properties.

      Chris: Yes and we should support good science and help it to naturally grow without leaping to make conjectures into principles before they’ve completed iterative run-throughs the scientific method. Actually, all models begin with the Scientific method but then mostly stop short. For instance, religion is like this using simply piles upon piles of assumptions. People who are masters of religion make free flowing streams of assumptions into an art form. It is kind of interesting to watch. Their imaginations have been exercised until they are able to outflow streams of assumptions on the fly.

      • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM

        Application of mindfulness is the same as applying the scientific method to the field of religion.

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 1:09 PM

          Agreed that a good scientist is mindful. Mindfulness as a whole is the first piece of the scientific method It is a piece of the scientific method. As the field of religion shrinks giving way to the field of science then the scientific method will be fully applied to religion but then the field of religion at that point will no longer be the field of religion and will be the field of science.

  • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 8:43 AM

    Now we look at the definitions of THETAN (self).

    From https://vinaire.me/2013/11/21/intention-to-harm/#comment-14300

    Compare theta to pure wave motion. When resistance (inertia) enters the wave motion it makes it appear more discrete and particle like. Similarly, when inconsistency entering theta, it makes it appear more discrete and individualistic.

    THETA = WAVE
    INDIVIDUAL = PARTICLE
    INCONSISTENCY = INERTIA (RESISTANCE)

    Thetan (individuality) appears as inconsistency enters Theta. That is an interesting look.

    .

    • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 8:57 AM

      Vin: Thetan (individuality) appears as inconsistency enters Theta. That is an interesting look.

      Chris: Yes, this is how I see it as well. I have been contemplating astrology and the “Age of Aquarius” which is near and comparing it to what we are now calling “The Information Age.” I had no idea that we were coming to an information age until I found myself embroiled in it. Fabulous advances have been and continue to be made at an ever increasing pace… Its potential is enormous and quickly changing the landscape of our understanding. I wonder at what future we will bring and what future “age” the information age will spawn.

      • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM

        Information Age already here. Now its A matter of absorbing all that information.

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 4:39 PM

          No, it’s actually not a matter of absorbing all that data anymore than there is any matter of paying off the National Debt. Mathematically not going to happen. What I see occurring is the individual spinning off into tangential vectors and condensing down into very specific collapses. In other words, there will be lifetimes of data regarding very specific condensations and that’s the end of the universal man.

        • vinaire  On November 22, 2013 at 5:11 PM

          The whole purpose of mindfulness is to reverse the process of repeated collapsing into different identities, and put the person stably back into the state of the universal man.”

          .

        • Chris Thompson  On November 22, 2013 at 8:45 PM

          I’m not following. Tell me more.

  • Chris Thompson  On November 28, 2013 at 1:25 PM

    I’ve just had my first KHTK session on the “intention to harm” beginning with clearing the definitions of words and then doing the exercises as described above. On step 8, I had a very nice epiphany regarding the implanted intention to harm and experienced a good relief from this. I am already looking forward to the next session.

    • vinaire  On November 28, 2013 at 3:38 PM

      Chris, you are a wonderful KHTK student!

      I would like to know if you can do step 9 on your own. Only you would know when you have completed that step. Of course you can call me to work with you, as and when you feel necessary.

      The function of a KHTK guide is to help a person until he or she can apply KHTK processes oneself.

  • vinaire  On November 28, 2013 at 3:42 PM

    This was the very first session with KHTK approach as it is laid out above. Chris is helping me tweak this approach.

    .

  • vinaire  On November 28, 2013 at 6:49 PM

    Chris, to ease your difficulty in navigating this blog, simply click on the page “KHTK MINDFULNESS” in the column on the left (near the top under Mathematics). The key KHTK exercises and processes are listed there.

    You may also jump from there to the “Scientology” and “KHTK Research” pages.

    .

  • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 8:45 AM

    Still percolating from yesterday’s session, I want to bring up the concept of implantation which is currently missing from the OP. I am finding that with respect to harmful intentions that these can be implanted. Not only can harmful intentions be implanted very simply through conditioning, but the notion or belief that one contains harmful intentions when in fact one does not is both very easy to condition into a person and exploitative.

    From dictionary.com, im·plant [v. im-plant, -plahnt; n. im-plant, -plahnt]
    verb (used with object)
    1. to put or fix firmly: to implant sound principles in a child’s mind.
    2. to plant securely.

    • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 11:00 AM

      I like my vector model of self. There is nobody implanting anything. It is simply the conditions reorienting the vectors.

      Implanting is how it appears, just as self is how it appears. But it all breaks down into vectors and a complex interaction among them.

      Yes there is fixation, but there is nobody bringing it about. There is just a basic principle somewhere here that needs to be isolated.

      .

      • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 12:07 PM

        I also like and am using your vector model of self. Vectors and input for iteration are for me synonymous. This is why auditing what has been done to us is effective. This is also why auditing what we have done is effective as the iterative and fractal processes of life are recursive. In other words, what we have done becomes input for the future. It’s without values such as good or bad. It is simply recursive. This is consistent with karma as I understand it.

        “Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present, and by each crime and every kindness, we birth our future.” ― David Mitchell, in Cloud Atlas.

        • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM

          That is a nice quote.

          There are influencing factors that add “force” to distort the native state. Underlying “what is done to us” or “what we have done” is the factor of FORCE.

          This factor of force appears as inconsistency. If we dissolve inconsistencies as we come across them, we also dissolve the force that determines our existing unwanted condition.

          .

      • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 12:09 PM

        Take out the anthropomorphism and implantation becomes consistent with your vector model.

      • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 12:12 PM

        Vin: Yes there is fixation, but there is nobody bringing it about. There is just a basic principle somewhere here that needs to be isolated.

        Chris: Our models drift toward a determinism. Whatever the unknowable underpinning, the world that I live in is deterministic. This is a tremendous and unsolicited and unconditioned turnaround from my view of will from a few short years ago.

        • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 1:09 PM

          Aren’t you glad! Haha…

          Determinism = collapsing from the wave state of all possibilities. But collapsing occurs because of some natural principle.

          There are no nasty pysches on the whole track. Those are like shadows in the dark that mother’s use to threaten their disobedient children to make them afraid and compliant.

          .

  • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 9:01 AM

    In dictionary.com, Intention is defined thusly, “in·ten·tion [in-ten-shuhn] noun 1. an act or instance of determining mentally upon some action or result . . . ”

    Philosophically, we are using intention to provide the physical interface between nothing, and something. By this, I am writing that mentally there is nothing and then there arises something. This is my observation of the inception of manifestation.

    There is an enormous assumption at the beginning of the definition of intention that the volition of this manifestation of something is caused by the individual.

    I am now considering whether this is true, or rather how true this is. As I have routinely written, it is my conjecture that our language describing physical phenomena may not be laid out quite rightly.

    • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM

      Yesterday during a review of the definition of the word intention, I demonstrated my intention to myself by picking up my own hand. By raising it and lowering it using different scenarios, I demonstrated that either raised or lowered “if and only if” I used the interface of intention. What is this intention I wondered. We are conditioned to believe that it arises from our immortal spirit. Yet I am noticing that this “if and only if” function is quite common in logic and other machinery.

      • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 11:12 AM

        The idea of “immortal spirit” just an agreed upon conjecture. It is now time to look at it more closely.

        .

  • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 9:17 AM

    There exists the assumption that personal responsibility and will to be adamantly welded. I am considering “How true is this?”

    I assume that if my opinions were important or if anyone cared what I think then I would receive a few flaming responses for this sacrilege. However, because I consider that no one cares what I think then this unholy comment may go unnoticed! I may be allowed to consider this issue of will in peace.

  • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 10:52 AM

    I believe that it is the tortured state of a person from which the intention to harm comes.

    When that tortured state is fixed, the intention to harm goes away completely.

    • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 11:29 AM

      For a person in good condition, simply understanding the “intention to harm” on deep personal terms, as this process does, brings about an incredible insight into the underlying mechanism here.

      .

      • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 12:58 PM

        Yes, the hour we spent on this yesterday illuminated an item left over from my problems with Scientology.

        • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 1:02 PM

          Yes, now I have to get busy converting L-10 to an easily doable process. LOL!

          .

        • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 1:10 PM

          That’s all? . . . Or we can just run it and see what happens then tweak from there. I learned yesterday how to adapt my looking from co-auditing, to solo auditing, then back again – the salient point of looking. I felt my efficiency making that conversion improved. I used to go completely limp in the hands of the auditor giving over control to allow the auditor to direct. Then I was more pleased with solo auditing for speed and control. Now I think I can do both while allowing the auditor to direct looking – remain also alertly in control and watching for “reads”.

        • MarkNR  On November 29, 2013 at 1:32 PM

          Excellent. Responsibility for ones case can be shared and multiplied.
          Mark

        • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 1:35 PM

          The purpose of a KHTK guide is simply to help one along with the principles of mindfulness. Apart from that it is simply the person looking for oneself totally under one’s own contol.

          When mindfulness is applied, the “reactive mind” is completely diffused, and solo auditing can be carried on easily.

          Practice of mindfulness replaces the needs for an auditor. Now you may continue with step 9 of the process of “Intention to harm” by yourself. Actually, looking at your recent posts, you are already doing it admirably.

          .

    • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 12:00 PM

      Implantation of the idea that one has harmful intentions when one does not can produce this tortured state as well. This seems to cross a spectrum or scale of severity depending on both sides of the implantation. On the effectiveness of the implanter to locate and implant to a willing receptor, for example the successful hypnotist or mother who has conditioned weaknesses for and willingness for reception of suggestions. And also on the side of the implantee whose weakness for and conditioning for and willingness for receiving the introvertive suggestions of others plays an important role.

      • Chris Thompson  On November 29, 2013 at 12:17 PM

        This is consistent with the Vectors Model of Self.

      • vinaire  On November 29, 2013 at 12:30 PM

        The solution is “seeing things as they are” (mindfulness). This will dissolve any inconsistency whether it originates internally due to misunderstanding, or it is imposed from external influences such as implantation.

        An implanted vector, whether it is positive or negative, is an inconsistency. It has force that overcomes naturalness. Removal of all force on a case shall restore the most optimum state.

        .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: